Contents

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 December 25: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:52, 25 December 2023

December 25

Template:Santa Cruz Futebol Clube squad

• Template:Santa Cruz Futebol Clube squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contains no links. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sir Milton Margai sidebar

• Template:Sir Milton Margai sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and only contains two direct links related to the subject. No navigation with this sidebar. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ōminato Line map

• Template:Ōminato Line map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and not needed. Ōminato Line has a route map in the infobox on the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Husiatyn Raion

• Template:Husiatyn Raion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Lanivtsi Raion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Monastyryska Raion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Terebovlia Raion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Zalishchyky Raion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Zbarazh Raion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All of these raions were abolished in 2020. The links featured in these navboxes have been replaced by other navboxes. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TLE

• Template:TLE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created a few weeks ago by a mostly inactive editor. Possibly an experiment; OK to userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Imported it from other language wikis, feel free to do anything, I don't care (as I am mostly inactive editor). Euglenos sandara (talk) 14:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Indian deities

• Template:South Indian deities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overlapping with {{Hindu deities and texts}}. No clear distinction of deities as South Indian; most are pan-Indian, pan-Hindu deities Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 08:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AI-generated images

• Template:AI-generated images (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unneeded. If an image is usable under Wikipedia:Image use policy and works as an illustrative aid under Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images, that image may be used without regard for how it was made, and there is no problem with that image being machine-generated. Whatever problem may be perceived can not be solved by providing "proper attribution" textually in the article itself, and there is no requirement for such attribution for such images, just as there is no requirement for such attribution for any other images. And requiring such attribution would worsen the articles, burdening them with unnecessary text. If an image has copyright problems it should be deleted. This template can't do anything about that. —Alalch E. 01:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There appear to be far fewer AI images in articles than were expected (when omitting the ones used specifically to describe AI topics). 3df (talk) 20:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AI-generated sources

• Template:AI-generated sources (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to Template:Unreliable sources. This is just about unreliable sources. A separate template listing one reason why sources used would be unreliable, but there are many reasons for a source to be an unreliable source, and separate templates are not needed for each of those scenarios. There is nothing special about sources which are unreliable for this reason relative to unreliable sources in general in terms of practical implications. —Alalch E. 01:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• This may be better as an inline tag. Something like ^{[AI-generated source?]}. --Trialpears (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{Unreliable source?}} and {{Better source needed}} cover inline use.—Alalch E. 15:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Sure, but the more important question is if it's more useful. It can be easier to deal with the problem if you know exactly what's wrong. It's faster to recognize AI generated text if told to look for it for instance. --Trialpears (talk) 17:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    A new tag like that could be helpful if it's possible the contents of the source itself are AI generated in a problematic way. For a source that might not exist, I had been wondering if a [nonexistent source?] inline would be appropriate. 3df (talk) 18:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]