Screenshot's easy to explain in brief words already. No need to display band members in the video just to identify them there. No proof that omitting the screenshot detriments understanding of the whole song (or music video). May fail "contextual significance" criterion. George Ho (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per c:COM:FOP US, freedom of panorama only extends to buildings. This historical marker is dated 2003 and there is no evidence to suggest that the text is freely licensed. As c:COM:CB#Noticeboards and signs states, "detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs [...] are almost always copyright-protected". ✗plicit00:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—since the marker originates after 1989, the text on it is protected by copyright. The photo must be deleted to avoid infringing. (As a reminder, state government works like this are not automatically placed in the public domain like federal government works, unless state says otherwise, and Michigan's does not.) Imzadi 1979→00:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP: The Clash of the Titans is directly discussed and reliably cited in the article, where it l makes a visual point vital to the article. Thee point made by the scholar is that the film can be criticised for casting a white actress (pictured) as the (black Aethiopian) Andromeda, This is important to the article, as Andromeda has a long tradition of being shown as white, and the film is the major modern case proving the misrepresentation has continued. Saying folks can look elsewhere misses the point that the film's poster directly and visceral demonstrates the enduring and still-current image, which a footnote that most readers will skip simply fails to achieve. I have extended the non-free usage rationale to this effect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: While I agree the rational for that citation, the poster does not really illustrate that point, so I don't know if it is valid here. It does predominantly feature two actors who appear to be white, but it's a stylized image and doesn't represent the cast at large. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for agreeing that the rationale is correct. I'll note that the article is not concerned with the cast at large. The article is about Andromeda, who is played by Judi Bowker, the white woman in the poster. The image is ideally suited to the scholar's point made in the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This should be considered to be a fair use file due to its background and since this file isn't used in mainspace, converting it is moot and should be deleted. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦»02:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This painting may still be under copyright; the uploader asserts {{PD-US}} without giving a reason. Painter is Harold Osman "Cowboy" Kelly (American, 1884–1950) and limited information on the painting is available online. Wikiacc (¶) 02:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This painting may still be under copyright; the uploader asserts {{PD-US}} without giving a reason. Painter is Dorothy Hood (American, 1919–2000) and limited information on the painting is available online. Wikiacc (¶) 02:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This painting may still be under copyright; the uploader asserts {{PD-US}} without giving a reason. Painter is Dawson Dawson-Watson (UK/US, 1864–1939) and limited information on the painting is available online. Wikiacc (¶) 02:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This painting may still be under copyright; the uploader asserts {{PD-US}} without giving a reason. Painter is Edward M. "Buck" Schiwetz (American, 1898–1984) and limited information on the painting is available online. Wikiacc (¶) 02:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Photo copied from [2], plus the sculpture is likely copyrighted. Claimed {{PD-US}} without justification. Deleteorrelicense as non-free. Wikiacc (¶) 02:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sculpture depicted is copyrighted (as a US sculpture from 1992) but erroneously claimed {{PD-US}}. Deleteorrelicense as non-free. Wikiacc (¶) 02:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Photo copied from [3], plus the sculpture is likely copyrighted. Claimed {{PD-US}} without justification. Deleteorrelicense as non-free. Wikiacc (¶) 02:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm the original uploader. Must have got this when there was not a lot posters for older art house films. All good for delete vote per the above. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image of an album cover is being used on an article about the contest itself and only has 2 sentences of text plus a table about the album. As such, fails WP:NFCC#8 as it doesn't significantly enhance a reader's understanding of the contest. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not 100% sure about this one. Isn't Germany have some very strict copyright laws that could cause issues? Otherwise, fine with the Commons version, but I know things like this can be complicated. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe Andrzejbanas is correct. The signature looks to me like Josef Fenneker (1895–1956), whose works will not be public domain in Germany until 2027. hinnk (talk) 18:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't read the signature, but it is indeed not yet in the public domain in the source country. I withdraw my deletion request. Yann (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The version on Commons just got deleted. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
