Hello, Shaunco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Evb-wiki19:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has nominated Josh Warner, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Warner and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot19:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Josh Warner
you left a note on my page, but, not being an admin, I can not see what I said or did on the subject. Do you have a saved copy of the article or the history?DGG 22:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
apologies: I see the AfD, and I now remember the article perfectly well. It made claims about the importance of his jewelry that would be notable if sourced. If you have references now, please add them directly to the deletion review page. DGG22:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Correction again. I have look at the photos and commented. Normally our sources are words, not image. I've wondered whether we could use images, and this might be an interesting context to discuss it. it would be important to know where the photos are from--it will be much stronger as an argument if they were actually published. If Deletion review should not agree to relist, the general question of using photos as evidence can be argued elsewhere. Frankly, I do not know what the consensus will be on that, but I think it should be discussed. It is established that the reason we add photos to articles is to provide information, not decoration, so that's a stating point.
But if you do have written reviews, that would solve the problem of the article--do you? .
In general, I would offer you the advice that a good way to start writing articles about jewelers would be to find where reviews or other sources are published, and start from there, rather than to pick the jewelers and then look for sources. DGG22:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
