Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Article assessment  





2 How to assess  



2.1  Examples  







3 Assessment scheme  



3.1  Article class scheme  





3.2  Non-article class scheme  





3.3  Article importance grading scheme  







4 Articles covered by the project  





5 Categories  





6 See also  














Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/Article assessment: Difference between revisions







Add links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders

Browse history interactively
 Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
→‎Article Assessment Department: section title caps as per MOS; don't need "department" I think
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

<noinclude>{{shortcut|[[WP:SPIA]]}}</noinclude>

<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/Tabs}}</noinclude>

<noinclude>{{Shortcut|WP:SPIA}}</noinclude>

{{Todo-Named|WikiProject Spiders/Article Classification|Wikipedia}}

{{Todo|target=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spiders/Article assessment}}



:This was shamelessly copied from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Article Classification]], and is currently being changed to suit the purpose of WikiProject Spiders. It is currently '''not functional'''!



'''WikiProject Spiders''' manages lots of articles related to spiders. This section is an attempt to categorise some of the main ones as to quality level and address which ones need work the most.

'''WikiProject Spiders''' manages lots of articles related to spiders. This section is an attempt to categorise some of the main ones as to quality level and address which ones need work the most.



<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; ">{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality statistics}}</div>

{{anchor|Table}}<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; ">{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality statistics}}</div>



This is an ongoing task and your help would be appreciated. Have a read of some of the existing classifications so you know what this is about, and please do read the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders/Article_Classification#How_to_grade|instructions]]''' before starting, as there are a few tweaks and other jobs we can do at the same time as classifying with minimal extra effort and good returns!

This is an ongoing task and your help would be appreciated. Have a read of some of the existing classifications so you know what this is about, and please do read the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders/Article_Classification#How_to_grade|instructions]]''' before starting, as there are a few tweaks and other jobs we can do at the same time as classifying with minimal extra effort and good returns!


<!--

However: '''PLEASE''' do not rate any new articles till the old comments are migrated over though, see above. Please pitch in and help. Instructions are here: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Article Classification/Migrating]] -->



__TOC__

__TOC__



==Article Assessment Department==

==Article assessment==

Welcome to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders|WikiProject Spiders]]' article assessment. The bot providing the classification information runs once a day at about 6:00 [[UTC]], so most of the time the data presented here have a lag of one day.

Welcome to [[WP:TB|WikiProject Spiders]]' Article Assessment Department.



==How to grade==

==How to assess==

* Locate ungraded spider related articles which are within the scope of the project. Those we know about reside in [[:Category:Unassessed Spiders articles]] and [[:Category:Unassessed-importance Spiders articles]]

* Locate an unassessed spider related articles which are within the scope of the project. Those we know about reside in [[:Category:Unassessed Spiders articles]].

* Grade the article using the grading and importance scheme below.

* Assess the article using the class and importance scheme below.

*'''Once graded, the {{tl|WPSpiders}} template needs to be included (not subst'd) on the Talk page with the correct [[Template:WPSpiders#How to use this template|parameters]]'''. (most articles will have it already, but with no parameters).

*'''Once assessed, the {{tl|WPSpiders}} template needs to be included (not subst'd) on the Talk page with the correct [[Template:WPSpiders#How to use this template|parameters]]'''. (Most articles will have it already, but may not have the correct parameters).

* Edit the /comments subpage to add comments about why you rated the article the way you did. Please sign and date your comment with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> as usual.

* You can edit the /comments subpage to add comments about why you rated the article the way you did. Please sign and date your comment with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> as usual.

* Apply small fixes on the spot (or big fixes if you have the time and inclination).

* Apply small fixes on the spot (or big fixes if you have the time and inclination).

* While you are there, check that the article is in at least one (and usually only one) spider category.

* While you are there, check that the article is in at least one (and usually only one) spider category.

* If the article is graded better than a stub but it has a stub template, remove the stub template(s) from the article.

