Hello, I'm Mufka. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to September 3 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
B0iP3rs0n (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
B0iP3rs0n (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Request reason:
I wanted to choose a name and ithat's a frequent nicknameBoiN1gg4 (talk) 23:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I've done the rename (from User:BoiN1gg4), but having examined your contributions I am not willing to unblock you at this point. I suggest you make a new unblock request in which you address the problems with your edits and offer a convincing explanation of how you would contribute in a constructive way if unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
