Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Etymology  





2 History  



2.1  Origins  





2.2  16th century onwards  





2.3  British suppression  







3 Thuggee's belief  



3.1  Sects  







4 Historical evaluations  



4.1  Modern skepticism  







5 In popular culture  





6 See also  





7 References  





8 Bibliography  





9 External links  














Thuggee







Català
Čeština
Dansk
Deutsch
Español
Euskara
Français
Galego

Հայերեն
Italiano

Lietuvių
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands


پنجابی
Polski
Português
Русский
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
ி


Türkçe
Українська
اردو
Tiếng Vit

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

(Redirected from Thugee)

Thuggee
Group of Thugs around 1894
Foundedunknown, possibly early 1300s[1]
Named afterSanskrit word for concealment
Founding locationCentral India and Bengal
Years activec. 14th century – late 19th century
TerritoryIndian subcontinent
MembershipUnknown
ActivitiesMurder, robbery
RivalsBritish Raj, merchants

Thuggee (UK: /θʌˈɡ/, US: /ˈθʌɡi/) was historical organised gangs of professional robbers and murderers in India. Thugs were said to have travelled in groups across the Indian subcontinent.[2]

They usually murdered their victims with strangling using a handkerchief as a tool.[3] The Thuggee was believed to practice their killings as a form of the worships toward the goddess Kali.[4] For centuries, the authorities of Indian subcontinent such as the Khalji dynasty.[5] the Mughal Empire,[1] and the British Raj has attemped to curtail the criminal activities of the Thuggees during their rules.[6]

Contemporary scholarship is increasingly skeptical of the thuggee concept, and has questioned the existence of such a phenomenon,[7][8] which has led many historians to describe thuggee as the invention of the British colonial regime.[9]

Etymology[edit]

ठग (Thuggee), translated from Hindi as 'swindler' or 'deceiver'. It is related with the verb thugna ('to deceive'), from the Sanskrit स्थग (sthaga 'cunning, sly, fraudulent') and स्थगति (sthagati, 'he conceals').[10] This term, describing the murder and robbery of travellers, was popular in the northern parts of the Indian subcontinent, especially the northern and eastern regions of India.[2] The English word thug was derived its roots the term of Thuggee.[11]

The Thuggee reportedly operated as gangs of highwayman who tricked and murdered their victims by strangling. To take advantage of their victims, the thugs would join travellers and gain their confidence, which would allow them to surprise and strangle the travellers with a handkerchief or noose.[3] They would then rob and bury the corpse of their victims.[12] This led to the thugs being called Phansigar ("using a noose"), a term more commonly used in southern India.[13]

Datura metel 'Fastuosa' (Hindi: काला धतूरा kāla dhatūra – "black datura"), the deliriant herb sometimes used by the Thugs to stupefy their victims.

Although strangulation is one of their most-recognised methods of murder, they also used blades and poison[14] The Thuggee gangs usually commence their act in evening,[15] and attacked travellers whose numbers smaller than their groups to avoid unnecessary losses.[16] To avoid suspicion, they avoided carrying more than a few swords.[15] The poisonous ingredients which prepared by the Thuggee were consisted of Datura metel, the Indian thornapple, (family Solanaceae), a poisonous plant sacred to Shiva[17][18] with powerful deliriant properties, were sometimes used by thugs to induce drowsiness or stupefaction, making strangulation easier.[19] The Hindi name for the plant धतूरा (dhatūra) is derived from the Sanskrit and was adapted by Linnaeus into the Latinate genus name Datura.[20][21]

When they have determined their target, they often pretended to be either Hindu or Muslim to deceive their victims.[22] The Thuggees also acted friendly to their potential targets and accompany them for while to assess the wealth their targets might have.[16] As the Thuggee who acted friendly managed to distract their victims by engaging them in conversation, the other members who tasked with the killing would strangle them swiftly from behind.[15] Many of them avoided committing the robberies near the areas in which they lived, which causing them to easily escape repercussion of their crimes.[16] After they commit the murder, sometimes they mutilated the corpses of their victims to hid the trace of the murdery,[23] and buried the remains.[24]

A leader of a Thuggee was called jemadar.[25] This was derived from military-style ranks such as jemadar and subedar among Thugs as well as reference to individual members as a "private", suggests that the organisation of their gangs had a military link.[26] They used a jargon known as Ramasee to disguise their true intentions from their targets.[23]

The Thuggee members comprised some who had inherited Thuggee as a family vocation, and others who were forced to turn to it out of necessity.[27] The leadership of many of the groups tended to be hereditary with family members sometimes serving together in the same band. Such thugs were known as aseel.[28] According to a Thuggee testimony, a young initiate who joined the group was usually trained by senior experienced Thuggee member who held the title of guru.[29] While they usually kept their acts a secret, female thugs also existed and were called baronee in Ramasee, while an important male Thuggee was called baroo.[30]

The Thuggee usually avoid killing children of the victims and instead adopted them.[31] However, sometimes the also resorted to also kill the women and children to eliminate witnesses or in case they had substantial plunder.[32] Some of the thugs avoided murdering victims they considered proscribed according to their beliefs and let other unscrupulous members commit the murder or were forced to let them by those who did not believe in their customs like the Muslim thugs.[33]

History[edit]

See caption
Watercolour (1837) by unknown artist of three Thugs strangling a traveller; one holds his feet, another his hands and a third tightens the ligature around his neck. Created in Lucknow, based on descriptions from imprisoned Thuggee leaders (Dash, 2005)

Origins[edit]

There were numerous traditions about their origin;

16th century onwards[edit]

Group of Thugs (From a Photograph)

In the 16th century Surdas, in his allegorical couplet, mentioned robbers called "thags" who would lure victims into their clutches to kill them and steal their property. Ibn Battuta, on his way to Calicut from Delhi as an envoy to China, was attacked by bandits, who probably were thugs.[42] The Janamsakhis used the term thag to refer to a robber who used to lure pilgrims. Jean de Thévenot in his 1665 account referred to a band of robbers who used a "certain Slip with a running noose" to strangle their victims. John Fryer also mentions a similar method of strangling used by robbers from Surat whom he saw being given capital punishment by the Mughals in 1675. He mentioned that three of them were relatives, which Kim A. Wagner notices is similar to the Thugs who were thought to have engaged in this as a family profession. A decree issued by Aurangzeb in 1672 refers to a similar method and uses the term "Phansigar".[43]

The garrote is often depicted as a weapon of the Thuggee.[44][45] Other evidences suggest that the katar (dagger) was their personal status weapon, the Thuggee wore this weapon proudly across their chest. Early references to Thugs reported they committed their strangulation murders with nooses of rope or catgut, but later they adopted the use of a length of cloth that could be used as a sash or scarf, and thus more easily concealed.[19] This cloth is sometimes described as a rumāl (head covering or kerchief), translated as "yellow scarf"; "yellow", in this case, may refer to a natural cream or khaki colour rather than bright yellow.

See caption
Sketch by the same artist of a group of Thugs stabbing the eyes of murdered travellers before throwing the bodies into a well.

The Thuggee;s preference for strangulation method was due to tak advantage of the loopholes of the civil law which persisted from the times of the Mughal Empire, which ruled most of India from the 1500s.[19] For a murderer to be sentenced to death, he or she must have shed the blood of their victim. Those who murdered but did not shed blood might face imprisonment, hard labor and paying a penalty—but they would not risk execution.[citation needed]

The "River Thugs" preyed upon people including Hindu pilgrims travelling using the Ganga river and became mostly active during the winter like their compatriots from Murnae, Bundelkhand and Awadh. Their dialect of Ramasee differed from the one used by their compatriots on land and used boats taken on lease from their builders or from a jemadar called Khuruck Baboo. Sleeman states that they tapped three times to give the signal to murder which they always committed during the day. To avoid detection of a corpse, they broke its back and threw it in the river to be eaten by crocodiles and only robbed money or jewels.[46]

British suppression[edit]

The British found out about them in Southern India for the first time in 1807, while in Northern India they were discovered in 1809 with an effort to suppress them being carried out from 1809 to 1812.[47]

Portrait of a middle-aged man in uniform
William Henry Sleeman, superintendent of the Thuggee and Dacoity Department

After a dispute developed between the Zamindar official named Tejun with a Thuggee named Ghasee Ram in 1812, the latter took refuge with his family under another landlord called Laljee. Tejun in turn revealed the thugs of Sindouse to Nathaniel Halhed.[48] Thomas Perry, the magistrate of Etawah, assembled some soldiers of the East India Company under the command of Halheld in 1812 to suppress the Thugs.[49] Laljee and his forces including over 100 Thugs were defeated, with the village of Murnae, a headquarter of the Thugs, destroyed and burnt by the Company soldiers.[50] Laljee fled to Rampura and the southern banks of Sindh River but was caught by the Marathas who turned him over to the company.[51][52]

British authorities had occasionally captured and prosecuted Thugs, circulating information about these cases in newsletters or the journal Asiatick ResearchesofThe Asiatic Society. However, Sleeman seems to have been the first to realize that information obtained from one group of stranglers might be used to track and identify other thugs in a different district. His first major breakthrough was the capture of "Feringhea" (also known as Syeed Amir Ali, Khuda Buksh, Deahuct Undun and Daviga Persaud[3]), who was persuaded to turn King's evidence. (Feringhea's story was the basis of the successful 1839 novel Confessions of a Thug). Feringhea brought Sleeman to a mass grave with a hundred bodies, told him the circumstances of the murders and named the Thugs who had committed them.[53]

After initial investigations confirmed what Feringhea had said, Sleeman began an extensive campaign using profiling and intelligence. Sleeman was made superintendent of the Thuggee and Dacoity Department in 1835, an organ of the Indian government first established by the East India Company in 1830.[54] (Dacoity referred to organised banditry, distinguished from thugs most notably by its open practice and due to the fact that murder was not an intrinsic element of their modus operandi.) Sleeman developed elaborate intelligence techniques that pre-dated similar methods in Europe and the US by decades.[19] During the 1830s, the thugs were targeted for eradication by the Governor-General of India, Lord William Bentinck, and his chief captain, William Henry Sleeman.[citation needed]

Records were made in which the accused were given prisoner numbers, against which their names, residences, fellow thugs, and the criminal acts for which they were blamed were also noted. Many thugs' names were similar; they often lacked surnames since the Thuggee naming convention was to use the names of their tribes, castes and job assignments in the gangs. Accurate recording was also difficult because the thugs adopted many aliases, with both Muslim and Hindu thugs often posing as members of the other religion. By the testimony from a Thuggee named Ghulam Hussain, Hindu and Muslim Thuggees avoided eating together, such was not the case for drinking and smoking.[22][3]

The campaign relied heavily on captured thugs who became informants. These informants were offered protection on the condition that they told everything that they knew. According to historian Mike Dash, who used documents in the UK archives, suspects were subject to bench trials before British judges. Though the trials were lacking by later standards (e.g., suspects were not allowed legal representation), they were conducted with care to protocols of the time. While most suspects were convicted, Dash notes that the courts genuinely seemed interested in finding the truth and rejected a minority of allegations due to mistaken identity or insufficient evidence. Even by later standards, Dash argues, the evidence of guilt for many thugs was often overwhelming.[19] Because they used boats and disposed of their victims in rivers,[55] the "River Thugs" were able to evade the British authorities for some time after their compatriots on land were suppressed. They were ultimately betrayed to the authorities by one of their compatriots, from Awadh. Forces under Sleeman's command hunted them down in 1836.[56]

In 1870s the Thuggee group was though to be extincted. However, the history of Thuggee led to the Criminal Tribes Act (CTA) of 1871. Although the CTA was repealed at Indian independence in 1947, tribes considered criminal still exist in India.[57][58] The Thuggee and Dacoity Department remained in existence until 1904, when it was replaced by the Central Criminal Intelligence Department (CID).[12]

InFollowing the Equator, Mark Twain wrote about an 1839 government report by William Henry Sleeman:[53]

There is one very striking thing which I wish to call attention to. You have surmised from the listed callings followed by the victims of the Thugs that nobody could travel the Indian roads unprotected and live to get through; that the Thugs respected no quality, no vocation, no religion, nobody; that they killed every unarmed man that came in their way. That is wholly true—with one reservation. In all the long file of Thug confessions an English traveller is mentioned but once—and this is what the Thug says of the circumstance:

"He was on his way from MhowtoBombay. We studiously avoided him. He proceeded next morning with a number of travellers who had sought his protection, and they took the road to Baroda."

We do not know who he was; he flits across the page of this rusty old book and disappears in the obscurity beyond; but he is an impressive figure, moving through that valley of death serene and unafraid, clothed in the might of the English name.

We have now followed the big official book through, and we understand what Thuggee was, what a bloody terror it was, what a desolating scourge it was. In 1830 the English found this cancerous organization embedded in the vitals of the empire, doing its devastating work in secrecy, and assisted, protected, sheltered, and hidden by innumerable confederates—big and little native chiefs, customs officers, village officials, and native police, all ready to lie for it, and the mass of the people, through fear, persistently pretending to know nothing about its doings; and this condition of things had existed for generations, and was formidable with the sanctions of age and old custom. If ever there was an unpromising task, if ever there was a hopeless task in the world, surely it was offered here—the task of conquering Thuggee. But that little handful of English officials in India set their sturdy and confident grip upon it, and ripped it out, root and branch! How modest do Captain Vallancey's words sound now, when we read them again, knowing what we know:

"The day that sees this far-spread evil completely eradicated from India, and known only in name, will greatly tend to immortalise British rule in the East."

It would be hard to word a claim more modestly than that for this most noble work.

— Chapter xlvi, conclusion

Thuggee's belief[edit]

Drawing of two men worshiping before a statue
The Thugs Worshiping Kalee, around 1850[59]

Thugs considered themselves to be the children of Kali, having been created from her sweat.[60] However, many of the Thugs who were captured and convicted by the British were Muslims,[61] perhaps up to a third.[19]

According to colonial sources, Thugs believed that they played a positive role in saving human lives. Without the Thugs' sacred service, Kali might destroy all mankind:

The Muslim thugs, while retaining their monotheistic faith, had functionalised Bhavani for Thuggee and she was syncretised as a spirit subordinate to Allah. A Muslim Thuggee caught by Sleeman stated "In my heart, I take the name of God, when I strangle a man – saying "God thou are King!" "Alla, toomee Malik!" I do not pray to Bhowanee, but I worship her." Other Muslim thugs who had agreed to testify for Sleeman, stated they had assimilated Bhavani and started the practice of thuggee.[63]

However, historian Mike Dash stated that the Thuggee had no religious motivation in their murderous conduct. When religious elements were present among Thugs, their beliefs, in principle, were little different from the religious beliefs of many others who lived on the Indian subcontinent and attributed their success or failure to supernatural powers: "Indeed all of the Thugs's legends which concerned the goddess Kali featured exactly the cautionary notes which are typically found in folklore."[19]

Kim Wagner asserts that we can analyse their traditions about events after their flight from Delhi "to a much greater advantage". A tradition which was recounted by a captive stated that Thuggee had originally tried to settle in Agra and they later settled in Akoopore in the Doab region. However, they had to flee to Himmutpur and later they fled to Parihara after their kings started demanding a larger share of the plunder. In turn the original Muslim and Kayastha Thugs helped spread Thuggee amongst other groups like the Brahmins, Rajputs, other Hindus, the Lodhi people and the Ahir people.[37]

The Thugge generally consider that it was forbidden to kill women, fakirs, ascetics, bards, musicians and dancers.[64] Like the ancient Hindu texts which distinguished robbery from the murder of Brahmins, women or children as violent crimes, many thugs considered it taboo to kill people who belonged to such categories.[65] Those who worked in lowly professions, the diseased and disabled were also forbidden as victims based on their folk belief.[66] The Thuggee cults believed that breaking these rules would incur Divine retribution.[67]

Sects[edit]