* If the article is graded better than a stub but it has a stub template, remove the stub template(s) from the article.

* * If the article in serious need of some 'tender loving care', add it to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders#Adopt_an_article]]

** If the article in serious need of some 'tender loving care', add it to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders#Adopt_an_article]]

* Add stubs to the "articles to expand" section of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders/To_do|To Do]] list, add cleanup candidates to that list too.

* You can add stubs to the "articles to expand" section of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders/To_do|To Do]] list, add cleanup candidates to that list too.

*If the article needs a photo, put a {{tl|Reqphoto}} template onto the article's talk page and add it to the "photos needed" list on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/To do|To do]] page<!-- maybe we could get our own Reqphoto template which would somehow add it automatically?? -->

* If the article needs an image, include {{para|needs-image|yes}} in the {{tl|WPSpiders}} template; this will add the article to [[:Category:Wikipedia requested images of spiders]].

* If an article might be in need of either merging or splitting, please note the article first and, for merge proposals, any articles you would suggest merging the article '''''into'''''. ''update this''

* If an article might be in need of either merging or splitting, please note the article first and, for merge proposals, any articles you would suggest merging the article '''''into'''''. ''update this''


===Examples===

===Examples===

For example, use

''Place some examples of the template usage/grading procedure here.''

*For example, change <nowiki>{{WPSpiders}}</nowiki> to <nowiki>{{WPSpiders|B|Low}}</nowiki> if you think it's a low importance B class article... then explain why on the comments subpage which you can get to by clicking on the edit link in the WPSpiders box.

* <nowiki>{{WikiProject Spiders|class=B|importance=Mid}}</nowiki>, or the shorter <nowiki>{{WPSpiders|B|Mid}}</nowiki>, if you think it's a mid importance B class article

* <nowiki>{{WikiProject Spiders|class=Stub|importance=Low}}</nowiki>, or the shorter <nowiki>{{WPSpiders|Stub|Low}}</nowiki>, if you think it's a low importance Stub class article

* <nowiki>{{WikiProject Spiders|class=Redirect}}</nowiki>, or the shorter <nowiki>{{WPSpiders|Redirect}}</nowiki>, if it's a redirect to a spider article; note that {{para|importance}} is not used in this case



== Grading scheme ==

== Assessment scheme ==



{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/AssessmentScheme}}

===Codes and meanings===


====Article progress grading scheme====

{| align=center class="wikitable"

!Status

!Template

!Meaning of Status

|-

|{{Needed-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Needed-Class|Needed-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|The article hasn't been started yet. You can help by creating it.

|-

|{{Merge-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Merge-Class|Merge-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|The article is a merge candidate, as it probably should not stand on its own. Remarks should clarify suggested merge target. If multiple articles are to be merged into one, or if the issue is complicated, it is advised to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders/Article_Classification#Merge_candidates|list it at the end of this article]].

|-

|{{Stub-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Stub-Class|Stub-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|The article is either a very short article or a stub that will need a lot of work to bring it to A-Class level.

|-

|{{Start-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Start-Class|Start-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|The article has a decent amount of content, but it is still very weak in certain areas (remarks should clarify where).

|-

|{{B-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:B-Class|B-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|The article is "almost there" but it may be missing one of the following: references, balance of content, NPOV or an important section. Alternatively, the English may need a comprehensive rewrite to make it flow.

|-

|{{A-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:A-Class|A-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|The article provides a well-written and complete description of the topic, as described in [[Wikipedia:How_to_write_a_great_article|How to write a Great Article]]. It includes a well-written introduction to the topic, and an appropriate series of headings to break up the article. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from the "hard" literature rather than websites. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems.

|-

|{{GA-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA-Class|GA-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "[[WP:GOOD|Good Article]]" status, and meet the current criteria for Good Articles. Article should be at or around A-class to receive this tag.

|-

|{{FA-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:FA-Class|FA-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "[[Wikipedia:Featured Articles|Featured article]]" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles.

|}

<!--

'''Note:''' The idea for using templates to simplify the tagging the quality of articles came from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Worklist]]. Thanks to the hard working users there for lots of great ideas about how to do classification!


'''Note:''' This is being moved to be in alignment with the [[Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team]] project.

-->


====Article importance grading scheme====

{| align=center class="wikitable"

!Status

!Template

!Meaning of Status

|-

|{{Top-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Top-Class|Top-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.

|-

|{{High-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:High-Class|High-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.

|-

|{{Mid-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Mid-Class|Mid-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.

|-

|{{Low-Class}}

|align="center"|'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Low-Class|Low-Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''

|This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.

|-

|None

|align="center"|'''None'''

|This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

|}

<!--

'''Note:''' These templates are based on those mentioned at [[Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WPArts#I have seen the future for WVWP, and it looks like this!]]. Also, the "importance" of an article is to be assessed for its importance ''within this WikiProject''. The Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team will then formularise importance of subject area and importance of article within that subject area to determine Wikipedia 1.0 importance. See also [[Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Release_Version_Criteria#Importance_of_topic]] for more on this rating system. (note, we previously had our own cell templates ([[/Top]], [[/High]], [[/Medium]] and [[/Low]]) and these should be sunsetted)

-->



== Articles covered by the project ==

== Articles covered by the project ==

===[[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality|Index]]===

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality}}



The covered articles are sorted in two ways: first, by class/quality (e.g. A, GA, B, Start, Stub), then, inside these categories, by importance (e.g. Top, High, Mid, Low).

<!--

===Article gradings===

<div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none; font-size: 100%;">

<div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none;">

<div class="NavHead" style="background: white; text-align: left;">[[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality/1|Page 1]] (long)</div>

<div style="font-size: smaller; text-align: left;">Make visible or invisible by clicking ''Show'' or ''Hide'', respectively.</div>

<div class="NavContent" style="display: none; text-align: left;">



See [[#Table|above]] for the latest table showing WikiProject Spiders articles.

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality/1}}


</div></div></div></div>

<div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none; font-size: 100%;">

<div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none;">

<div class="NavHead" style="background: white; text-align: left;">[[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality/2|Page 2]] (long)</div>

<div style="font-size: smaller; text-align: left;">Make visible or invisible by clicking ''Show'' or ''Hide'', respectively.</div>

<div class="NavContent" style="display: none; text-align: left;">


{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Spiders articles by quality/2}}


</div></div></div></div>


===Articles not yet in any category===

-->

<!--

==Merge candidates==

===Merge proposals:===


===The big ones===


===Split proposals:===


===Already merged===

See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders/Log#Page_merges]] and [[:Category:WikiProject Spiders merged articles]]

-->



==Categories==

==Categories==

Line 157: Line 48:

*[[:Category:Unassessed Spiders articles]] - Articles which have not yet been assessed by quality

*[[:Category:Unassessed Spiders articles]] - Articles which have not yet been assessed by quality

*[[:Category:Spiders articles by importance]] - Articles categorised by importance

*[[:Category:Spiders articles by importance]] - Articles categorised by importance

<!--

*[[:Category:Unassessed-importance Spiders articles]] - Articles which have not yet been assessed for importance

<~--

===Worklist categories===

===Worklist categories===

*[[:Category:WikiProject Spiders deletion candidates]] - Articles which the assessing editor has recommended for deletion

*[[:Category:WikiProject Spiders deletion candidates]] - Articles which the assessing editor has recommended for deletion


Latest revision as of 10:44, 17 January 2016

WikiProject Spiders manages lots of articles related to spiders. This section is an attempt to categorise some of the main ones as to quality level and address which ones need work the most.

This is an ongoing task and your help would be appreciated. Have a read of some of the existing classifications so you know what this is about, and please do read the instructions before starting, as there are a few tweaks and other jobs we can do at the same time as classifying with minimal extra effort and good returns!

