Contents

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li (state): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:51, 3 July 2013

This article has no citations, and it is unclear if it is recounting legend or actual fact. Searching for supporting evidence is coming up with nothing (a problem which is compounded by "Li" being a common surname, which may be obscuring legitimate results) BirdbrainedPhoenix (talk) 02:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 02:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 02:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: This needs to be taken to articles for creation, beaten into shape and brought back. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 03:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There's no clear scope and there's none to built on or verify. I've tried to search for literature, but I can't confirm the topic (actually topics, since it seems a mix-and-match of two things). The competence of the creator has been raised after the user made a mess at the articles relating to the "Li" surname. --Cold Season (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• RedirecttoLi, as there were two states with this name, this title should only ever be a disambiguation page. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 07:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]