No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
|
→19 June 2024: clerk help needed
|
||
(38 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|1=Andrew5|crosswiki=yes|deny=yes|notalk=yes}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|1=Andrew5|crosswiki=yes|deny=yes|notalk=yes}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
⚫ | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{SPI case status|close}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1= |
{{sock list|1=68.129.15.101|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
Edit history would suggest this is a [[WP:DUCK]] of Andrew5. Between 2023-24, they have made less than 50 edits, consisting of sports (baseball) and weather edits, even on the same day (20 May 2023). This is exactly the lookout on [[WP:LTA/A5]]. Coincidentally (DUCK-coincidence), [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:December_2021_Midwest_derecho_and_tornado_outbreak&diff=prev&oldid=1225658962 their first edit] in several months happen to also be telling others to discount my !vote in a requested move discussion. This is also common Andrew5 behavior, with either personal attacks against other weather editors (plus a few admins) or inserting themselves in discussions in an attempt to say several long-term editors are stupid/irrelevent. Even if they have not edited recently when this SPI is reviewed, if the reviewing administrator feels this is Andrew5 DUCK evidence, I would still appreciate a block or some agreement statement at least, given they are involved in an ongoing RM discussion. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
(69.123.50.215) There second edit today (1 minute after their first edit today) was to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=June_2021_North_American_storm_complex&diff=prev&oldid=1216189969 complete a merge], which Andrew5 was confirmed (via blocked-sock 208.253.89.50) to have participated in along with a possible 2nd DUCK account. Their edit summary commented about that talk page discussion, where only 2 actual users commented + 2 Andrew5 comments. 69.123.50.215 is also working on [[Draft:December 2023 nor'easter]], which is a common theme for Andrew5 socks — Being aware of draft-space weather articles. Seems very DUCKY here, given Andrew5 having confirmed knowledge of that merge discussion and then an unregistered user actually merging that discussion after only 4 registered users (2 commenters, the admin closer, and myself) seemingly having knowledge of said merge discussion…Also the 2nd unregistered user was suspected by myself along with the admin to have maybe been Andrew5, who coincidentally opened that merge discussion. I.e. based on DUCK evidence: Andrew5 wanted to merge the article, commented in it, had others agree, and finally today actually merge that article via a new IP address based on a talk page discussion which had 49 views in the last month. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 17:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 17:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
*So um what exactly did Andrew5 do wrong? Those edits look fine, not disruptive, quite helpful and productive actually. Is it just because he’s “socking?” Well, SchroCat blatantly engaged in abusive sockpuppetry but is still allowed to edit. In fact he never had to serve the sanctions that the community decided he deserved. Why doesn’t he get blocked?? Maybe it’s time to realize that Andrew5 is actually an enthusiastic contributor to wikipedia… or else block SchroCat. Can’t be treating certain people differently.[[User:Defjotme|Defjotme]] ([[User talk:Defjotme|talk]]) 12:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
* |
*Obvious sock blocked; closing.-- [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 16:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
*I've blocked Defjotme without tags.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 12:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
=== |
===19 June 2024=== |
||
{{SPI case status|open}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
|||
{{sock list|1=24.164.139.102|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
|||
Their [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=June_2021_North_American_storm_complex&diff=prev&oldid=1216349388 first edit since 2007] was to reinstate a SOCK reversion edit saying “The sock is right though”. DUCK block needed on Andrew5 sock here. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 13:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
|||
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
|||
* Ducky indeed. Blocked 6 months. Closing. [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 03:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
===31 March 2024=== |
|||
{{SPI case status|}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1=2600:4808:353:7B01:49BE:53F0:16E6:5689|2= 2600:4808:353:7B01:730:7D7C:FFB5:AA53|tools_link=yes}} |
|||
{{sock list|1=98.116.45.220|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
|||
|
Second IP protested and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=June_2024_South_Florida_floods&oldid=1229939069 re-inserted sports-related material that was deemed trivial] on [[June 2024 South Florida floods]], two areas Andrew is notorious in. After the first removal, the first IP [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=June_2024_South_Florida_floods&oldid=1229931915 reverted it again], and then when taken to talk page, the first IP proceeded to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:June_2024_South_Florida_floods&diff=prev&oldid=1229942366 argue for its inclusion by mentioning the team names and score]. Reeks of [[WP:DUCK]] here. Additionally, both added trivial information to [[Draft:Effects of Hurricane Ian in Florida]]. --'''''[[User:MarioProtIV|MarioProtIV]]''''' (<sup>[[User talk:MarioProtIV|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/MarioProtIV|contribs]]</sub>) 16:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
Line 43: | Line 30: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*I've blocked the /64. Note that this report wasn't opened correctly (it looks like it was tacked on as opposed to using the auto-create script)?-- [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 20:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrew5/Archive.
Along-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Andrew5.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.
A clerk or checkuser recommends that new socks in this case not receive tags per WP:DENY.
This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.
Edit history would suggest this is a WP:DUCK of Andrew5. Between 2023-24, they have made less than 50 edits, consisting of sports (baseball) and weather edits, even on the same day (20 May 2023). This is exactly the lookout on WP:LTA/A5. Coincidentally (DUCK-coincidence), their first edit in several months happen to also be telling others to discount my !vote in a requested move discussion. This is also common Andrew5 behavior, with either personal attacks against other weather editors (plus a few admins) or inserting themselves in discussions in an attempt to say several long-term editors are stupid/irrelevent. Even if they have not edited recently when this SPI is reviewed, if the reviewing administrator feels this is Andrew5 DUCK evidence, I would still appreciate a block or some agreement statement at least, given they are involved in an ongoing RM discussion. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Second IP protested and re-inserted sports-related material that was deemed trivialonJune 2024 South Florida floods, two areas Andrew is notorious in. After the first removal, the first IP reverted it again, and then when taken to talk page, the first IP proceeded to argue for its inclusion by mentioning the team names and score. Reeks of WP:DUCK here. Additionally, both added trivial information to Draft:Effects of Hurricane Ian in Florida. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 16:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]