Two drawings of an older, bearded man
Guru Multhoo Byragee Jogee, a native of Ajmere aged 90, in jail (1840)
Sketch of three standing men, of different ages
Murdan Khan and gang from Lucknow (1840)

The East India Company officers since the time of Thomas Perry, who was appointed to Etawah in 1811, came to understand that there were many Thuggee groups and they all viewed themselves to be different from the other groups.[68]

The Thuggee sects often formed their group based on their native hometown, although some also formed based on their professions. The sect called Jamuldahee was named so because its members lived along the Yamuna river, they hailed from the Doab and Awadh regions. Another stated origin is that their ancestor was the Thuggee Jumulud Deen. The Telinganie originated from Telangana, Arcottees from Arcot and Beraries from Berar. The Lodaha sect, mostly concentrated in Bihar, were caravaneers named after the lodha or load they carried and according to a Thuggee from the Doab, originated from the same ancestors of his clan. The Lodahas were prevalent in the region around Nepal in Bihar and Bengal during the tenure of Perry and originally hailed from Awadh which they left around 1700. A Deccan Thuggee stated that the "Hindu Thugs of Talghat", located around the Krishna River, didn't marry with the Telinganies whom they considered to be descendants of lower classes as a result of their professions.[69][70] The Telinganie sect were also disparagingly called Handeewuls (from handi) due to their eating habits.[71]

The Pungoo or Bungoo of Bengal derived their name from the region, with the Lodhees or Lodaha also present. The Motheea sect of Rampur-Purnia region was from a caste of weavers and their name derived from the practice of giving "handful" (muhti) of the spoils to the head. In the Uttar Pradesh the sects were: the Korkureeas from Kohrur, Agureeas of Agra, Jumaldahees, Lodhees and Tundals. The Multaneea were from Multan. In Madhya Pradesh the sects were: Bangureeas or Banjaras, Balheems or Bulheems, Khokhureeas and Soopurreeas of Sheopur. In modern Rajasthan, the sects were Guguras whose name derives from river Ghaggar and Sooseeas who were part of the Dhanuk clan. The Dhoulanee sect existed in modern-day Maharashtra. The Duckunies of Deccan were from Munirabad and Kurnaketies from Carnatic region. Another sect was Kathurs whose name derives from a bowl called kathota, based on a tradition of a man who held it during celebrations by Thugs. The Qulundera sect's name was derived from the Muslim saints called qalandar. There were also Jogi thugs who were divided into twelve sub-groups.[72]

According to Feringheea, the Brahmins of Tehngoor village of Parihar were taught the Thuggee after they accompanied the kings of Meos to Delhi and later helped in spreading it in the region around Murnae. He also states that two of his ancestors who had settled and intermarried with Brahmins of Murnae about seven generations ago, which led to the introduction of Thuggee in the area. A Thuggee hailing from Shikohabad whilst talking of his clan's origin recounted to Perry a tradition that the Munhars were influenced to take up Thuggee after witnessing the immense plunder acquired by Afghans, Mewatties and the Sheikhs.[73]

Sleeman in 1839 identified a band called "Meypunnaists" who he stated abducted children to sell them further. Another band called "Tashmabazes" who used methods introduced by a soldier named Creagh who was deployed at Cawnpore in 1802 were also identified by him.[74] The group called "River Thugs" were based deep in the Hooghly region.[56]

Historical evaluations[edit]

The British generally took the view that Thuggee was a type of ritual murder practiced by worshippers of the goddess Kali. Sleeman's view of it as an aberrant faith was based on the contemporary British view that Hinduism was a despicable and immoral faith founded on idol-worship.[4] R. C. Sherwood in Asiatick Researches published in 1820 traces this phenomenon back to the Muslim conquests of India and suggests links to Hindu mythology.[75] Charles Trevelyan however instead of seeing them as a deviant sect, considered them to be representatives of the "essence" of Hinduism which he considered as "evil" and "false".[76] Sleeman considered some Brahmins acted as intelligence providers to thugs, claiming that they profited from Thuggee and directed it.[77]

