Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Use by senior White House staff  





2 Investigations with missing emails  



2.1  House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform  





2.2  Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy  





2.3  CIA leak grand jury investigation  





2.4  General Services Administration  





2.5  Department of Education  







3 Legalities  



3.1  The Hatch Act  





3.2  Presidential Records Act  







4 See also  





5 References  





6 External links  














Bush White House email controversy







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

(Redirected from 2007 Whitehouse email controversy)

During the 2007 Congressional investigation of the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys, it was discovered that administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[1] for various official communications. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The use of this email domain became public when it was discovered that Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[2] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[3]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[4]). Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978.[5] Over 5 million emails may have been lost.[6][7] Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations.[8] In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.[9]

The "gwb43.com"[10] domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation.[11] Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[12] The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[13]

On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts."[14] Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email, themselves.

On December 14, 2009, CNN reported[15] that 22 million missing emails had been found on backup tapes, and that the Obama Administration reached a settlement with two watchdog groups who had sued to obtain the emails.

Use by senior White House staff[edit]

According to a former White House official, Karl Rove used RNC-hosted addresses for roughly "95 percent" of his email.[16] Rove provided email from his kr@georgewbush.com[17] address in exhibits to the United States House Committee on the Judiciary.[18]

White House deputy Jennifer Farley told Jack Abramoff not to use the official White House system "because it might actually limit what they can do to help us, especially since there could be lawsuits, etc."[2] Abramoff responded, "Dammit. It was sent to Susan on her RNC pager and was not supposed to go into the WH system."[19]

Investigations with missing emails[edit]

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform[edit]

The House Oversight committee in an interim staff report, released on June 18, 2007:[20]

Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy[edit]

During the investigation into the firing of eight U.S. attorneys,[21] it became known White House staff was using Republican National Committee (RNC) email accounts.[22] The White House stated it might have lost five million emails.[6]

On May 2, 2007, the Senate Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and the Department of Justice (DOJ) compelling the production of email Karl Rove sent to DOJ staff, regarding evaluation and dismissal of attorneys, no matter what email account Rove used, whether White House or National Republican party accounts, or other accounts, with a deadline of May 15, 2007 for compliance. The subpoena also demanded relevant email previously produced in the Valerie Plame controversy and investigation for the CIA leak scandal (2003).[23]

CIA leak grand jury investigation[edit]

Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson alleged that his wife's identity was covert and that members of the George W. Bush administration knowingly revealed that information as retribution for his New York Times op-ed entitled "What I Didn't Find in Africa," of July 6, 2003, regarding the claim that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium.[citation needed] Patrick J. Fitzgerald, while investigating the leak, found that emails were missing from the White House server.[24][25] Mother Jones wrote that this is possibly the reason the RNC changed the policy of deleting emails after 30 days to saving all email sent and received by White House officials.[25] In light of the apparent vanished emails Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has asked to reopen the investigation.[26][27]

General Services Administration[edit]

It is feared that the missing emails might also affect congressional investigation of General Services Administration.[28]

Department of Education[edit]

While investigating the Reading First program CREW learned that employees use private emails to conduct official business. This might be a violation of the Federal Records Act.[29][30]

Legalities[edit]

The Hatch Act[edit]

The Hatch Act prohibits the use of government resources, including email accounts, for political purposes. The Bush administration stated the RNC accounts were used to prevent violation of this Act.[6][25]

Presidential Records Act[edit]

