|
→Brianna Wu: Requesting full protection of Brianna Wu.
|
|
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* {{pagelinks|1=Brianna Wu}} |
* {{pagelinks|1=Brianna Wu}} |
||
'''Temporary full protection:''' I'm not against a goldlock protection and I can understand arbcom's decision, however it would be ideal if the protection is temporary (even if it's 4 years or something like that); if that fails immediately, then should we consider a definitive goldlock protection. [[User:Josethewikier|Josethewikier]] ([[User talk:Josethewikier|talk]]) 00:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
'''Temporary full protection:''' I'm not against a goldlock protection and I can understand arbcom's decision, however it would be ideal if the protection is temporary (even if it's 4 years or something like that); if that fails immediately, then should we consider a definitive indefinite goldlock protection. [[User:Josethewikier|Josethewikier]] ([[User talk:Josethewikier|talk]]) 00:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
Click here to return to Requests for page protection. Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level | |
Block: User Semsûrî keeps on reverting edits and claiming that the map and Anthem should be sourced (they're very clear and don't need to be sourced)....... . Kirkukturk3 (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: remove protection for this page Wikipedia:Requests for page protection 173.72.3.91 (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No rationale provided. Favonian (talk) 19:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]Reason: The protection was put up to stop a sockpuppet account from edit and it's been 15 years and i haven't seen any of that happening. User1432532758 (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotection: Whitelock was added 7 years ago for disruptive editing, and there no longer is as much disruptive editing. For the article of an important American city, it's probably better not to whitelock. Josethewikier (talk) 00:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary full protection: I'm not against a goldlock protection and I can understand arbcom's decision, however it would be ideal if the protection is temporary (even if it's 4 years or something like that); if that fails immediately, then should we consider a definitive indefinite goldlock protection. Josethewikier (talk) 00:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
