Was not sure if this should be tagged for a speedy because of the PD license but it does say "This is me for my User page ONLY" which is very much akin to "For Wikipedia use only" which is not allowed. So feel free to speedy it if any6one else feels it should be. Also unused and It is (was) also a duplicate of File:Yourboi.jpg, which was updated on July 27, 2010. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right, but it doesn't seem to have any contextual significance in the article, which is a requirement for a non-free image. --Mosmof (talk) 00:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: "purpose of use" is inadequate considering there is no mention of the image in the prose, so there is no way it can increase the reader's understanding of the article and therefore fails WP:NFCC#8. ww2censor (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; Not valid reason for deletion request. It has clearly better quality within available. Also there is no strict guideline about foreseeable use in such notable actress or stage production. --Pefp (talk) 10:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: This editor has uploaded several copyright violations for some of which I was able to find sources proving his licence claims were false. Based on his track record I have to assumed all the above files are also copyright violations even though I have been unable to find sources. ww2censor (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright image with .o clear reason its inclusion in the article. Reference is not made to this card in the article and the accompanying text where its placed has no relevance. Image seems largely decorative in effect Solid State Survivor (talk) 07:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. There is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect. The claimed purpose of this image is to illustrate the groups as a quintet but the text clearly establishes this fact. Solid State Survivor (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. here is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect.Solid State Survivor (talk) 19:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. here is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect.Solid State Survivor (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. here is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect.Solid State Survivor (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
