Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Rationale  





2 Procedure  



2.1  Period 1: discussion and questions  





2.2  Period 2: voting  



2.2.1  Who can vote  







2.3  Tallying  







3 Election dates  





4 Are RFCs required before the trial?  





5 Comparison with the Requests for Adminship process  





6 Newsletter  





7 See also  





8 References  














Wikipedia:Administrator elections






Bahasa Indonesia
 

Edit links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

(Redirected from Wikipedia:AELECT)

Administrator elections is a process, pending a trial run, by which the Wikipedia community decides who will become administrators (also known as admins), who are users with access to additional technical features that aid in maintenance. It is an alternative to the Requests for Adminship process.

The Requests for Adminship process grants administrative privileges if a consensus is found as a result of a public discussion of support, oppose, and neutral statements and rationales from users. The administrator election process grants administrative privileges based on a secret ballot vote. See "Comparison with the Requests for Adminship process" for more details.

A trial of administrator elections will run side-by-side with the Requests for Adminship process. Neither process affects the other in any way, and you can choose to follow either process to be an administrator candidate.

Rationale

[edit]

Administrator elections are a private vote, using the SecurePoll software. A list of voters is available, but their votes are kept secret. The intent is to reduce the amount of contentious discussion amongst voters, thus making the process less antagonistic and increasing the number of candidates willing to volunteer to be administrators.

English Wikipedia administrator promotion rates have been steadily declining since the golden age of administrator promotions around 2005–2008, where as many as 408 admins were being promoted per year. Modern promotion rates are closer to 12 per year.

Procedure

[edit]

The overall process lasts 10 days: an initial 3-day period for discussion and questions, and a 7-day period for a secret ballot vote. Candidates sign up by a specified date prior to the discussion and questions period.

Election cycles are advertised in advance, including watchlist notices. The process is managed by the bureaucrats, initially in concert with the WMF to set up the SecurePoll software.

Period 1: discussion and questions

[edit]

During this 3-day period, the community can ask questions and raise issues, as well as provide positive feedback. Candidates are encouraged to participate in the discussion period, answering questions and responding to feedback. During this time, commenters must not indicate their support or opposition.

Period 2: voting

[edit]

Once the discussion period is complete, a secret ballot vote occurs for 7 days, using SecurePoll. During this period, discussion is closed. Candidates may be asked direct questions on their user talk pages, but they are not expected to watch their discussion page, nor the election page for the full period, to allow them a respite from community vetting.

Who can vote

[edit]

Administrator elections use the Arbitration Committee Election suffrage requirements. To vote, an editor must meet the following criteria:

Tallying

[edit]

At the end of Period 2, votes are scrutinised and tallied, results are announced, and new admins are granted administrative privileges. The pass rate is 70% or greater. The vote tally is calculated by Support / (Support + Oppose) for each candidate.

Election dates

[edit]

Administrator elections are approved for one election cycle as a trial run, then will need to be renewed with an RFC. This trial will take place in October 2024.

Are RFCs required before the trial?

[edit]

No. The result of the corresponding request for comment discussionisThe community supports trying this proposal for 1 election, after which it will be reviewed in Phase II. While there are concerns regarding the implementation details of this proposal, given this is a trial run, there is sufficient support to run the election as written.

Accordingly, one election will be held, with implementation details (such as scrutineering) worked out based on discussions on this page's talk page. After the trial, request for comment discussions will be held to discuss how to proceed, thus allowing the community to alter the process if desired, or choose not to continue.

Comparison with the Requests for Adminship process

[edit]
Requests for adminship Administrator elections
Duration 2 days discussion + 5 days voting[1] 3 days discussion + 7 days voting
Scheduled No Yes
Voting Public Secret (using SecurePoll)
Selection method Consensus Vote
Pass threshold 65–75%[2] 70%
Suffrage requirement Extended confirmed account See § Who can vote

Newsletter

[edit]

If you'd like to receive a user talk message when important administrator election milestones are reached, such as when a date is chosen and when the "accepting candidates" phase opens, please add yourself to the mailing list.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ As per consensus at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I § Proposal 3b: Make the first two days discussion-only (trial), for a trial period, there is 2-day discussion-only period.
  • ^ As RfA is a consensus-based process, there is not exact threshold for success, but in practice a candidate with below 65% support is almost always unsuccessful, and above 75% almost always successful. Candidates with between 65 and 75% support are typically subject to a bureaucrat discussion about the consensus for their request, and outcomes vary on a case-to-case basis.
  • ^ Special:Diff/1051774464
  • ^ Special:Diff/1061827298
  • ^ Special:Diff/1209708419
  • ^ Special:Diff/1219019228

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_elections&oldid=1227125454"

    Category: 
    Wikipedia draft proposals
     



    This page was last edited on 3 June 2024, at 21:30 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki