|
m harmonize signpost templates (via WP:JWB)
|
Notifying of requested move using rmCloser
|
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Holidays/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Holidays/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
| ⚫ |
== Requested move at [[Talk: |
||
| ⚫ |
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk: |
||
== Requested move at [[Talk:Heathen holidays#Requested move 10 March 2022]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Heathen holidays#Requested move 10 March 2022]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:EpicPupper|🐶 EpicPupper]] <sup>(he/him | [[User talk:EpicPupper|talk]])</sup> 04:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == |
== One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == |
||
| Line 27: | Line 21: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|right|85px]] |
|[[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|right|85px]] |
||
Hello,<br>Please note that '''[[ |
Hello,<br>Please note that '''[[Christmas in Russia]]''', which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for improvement|Articles for improvement]]'''. The article is [[Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement/Schedule|scheduled]] to appear on Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Community portal|Community portal]] in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! <!-- Substituted from Template:AFI project notice --><br /> |
||
<sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, |
<sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team</sub> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
| ⚫ | == RfC: A TikToker, ... , other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not? == |
||
== User script to detect unreliable sources == |
|||
| ⚫ | Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: [[WP:BLP]], [[WP:SUSPECT]], [[WP:BLPPUBLIC]], [[WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE]]. |
||
{{Main|User:Headbomb/unreliable}} |
|||
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to [[WP:URS|unreliable sources]] and [[predatory journal]]s. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the [[Wikipedia:User scripts/Most imported scripts|39th most imported script on Wikipedia]]. The idea is that it takes something like |
|||
*John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. (<code><nowiki>John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.</nowiki></code>) |
|||
and turns it into something like |
|||
* John Smith "{{highlight|[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]|pink}}" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. |
|||
| ⚫ | Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, [[WP:BLP]] protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused. |
||
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{tl|cite web}}, {{tl|cite journal}} and {{tl|doi}}. |
|||
| ⚫ | ''Requesting'' ''well studied, carefully thought'' ''inputs'' @ [[Talk:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault#RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?|RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?]] |
||
The script is mostly based on [[WP:RSPSOURCES]], [[WP:NPPSG]] and [[WP:CITEWATCH]] and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Do note that this is '''not a script to be mindlessly used''', and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at [[User:Headbomb/unreliable]]. Questions, comments and requests can be made at [[User talk:Headbomb/unreliable]]. |
|||
| ⚫ | [[User:Bookku| Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge']] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 11:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
-  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> |
|||
== Project-independent quality assessments == |
|||
<span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 --> |
|||
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]], but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent [[WP:Village pump (proposals)/Archive_198#Project-independent_quality_assessments|Village pump proposal]] was approved and has been implemented to add a {{para|class}} parameter to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. |
|||
== One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == |
|||
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. |
|||
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} a new {{para|QUALITY_CRITERIA|custom}} parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
{| style="background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #000080; padding: 10px; width: 100%" |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|right|85px]] |
|||
Hello,<br>Please note that '''[[Christmas in Russia]]''', which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for improvement|Articles for improvement]]'''. The article is [[Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement/Schedule|scheduled]] to appear on Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Community portal|Community portal]] in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! <!-- Substituted from Template:AFI project notice --><br /> |
|||
<sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team</sub> |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
|||
== Unity Day (United States) Article needs a little love. == |
|||
| ⚫ | == RfC: A TikToker, ... , other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not? == |
||
The Unity Day (United States) article needs a little love. The article is a mess, the history section is reversed, the article reads like an advertisement, there are external links in the body of the article, it is overly specific and niche, and there is a myriad of other problems as well. I am a new editor on Wikipedia and don't yet have the tool set or skills to fully fix the article, so I am asking for this community's help to try and improve the passage. [[User:MadManJackHasABigSword|MadManJackHasABigSword]] ([[User talk:MadManJackHasABigSword|talk]]) 16:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: [[WP:BLP]], [[WP:SUSPECT]], [[WP:BLPPUBLIC]], [[WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE]]. |
||
== Family Day celebrations. == |
|||
| ⚫ | Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, [[WP:BLP]] protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused. |
||
Sister day on the first Sunday in August, as well as Brother’s day celebrated on May 24th need to be added. [[User:Jackaloupe52|Jackaloupe52]] ([[User talk:Jackaloupe52|talk]]) 05:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | ''Requesting'' ''well studied, carefully thought'' ''inputs'' @ [[Talk:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault#RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?|RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?]] |
||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at [[Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024]] == |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | [[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:RodRabelo7|RodRabelo7]] ([[User talk:RodRabelo7|talk]]) 13:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | [[User:Bookku| Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge']] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 11:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Holidays and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 91 days  |
| |
|---|---|
| Project |
|
| |
| Workgroups |
|
| Subprojects |
|
 | Holidays Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | WikiProject Holidays was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 29 November 2010. |
|
Hello, |
Some of other related policies for current requested RfC discussion: WP:BLP, WP:SUSPECT, WP:BLPPUBLIC, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE.
Requesting inputs about WP policies regarding, WP:BLP protocols and naming of the accused in relation to mentions of allegations and counter allegations in the given article, against a female victim of sexual assault, her associates and also other accused.
Requesting well studied, carefully thought inputs @ RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not?
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Unity Day (United States) article needs a little love. The article is a mess, the history section is reversed, the article reads like an advertisement, there are external links in the body of the article, it is overly specific and niche, and there is a myriad of other problems as well. I am a new editor on Wikipedia and don't yet have the tool set or skills to fully fix the article, so I am asking for this community's help to try and improve the passage. MadManJackHasABigSword (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sister day on the first Sunday in August, as well as Brother’s day celebrated on May 24th need to be added. Jackaloupe52 (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pão-por-Deus#Requested move 30 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
