On June 28, 2023, Wittes announced a new URL, modernized website, and "an end-to-end reboot of Lawfare's user experience":
Lawfare is no longer a blog and hasn't been one for many years. It is a full-featured multimedia magazine and platform that features a wide array of authors and content types. Continuing to have the suffix "blog" in the URL has important negative consequences. Some databases, for example, refuse to carry Lawfare because they don't carry blogs, and the site has labeled itself as one.[4]
In January 2017 PresidentDonald Trump tweeted "LAWFARE" and quoted a line from one of its posts that criticized the reasoning in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that blocked Trump's first refugee-and-travel ban.[2][8][9] Trump tweeted the excerpt minutes after the line was quoted on Morning Joe.[8] Wittes, who supported the court ruling, criticized Trump for the tweet, asserting that Trump distorted the argument presented in the article.[9] Wittes also wrote that it was disturbing that Trump cited the line "with apparently no idea who the author was or what the publication was, and indeed without reading the rest of the article", and that no one in the White House vetted the tweet.[10][non-primary source needed]
On May 18, 2017, Lawfare's editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes was the principal source of an extensive New York Times report about President Trump's interactions with FBIDirectorJames Comey, who is a friend of Wittes, and how those interactions related to Comey's subsequent firing.[11] Wittes also provided a 25-minute interview to PBS NewsHour on the same subject. According to him, Trump's hug "disgusted" Comey.[12] Wittes said Comey was not expecting a hug, adding "It was bad enough there was going to be a handshake."[11] According to Wittes, Comey had been "disgusted" with Trump's attempts to publicly ingratiate himself with Comey, which Comey saw as calculated attempts to compromise him by agitating Democrats. Wittes elaborated on this shortly thereafter in a post on Lawfare.[13][non-primary source needed]
The website has been criticized by attorney and journalist Glenn Greenwald. Writing in The New York Times he said it has a "courtier Beltway mentality" devoted to "serving, venerating and justifying the acts of those in power".[2]