|
Reverted 1 edit by 2A00:23C4:BAA9:900:3C89:2980:528D:5F0 (talk): Obvious true positive (TW)
|
|
||
| Line 675: | Line 675: | ||
;Comments |
;Comments |
||
<!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! --> |
<!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! --> |
||
{{done}} [[User:Omni Flames|Omni Flames]] ([[User talk:Omni Flames|talk]]) 22:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==96.18.247.150== |
==96.18.247.150== |
||
|
|
Click here to report a false positive
To report a false positive affecting an editor other than yourself, click here instead.
Comment: There's nothing in the filter log for the Forest of Avon Trust page or under your IP address. I don't think any edits got caught in a filter; it must have been something else that prevented your edit. Maybe it the spam blacklist? I'm not very familiar with that, and I'm not sure if edits that are prevented due to that are logged anywhere. Either way, I would suggest you read this page if you are the Trust's Executive Director, as it contains info about what to do if you have a conflict of interest. Best, --SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 16:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done With names like that, I'm hesitant to make an unsourced edit. you're going to need to provide a source. [Username Needed] 09:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Me shits correct yeh
Not done filter working --DannyS712 (talk) 01:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filter working --DannyS712 (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filter working --DannyS712 (talk) 20:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]That looks like one for the talk page as a poentially controversial edit. [Username Needed] 09:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done filters working --DannyS712 (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filter working --DannyS712 (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filters working - for test edits, please see the sandbox. --DannyS712 (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Investigating...... Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed on testwiki at least, filters set to the generic Mediawiki:Abusefilter-disallowed will show the default system message (such as the one Username Needed linked above), not our local copy, while those with custom messages seem to show our version. Not sure if there is way for us to override that. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done --DannyS712 (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done Its because of the "Dick" in "Dicks Sporting Goods" --DannyS712 (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filter working --DannyS712 (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done. (as for why it was flagged, we had (and may still do) a load of vandalism surrounding harambe, so we just have a filter that disallows all additions of "Harambe" by IPs or users with less than 10 edits. [Username Needed] 09:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done it was because of "Evil Nigger and Gay Guerrilla" - I have made the edit. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filters working --DannyS712 (talk) 00:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now that was a false positive, but without a reliable source I'm hesitant to make the edit. Do you have any sources to back up your claim? --DannyS712 (talk) 02:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]added_lines should probably stay as \blol\b. But for the match on summary perhaps ^lol$ (or something) might be a better fit. Or maybe it should be left out entirely. But with everything crammed together into the same log, it's hard to tease apart. Do you think maybe we should have a separate filter for edit summaries, so the regexes can evolve as needed? 384 is currently doing the work of maybe ten Hugglers, so I think we can spare a few extra conditions. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Our filters can't determine what's factual or not, so they disallow some common patterns. [Username Needed] 09:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]These were not vandalism removals - the links are blatantly promotional. Do you have a WP:COI to disclose? Simonm223 (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done filters working --DannyS712 (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filter working --DannyS712 (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done its because of the name "dick" --DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done these attempted edits weren't false positives. --DannyS712 (talk) 01:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done filter working; not a false positive --DannyS712 (talk) 04:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done AIV filed --DannyS712 (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done Seems to be a false positive, edit has been completed. EggRoll97 (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done Looks like since one IP censored the track listing a couple of years ago, multiple IPs have been prevented from uncensoring them judging by the filter log. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done Thanks for the contribution, this seems to have been a false positive. EggRoll97 (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done, working as intended. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done Should I report you to WP:AIV now !? Go playing elsewhere. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Done. Clearly a false positive, so I have made the requested edit. Thanks for contributing and I'm sorry your edit didn't go through initially.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 01:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]References
Already donebyMusikAnimal. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Not done Warned for vandalism ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Already done --DannyS712 (talk) 02:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Already done. EggRoll97 (talk) 11:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Omni Flames (talk) 22:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
