J u m p t o c o n t e n t
M a i n m e n u
M a i n m e n u
N a v i g a t i o n
● M a i n p a g e ● C o n t e n t s ● C u r r e n t e v e n t s ● R a n d o m a r t i c l e ● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a ● C o n t a c t u s ● D o n a t e
C o n t r i b u t e
● H e l p ● L e a r n t o e d i t ● C o m m u n i t y p o r t a l ● R e c e n t c h a n g e s ● U p l o a d f i l e
S e a r c h
Search
A p p e a r a n c e
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t ● L o g i n
P e r s o n a l t o o l s
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t ● L o g i n
P a g e s f o r l o g g e d o u t e d i t o r s l e a r n m o r e ● C o n t r i b u t i o n s ● T a l k
( T o p )
1 U n r e l i a b l e r e p l y l i n k o n A f D
2 s b n a t i o n
3 S t e r e o g u m
4 m o r e S p u t n i k s i s t e r s i t e s
5 U p d a t e d s t a t u s f o r M i d d l e E a s t M o n i t o r
T o g g l e t h e t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s
U s e r t a l k : H e a d b o m b / u n r e l i a b l e
A d d l a n g u a g e s
P a g e c o n t e n t s n o t s u p p o r t e d i n o t h e r l a n g u a g e s .
● U s e r p a g e ● T a l k
E n g l i s h
● R e a d ● E d i t ● A d d t o p i c ● V i e w h i s t o r y
T o o l s
T o o l s
A c t i o n s
● R e a d ● E d i t ● A d d t o p i c ● V i e w h i s t o r y
G e n e r a l
● W h a t l i n k s h e r e ● R e l a t e d c h a n g e s ● U s e r c o n t r i b u t i o n s ● U s e r l o g s ● V i e w u s e r g r o u p s ● U p l o a d f i l e ● S p e c i a l p a g e s ● P e r m a n e n t l i n k ● P a g e i n f o r m a t i o n ● G e t s h o r t e n e d U R L ● D o w n l o a d Q R c o d e
P r i n t / e x p o r t
● D o w n l o a d a s P D F ● P r i n t a b l e v e r s i o n
A p p e a r a n c e
F r o m W i k i p e d i a , t h e f r e e e n c y c l o p e d i a
< U s e r t a l k : H e a d b o m b ( R e d i r e c t e d f r o m U s e r t a l k : H e a d b o m b / u n r e l i a b l e . j s )
Any idea why your unreliable.js script is tagging the reply link to S0091's !vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amna Malik (2nd nomination) as "generally unreliable source"? I mean, the link is to a Wikipedia url, so it would be generally unreliable, if it were a source, but it's just a reply link. Is it the html comment after the signature? —David Eppstein (talk ) 05:23, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
WP:UPSD#Comments (and Masala.com in SD's comment). Headbomb {t c p b 08:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
David Eppstein (talk ) 18:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
WP:NPPSG ltb d l talk ) 05:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
Headbomb {t c p b 21:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
WP:A/S . — lunaeclipse (talk ) 02:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
Headbomb {t c p b 03:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
Deprecated per WP:SPUTNIK . - Amigao (talk ) 20:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
Headbomb {t c p b 21:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
WP:MEMO . - Amigao (talk ) 23:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
R e t r i e v e d f r o m " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Headbomb/unreliable&oldid=1233800940 " ● T h i s p a g e w a s l a s t e d i t e d o n 1 0 J u l y 2 0 2 4 , a t 2 3 : 3 3 ( U T C ) . ● T e x t i s a v a i l a b l e u n d e r t h e C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n - S h a r e A l i k e L i c e n s e 4 . 0 ;
a d d i t i o n a l t e r m s m a y a p p l y . B y u s i n g t h i s s i t e , y o u a g r e e t o t h e T e r m s o f U s e a n d P r i v a c y P o l i c y . W i k i p e d i a ® i s a r e g i s t e r e d t r a d e m a r k o f t h e W i k i m e d i a F o u n d a t i o n , I n c . , a n o n - p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n . ● P r i v a c y p o l i c y ● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a ● D i s c l a i m e r s ● C o n t a c t W i k i p e d i a ● C o d e o f C o n d u c t ● D e v e l o p e r s ● S t a t i s t i c s ● C o o k i e s t a t e m e n t ● M o b i l e v i e w
Moved from User talk:Headbomb
