These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
; [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Asmodeus|Asmodeus]]
: This user has ongoing problems with being civil and not bullying other editors, as well as possible long-term abuse of Wikipedia as a [[WP:SOAP|soapbox]] 17:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
;[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Lordkazan|Lordkazan]]
;[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Lordkazan|Lordkazan]]
This process is for discussing specific users who have violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in Article content disputes.
Uncertified user RfCs
Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.
Closing and archiving
Disputes may be removed from this page and archived under any of the following circumstances:
If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
The parties to the dispute agree.
The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.
Remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.
General user conduct
Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:
This user has ongoing problems with being civil and not bullying other editors, as well as possible long-term abuse of Wikipedia as a soapbox 17:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
The dispute is over the behavior by POnju such as lack of civility, repeatedly editing an article about himself, and personal attacks. 19:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This user is engaged in an edit war to advance a point of view at Global Positioning System and Hafele-Keating experiment and does not seem interested in reaching concensus or communicating with other users. 22:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Persistent refusal to satisfy WP:V, WP:NOR, and WP:CIVILatCharun, a page which has been edit protected since August 25. Rejects input from impartial third parties. 01:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Constant reverting, POV pushing and personal attacks on Provisional Irish Republican Army and related pages. Such behaviour going on for about a year now.
11:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Tatsuma jumped into the middle of a content dispute about criticism in the Ars Technica article and began reverting the article during a mediation request to force his POV against any consensus. He continued the reverts after mediation ended. New information has come to light on the user in the RfC. 15:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Repeated personal attacks on pages related to the United Kingdom and Ireland have long gone unchecked. Now user is being warned, he or she has repeatedly removed warnings labeling them as 'vandalism'. 18:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
repeated reversion of article MySpace (as a dynamic IP until recently), breaking 3rr several times. Led to protection of page. Makes experienced editors discuss any changes with him before approval, even though he's three days old. Basically, everything in WP:OWN. 13:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Aggressive POV editing and apparent article ownership of Paul Weyrich. Aggressive POV editing of Dominionism-related articles. 04:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
WP:NOR, exhausting the patience of physicist editors by failing to acknowledge the results of textbook level special relativity. 15:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Repeated edit warring at Moscow Metro, coupled with a refusal to cooperate and negotiate with other editors attempting to resolve the dispute at the article. 23:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
User:Teemu Ruskeepää Has been continually attempting to restructure the talk page of Fidel Castro, and is now adding a lengthy poll to the foot of each talk discussion, despite many comments that he does not have consensus. Furthermore, responses to the many other users who object to this have become increasingly uncivil and accusatory. 10:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
JD_UK argues about any changes I make to any articles. I have heard that he doesn't accept things, even though he admits they're good, because I did it. He constantly argues all the time with me, and it's causing unneeded wikistress. He has often demanded I stay off his talkpage, and made personal attacks towards me.
User:Michaellovesnyc has been violating multiple Wikipedia policies in his attempt to push his point of view, primarily on Mail-order bride. 22:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Irpen has been engaging in removing repeatedly a dispute tag altough the dispute was not settled. He refused to follow WP:DR, misinterpreted WP:Consensus, was adding misleading edit summaries and comments.--05:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Imacomp has been engaging in uncivil behavior, including blatantly misleading edit summaries, repeated personal attacks, edit warring, and blanket reverts of edits to edits made by editors that he "trusts". 16:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User:Brya has made a series of controversial edits to pages in biology (specifically botany), reverting changes made. Discussion and informal mediation has been attempted on his talk.09:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mines45 has repeatedly made controversial edits to a small number of pages, and has continually reinstated these edits in the face of factual evidence to the contrary. In over seven months of editing, he/she has yet to use a single edit summary, or respond to a single discussion page posting. In fact, all posts made on Mines45's talk page are quickly removed. In addition, he/she has made two personal attacks on a Wikipedia administrator. 19:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
A member of Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Rosicrucian Order of A+O), this user came to Wikipedia to intentionally wage a propaganda battle against all other Golden Dawn orders. He has done this through edit warring, revert warring, recruitment of meatpuppets to support him in revert warring, and continued edit warring after signing an agreement to mediation. He has exhausted the patience of all other editors of the articles he has been attacking. This is a requeset for a community ban. 17:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Allegations against Wolok of continually disregards content policies, behavior policies, engages in spamming campaigns, exhausts community patience 14:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
User constantly adds innacurate/unsourced information to articles and ignores requests that s/he stop. 00:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Use of administrator privileges
This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Wikipedia:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:
Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~
As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.
Candidate pages
These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
Approved pages
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
Administrator FCYTravis has been uncivil, abused his status as an administrator by engaging in edit wars, reverting protected pages, and setting a poor example by being uncivil to editors and abusing Wikipedia policy to suit his interpretations. 26 September 2006 (UTC)
