Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Etymology  





2 In the Bible  



2.1  Usage  





2.2  Ritual impurity  



2.2.1  Activities which create impurity  





2.2.2  Implications of impure status  





2.2.3  Purification  







2.3  Moral impurity  



2.3.1  In EzraNehemiah  









3 In rabbinic literature  



3.1  Mandatory or optional  





3.2  Hierarchy of impurity  





3.3  Impurity of scrolls  





3.4  In modern times  







4 See also  





5 References  





6 Further reading  





7 External links  














Tumah and taharah






فارسی
Italiano
עברית
مصرى
Русский
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

(Redirected from Tamei)

InJewish religious law, ṭum'ah (Hebrew: טומאה, pronounced [tumʔa]) and ṭaharah (Hebrew: טהרה, pronounced [taharɔ]) are the state of being ritually "impure" and "pure", respectively.[1][2] The Hebrew noun ṭum'ah, meaning "impurity", describes a state of ritual impurity. A person or object which contracts ṭum'ah is said to be ṭamé (טמא‎ Hebrew adjective, "ritually impure"), and thereby unsuited for certain holy activities and uses (kedushah, קְדֻשָּׁה‎‎ in Hebrew) until undergoing predefined purification actions that usually include the elapse of a specified time-period.

The contrasting Hebrew noun ṭaharah (טָהֳרָה‎) describes a state of ritual purity that qualifies the ṭahor (טָהוֹר‎; ritually pure person or object) to be used for kedushah. The most common method of achieving ṭaharah is by the person or object being immersed in a mikveh (ritual bath). This concept is connected with ritual washing in Judaism, and both ritually impure and ritually pure states have parallels in ritual purification in other world religions.

The laws of ṭum'ah and ṭaharah were generally followed by the Israelites, particularly during the First and Second Temple Period,[citation needed] and to a limited extent are a part of applicable halakha in modern times.

Etymology[edit]

The Hebrew noun ṭum'ah (טֻמְאָה‎) derives from the verb ṭamé (טָמֵא‎), in the qal form of the verb "to become impure"; in the niphal to "defile oneself"; and in the transitive Piel to defile something or pronounce something impure.[3] The verb stem has a corresponding adjective, ṭamé (טָמֵא), "impure".

Likewise the Hebrew noun ṭahara (טָהֳרָה‎) is also derived from a verb, in this case ṭaher (טָהֵר‎) "to be ritually pure". and in the transitive piel "to purify". The verb and noun have a corresponding adjective, ṭahor (טָהוֹר‎), "ritually pure". The word is a cognate to the Arabic word 'طهارة' ṭahāra(h) (pronounced almost identically, with the elongation of the second 'a') which has the same meaning in Islam.

Some sources, such as Samson Raphael Hirsch on Genesis 7:2, claim that the meaning is "entombed", meaning the person or item that is in the tame state is blocked, and not in a state of receiving holy transmission. Ṭahor, by contrast, is defined as "pure" in the sense that the person or object is in a clear state and can/may potentially serve as a conduit for Divine and Godly manifestation. Although ṭum'ah and ṭaharah is sometimes translated as unclean and clean, it is more a spiritual state than a physical one. Once initiated (for the physical signs that initiate tzaraath, zav and niddah, see below) it is generally immeasurable and unquantifiable by known mechanical detection methods, there is no measure of filth, unsanitary, or odorous affiliation with the state of ṭum'ah, nor any mechanically measurable level of cleanliness, clarity, or physical purity for the state of ṭaharah.

In the Bible[edit]

Usage[edit]

The noun form of ṭum'ah is used around 40 times in the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible is generally translated as "uncleanness" in English language Bibles such as the KJV, and JPS Tanakh.[4] The majority of uses are in Leviticus. Though uses for national impurity occur in Ezra and Ezekiel, and Zechariah prophesies the removal of the "prophets and spirit of impurity (רוּחַ הַטֻּמְאָה‎) from the land",[5] the adjective tamei (טָמֵא‎, "impure") is much more common.

