|
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Holidays/Archive 7) (bot
|
Notifying of requested move using rmCloser
|
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Christianity-related talkpages}} |
{{Christianity-related talkpages}} |
||
{{WikiProject Holidays}} |
{{WikiProject Holidays}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/ |
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-11-29/WikiProject report|writer=[[User:Mabeenot|Mabeenot]]| |
||
|day=29|month=November|year=2010}} |
|day=29|month=November|year=2010}} |
||
{{to do|target=Wikipedia:WikiProject Holidays}} |
{{to do|target=Wikipedia:WikiProject Holidays}} |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
== One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == |
|||
== Discussion at [[Talk:This Christmas (Donny Hathaway song)]] == |
|||
The [[Jess Glynne]] version of "This Christmas" is discussed at [[Talk:This Christmas (Donny Hathaway song)#Removed Jess Glynn section]]. Your inputs are welcome there. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 23:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{| style="background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #000080; padding: 10px; width: 100%" |
|||
== Jews and Christmas == |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|right|85px]] |
|||
Hello,<br>Please note that '''[[Christmas in Russia]]''', which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for improvement|Articles for improvement]]'''. The article is [[Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement/Schedule|scheduled]] to appear on Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Community portal|Community portal]] in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! <!-- Substituted from Template:AFI project notice --><br /> |
|||
<sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team</sub> |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
|||
== RfC: A TikToker, ... , other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not? == |
|||
Input and contributions will be appreciated at [[Draft:Jews and Christmas]], where work is ongoing. Thank you! <span style="color:magenta;">ezlev</span> <small>([[User:Ezlev|user]]/[[User talk:Ezlev|tlk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Ezlev|ctrbs]])</small> 17:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: [[WP:BLP]], [[WP:SUSPECT]], [[WP:BLPPUBLIC]], [[WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE]]. |
|||
| ⚫ |
== Requested move at [[Talk: |
||
| ⚫ |
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk: |
||
Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, [[WP:BLP]] protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused. |
|||
== FAR notice == |
|||
''Requesting'' ''well studied, carefully thought'' ''inputs'' @ [[Talk:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault#RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?|RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?]] |
|||
I have nominated [[Inaugural games of the Flavian Amphitheatre]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Inaugural games of the Flavian Amphitheatre/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 07:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks and warm regards |
|||
== Requested move at [[Talk:Bataan Day#Requested move 31 January 2022]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Bataan Day#Requested move 31 January 2022]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Tw Cen MT;color:black">[[User:HueMan1|hueman1]] ([[User talk:HueMan1|<small>talk</small>]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/HueMan1|<small>contributions</small>]])</span> 15:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Bookku| Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge']] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 11:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Project-independent quality assessments == |
|||
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]], but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent [[WP:Village pump (proposals)/Archive_198#Project-independent_quality_assessments|Village pump proposal]] was approved and has been implemented to add a {{para|class}} parameter to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. |
|||
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. |
|||
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} a new {{para|QUALITY_CRITERIA|custom}} parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Unity Day (United States) Article needs a little love. == |
|||
The Unity Day (United States) article needs a little love. The article is a mess, the history section is reversed, the article reads like an advertisement, there are external links in the body of the article, it is overly specific and niche, and there is a myriad of other problems as well. I am a new editor on Wikipedia and don't yet have the tool set or skills to fully fix the article, so I am asking for this community's help to try and improve the passage. [[User:MadManJackHasABigSword|MadManJackHasABigSword]] ([[User talk:MadManJackHasABigSword|talk]]) 16:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Family Day celebrations. == |
|||
Sister day on the first Sunday in August, as well as Brother’s day celebrated on May 24th need to be added. [[User:Jackaloupe52|Jackaloupe52]] ([[User talk:Jackaloupe52|talk]]) 05:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at [[Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024]] == |
||
| ⚫ | [[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:RodRabelo7|RodRabelo7]] ([[User talk:RodRabelo7|talk]]) 13:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Holidays and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 91 days  |
| |
|---|---|
| Project |
|
| |
| Workgroups |
|
| Subprojects |
|
 | Holidays Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | WikiProject Holidays was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 29 November 2010. |
|
Hello, |
Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: WP:BLP, WP:SUSPECT, WP:BLPPUBLIC, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE.
Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, WP:BLP protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused.
Requesting well studied, carefully thought inputs @ RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Unity Day (United States) article needs a little love. The article is a mess, the history section is reversed, the article reads like an advertisement, there are external links in the body of the article, it is overly specific and niche, and there is a myriad of other problems as well. I am a new editor on Wikipedia and don't yet have the tool set or skills to fully fix the article, so I am asking for this community's help to try and improve the passage. MadManJackHasABigSword (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sister day on the first Sunday in August, as well as Brother’s day celebrated on May 24th need to be added. Jackaloupe52 (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
