J u m p t o c o n t e n t
M a i n m e n u
M a i n m e n u
N a v i g a t i o n
● M a i n p a g e
● C o n t e n t s
● C u r r e n t e v e n t s
● R a n d o m a r t i c l e
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● C o n t a c t u s
● D o n a t e
C o n t r i b u t e
● H e l p
● L e a r n t o e d i t
● C o m m u n i t y p o r t a l
● R e c e n t c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
S e a r c h
Search
A p p e a r a n c e
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P e r s o n a l t o o l s
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P a g e s f o r l o g g e d o u t e d i t o r s l e a r n m o r e
● C o n t r i b u t i o n s
● T a l k
( T o p )
1
S e e a l s o
2
R e f e r e n c e s
T o g g l e t h e t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s
B r e z i s – G a l l o u ë t i n e q u a l i t y
2 l a n g u a g e s
● F r a n ç a i s
● S v e n s k a
E d i t l i n k s
● A r t i c l e
● T a l k
E n g l i s h
● R e a d
● E d i t
● V i e w h i s t o r y
T o o l s
T o o l s
A c t i o n s
● R e a d
● E d i t
● V i e w h i s t o r y
G e n e r a l
● W h a t l i n k s h e r e
● R e l a t e d c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
● S p e c i a l p a g e s
● P e r m a n e n t l i n k
● P a g e i n f o r m a t i o n
● C i t e t h i s p a g e
● G e t s h o r t e n e d U R L
● D o w n l o a d Q R c o d e
● W i k i d a t a i t e m
P r i n t / e x p o r t
● D o w n l o a d a s P D F
● P r i n t a b l e v e r s i o n
A p p e a r a n c e
F r o m W i k i p e d i a , t h e f r e e e n c y c l o p e d i a
( R e d i r e c t e d f r o m B r e z i s – G a l l o u e t i n e q u a l i t y )
‖
u
‖
L
∞
(
Ω
)
≤
C
‖
u
‖
H
1
(
Ω
)
(
1
+
(
log
(
1
+
‖
u
‖
H
2
(
Ω
)
‖
u
‖
H
1
(
Ω
)
)
)
1
/
2
)
.
{\displaystyle \displaystyle \|u\|_{L^{\infty }(\Omega )}\leq C\|u\|_{H^{1}(\Omega )}\left(1+{\Bigl (}\log {\bigl (}1+{\frac {\|u\|_{H^{2}(\Omega )}}{\|u\|_{H^{1}(\Omega )}}}{\bigr )}{\Bigr )}^{1/2}\right).}
Proof
The regularity hypothesis on
Ω
{\displaystyle \Omega }
is defined such that there exists an extension operator
P
:
H
2
(
Ω
)
→
H
2
(
R
2
)
{\displaystyle P~:~H^{2}(\Omega )\to H^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}
such that:
P
{\displaystyle P}
is a bounded operator from
H
1
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle H^{1}(\Omega )}
to
H
1
(
R
2
)
{\displaystyle H^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}
;
P
{\displaystyle P}
is a bounded operator from
H
2
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle H^{2}(\Omega )}
to
H
2
(
R
2
)
{\displaystyle H^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}
;
the restriction to
Ω
{\displaystyle \Omega }
of
P
u
{\displaystyle Pu}
is equal to
u
{\displaystyle u}
for all
u
∈
H
2
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle u\in H^{2}(\Omega )}
.
Let
u
∈
H
2
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle u\in H^{2}(\Omega )}
be such that
‖
u
‖
H
1
(
Ω
)
=
1
{\displaystyle \|u\|_{H^{1}(\Omega )}=1}
. Then, denoting by
v
^
{\displaystyle {\widehat {v}}}
the function obtained from
v
=
P
u
{\displaystyle v=Pu}
by Fourier transform, one gets the existence of
C
>
0
{\displaystyle C>0}
only depending on
Ω
{\displaystyle \Omega }
such that:
‖
(
1
+
|
ξ
|
)
v
^
‖
L
2
(
R
2
)
≤
C
{\displaystyle \|(1+|\xi |){\widehat {v}}\|_{L^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}\leq C}
,
‖
(
1
+
|
ξ
|
2
)
v
^
‖
L
2
(
R
2
)
≤
C
‖
u
‖
H
2
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle \|(1+|\xi |^{2}){\widehat {v}}\|_{L^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}\leq C\|u\|_{H^{2}(\Omega )}}
,
‖
u
‖
L
∞
(
Ω
)
≤
‖
v
‖
L
∞
(
R
2
)
≤
C
‖
v
^
‖
L
1
(
R
2
)
{\displaystyle \|u\|_{L^{\infty }(\Omega )}\leq \|v\|_{L^{\infty }(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}\leq C\|{\widehat {v}}\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}}
.
For any
R
>
0
{\displaystyle R>0}
, one writes:
‖
v
^
‖
L
1
(
R
2
)
=
∫
|
ξ
|
<
R
|
v
^
(
ξ
)
|
d
ξ
+
∫
|
ξ
|
>
R
|
v
^
(
ξ
)
|
d
ξ
=
∫
|
ξ
|
<
R
(
1
+
|
ξ
|
)
|
v
^
(
ξ
)
|
1
1
+
|
ξ
|
d
ξ
+
∫
|
ξ
|
>
R
(
1
+
|
ξ
|
2
)
|
v
^
(
ξ
)
|
1
1
+
|
ξ
|
2
d
ξ
≤
C
(
∫
|
ξ
|
<
R
1
(
1
+
|
ξ
|
)
2
d
ξ
)
1
2
+
C
‖
u
‖
H
2
(
Ω
)
(
∫
|
ξ
|
>
R
1
(
1
+
|
ξ
|
2
)
2
d
ξ
)
1
2
,
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\displaystyle \|{\widehat {v}}\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}&=\int _{|\xi |<R}|{\widehat {v}}(\xi )|{\rm {d}}\xi +\int _{|\xi |>R}|{\widehat {v}}(\xi )|{\rm {d}}\xi \\&=\int _{|\xi |<R}(1+|\xi |)|{\widehat {v}}(\xi )|{\frac {1}{1+|\xi |}}{\rm {d}}\xi +\int _{|\xi |>R}(1+|\xi |^{2})|{\widehat {v}}(\xi )|{\frac {1}{1+|\xi |^{2}}}{\rm {d}}\xi \\&\leq C\left(\int _{|\xi |<R}{\frac {1}{(1+|\xi |)^{2}}}{\rm {d}}\xi \right)^{\frac {1}{2}}+C\|u\|_{H^{2}(\Omega )}\left(\int _{|\xi |>R}{\frac {1}{(1+|\xi |^{2})^{2}}}{\rm {d}}\xi \right)^{\frac {1}{2}},\end{aligned}}}
owing to the preceding inequalities and to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. This yields
‖
v
^
‖
L
1
(
R
2
)
≤
C
(
log
(
1
+
R
)
)
1
2
+
C
‖
u
‖
H
2
(
Ω
)
1
+
R
.
{\displaystyle \|{\widehat {v}}\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}\leq C(\log(1+R))^{\frac {1}{2}}+C{\frac {\|u\|_{H^{2}(\Omega )}}{1+R}}.}
The inequality is then proven, in the case
‖
u
‖
H
1
(
Ω
)
=
1
{\displaystyle \|u\|_{H^{1}(\Omega )}=1}
, by letting
R
=
‖
u
‖
H
2
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle R=\|u\|_{H^{2}(\Omega )}}
. For the general case of
u
∈
H
2
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle u\in H^{2}(\Omega )}
non identically null, it suffices to apply this inequality to the function
u
/
‖
u
‖
H
1
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle u/\|u\|_{H^{1}(\Omega )}}
.
Noticing that, for any
v
∈
H
2
(
R
2
)
{\displaystyle v\in H^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{2})}
, there holds
∫
R
2
(
(
∂
11
2
v
)
2
+
2
(
∂
12
2
v
)
2
+
(
∂
22
2
v
)
2
)
=
∫
R
2
(
∂
11
2
v
+
∂
22
2
v
)
2
,
{\displaystyle \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{2}}{\bigl (}(\partial _{11}^{2}v)^{2}+2(\partial _{12}^{2}v)^{2}+(\partial _{22}^{2}v)^{2}{\bigr )}=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{2}}{\bigl (}\partial _{11}^{2}v+\partial _{22}^{2}v{\bigr )}^{2},}
one deduces from the Brezis-Gallouet inequality that there exists
C
>
0
{\displaystyle C>0}
only depending on
Ω
{\displaystyle \Omega }
such that, for all
u
∈
H
2
(
Ω
)
{\displaystyle u\in H^{2}(\Omega )}
which is not a.e. equal to 0,
‖
u
‖
L
∞
(
Ω
)
≤
C
‖
u
‖
H
1
(
Ω
)
(
1
+
(
log
(
1
+
‖
Δ
u
‖
L
2
(
Ω
)
‖
u
‖
H
1
(
Ω
)
)
)
1
/
2
)
.
{\displaystyle \displaystyle \|u\|_{L^{\infty }(\Omega )}\leq C\|u\|_{H^{1}(\Omega )}\left(1+{\Bigl (}\log {\bigl (}1+{\frac {\|\Delta u\|_{L^{2}(\Omega )}}{\|u\|_{H^{1}(\Omega )}}}{\bigr )}{\Bigr )}^{1/2}\right).}
The previous inequality is close to the way that the Brezis-Gallouet inequality is cited in.[2]
See also [ edit ]
References [ edit ]
^ Foias, Ciprian ; Manley, O.; Rosa, R.; Temam, R. (2001). Navier–Stokes Equations and Turbulence . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36032-3 .
R e t r i e v e d f r o m " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brezis–Gallouët_inequality&oldid=1142627357 "
C a t e g o r i e s :
● T h e o r e m s i n a n a l y s i s
● I n e q u a l i t i e s
● T h i s p a g e w a s l a s t e d i t e d o n 3 M a r c h 2 0 2 3 , a t 1 3 : 5 3 ( U T C ) .
● T e x t i s a v a i l a b l e u n d e r t h e C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n - S h a r e A l i k e L i c e n s e 4 . 0 ;
a d d i t i o n a l t e r m s m a y a p p l y . B y u s i n g t h i s s i t e , y o u a g r e e t o t h e T e r m s o f U s e a n d P r i v a c y P o l i c y . W i k i p e d i a ® i s a r e g i s t e r e d t r a d e m a r k o f t h e W i k i m e d i a F o u n d a t i o n , I n c . , a n o n - p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n .
● P r i v a c y p o l i c y
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● D i s c l a i m e r s
● C o n t a c t W i k i p e d i a
● C o d e o f C o n d u c t
● D e v e l o p e r s
● S t a t i s t i c s
● C o o k i e s t a t e m e n t
● M o b i l e v i e w