|
No edit summary
|
Notifying of requested move using rmCloser
|
||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Christianity-related talkpages}} |
{{Christianity-related talkpages}} |
||
{{WikiProject Holidays}} |
{{WikiProject Holidays}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/ |
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-11-29/WikiProject report|writer=[[User:Mabeenot|Mabeenot]]| |
||
|day=29|month=November|year=2010}} |
|day=29|month=November|year=2010}} |
||
{{to do|target=Wikipedia:WikiProject Holidays}} |
{{to do|target=Wikipedia:WikiProject Holidays}} |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Holidays/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Holidays/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Clarifying that Santa Claus does not exist should be part of this project. == |
|||
All references to Santa Claus should make it clear that he does not exist, as it was discussed on [[Talk:Santa Claus]] that Wikipedia is [[WP:NOTCENSORED]]. When kids come to Wikipedia, they need to learn the truth and straight-up facts. Wikipedia is not censored to protect anyone's feelings. [[User:Félix An|Félix An]] ([[User talk:Félix An|talk]]) 18:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:For the record, I'm older than Wikipedia and [[:File:Yes,Virginia,ThereIsASantaClausClipping.jpg|I believe]]. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 03:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == |
== One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == |
||
| Line 26: | Line 21: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|right|85px]] |
|[[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|right|85px]] |
||
Hello,<br>Please note that '''[[Christmas |
Hello,<br>Please note that '''[[Christmas in Russia]]''', which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for improvement|Articles for improvement]]'''. The article is [[Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement/Schedule|scheduled]] to appear on Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Community portal|Community portal]] in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! <!-- Substituted from Template:AFI project notice --><br /> |
||
<sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, |
<sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team</sub> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== RfC: A TikToker, ... , other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not? == |
|||
Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: [[WP:BLP]], [[WP:SUSPECT]], [[WP:BLPPUBLIC]], [[WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE]]. |
|||
Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, [[WP:BLP]] protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused. |
|||
''Requesting'' ''well studied, carefully thought'' ''inputs'' @ [[Talk:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault#RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?|RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?]] |
|||
Thanks and warm regards |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Public holidays in Yugoslavia]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
[[User:Bookku| Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge']] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 11:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
The article [[:Public holidays in Yugoslavia]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
<blockquote>'''Fails [[WP:V]] and [[WP:GNG]] There are no references, my search for references did not find any [[WP:RS]]. The two other language articles have similar content and no reference.'''</blockquote> |
|||
== Project-independent quality assessments == |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]], but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent [[WP:Village pump (proposals)/Archive_198#Project-independent_quality_assessments|Village pump proposal]] was approved and has been implemented to add a {{para|class}} parameter to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Public holidays in Yugoslavia|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 18:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC) |
|||
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} a new {{para|QUALITY_CRITERIA|custom}} parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Assistance on List of Christmas carols article == |
|||
== Unity Day (United States) Article needs a little love. == |
|||
Hello, I am writing about the [[List of Christmas carols|List of Christmas Carols]] article which requires immediate attention. The article has since gone into disrepair and I and others have been trying to bring it back to the status others had achieved, however, there is one particular editor who has continually reverted any edits made and who is currently serving out a block due to this type of behaviour on another article and who insists popular Christmas songs such as [[The Christmas Song]], [[Silver Bells]] and others are Christmas Carols (A better understanding will be got by observing the [[Talk:List of Christmas carols|talk page]] in recent years), which contradicts the consensus many editors reached some years ago on the defining of which type of songs would be present on the list. I would be grateful if all could collaborate and return the article to its pristine state that others had achieved in the past. Also, I would be grateful if everyone could give the articles [[Christmas carol]] and [[Carol (music)|Carol]] a look over too. I would like to see the articles achieve [[Wikipedia:Featured articles]] status in advance of the holiday. Thank you [[Special:Contributions/37.18.134.184|37.18.134.184]] ([[User talk:37.18.134.184|talk]]) 16:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
The Unity Day (United States) article needs a little love. The article is a mess, the history section is reversed, the article reads like an advertisement, there are external links in the body of the article, it is overly specific and niche, and there is a myriad of other problems as well. I am a new editor on Wikipedia and don't yet have the tool set or skills to fully fix the article, so I am asking for this community's help to try and improve the passage. [[User:MadManJackHasABigSword|MadManJackHasABigSword]] ([[User talk:MadManJackHasABigSword|talk]]) 16:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== What Constitutes a Christmas carol discussion == |
|||
== Family Day celebrations. == |
|||
There is currently a discussion on [[List of Christmas carols|List of Christmas Carols]] on what constitutes as a Christmas carol. To participate [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Christmas_carols#Definition_of_Carols_listed_intro|click here]] |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/37.18.134.184|37.18.134.184]] ([[User talk:37.18.134.184|talk]]) 12:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Sister day on the first Sunday in August, as well as Brother’s day celebrated on May 24th need to be added. [[User:Jackaloupe52|Jackaloupe52]] ([[User talk:Jackaloupe52|talk]]) 05:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== "Christmas parade car crash" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] |
|||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect [[:Christmas parade car crash]]. The discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 23#Christmas parade car crash]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[Special:Contributions/65.92.246.43|65.92.246.43]] ([[User talk:65.92.246.43|talk]]) 21:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Requested move at [[Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024]] == |
|||
==[[Santa Claus parade]]== |
|||
|
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] Thereisa requested move discussion at [[Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:RodRabelo7|RodRabelo7]] ([[User talk:RodRabelo7|talk]]) 13:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Holidays and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 91 days  |
| |
|---|---|
| Project |
|
| |
| Workgroups |
|
| Subprojects |
|
 | Holidays Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | WikiProject Holidays was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 29 November 2010. |
|
Hello, |
Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: WP:BLP, WP:SUSPECT, WP:BLPPUBLIC, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE.
Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, WP:BLP protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused.
Requesting well studied, carefully thought inputs @ RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Unity Day (United States) article needs a little love. The article is a mess, the history section is reversed, the article reads like an advertisement, there are external links in the body of the article, it is overly specific and niche, and there is a myriad of other problems as well. I am a new editor on Wikipedia and don't yet have the tool set or skills to fully fix the article, so I am asking for this community's help to try and improve the passage. MadManJackHasABigSword (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sister day on the first Sunday in August, as well as Brother’s day celebrated on May 24th need to be added. Jackaloupe52 (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