Article assessment

[edit]

Welcome to WikiProject Spiders' article assessment. The bot providing the classification information runs once a day at about 6:00 UTC, so most of the time the data presented here have a lag of one day.

How to assess

[edit]

Examples

[edit]

For example, use

Assessment scheme

[edit]

Article class scheme

[edit]

Articles that fall within this wikiproject should have the project template placed on their talk pages with |class=one of the values below; |importance= should also be specified. Example: {{WikiProject Spiders|class=Start|importance=Low}} or the equivalent shorthand {{WPSpiders|Start|Low}}.

Status Meaning of Status
NA (NA=Not Assessed) The class of this article has not yet been assessed. There shouldn't be any such articles, so the category should be empty.
SIA The article is a set index article (SIA). A spider SIA is a list article about spiders that share the same (or a similar) name, either the same English name (e.g. Banana spider) or the same synonym (e.g. Sparassus argelasius). Unlike a disambiguation page, it can contain extra information, links, images, etc.
List The article is a list.
Stub The article is a stub or a very short article that will need a lot of work to bring it to A-Class level. For genus pages, this is anything up to a taxobox and basic description of family, authority, species list, and endemic location.
Start The article has some content useful to readers, but it is still very weak in certain areas. It includes everything a stub class article has plus some extra information. This can include physical description, author notes, or anything in addition to the basic information that makes up a stub class.
C The article has more content useful to readers, but may be missing one or more of the following: adequate references, balance of content/NPOV or an important section.
B The article is "almost there" but it may still be missing one of the following: balance of content, NPOV or an important section. Alternatively, the English may need a comprehensive rewrite to make it flow.
GA Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Good Article" status, and meet the current criteria for Good Articles. Article should be at or around A-class to receive this tag.
A The article provides a well-written and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a Great Article. It includes a well-written introduction to the topic, and an appropriate series of headings to break up the article. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from the "hard" literature rather than websites. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems.
FL Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured list" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists.
FA Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles.

Non-article class scheme

[edit]

Pages that are not articles but fall within this wikiproject should also have the project template placed on their talk pages with |class=one of the values below. In these cases, |importance= is omitted (it defaults to "NA"). Example: {{WikiProject Spiders|class=Redirect}} or the equivalent shorthand {{WPSpiders|Redirect}}.

Status Meaning of Status
Category Used for category pages, e.g. Category:Araneomorphae.
Disambig Used for disambiguation pages that disambiguate between spiders as well as other items. Pages that only disambiguate between spiders are better treated as Set Index Articles (SIAs) – see above – because these are more flexible in their content.
Draft Used for draft articles, i.e. articles with the title prefixed "Draft:". The class must be changed as soon as they are moved to the main article space.
File Used for files stored in Wikipedia rather than in Commons. These are rare, but occasionally used for purely internal use where they would not be of any value outside the encyclopedia.
Project Used for pages like this one that are only concerned with the project and not intended for the general reader.
Redirect Used for redirects concerned with spiders, e.g. from an English name to a scientific name or vice versa, or from a synonym to an accepted scientific name.
Template Used for templates concerned with spiders.

Article importance grading scheme

[edit]
Status Meaning of Status
Top This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information (e.g. Spider).
High This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge (e.g. spider families).
Mid This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas (e.g. commonly known spider species).
Low This article is of less importance to this project, as it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or a less well known spider species.
NA (NA=Not Assessed) This article is belongs to a class of article that does not need an assessment (e.g. a Category) or it has not yet been assessed.

Articles covered by the project

[edit]

The covered articles are sorted in two ways: first, by class/quality (e.g. A, GA, B, Start, Stub), then, inside these categories, by importance (e.g. Top, High, Mid, Low).

See above for the latest table showing WikiProject Spiders articles.

Categories

[edit]

See also

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spiders/Article_assessment&oldid=700252105"

Categories: 
Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
Wikipedia pages with to-do lists, unused
Wikipedia editorial validation
WikiProject Spiders
 



This page was last edited on 17 January 2016, at 10:44 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki