→Turkmeneli: see OO’s talk page
|
→Privacy concerns with social networking services: The page is not protected. Or are you referring to something else?
|
||
(27 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/URheading}}{{Shortcut|WP:RPPD|WP:RPP/D}}<noinclude>{{/Header}}</noinclude> |
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/URheading}}{{Shortcut|WP:RPPD|WP:RPP/D}}<noinclude>{{/Header}}</noinclude> |
||
=== [[ |
=== [[Joseph Kallarangatt]] === |
||
* {{pagelinks| |
* {{pagelinks|Joseph Kallarangatt}} |
||
'''Reason:''' The protection is not needed as the disruptive edits by unnecessarily reverting are done by an extended confirmed user. The disruptive edits(reverting) are [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Kallarangatt&diff=prev&oldid=1226931242] [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Kallarangatt&diff=prev&oldid=1226932461] [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Kallarangatt&diff=prev&oldid=1226965161]. These constant and complete revertings of contributions done by multiple users prevents the improvements done to the page. That particular user is alerted in the talk page of the article and hasn't yet provided evidence to his claims. Not blanket page protection but page protection from this particular user is the one needed. [[User:അദ്വൈതൻ|അദ്വൈതൻ]] ([[User talk:അദ്വൈതൻ|talk]]) 16:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''Block:''' User Semsûrî keeps on reverting edits and claiming that the map and Anthem should be sourced (they're very clear and don't need to be sourced)....... . [[User:Kirkukturk3|Kirkukturk3]] ([[User talk:Kirkukturk3|talk]]) 15:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:That's not an argument for unprotection, given the BLP issues {{user|FrancisSobieski123}} introduced right before the ECP. If anything, that's an argument to escalate it to full-protection until a discussion has actually run its course. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 16:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:See editor's talk page. 20:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked [[User:അദ്വൈതൻ|അദ്വൈതൻ]] ([[User talk:അദ്വൈതൻ|talk]]) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::You're still making a case for ''escalating'' the protection, not ''downgrading'' it. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::I presume you are saying about full protection because the user who is blatantly reverting is an extended confirmed+ user, correct? [[User:അദ്വൈതൻ|അദ്വൈതൻ]] ([[User talk:അദ്വൈതൻ|talk]]) 17:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Correct, and because this is a content dispute. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small></sup> 17:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::So what the solution apart from discussing in the article's talk page. As the particular user hasn't yet replied to substantiate its claims in the talk page. [[User:അദ്വൈതൻ|അദ്വൈതൻ]] ([[User talk:അദ്വൈതൻ|talk]]) 17:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
=== [[ |
=== [[Privacy concerns with social networking services]] === |
||
* {{pagelinks| |
* {{pagelinks|Privacy concerns with social networking services}} |
||
⚫ | '''Reason:''' No puedo acceder [[Special:Contributions/38.49.141.10|38.49.141.10]] ([[User talk:38.49.141.10|talk]]) 00:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
'''Reason:''' remove protection for this page [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]] |
|||
⚫ |
[[Special:Contributions/ |
||
: |
:@38.49.141.10. The page is not protected. Or are you referring to something else? -- [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 01:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Requests for page protection | |
---|---|
Click here to return to Requests for page protection. Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level |
Reason: The protection is not needed as the disruptive edits by unnecessarily reverting are done by an extended confirmed user. The disruptive edits(reverting) are [1] [2] [3]. These constant and complete revertings of contributions done by multiple users prevents the improvements done to the page. That particular user is alerted in the talk page of the article and hasn't yet provided evidence to his claims. Not blanket page protection but page protection from this particular user is the one needed. അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: No puedo acceder 38.49.141.10 (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]