Contents

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meister und Margarita: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:43, 26 May 2019

Meister und Margarita (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meister und Margarita/Archive.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.

25 May 2019

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Kritischer Berichterstatter (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Blocked on deWP for ban evasion. Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 23:54, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Since the sockmaster isn't globally banned I felt it was inappropriate to report this sock on meta at this point. Would you still recommend that?
  I made this report because the sockmaster is blocked on enWP and has on deWP announced his intentions to move his activity here after an impending block there. Either way, it seems he has abandoned this sock. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a short notice: fresh data of the sockmaster can be seen on the cs:wiki here - sorry to disturb. Regards -jkb- (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HiBbb23 - my lionk to cswiki shows that he is editing there de facto exclusively in the branch "Stolpersteine" only, sometimes comming in conflict i.e. with me; he was advices by the cs admins some times to write Czech (he cannot); do you need more? (and: adding Pietra d'inciampo - yep, asaw it on dewiki lst dayas). Regards -jkb- (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate. Cabayi (talk) 09:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly Please file a report at m:srg rather than chasing the sock from one wiki to another. It'll ensure the sock is locked out of ALL wikis. I don't have enough German to decipher the events on de:. Danke, Cabayi (talk) 09:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly The discussion on meta was closed with M&M unlocked to allow discussion and the ultimate decision thrown back to the wikis. I think dewiki has the evidence of continuing sockpuppetry & xwiki activity and has the case for a global lock. His activity here, one edit adding a wikilink to existing text, does not offer any behavioural evidence, nor are any of the previous socks fresh enough for checkuser evidence.

I'll strike my claim of this case as one of my training cases so that it can be taken up by another clerk if they feel differently - but, on the evidence available, I feel this case should be closed, and a global lock pursued from the dewiki evidence. Cabayi (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed plus Pietra d'inciampo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki).  Blocked and tagged. @Ajraddatz: The discussion linked to here from Meta is a year old. I can't read the material at cs.wiki provided by -jkb-. I don't know what has transpired in the meantime at de.wiki, but as far as I'm concerned, continuing cross-wiki abuse warrants global locks, and that's what I recommend for these two accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]