Contents

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Trocheck: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:05, 2 July 2011

Topic of article has not attained notability standards of WP:NHOCKEYorWP:GNG. Playing in top prospects game is not a major award. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nomination. --Ozgod (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - He passes WP:GNG as demonstrated by the significant coverage he has received in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, including:
• Pittsburgh Post-Gazette feature article
• Dan Swallow's feature article

The published feature stories (non-routine coverage) about this player pushes this article over the GNG threshold required for a stand-alone article. Dolovis (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• A Q&A on a blog is not even remotely a reliable source. -DJSasso (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I agree that the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette source is significant and reliable, so this article does pass GNG. Oonissie (talk) 18:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]