This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
The following is added as a remedy to the Antisemitism in Poland arbitration case: 7) 500/30 restriction: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This prohibition may be enforced preemptively by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP), or by other methods such as reverts, pending changes protection, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 rule are not considered edit warring.
Passed 6 to 0 by motion at 19:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
For the arbitration committee, Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 20:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee has opened the anti-harassment RfC, and invites discussion from interested editors. Maxim(talk) 13:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Due to recent misuse of multiple accounts, Therapyisgood (talk · contribs) is indefinitely restricted to editing with one account.
Support: Joe Roe, Maxim, SoWhy, Casliber, Bradv, Beeblebrox
Oppose:
Recuse:
For the Arbitration Committee, – Joe (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
In April, the Arbitration Committee privately warned Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) that his use of the CheckUser tool had been contrary to local and global policies prohibiting checking accounts where there is insufficient evidence to suspect abusive sockpuppetry ("fishing"). The committee additionally imposed specific restrictions on Bbb23's use of the CheckUser tool in ambiguous cases otherwise considered to be within the discretion of individual CheckUsers. Bbb23 has subsequently communicated to the committee that he is unwilling to comply with these restrictions, continued to run similar questionable checks, and refused to explain these checks on request. Accordingly, Bbb23's CheckUser access is revoked.
For the Arbitration Committee, – Joe (talk) 06:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
