Contents

Portal talk:Transport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the portal about Transport. Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the WikiProject Portals talk page. If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list.

This page was nominated for deletion on 7 November 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Transport Portal‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles Portal This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Portals

This page is a portal. Portals are within the scope of WikiProject Portals, a collaborative effort to improve portals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortalsWikipedia:WikiProject PortalsTemplate:WikiProject PortalsPortals articles ??? This portal has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.  ???  This portal has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. See also: List of Portals This portal is manually maintainedbyNorthamerica1000. Please contact these user(s) when you plan to make significant changes. This portal's subpages have been checked by an editor, and are needed. Please take care when editing, especially if using automated editing software, and seek consensus before making major changes. Learn how to update the maintenance information here. (June 2018)

Transport has had a portal peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this portal.

Automated portal content suggestions (purge) The following suggestions have been automatically generated as content that might be suitable for the portal, subject to review by a human editor. Please do not mindlessly copy items to the portal page without first checking that the suggestions are appropriate. Recent Did you know? items * ... that Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority general manager Phillip Eng brews his own beer? * ... that [[Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority]] general manager '''[[Phillip Eng]]''' brews his own beer? * ... that the Adly Mansour Transportation Hub was selected as the best rail project of 2022 by Engineering News-Record? * ... that the '''[[Adly Mansour Transportation Hub]]''' was selected as the best rail project of 2022 by ''[[Engineering News-Record]]''{{-?}} * ... that the F-16XL aircraft was built as a possible successor to the F-111 Aardvark, but after being rejected it served as part of NASA's High Speed Civil Transport project instead? * ... that the '''[[General Dynamics F-16XL|{{nowrap|F-16XL}}]]''' aircraft was built as a possible successor to the [[General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark|{{nowrap|F-111}} Aardvark]], but after being rejected it served as part of [[NASA]]'s [[High Speed Civil Transport]] project instead? * ... that a section of Mississippi Highway 489 was designated as the Jason Boyd Memorial Highway to commemorate the MDOT superintendent who was killed while removing debris from the road? * ... that a section of '''[[Mississippi Highway 489|Mississippi Highway 489]]''' was designated as the Jason Boyd Memorial Highway to commemorate the [[Mississippi Department of Transportation|MDOT]] superintendent who was killed while removing debris from the road? * ... that a guerrilla garden established atop an abandoned railroadinLong Island City became legally recognized by the MTA? * ... that a [[guerrilla gardening|guerrilla garden]] established atop '''[[Montauk Cutoff|an abandoned railroad]]''' in [[Long Island City]] became legally recognized by the [[Metropolitan Transportation Authority|MTA]]? * ... that William Rees Jeffreys was a cyclist who became the first secretary of the Road Board, the forerunner of the UK's Department for Transport? * ... that '''[[William Rees Jeffreys]]''' was a cyclist who became the first secretary of the Road Board, the forerunner of the UK's [[Department for Transport]]? Recent In the news items No recent news Featured, valued, and quality images (on Commons) Open a link, then click the "Do it" button. If there are results, you can click the "Thumbnails" button to preview all the images. Featured pictures for Transport with recent edits Valued images for Transport with recent edits Quality images for Transport with recent edits Articles Featured articles for Category:Transport promoted in 2024

What is the Wikipedia policy on tram, streetcar, bus, minibus, and lightrail stops? Is there a policy? How about articles like South Pier tram stop? Shall we have a Wikipedia article on every stop on six continents? Hu 22:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do I request one?

Nautical portal[edit]

I created a Nautical Portal. I was tempted to call it Marine Transport, but that would have semantically excluded military, research, fishing, and other types of special-purpose ships and boats. Cheers. Haus42 21:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All netherlands "nl:rijksweg" have a wrong headline in the english wikipedia. I.e. nl:rijksweg 9 is described in english Wipedia as A9 motorway (Netherlands). But a rijksweg is not a motorway.

• Rijksweg translates as national highway, a road maintained by the national government.
• The road's profile (ordinary road or motorway, level or split-level crossings, interchanges, number of lanes etc.) depends on the expected traffic density.
• Arijksweg with A-number is a motorway = nl:autosnelweg, a rijksweg with N-number is not a motorway = nl:autoweg.

I.e. the nl:rijksweg 9 is only partly a motorway (A-street) and partly a N-street. Thus the headline A9 motorway (Netherlands) in the English Wikipedia is not correct.

