→Ýdalir: Reply
|
comment
|
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* '''Comment'''. At risk of stinking up the scholarly sources with an "In popular culture" section, I have added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%9Ddalir&diff=prev&oldid=1228792092 this diff]. Feel free to revert if desired, but given that Orchard has all of one sentence on Ýdalir, Simek/Hall has two sentences, and Bevan-Jones has two sentences or so describing a wild guess on the derivation of Udale... I think this might genuinely be one of the most notable aspects of Ýdalir. (Yeah, we don't list every single time Gungir is called out, but when there's so little else to "compete", I think it's fair. Note that Nintendo World Report is listed as reliable at [[WP:VG/RS]] as well.) [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 06:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
* '''Comment'''. At risk of stinking up the scholarly sources with an "In popular culture" section, I have added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%9Ddalir&diff=prev&oldid=1228792092 this diff]. Feel free to revert if desired, but given that Orchard has all of one sentence on Ýdalir, Simek/Hall has two sentences, and Bevan-Jones has two sentences or so describing a wild guess on the derivation of Udale... I think this might genuinely be one of the most notable aspects of Ýdalir. (Yeah, we don't list every single time Gungir is called out, but when there's so little else to "compete", I think it's fair. Note that Nintendo World Report is listed as reliable at [[WP:VG/RS]] as well.) [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 06:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:With this expansion, and given that no sources have been found to make it more broad, I think it now meets the broadness criterion, and can be '''kept''' listed. [[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 19:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
*:With this expansion, and given that no sources have been found to make it more broad, I think it now meets the broadness criterion, and can be '''kept''' listed. [[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 19:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:'''Keep''' I would have passed this for [[wp:GA|Good article status]] if I were the reviewer and the article looked like what it is today. ''[[User:CosXZ|Cos]]'' ''<sup>([[User talk:CosXZ|X]] + [[Special:Contributions/CosXZ|Z]])</sup>'' 20:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
At 251 words, counting the 44-word lead, this 2009 promotion is far too short to meet the modern standard for broadness. There is little to mine from the sourcing - each source discusses it in no more than a sentence or two.
(Honestly, given the limited information available about it, I am hardly sure it even needs its own article at all - it could very easily be merged into Ullr.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]