The Presidential Records Act mandates the preservation of all presidential records. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and The Wall Street Journal contend that the missing emails may constitute a violation of this Act.[5][6][26][31]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  • ^ a b The Washington Post. GOP Groups Told to Keep Bush Officials' E-Mails. 27 March 2007
  • ^ "georgewbush.com Whois Record". (domaintools.com). Retrieved 2009-08-11.
  • ^ "rnchq.org Whois Record". (domaintools.com). Retrieved 2009-08-11.
  • ^ a b Rove and Co. Broke Federal Law With Email Scam by Jonathan Stein, Mother Jones, April 12, 2007
  • ^ a b c d CREW Releases New Report - Without A Trace: The White House Emails and The Violations of The Presidential Records Act Archived 2008-05-16 at the Wayback Machine"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-05-02. Retrieved 2007-04-25.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, April 13, 2006
  • ^ Officials' e-mails may be missing, White House says Democrats in Congress want messages from private system for probe of U.S. attorney firings By Tom Hamburger, Los Angeles Times, April 12, 2007
  • ^ "I have Karl Rove's emails". gregpalast.com. 11 May 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
  • ^ "Millions of Bush administration e-mails recovered - CNN.com". www.cnn.com. Retrieved 2019-08-03.
  • ^ "gwb43.com" - who is .com
  • ^ CREW asks for House Investigation into White House violations of Presidential Records Act. Archived April 20, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), 15 March 2007.
  • ^ The Hill. Waxman wants RNC, Bush campaign to preserve e-mails. 26 March 2007
  • ^ News from CNN
  • ^ White House - April 12, 2007 Press Gaggle by Scott Stanzel Archived April 15, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  • ^ CNN Politics
  • ^ Froomkin, Dan. The Rovian Theory washingtonpost.com 2007-03-23
  • ^ "georgewbush.com" - who is .com
  • ^ "Rove Exhibits Part 1" (PDF). pp. 50, 55, 113 etc. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-08-25. and "Rove Exhibits Part 2" (PDF). pp. 8, 10, 40, 46. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-08-15. and "White House Documents". United States House Committee on the Judiciary. Archived from the original on 2009-08-13. Retrieved 2009-08-11.
  • ^ Financial Times. Aides to Bush told not to destroy e-mails. 26 March 2007
  • ^ Committee Staff (2007-06-18). "The Use of RNC E-Mail Accounts by White House Officials". Interim Report: Administration Oversight, White House Use of Private E-mail Accounts. U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Archived from the original on 2007-06-27. Retrieved 2007-06-18.
  • ^ Dismissal attorneys uncommon
  • ^ Advisers' E-Mail Accounts May Have Mixed Politics and Business, White House Says By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG, The New York Times, April 12, 2007
  • ^ Lahey, Patrick Rove Email Subpoena United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary (via Findlaw) May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  • ^ Fitzgerald
  • ^ a b c Mother Jones: RE: Those Missing White House Emails. April 13, 2007
  • ^ a b Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington: CREW Writes Patrick Fitzgerald Asking to Re-Open Rove Case in Light of Missing Emails Archived March 6, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. April 13, 2007.
  • ^ CREW Writes Patrick Fitzgerald Asking to Re-Open Rove Case in Light of Missing Emails[permanent dead link] Yahoo, April 13, 2007
  • ^ Immunity for Ex-Gonzales Aide Weighed Potential Witness's Role in Firings Cited By Paul Kane, The Washington Post, April 18, 2007; Page A08
  • ^ CREW learns Dept. of Education staff are using private e-mails in violation of federal law Archived May 23, 2007, at the Wayback Machine CREW, May 16, 2007
  • ^ Ethics watchdog accuses Education Department of illegal e-mail use by Nick Juliano, Raw Story, May 16, 2007
  • ^ LEGAL WORRIES OVER MISSING EMAILS GROW Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine by John D. McKinnon, Wall Street Journal
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_White_House_email_controversy&oldid=1232560267"

    Categories: 
    George W. Bush administration controversies
    Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy
    Email
    Computing-related controversies and disputes
    Hidden categories: 
    Webarchive template wayback links
    CS1 maint: archived copy as title
    All articles with dead external links
    Articles with dead external links from November 2016
    Articles with permanently dead external links
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from July 2016
     



    This page was last edited on 4 July 2024, at 10:48 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki