curprev16:0916:09, 13 October 2023 Googleguy007talkcontribs 6,746 bytes+7 Undid revision 1179962870 by Scribolt (talk) People cite essays to summarize their own thoughts and opinions, they should be able to do that without a (added very far after the essays creation) clause saying tht they cant cite itundoTags: UndoReverted
curprev16:0416:04, 13 October 2023 Scribolttalkcontribs 6,739 bytes−7 Even in that unlikely event, citing this essay wouldn't be a helpful, and without any caveats I don't see any benefit to softening the language here.undoTags: UndoReverted
curprev11:1711:17, 31 May 2022 Uanfalatalkcontribs 6,707 bytes−20 →top: the description should make it clear why the hatnote is listed here (the common factor is "blue", not "link colour"); no need to mention Wikipedia: obviously all the guidelines are about itundo
curprev06:0306:03, 3 June 2019 Snow Risetalkcontribs 6,181 bytes+1 →top: Dummy edit in order to introduce the following correction into the edit summary history: in the last edit, I said that the page and been re-labelled inappropriately to an essay. I meant to say rather that it had been re-labelled from WP:essay status to WP:infopage status without appropriate community process, vetting, and validation, and thus I've reverted it back--discussion with the party who made this change unilaterally being pointless in that they were sitebanned.undo
curprev05:5805:58, 3 June 2019 Snow Risetalkcontribs 6,182 bytes−3 I just noticed that this page was re-labelled an essay by a user who was ultimately sitebanned by the community for disruptive behaviour,with absolutely no explanation in the edit summary or on the talk page for why it should be so upgraded.The page remains very much an idiosyncratic essay-like statement of opinion as to how to approach WP:V + I do not feel it has gone through a proper community WP:PROMOTE process to validate that it is a straight summary of policy.Reverting accordingly.undo