| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level | |
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User keeps replacing real information with fake TV programming in place of this show. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. El_C 04:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]Reason: Lots of IP and new user vandalism/nonconstructive edits. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 05:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated edits from socks of Jagdeep singh bittu adding copyrighted images. Ravensfire (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and non-EC editors, e.g. [1] (also creates a fake ref), [2], [3] (includes addition of unsupported information about Locke), [4], [5] (changes text of quote), [6] (removal of "American" from lead), [7], [8]. Beccaynr (talk) 02:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, for now. Looking at the dates of these diffs and the overall level of activity, I think protection would be premature at this point. Too active for pc at this time, so probably best to just wait and see. @Beccaynr: courtesy ping. El_C 05:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect hijacking including copy and paste page moves following the protection of the redirect target. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]Indefinite create protection: this page is linked to in "What Wikipedia is not" as being an unacceptable article. salting the page would prevent newbies or vandals from creating it. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 03:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question: InterstateFive, I don't think any of the red link examples at WP:NOT have been salted, despite several of them having been repeatedly recreated. This one, however, never was, so my question is: why feature it, specifically, in your request? El_C 05:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply] Declined The names change every year and there is no need to protect the next example. The point of the entry is that the article will be created when appropriate (when it happens and when reliable sources have written about it). Johnuniq (talk) 06:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Escalating level of IP vandalism. Three different IP addresses (most likely the same person, but I'm not sure), keep adding hoax cast list entries, which also happened on the main Kamen Rider Saber page. Blazewing16 (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and deleting referenced information Wikipedialuva (talk) 07:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page has been repeatedly created only to be moved, or redirected to draft article. Page should be protected until draft has been accepted for mainspace. AussieLegend (✉) 07:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
