|
|
Requesting admin action, comment (using spihelper.js)
|
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===09 October 2021=== |
===09 October 2021=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|admin}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
* {{checkuser|1=Mangobdwiki}} |
* {{checkuser|1=Mangobdwiki}} |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*I also note {{noping|SanzidWi}} (see [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BalPakna2021]]) appears in these ranges... fun. ~[[User:TheresNoTime|TNT]] (she/her • [[User talk:TheresNoTime|talk]]) 23:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC) |
*I also note {{noping|SanzidWi}} (see [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BalPakna2021]]) appears in these ranges... fun. ~[[User:TheresNoTime|TNT]] (she/her • [[User talk:TheresNoTime|talk]]) 23:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
*{{awaitingadmin}} - some of the confirmed socks were also promoting Arfius Al-Din [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kathbirali&diff=prev&oldid=1049037151][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Arfius63], so I think Arfius63 is related. Please indef the sock. Thanks, [[User:Spicy|Spicy]] ([[User talk:Spicy|talk]]) 23:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
===10 October 2021=== |
===10 October 2021=== |
||
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gazakhordarsonik/Archive.
– An SPI clerk has requested administrator assistance for action regarding the case below. The requested action is below.
The junior account has made six edits, all of which are to Draft:Al-Mamun Al Siyam, which was declined. The senior account, which started editing in August 2021, then created the exact same biography in article space as Al-Mamun Al Siyam. If this is not sockpuppetry, then it may be UPE or some sort of meatpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
In progress - ~TNT (she/her • talk) 23:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed to:
Likely to:
Blocked and tagged, please review Arfius63.
Awaiting administrative action - some of the confirmed socks were also promoting Arfius Al-Din [1][2], so I think Arfius63 is related. Please indef the sock. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
– This SPI case is open.
Aside from the absurd similarity in names, this sock has removed a G5 tag from a creation of the master. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Please also check this user. They're adding links to Arfius Al-din which previous socks [3] have also done. Ravensfire (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
