Contents

User talk:BendersGame/Archive 1

Hi folks,

I've confirmed a time for the next conversation on Tuesday night, US time, (Wednesday, 02.30 UTC). Huge apologies that this isn't going to be good for Euro folk, and I know Anthony and Peter will likely be unable to attend therefore. It's possible we need a bit of a wiki effort at the project page to better organise and plan conversations - and I'd also like to encourage all interested folks to watchlist that page for updates / changes etc. which will probably be a smoother way of staying in touch than many talk page messages (though it's great that more people are expressing interest in participating...). With that in mind, if you'd like to reply to this message, please do so at my talk page, and I'll respond as soon as I can.

If you are able to attend at the given time, please do head over to Wikipedia:NotTheWikipediaWeekly#Confirmed_Participants and sign up - this is a great help in making sure everyone is around. We generally chat for about 10 minutes before 'going live' and the whole process takes about an hour, and I very much look forward to chatting to all!

best, Privatemusings (talk) 00:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From one Clemson grad to another, welcome to Wikipedia. Chris (talk) 03:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Voceditenore/A_handy_guide_to_fooling_Wikipedians_about_your_age

I almost missed violin lessons for you XD Yamakiri ^T_C § 07-2-2008 • 21:30:03

It would be easier to say if I could see the edits, but as a generalization, it probably isn't. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 02:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I don't think that it would be POV as long as you don't touch something regarding opinion or add yourself to the staff list or something :P --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 04:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are just tempting me :P Lucifer (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Regarding the red links, I would suggest Wikipedia:Most wanted articles (though remember to check that the article name doesn't exist under some other variation...that is just a list of non-existant pages that a large number of articles link to), Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery (which is primarily dedicated to alternative methods of fixing red links, such as adding and removing diacritical marks, changing to a proper name, etc, but which does work toward creating articles to fill gaps, Category:Red list (which are editor-compiled lists of red-links), and Wikipedia:Requested articles (which is where people actually request new articles be created).

Also, yes, the userspace links on my page no longer function, because I deleted all the previous versions of my page since it used to contain some personally-identifiable information. And Risk does sound fun, though I've recently gotten into EVE Online, and if I'm not here, I'm normally there, lol. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 03:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For giving me kind words of encouragement and filling out my ER when you said you probably wouldn't be able to, I award you The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar! Yamakiri TC § 08-1-2008 • 21:24:21

Thanks! You made me really happy ;-) Yamakiri ^T_C § 08-1-2008 • 21:24:21

I confirm that my freenode nick is Lucifer_Cat —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.15.251.18 (talk) 17:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, I'm also an idiot. Lucifer (Talk) 18:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I don't care about the mess :P As for the RfA thing, I don't think so - what screws up the bot is having an empty * in one of the vote sections. Of course, such a bug may exist, but I haven't heard about it. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 19:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Someone had mentioned it somewhere, when i was looking for dramaz. Also, i've seen some "X:0:0" counts on a page when actually there has been a single oppose or a neutral. But that just may have been a lazy bot. Thanks for the help again :D Lucifer (Talk) 20:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE FIXED YOUR USERPAGE SO IT MEETS THE MINIMUM KAT QUOTA. Ceiling Cat (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your discussion of Keyserling's fuhrerprinzip does relies to much on Plato. The "philosopher Kings" reference is out of place and not on point. Remove it or I will remove the fuhrerprinzip from Schopenhauer's article. Also, the Nazi flag on the page is also out of place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.20.143.93 (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It probably is. I wouldnt have a clue. I only reverted valdalism once on that article. I have no idea what you are talking about. I suggest you talk to people who have actually edited that page. Have a good day :) Lucifer (Talk) 15:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was NOT Vandalism at all!

I was answering another contributor's inquiry made in that article. He/She asked about WHY the term The shits redirectedtodiahorrea. 205.240.146.148 (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone on that article's talk page also asked about the "American expression the shits", when he/she had seen it on a TV show. See the article's Talk Page, Re.:"The shits". Hope this helps. 205.240.146.148 (talk) 23:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles that are clearly patent nonsense can be marked for speedy deletion under category g3, vandalism. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IPv6Gate and 'vote' for blocking both User_Talk:213.197.27.252 and User_Talk:94.75.219.73 permanently. See further text on the noticeboard. Jeroen (talk) 12:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Lonely Geek Barnstar
		This barnstar is in honor of your depressing, unloved presence on IRC on Valentine's Day, 2009. Roses and kisses work for some, but you, noble Wikipedian, have important things to discuss on the internet with people you barely know who you'll probably never meet. Here's to you! FlyingToaster 20:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have a template loop on User:LuciferTiger/User infobox. I hope you don't mind that I put it inside remark tags, to neutralise the template loop. Writing an infobox isn't easy, actually, it's hard. I'd advise you to ask for help, or delete the page by putting {{db-userreq}} on top. Debresser (talk) 23:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How was my edit not constructive? People who see that piece of garbage movie will think that's exactly what the book is like and that isn't true at all. Please revert your edit now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.28.70.129 (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I♡ you. I may be pointing ☝ but i may be pointing ☟ and i may point to ☞ or ☜. And you gotta have a ☂ because it's gonna rain! --Mixwell!^Talk 02:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for The Sparky Barnstar. You make ME feel appreciated--Michael (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-download | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Monster sig right there! ====> --Mixwell^{☞TALK☜STALK!!!} 00:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats a rainbow sig... not a monster sig ;) Lucifer (Talk) 00:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Lucifer. I've removed your support from Synergy's RfA because it was put in too early. Feel free to readd your opinion whenever you want because it's now gone live. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've createdorlet's have banter} 22:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed. And I Swore. But I understand ;) Thanks. Lucifer (Talk) 22:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's just that I find people who openly deny the Holocaust to be disgusting and true abominations, people that are a disgrace to humanity.—Preceding Signatures comment added by

haha u cant give me warnings im an admin!

I'^mperator has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

As per IRC :D Cheers. I'^mperator 00:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So now I have a cookie AND bubble tea! Awesome!! Lucifer (Talk)

I had made an edit to the article Yakko's World, correcting a reference to a segment of Episode 73 of Animaniacs. When I had viewed the article originally, it gave the segment's title as "Please Please Please Get a Life Foundation" when in fact, the show's creators had deliberately misspelled the third please as "pleese". The segment's title is correctly listed in the Wikipedia articles Animaniacs and List of Animaniacs episodes, and the segment in question can be found on YouTube, if independent verification that, yes, the show's creators really did spell it "pleese" is needed (relevant portion is 3 minutes and 24 seconds into the clip).

While I can understand that most single word edits that change a correct spelling to an incorrect spelling are acts of vandalism, I did go out of the way to include a descriptive edit summary. I had hoped that the edit summary would have given the vandalism patrol pause, that it would have perhaps encouraged at least a bit of research into the topic, especially since I ended the summary with a note requesting that the edit not be reverted. I've made my good faith effort to try to make an improvement, and I'll leave it to you to review the topic and to undo your revert or not, as you see fit.

At the very least, I would encourage you to at least watch the Animaniacs segment in question in full, as it does have the signifigance of being one of the earliest pop culture recognitions of the internet's power for collecting and categorizing even the smallest facts. And after all, isn't that the spirit that drives Wikipedia? 72.28.177.52 (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Also striked out the warning on your page. :) Lucifer (Talk) 14:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coolness. Thank you. 72.28.177.52 (talk) 18:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]