Kali's worship by thugs, both Muslims and Hindus, was emphasized by the British. McLeod commented, "It is a notable fact that not only amongst the Thugs, but in an especial manner among all lawless fraternities, and to a certain extent throughout the uneducated population of Central India, the Mussulmans vie with the Hindus in a devotion of this sanguinary deity (DeviorBhavani) far exceeding that they pay to any other."[78] David Ochterlony blamed the Pindaris for the rise of Thuggee while Sleeman blamed it on Indian rulers dismissing their armies which took away the jobs of many soldiers.[40] Based on Sleeman's writings about the Thugs, Robert Vane Russell claimed that most of them were Kanjars. He viewed the Muslim Kanjars as having recently converted to Islam.[38]

In 1882 Alexander Cunningham commented on Hiouen-Thsang's remarks about "people who visited Kahalgaon and forgot to leave it", speculating that the actual reason might not have been that posited by the monk and noting Kahalgaon's later reputation as a place frequented by the "River Thugs".[5]

Modern skepticism[edit]

Modern contemporary scholars have become increasingly sceptical of the "thuggee" concept, and have even questioned the existence of such a phenomenon.[7][8][9] The British representation of Thuggee is held by some critics to be full of inconsistencies and exaggerations. Numerous historians have described "thuggee" as basically the invention of the British colonial regime.[79] However, the more radical critics in this camp have themselves been criticized for focusing overly on British perceptions of thuggee rather than on the historical accuracy of primary source documents, but conclude that "the colonial representation of thuggee cannot be taken at face value".[6]

Martine van Woerkens of École Pratique des Hautes Études writes that evidence for a Thuggee group in the 19th century was the product of "colonial imaginings", arising from British fear of the little-known interior of India, as well as limited understanding of the religious and social practices of its inhabitants.[80]

Cynthia Ann Humes states that the testimony of most of the thugs captured by Sleeman does not support his view of priests profiting from and directing the thugs. She adds that the Islamic idea of fate was more commonly invoked during Thuggee acts, while invoking the Hindu Bhavani was far more rare.[77]

Historian Kim Wagner views the policies of East India Company in relation to the dismissal of armies of the conquered Indian kingdoms as being responsible for the development of Thuggee. Roaming bands of freelance soldiers had often joined one kingdom or another during the pre-British era, with the main income of many armies coming from plunder. After being dismissed from military service, they turned to robbery as a means of subsistence.[40] He also contested whether the thugs mentioned by Firuz Shah Tughlaq's biography were actually the same thugs the British authorities fought against.[81]

Sagnik Bhattacharya agrees with the sceptics and claims the thug-phenomenon to be nothing but a manifestation of the fear of the unknown that dawned on the British Raj at the thought of being alone in the wilderness of Central India. Using literary and legal sources, he has connected the "information panic" of the thug-phenomenon to the limitations of British demographic models that fell short of truly capturing the ethnic diversity of India. He explains the "Thuggee hysteria" around 1830s as being caused by the Raj's angst at realizing its own ignorance of local society.[82]