The verb form of ṭaharah (טָהֳרָה‎), the verb ṭaher (טָהֵר‎) "be pure", is used first in the Hebrew Bible is in Genesis 35:2, where Jacob tells his family to "put away strange gods, and be pure".

In general, the term tum'ah is used in two distinct ways in the Hebrew Bible:[6][7]

In general, tum'ah in the sense of "ritual impurity" is prefixed by the letter lamed or lacks any prefix at all, while tum'ah in the sense of "moral impurity" is prefixed by the letter bet.[6]

Ritual impurity[edit]

Activities which create impurity[edit]

The Torah, particularly the book of Leviticus, lists various activities which create an "impure" (tamei) status:

Some of these activities are forbidden (i.e. eating non-kosher meat),[21] others are permitted (i.e. sex between a married couple),[22] and others are unavoidable (i.e. if a person dies suddenly while other people are in the house). Thus, there is no automatic moral stigma to becoming "impure"; impurity "comes to everyone universally and without exception by virtue of biological existence".[23]

Implications of impure status[edit]

Certain activities are prohibited as a result of acquiring this "impure" status. For example:

Just as it is a severe offense to bring impurity into the Israelite sanctuary, "impurity" is also seen as a means of nullifying a worship site of other religions;[28] though the rules for this impurity are not made clear.

Purification[edit]

Different forms of impurity requires various rituals in order to regain a "pure" (tahor) status. For example:

Moral impurity[edit]

The term tumah is also used to refer to certain sins, for which there is no specific ritual to remove the impure status. For example:

In a number of cases, no specific sin is mentioned; overall sinful behavior has led to impurity.[38]

In Ezra–Nehemiah[edit]

Christine Hayes argues that moral impurity is the reason for the gentile expulsion and alienation that occurs in Ezra–Nehemiah.[39] However, S.M. Olyan argues that this expulsion was inspired by earlier biblical traditions regarding both ritual and moral impurity.[40]

In rabbinic literature[edit]

The Mishnah devotes one of its six sub-divisions, named Tohorot ("purities"), to the laws of ritual impurity.

Neither the Babylonian nor the Jerusalem Talmud contains systematic commentaries to the tractates of Tohorot (except for Niddah which is an integral part of Babylonian and Jerusalem Talmud as well), as these laws had little practical relevance after the destruction of the Temple. However, the laws are discussed many times in other tractates, and in later rabbinic literature.

Maimonides clarifies that, in addition to all of Israel, the priests are expected to be knowledgeable and fluent in the general and specifics of ṭumah and ṭaharah law. Given his role of Temple service and year round consumption of terumah, each priest was required to be in a ṭahor state.[41]

Mandatory or optional[edit]

The mainstream view among rishonim[42] and non-Kabbalistic authorities[43] is that one is permitted to become tamei (except on those occasions when one must visit the Temple, or touch holy objects), and thus there is no obligation to attempt to remain tahor.[44] As an example, it is not only permitted but a mitzvah to tend to a dead person, even though this causes impurity.

A niddah hut (Mergem Gogo) at the Jewish village of Ambober in northern Ethiopia, 1976.

However, some rabbis have advocated keeping some of the laws of purity even in the absence of the temple in Jerusalem and even in the diaspora.[45]

One category that was commonly kept in Talmudic and pre-Talmudic times is ṭumath ochlin v'mashkin (consuming food and drink that did not become ṭamei).[46] Sages such as Rabban Gamaliel[47] and Hiyya the Great[48] encouraged eating only pure food at all times. Targum Yonathan considered this to be implicit in Exodus 22:30.[49] One who kept this stringency was called a porush, meaning "separated" (from ṭumah).[50] This was also one of the criteria for being a haver (a "friend" or "fellow" with whom the rabbis could eat without risk of violating purity laws),[51] and according to some, the main criterion.[52]

Additionally, some rabbis advocated abstaining from the midras of a niddah.[53] Rabbi Menachem Schneerson discouraged abstaining from any object made impure by a menstruating woman in modern times, with the exception for unique individuals.[54]

Hierarchy of impurity[edit]

The rabbis describe a hierarchy of levels of impurity. In general, each level can result from touch by the level above it. The levels are:

Impurity of scrolls[edit]

The rabbis declared Torah scrolls to be impure by rabbinic law. This seemingly strange law had a practical purpose: it discouraged Jews from storing their terumah produce alongside Torah scrolls, which attracted mice and caused the Torah scrolls to be nibbled on as well.[59]

In modern times[edit]

Following the destruction of the Second Temple, ritual impurity status ceased to have practical consequences, with the exception of niddah and zav/zavah, and rules forbidding making a Kohen impure. These rules are still practiced in Orthodox Judaism.

InConservative Judaism, while the concept of niddah and a prohibition on sexual relations during the niddah period (including childbirth) are still agreed upon, recent decisions by the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards have endorsed multiple views about the concept of zavah, as well as the tumah status of a niddah. The liberal view held that the concepts of ṭumah and ṭaharah are not relevant outside the context of a Holy Temple (as distinct from a synagogue; hence a niddah cannot convey ṭumah today), found the concept of zavah no longer applicable, and permitted spouses to touch each other in a manner similar to siblings during the niddah period (while retaining a prohibition on sexual conduct). The traditional view retained the applicability of the concepts of tumah, ṭaharah, and zavah, and retained a prohibition on all contact.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Martin S. Jaffee Early Judaism: religious worlds of the first Judaic millennium 2006 - 277 "For the conceptual background of rabbinic conceptions of cleanliness and uncleanliness, including the relation of these concepts to moral conditions"
  • ^ The Talmud of Babylonia: An American Translation IV: Pesahim ed. Jacob Neusner - 1993 "P. If the Israelites were half clean and half unclean, these prepare the offering by themselves, ... Kahuna's ruling: R. Lo, if half of the Israelites were clean and half unclean, the clean ones observe the first Passover and the"
  • ^ Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew Lexicon article ṭa'ama
  • ^ Johnson M. Kimuhu Leviticus: The Priestly Laws and Prohibitions from the Perspective of Ancient Near East and Africa. 2008 Vol. 115 - Page 352 citing Helmer Ringgren in Bolterweck Theological Dictionary of the OT
  • ^ Michael Katz (Rabbi), Gershon Schwartz Searching for meaning in Midrash: lessons for everyday living 2002 Page 166 "This spirit is the spirit of impurity, as it is written, 'And I will also make the "prophets" and the unclean spirit vanish from the land' (Zechariah 13:2). Water of purification is sprinkled upon him, and it flees."
  • ^ a b c Malbim, HaTorah VeHaMitzvah, commentary on Vayikra 11:43, Vayikra 5:2-3
  • ^ David Tzvi Hoffman, introduction to Leviticus 11 (R. David Zvi Hoffmann, Leviticus 11:1); his term for "moral impurity" is טומאת הקדושות‎.
  • ^ Numbers 19:11, 19:16
  • ^ Leviticus 5:13, Numbers 19:22, Haggai 2:13
  • ^ Leviticus 11:24–40
  • ^ Leviticus 11:29–30
  • ^ Leviticus 11:32–33
  • ^ Leviticus 12:2–5
  • ^ Leviticus 13
  • ^ Leviticus 14:36–47
  • ^ Leviticus 15
  • ^ Leviticus 15:16–17
  • ^ Leviticus 17:15
  • ^ Numbers 19:7,10,21
  • ^ Numbers 19:14
  • ^ Leviticus 11:8
