|
No edit summary
|
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
|
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:*{{ping|PARAKANYAA}} How does it pass [[WP:NBOOK]]? Ignore the misleading claim above that there is coverage from "Kansas City Star" because it simply not verifiable. [[User:ArvindPalaskar|ArvindPalaskar]] ([[User talk:ArvindPalaskar|talk]]) 09:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC) |
:*{{ping|PARAKANYAA}} How does it pass [[WP:NBOOK]]? Ignore the misleading claim above that there is coverage from "Kansas City Star" because it simply not verifiable. [[User:ArvindPalaskar|ArvindPalaskar]] ([[User talk:ArvindPalaskar|talk]]) 09:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' At best we have only 1 review that meets [[WP:V]]. I agree that special care should be taken over a fringe subject but even without that this book easily fails all points of [[WP:NBOOK]]. [[User:Azuredivay|Azuredivay]] ([[User talk:Azuredivay|talk]]) 11:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' At best we have only 1 review that meets [[WP:V]]. I agree that special care should be taken over a fringe subject but even without that this book easily fails all points of [[WP:NBOOK]]. [[User:Azuredivay|Azuredivay]] ([[User talk:Azuredivay|talk]]) 11:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''delete''', one review doesn't prove notability. [[User:Artem.G|Artem.G]] ([[User talk:Artem.G|talk]]) 11:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Book from conspiracy theorists that failed to attract any coverage or reviews. At best it has only received little coverage over disinformation it spread. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