In popular culture[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Wagner 2007, p. 26.
  • ^ a b "Tracing India's cult of Thugs". 3 August 2003. Los Angeles Times.
  • ^ a b c d David Scott Katsan (2006). The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. p. 141. ISBN 9780195169218.
  • ^ a b Will Sweetman, Aditya Malik (23 May 2016). Hinduism in India: Modern and Contemporary Movements. SAGE Publications India. ISBN 9789351502319.
  • ^ a b c Martine van Woerkens (2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 110. ISBN 9780226850856.
  • ^ a b Wagner 2007, p. 7.
  • ^ a b Gámez-Fernández, Cristina M.; Dwivedi, Om P. (2014). Tabish Khair: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 9781443857888.
  • ^ a b MacFie, Alexander Lyon (2008). "Thuggee: An orientalist construction?". Rethinking History. 12 (3): 383–397. doi:10.1080/13642520802193262. S2CID 144212481.
  • ^ a b S. Shankar (2001). Textual Traffic: Colonialism, Modernity, and the Economy of the Text. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0791449929.
  • ^ "Thugs". 1902encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
  • ^ Jan Alber; Frank Lauterbach (2009). Stones of Law, Bricks of Shame: Narrating Imprisonment in the Victorian Age. University of Toronto Press. pp. 78, 81. ISBN 1442693134. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
  • ^ a b Rost 1911.
  • ^ R. V. Russell; R. B. H. Lai (1995). The tribes and castes of the central provinces of India. Asian Educational Services. p. 559. ISBN 978-81-206-0833-7. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 116.
  • ^ a b c Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 77. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ a b c Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 33. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Siklós, Bulcsu (1994). "Datura rituals in the Vajramahabhairava-Tantra". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 47 (3): 409–416. JSTOR 23658487.
  • ^ Geeta, R.; Gharaibeh, Waleed (December 2007). "Historical evidence for a pre-Columbian presence of Datura in the Old World and implications for a first millennium transfer from the New World". Journal of Biosciences. 32 (S3): 1227–1244. doi:10.1007/s12038-007-0132-y. PMID 18202447. S2CID 11871048.
  • ^ a b c d e f g Dash, Mike Thug: the true story of India's murderous cult ISBN 1-86207-604-9, 2005
  • ^ Schultes, Richard Evans; Hofmann, Albert (1979). The Botany and Chemistry of Hallucinogens (2nd ed.) pub. Springfield Illinois: Charles C. Thomas. Pages 283 and 288
  • ^ 'Datura (Solanaceae) is a New World Genus' by D.E. Symon and L. Haegi in (page 197 of) Solanaceae III: Taxonomy Chemistry Evolution, Editors J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester, M. Nee & N. Estrada, published by The Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK for The Linnean Society of London 1991. ISBN 0-947643-31-1.
  • ^ a b Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 193. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ a b Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 73. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 79. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 67. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 110.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 135.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 87. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 84. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 146. ISBN 9780226850856.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 107.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 147. ISBN 9780226850856.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 92. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ a b Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. pp. 28, 36 & 37. ISBN 978-1-84708-473-6.
  • ^ "Thug – Indian bandit". Britannica.com. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
  • ^ Syama Prasad Basu (1963). Rise and Fall of Khilji Imperialism. History of the Khilji rulers of India, 1290-1320. U. N. Dhur. p. 33. Retrieved 8 July 2024.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • ^ a b Wagner 2007, pp. 154–155.
  • ^ a b c Martine van Woerkens (3 February 2011). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-226-85086-3.
  • ^ a b Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 37. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ a b c Wagner 2007, p. 92.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 112.
  • ^ Dunn 2005, p. 215; Gibb & Beckingham 1994, p. 777 Vol. 4
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 26-28.
  • ^ Richard James Popplewell (1995). Intelligence and imperial defence: British intelligence and the defence of the Indian Empire, 1904–1924. Frank Cass. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-7146-4580-3. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
  • ^ Gresh, Lois H.; Weinberg, Robert (4 April 2008). Why Did It Have To Be Snakes: From Science to the Supernatural, The Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 104–107. ISBN 978-0-470-22556-1. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 247; 248; 249. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, pp. 7–8.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 167.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 193. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 48. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 49. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 168.
  • ^ a b Twain, Mark (18 August 2006). Following the Equator (ASCII). Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 27 February 2011.
  • ^ Shah, Giriraj (1 January 1993). Image Makers: An Attitudinal Study of Indian Police. Abhinav Publications. p. 52. ISBN 978-81-7017-295-6. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