Compare nl:Provinciale weg:

• Provinciale weg translates as provincial highway, a road maintained by the provincial government.
• The road's profile (ordinary road or motorway, level or split-level crossings, interchanges, number of lanes etc.) depends on the expected traffic density.
• Aprovinciale weg with A-number is a motorway = nl:autosnelweg, a provinciale weg with N-number is not a motorway = nl:autoweg.

Thus all motorway (netherlands) could be renamed. Because I am not a native english speaker and my English is not good enough for editing articles, I cannot do this. I do not know which correct names can be used for this in english. Possibly i.e. the A9 motorway (Netherlands) should be simply called Rijksweg 9 (Netherlands), similar i.e. to the german Bundesautobahn 1, which is not called A1 motorway (germany). For all other languages of wikipedia it is important that the netherlands system is described correct here, because they translate it from here. And because it is wrong here, the translations are also wrong at the moment. Could someone of the nartives speakers help this situation?

Thank you. -- 84.132.101.93 09:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probalby a new name like Rijksweg 9 without the (Netherlands) would suffice. HenkvD 11:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. You can simply use the same titles as the Dutch Wikipedia. I see no reason not to use them. --Erwin85 18:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that sounds fine. On pages like A9 road, it could say "A9 in the Netherlands, part of Rijksweg 9, or A9 (Netherlands) redirects to Rijksweg 9. Just an easy way so I don't have to fumble through four or five pages to get to the article. Also you should do the same with N9 and all the others. --MPD ^{T / C} 23:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did something change in the process? Since none of the mentioned articles were changed? Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 00:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone object to me working on the neglected Portal:Rapid transit?--MrFish^{Go Fish} 20:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you would all be so kind as to review the issue being discussed at this article and weigh in with your opinion I would appreciate it. We'd like to incur a larger, more objective, unemotional share of input then what exists right now. Thank you very much for your time and we really appreciate it. 68.52.42.38 (talk) 04:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the early 19th century rich countries have drifted into an energy glut, which has had dramatic effects on our transport systems - so much so that many people believe "traffic = motor traffic". Walking and cycling still go on, and some policy makers actively encourage both, while others favour power-driven vehicles (most of which are much heavier than their payload and are designed to travel fast, so they consume far more energy than walking or cycling and also create a discouraging atmosphere for would-be walkers and cyclists).

Looking at the articles on Sustainable transport and on Utility cycling, I feel that the energy efficiency aspect (which will become more important in the future) has been underplayed. Would it be possible to add links to Walking and Utility cycling at the top of the Environmentally sustainable transport section? Would it be possible to insert a comparison of energy consumption between walking, straight cycling, power-assisted cycling, electric cars, petrol-driven cars and various forms of public transport (at real-life levels of ridership) somewhere?

I hesitate to simply wade in and start editing existing articles because the authors might well resent such intervention - but if I could collaborate with them on enhancing such articles, I'd be very pleased.

Incidentally, I'm a self-employed mobility consultant in Austria with quite some experience of the practical side of transport policy at the local and regional levels.

Agmobcons (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My gut feeling says that your suggestions are excellent and would be welcome additions to this portal. I should tell you that I am not one of the "involved" editors who maintain this portal and am here solely to upgrade any shortcuts to this portal that exist. I do like to check talk pages because sometimes they also have shortcuts, and I caught your message above. Please never hesitate to "simply wade in", because that's what Wikipedia's all about. For any edits that turn out to be either controversial or perhaps misunderstood by involved editors (those will probably be reverted), that is when discussion should ensue. Please read Wikipedia:Be bold and especially Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for more information. Joys! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 17:50, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add some information regarding emerging concepts, such as the "hyperloop" to the portal, is there an area for future designs that are being placed into production, or does this concept fit into a specific category already before-mentioned? Twillisjr (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked the German Wikipedia link (Deutsch) and was led to the Userpage of Wollex.

While I entered wikidata page, I discoverd a normal link to the correspondent Portal in German de:Portal:Transport_und_Verkehr.

I tried entering German Portal page from portal of other languages. The error doesn't exist.

Why could there be a normal link, but I can't go to the Portal in German from Portal in English?

Who know the key? Come fix it!

I just forgot to sign. 辛庚己戊 (talk) 07:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Portals is back!

The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.

As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.

There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals. So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.

Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.

And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.

From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   07:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This portal was updated and expanded, which was subsequently reverted by another user in the following edit: diff. The improvements included:

• Overhauled portal with modernized wiki markup using transclusion from articles to display content, which provides readers with current, up-to-date information.
• Article content from various portal subpages was moved directly into the portal using transclusions.
• New content was added, including Featured-class and Good-class articles.
• Additional updates, cleanup and layout changes had been performed.
• The articles added can be readily viewed in this version of the portal, and then selecting the Edit link (here). Then scroll down.
• Additional articles for the portal can be considered from those available in the table listed below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transport articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA		1	3	8		2	14
FL			1	2			3
A			1	1			2
GA		3	10	54		30	97
B	7	29	59	146		238	479
C	13	69	148	616		866	1,712
Start	5	71	260	1,660		1,860	3,856
Stub		11	63	1,042		1,372	2,488
List	2	2	21	102	4	155	286
Category				2	9,161		9,163
Disambig					96		96
File					75		75
Portal					58		58
Project			1		63		64
Template				1	436		437
NA		2	6	56	430		494
Other				3	106		109
Assessed	27	188	573	3,693	10,429	4,523	19,433
Unassessed				1		2,657	2,658
Total	27	188	573	3,694	10,429	7,180	22,091

• Below is a list of articles that were present using transclusions of articles directly on the main portal page, before the updates were reverted by another user four days later (diff). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the neutral point of view concerns that have been presented regarding this portal at its MfD discussion, I have removed most, but not entirely all of the U.S.-based entries from the portal (diff). Removing all of the U.S. based portals would conversely present a non-neutral point of view of intentionally avoiding all U.S. based topics. Per this, I have also removed some U.K-related articles, because after removing the U.S.-based articles to balance it out, the portal would have been slightly slanted toward U.K. related topics.

The portal would certainly now benefit from more additions to further round it out in relation to presenting additional transport-related articles from various areas of the world. I hesitate to add any new articles to it, because at this point, article selections should be discussed here on the talk page. Of course, now one could state that there are too many or not enough of one type or another type of topic present in the portal, such as it now having too many engine-related transport articles, as in articles involving transport regarding vehicles that use engines, not enough animal-powered transport articles, too many port-related and nautical-related articles, too many historical-related articles, too many articles that involve modern aspects of transport, not enough aviation-related articles, etc., and also vice-versa per these notions. Furthermore, it could be argued that some transport-related topics are presently not covered in the portal. So, if the portal is retained, I encourage talk page discussion to occur.

As I have stated at the MfD discussion, there was no intention of creating a non-neutral portal. Articles were added relative to WP:POG, where it states, "For the Selected article, Selected biography or other Selected content items, find a good number of articles, as many as you can, that could be showcased on the portal" that are "of high quality, either a featured article, a good article or one which deals with its subject substantially or comprehensively". While WP:POG is no longer a guideline page, many portals are still based upon it, and it is common sense to use high-quality articles in portals. However, I certainly understand that article selections in portals should not favor one geographic area over another, and that elements of systemic bias that may exist in various areas of English Wikipedia should not be reflected in portals.

The following is a list of articles that are presently being used in the portal as transclusions after the above edit occurred on 13 November 2019 (UTC)

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
• Telegraph Road Bridge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion

Subject to some important structural engineering technology and studies. See the sources in the article. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:16, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following updates have been performed to the Transport portal in 2020. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Added the following FA-class articles to the Selected article (SA) section:

• Tunnel Railway, Pioneer Zephyr, Manila Light Rail Transit System, Pulaski Skyway, O-Bahn Busway, Hellingly Hospital Railway, Kansas Turnpike, Talyllyn Railway, Hours of service.

• Added the following B-class articles to the SA section:

• Rail transport in India, SkyTrain (Vancouver), Pan American World Airways, Isambard Kingdom Brunel

• Added the FL-class article: List of locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal.
• Added List of longest suspension bridge spans, a former featured list article that is nevertheless extensive, comprehensive and thorough.
• Added the following GA-class articles to the SA section:

• Royal Road, San Francisco tech bus protests, Ben Carlin, Bristol Harbour, Ice block expedition of 1959, Joseph Hazelwood, Port of Constanța, Pony Express, Trade route, Finnieston Crane

Hello, I have uploaded loads of photos, maybe they will be usable somewhere on Wiki?

https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedista:Penguin9/Moje_fotogalerie_MHD

--Penguin9 (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Penguin9: Check out Portal:Transport/Tram media and Portal:Transport/Bus media, where some of these images are now being used for this portal. Thanks very much! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Great, it is honor for me! Penguin9 (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]