|
|
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::::Of course not. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 17:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
::::Of course not. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 17:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::::Thanks for your cooperation Todd—[[User:Rochelimit|Rochelimit]] ([[User talk:Rochelimit#top|talk]]) 17:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
:::::Thanks for your cooperation Todd—[[User:Rochelimit|Rochelimit]] ([[User talk:Rochelimit#top|talk]]) 17:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
I've mostly given up on the project. Once the bot stopped patrolling, I lost interest (if there's a new one, I haven't noticed). The lack of participation has always been a problem and now it's been pushed to a new extreme of inconsistency that equates to a smoking turd. In line references for every item is insane and will never be enforceable - its just a bad idea. If it's not enforceable, what's the point? The idea of a nice, clean (albeit long), reasonably curated list is gone and the project has succumbed to the pressure of compliance for the sake of compliance. The project was once grounded in [[WP:BRAR]] for good reason - it worked. I've found over the 11 years since I became involved with the project, ''most'' of the harsh critics and proponents of change slip in for a couple of months and then disappear. Once in a while they will clamor for a [[WP:RFC]] and then there is a smattering of input from people with no real interest in the project, and it goes nowhere or creates an uninformed consensus leading to a mandate that is unmanageable. Anyway, that's what I think. -- <span style="color: #000080;">Mufka</span> [[User:Mufka|<sup>(u)</sup>]] [[User talk:Mufka|<sup>(t)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Mufka|<sup>(c)</sup>]] 11:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC) |
This is Rochelimit's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2 |
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. Your removal of a source from March 14 was reverted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've mostly given up on the project. Once the bot stopped patrolling, I lost interest (if there's a new one, I haven't noticed). The lack of participation has always been a problem and now it's been pushed to a new extreme of inconsistency that equates to a smoking turd. In line references for every item is insane and will never be enforceable - its just a bad idea. If it's not enforceable, what's the point? The idea of a nice, clean (albeit long), reasonably curated list is gone and the project has succumbed to the pressure of compliance for the sake of compliance. The project was once grounded in WP:BRAR for good reason - it worked. I've found over the 11 years since I became involved with the project, most of the harsh critics and proponents of change slip in for a couple of months and then disappear. Once in a while they will clamor for a WP:RFC and then there is a smattering of input from people with no real interest in the project, and it goes nowhere or creates an uninformed consensus leading to a mandate that is unmanageable. Anyway, that's what I think. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 11:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]