  • ^ Sleeman, Sir William Henry (1839). The Thugs or Phansigars of India: comprising a history of the rise and progress of that extraordinary fraternity of assassins; and a description of the system which it pursues, and of the measures which have been adopted by the supreme government of India for its suppression, Vol. 2. Carey & Hart. p. 159. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
  • ^ a b Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 249. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ "Thugs Traditional View". BBC. Archived from the original (shtml) on 17 October 2007. Retrieved 17 September 2007.
  • ^ Sinister sects: Thug, Mike Dash's investigation into the gangs who preyed on travellers in 19th-century India by Kevin Rushby, The Guardian, Saturday, 11 June 2005.
  • ^ "The Thugs Worshipping Kalee". The Missionary Repository for Youth, and Sunday School Missionary Magazine. XII: 98. 1848. Retrieved 6 November 2015.
  • ^ Luchesi, Brigitte; Kocku von Stuckrad (2004). Religion im kulturellen Diskurs. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 623–624. ISBN 978-3-11-017790-9. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  • ^ Peers, Douglas M. (2013). India Under Colonial Rule: 1700-1885. Routledge. p. 57. ISBN 978-1-31-788286-2.
  • ^ Wœrkens, Martine van; Tihanyi, Catherine (2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 170. ISBN 978-0-226-85086-3. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 141.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 92. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 111. ISBN 9780226850856.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thug: The True Story Of India's Murderous Cult. Granta Publications. p. 93. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 165. ISBN 9780226850856.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 16; 39. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Dash, Mike (3 February 2011). Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Granta. p. 38; 39. ISBN 9781847084736.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 134. ISBN 9780226850863.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 133. ISBN 9780226850863.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 133;134. ISBN 9780226850863.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 154-155.
  • ^ Martine van Woerkens (November 2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India. University of Chicago Press. p. 103. ISBN 9780226850856.
  • ^ Moore-Gilbert, Bart (1996). Writing India, 1757-1990: The Literature of British India. Manchester University Press. p. 86. ISBN 9780719042669.
  • ^ P.D. Reeves (10 June 2010). Sleeman in Oudh: An Abridgement of W. H. Sleeman's A Journey Through the Kingdom of Oude in 1849–50. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521153096.
  • ^ a b Encountering Kālī: In the Margins, at the Center, in the West. University of California Press. 2003. ISBN 9780520232396.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, pp. 140–141.
  • ^ R. Roque; K. Wagner (2011). Engaging Colonial Knowledge: Reading European Archives in World History. Springer. ISBN 978-0230360075.
  • ^ van Woerkens, Martine (2002). The Strangled Traveler: Colonial Imaginings and the Thugs of India.
  • ^ Wagner 2007, p. 156.
  • ^ Bhattacharya, Sagnik (4 May 2020). "Monsters in the dark: the discovery of Thuggee and demographic knowledge in colonial India". Palgrave Communications. 6 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0458-8. ISSN 2055-1045.
  • ^ Johnson, Toby Braden (2014). Living and Learning with Guru Nanak: Participation and Pedagogy in the Janam-Sakhi Narratives (Thesis).
  • ^ "Were Thugs of India religious terrorists or mere bandits? The evidence of Hockley’s Pandurang Hari" by Ayusman Chakraborty, Academia Letters, Article 198, January 2021.
  • ^ History of Ameer Ali Thug
  • ^ "Thuggee in England: Tracing the Origin and Development of Fantasies of Thug-invasion and Reverse Colonization in late nineteenth century British Fiction" by Ayusman Chakraborty, ' ' Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities ' ', vol. 13, no. 1. 2021.
  • ^ McKinney, Devin (2003). Magic Circles: The Beatles in Dream and History. Harvard University Press. p. 78. ISBN 978-0-674-01202-8.
  • ^ Enright, Laura (30 June 2011). Vampires' Most Wanted: The Top 10 Book of Bloodthirsty Biters, Stake-wielding Slayers, and Other Undead Oddities. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-59797-752-4.
  • ^ "The Deceivers". 9 November 2021.
  • ^ Ganguly, Swagato (2017). Idolatry and the Colonial Idea of India: Visions of Horror, Allegories of Enlightenment. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1351584678. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
  • Bibliography[edit]

    External links[edit]



    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thuggee&oldid=1234367268"

    Categories: 
    British India
    Bandits
    Outlaws
    Illegal occupations
    Indian robbers
    Gangs in India
    Indian slang
    Secret societies in India
    Secret societies related to organized crime
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 maint: date and year
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Use dmy dates from May 2021
    Pages using infobox criminal organization with rivals parameter
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from July 2024
    Pages using multiple image with manual scaled images
    Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference
    Articles with J9U identifiers
    Articles with LCCN identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 14 July 2024, at 00:17 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki