Fair use images that have been challenged. I no longer bother to add a fair use description. It's just too much hassle. --Vizcarra (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Municipalities vs Seats Wikiproject Mexico
Hello! I hope you are an active wikipedian. I read you wrote the article about Ensenada, I noticed you have a clear idea about municipalities vs municipal seats (cities) with the same name. For me the Baja´s articles are an example of what we must do for all the states. Could you give us your opinion about a discussion we are having at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mexico/Strategy
Your comments will be much appreciated. --Judith Soto | Talk 17:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aproposed deletion template has been added to the article 1884 in Mexico, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -192.193.221.202 (talk)
An article that you have been involved in editing, 1884 in Mexico, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1884 in Mexico. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?
A tag has been placed on Alma Latina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. magnius (talk) 20:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
