→M-T pronouns: Reply
|
→M-T pronouns: Reply
|
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*:::What comes off as advocacy to me is covering FRINGE theories in multiple articles and then refusing to discuss the evidence, when consideration of that evidence would cast doubt on the theories. That would be like refusing to discuss the evidence posited for astrology or UFOs, leaving readers with only the perspective of advocates to go by. [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 12:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
*:::What comes off as advocacy to me is covering FRINGE theories in multiple articles and then refusing to discuss the evidence, when consideration of that evidence would cast doubt on the theories. That would be like refusing to discuss the evidence posited for astrology or UFOs, leaving readers with only the perspective of advocates to go by. [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 12:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*::::This is [[WP:Original research]], by your own words, and has no place in the encyclopedia. Use a blog to promote your personal research. '''Delete''' —<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">[[User:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE"> Iadmc</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Iadmc|<span style="color: black">♫</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE">talk </span>]]</sup></span> 12:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
*::::This is [[WP:Original research]], by your own words, and has no place in the encyclopedia. Use a blog to promote your personal research. '''Delete''' —<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">[[User:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE"> Iadmc</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Iadmc|<span style="color: black">♫</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE">talk </span>]]</sup></span> 12:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*::::Nostraticists have a long and storied history of claiming basically anything they can as evidence. These claims aren’t taken seriously among linguists for good reason. I’m unaware of a single piece of scholarship that’s pass [[WP:RS]] (or even not those that’d pass) claiming this as evidence for Nostratic, and frankly I find your accusations here inappropriate so I’ll bow out of engaging and let the rest of the AfD play out. [[User:Warrenmck|Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ]] 12:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Note''' [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] is the creator and sole contributor to this article—<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">[[User:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE"> Iadmc</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Iadmc|<span style="color: black">♫</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE">talk </span>]]</sup></span> 12:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Note''' [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] is the creator and sole contributor to this article—<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">[[User:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE"> Iadmc</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Iadmc|<span style="color: black">♫</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE">talk </span>]]</sup></span> 12:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Almost exclusively from a single source, and fails to establish WP:N. Practically zero mention of the concept outside of that single source and veers dangerously into WP:PROFRINGE territory with the WP:OR links to fringe theory language families like Nostratic, which aren't mentioned in the source. Without establishing notability this seems to not really belong here, and I'm unable to verify that this is at all taken seriously in linguistics.
For anyone unfamiliar with this topic:
Nostratic is emphatically a fringe theory within linguistics and is not mentioned in any of the sources, and this article seems heavily like WP:ADVOCACY. Any sources linking Nostratic to M-T Pronouns are inherently fringe sources, but even then many of the claims here are entirely un-cited. It doesn't seem this article can be saved. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 09:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]