  • ^ Leviticus 15:16, Deuteronomy 24:1
  • ^ Mary Douglas, "Atonement in Leviticus", Jewish Studies Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 2 (1993/94), p.114
  • ^ Exodus 19:15
  • ^ Leviticus 13:46, Numbers 5:2–3
  • ^ Numbers 18:11,13
  • ^ Numbers 19:13,20
  • ^ 2 Kings 23:8,10,13; Isaiah 30:22; 2 Chronicles 34:5
  • ^ Leviticus 15:16
  • ^ Leviticus 14:9
  • ^ Numbers 19
  • ^ Genesis 34:5,13,27; Leviticus 18; Numbers 5; Deuteronomy 24:4; Ezekiel 8:6,18:11,22:11,33:26
  • ^ Leviticus 19:31
  • ^ Leviticus 20:2
  • ^ Numbers 35:34
  • ^ Deuteronomy 21:23
  • ^ Jeremiah 2:23, 7:30, 32:34; Ezekiel 20:18
  • ^ For example Ezekiel 14:11, 36:17, Hosea 6:10, Psalms 106:39
  • ^ Hayes, C. (1999). Intermarriage and impurity in ancient Jewish sources. Harvard Theological Review, 92(01), 11.
  • ^ Olyan, S. M. (2004). Purity ideology in Ezra-Nehemiah as a tool to reconstitute the community. Journal for the Study of Judaism, 35(1), 1-16.
  • ^ Maimonides, end of introduction to Seder Taharoth
  • ^ R' Aharon Lichtenstein, Taharot: Basic concepts (1). Full text: בשורה התחתונה, הדעה הרווחת בראשונים היא שאין איסור להיטמא, ולא חובה להיטהר, כל עוד לא נמצאים במגע עם עולם של מקדש וקדשיו.
  • ^ Martin L. Gordon, Netilat yadayim shel shaharit: Ritual of crisis or dedication? Gesher: Yeshiva University Journal of Jewish Studies, v.8 p.36-72 (1981); see p.39 and footnotes 35-36
  • ^ Mishneh Torah, Tumat Ochlin 16:8-9; Sefer Hamitzvot, Mitzvat Aseh 109; Ramban, commentary to Leviticus 11:33
  • ^ Maimonides Chap. 13 of Tractate Nega'im. Meir Leibush ben Yehiel Michal, to Sifra on Leviticus 22:3 minor Chap. 66. b
  • ^ Sefer ha-Chinuch chap. 160
  • ^ Tosefta, Hagigah 3:3 - רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל הָיָה אוֹכֵל עַל טַהֲרַת חֻלִּין כָּל יָמָיו
  • ^ Jerusalem Talmud, Shabbat 1:3 page 8b: "רבי חייא רובא מפקד לרב: אין את יכול מיכול כל שתא חולין בטהרה אכול. ואם לאו תהא אכילת שבעה יומין מן שתא."
  • ^ Targum Yonathan to Exodus 22:30 translated "You shall be holy men to me" as "You shall be holy men, tasting non-Temple food in purity, to me".
  • ^ Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Tumat Ochlin 16:12
  • ^ Tosefta, Damai 2:2 - המקבל עליו ארבעה דברים מקבלין אותו להיות חבר שלא ליתן תרומות ומעשרות לעם הארץ ושלא יעשה טהרות אצל עם הארץ ושיהא אוכל חולין בטהרה.
  • ^ Encyclopedia Talmudit: Haver
  • ^ Isaiah Horowitz vol. 1 p. 452; Menachem Recanati Pithkei Harakanti Chap. 586; Isaac Alfasi Teshuvath HaRif Chapter 297
  • ^ Menachem Mendel Schneerson Igrot Kodesh vol. 3 p. 374
  • ^ Maimonides, commentary to the Mishnah, introduction to Taharot; see also Mishnah Kelim 1:1-4, Maimonides, Mishneh Torah Hilchot Avot HaTuma'ot 6:12
  • ^ Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Avot HaTuma'ot 8:2
  • ^ Mishneh Torah Hilchot Shear Avot Hatumot 11:4
  • ^ Pesachim 18
  • ^ Shabbat 14a
  • Further reading[edit]

    External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tumah_and_taharah&oldid=1219352246"

    Categories: 
    Jewish ritual purity law
    Hebrew words and phrases in Jewish law
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles containing Hebrew-language text
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Pages with Hebrew IPA
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from March 2012
     



    This page was last edited on 17 April 2024, at 06:56 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki