comments
|
→No Line on the Horizon: reply to comment by Ealdgyth
|
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
** http://www.exploremusic.com/home/ |
** http://www.exploremusic.com/home/ |
||
: Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 17:32, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
: Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 17:32, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
***U2Gigs, though a fansite, is the most reliable and reputable when it comes to data on U2 performances. As far as I'm aware there has never been any questions or concerns raised regarding it's accuracy; indeed, just about every active member of the U2 WikiProject has used it in articles at some point in time. ExploreMusic is also a very reliable source when it comes to breaking music news. The host of the program, [[Alan Cross]], is one of the most prominant Canadian musical journalists. Though I know blogs are not usually accepted as a reliable source, there are some exceptions. I remember of a time when a New York Times blog was accepted as a reliable source, and I think that Mojo, a forefront musical publication, is as well. I'll have to look into the Mog and Consequence of Sound refs when I have time (Just about to leave for work). [[User:MelicansMatkin|MelicansMatkin]] <small>([[User talk:MelicansMatkin|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/MelicansMatkin|contributions]])</small> 17:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating No Line on the Horizon for featured article because I believe it meets all of the current FA criteria. A lot of work has been put into this article and I think that shows in the present result. It's been copyedited several times by other users and undergone a peer review which is now archived; all of the concerns raised by the PR, the GA review, and other users have, I believe, been addressed. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 16:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]