Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 

















Wikipedia:Editor review/Gosox5555 (2): Difference between revisions







Add links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< Wikipedia:Editor review

Browse history interactively
 Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
→‎Gosox5555*: remove star + tag
blanking my own review request, no responses and very old.
 
Line 1: Line 1:

===[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Gosox5555 (2)|Gosox5555]]<!--REMOVE THIS ASTERISK WHEN YOU REVIEW.-->===


{{user2|Gosox5555}} I want to be reviewed because, to put it bluntly, I'm interested in an RfA, probably in about 2 or 3 months. Looking for what I should do to gain more experience and respect in the community. Article writing isn't my forte. I prefer to work on articles created by other users, making me mostly a gnome. [[User:Gosox5555|Gosox]]<sup>([[User_talk:Gosox5555|55]])</sup><sub>([[Special:Contributions/Gosox5555|55]])</sub> 00:40, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

<!--Use {{admin| instead of {{user| if you are a sysop.-->


''' Questions'''


<!-- If you wish to leave a blank line after your answer to Q1, please start the blank line with # -->

# What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?

#: ''My biggest contributions are [[WP:WSS|stub sorting]] and [[WP:AfC|AfC]]. I believe that new users often create the best articles, if given the chance and experience. AfC allows those articles, sometimes of outstandting caliber, to be created. I also work on stub sorting. Categorizing stubs means that people with an interest in the topic may view and expand upon them. I also am on [[WP:NPP]], but have been less active there recently. I had AfD experience while doing that.''

#

# Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

#: ''I do not have any serious conflicts that I recall that I have been involved in. I haven't ever editwarred, and I haven't been very active in dispute resolution. This just isn't something I'm good at.''



''' Reviews '''


About the Lexington article, I think you should reference it so that a) it is more verifiable and b) people will think it's notable. Munroe could use a few more references too, and I think you're splitting it into too many sections. I find no fault with the list, Eddie Arning and the Shanghai Moon though you could certainly improve the ref by adding the publisher, the publication date, author, etc. As for RfA, it's a bit far-fetched to have one in a couple of months IMHO given your experience but you are not too far. Good luck on your Wikipedian life! '''[[User:Kayau|<span style="color:lime"> Kayau </span>]]''' ''[[User talk:Kayau|Voting]]'' [[Special:Contributions/Kayau|<span style="color:red">IS</span>]] <small> [[User:Kayau/guestbook|evil]] </small> 14:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 05:28, 21 December 2016


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Editor_review/Gosox5555_(2)&oldid=755968148"





This page was last edited on 21 December 2016, at 05:28 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki