Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.
If there are several dubious statements, or if a dispute arises:
Begin a "Disputed" section on the talk page to describe the problem, alert other editors, and gain more opinions on whether the content is inaccurate and how to handle it.
Paste {{Disputed}} at the beginning of the article to add a general warning.
If only the accuracy of a section is disputed, add {{Disputed-section}} at the beginning of the section.
If you see an article with a factual accuracy warning, please do the following:
Don't remove the warning simply because the material appears reasonable: please ensure that content is verifiable using reliable sources, that it is unbiased and that it contains no original research before removing the notice.
If you are sure that a statement is factually inaccurate then remove it, or move it to the talk page for further discussion. If you are familiar with the subject matter contained in the article but are not sure about the accuracy of a statement, then add "{{Citation needed}}" at the end of the statement. If you are not familiar with the subject matter contained in the article but wish to ask about the accuracy of a statement, then raise the issue on the article's talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN and WP:HANDLE for a more detailed explanation of how to handle potentially false or misleading information.
Once you have found the correct information, edit the page to correct it, remove the warnings, and put something like the following in your edit summary:
If a Wikipedia article links to this page, it is due to an editor's concerns regarding the accuracy of statements within that article. Statements causing such concern are marked with the tags [disputed – discuss]or[dubious – discuss]. An editor can insert such a warning by using the templates {{Disputed inline}}or{{Dubious}}.
Several factors can prompt concerns about the accuracy of a statement, including:
Implausible information, without providing adequate references;
Information that is particularly difficult to verify;
Highly detailed information subject to frequent changes, rendering its accuracy variable over time;
Reference to sources that are outdated or whose reliability has been subsequently questioned;
Contributions from users with a history of providing inaccurate information on the subject matter;
Ambiguously worded statements that allow for multiple interpretations due to grammatical issues or subjective phrasing; or
Existence of reliable sources that corroborate divergent claims.
If necessary, rephrase the statement to ensure it is neutral and clear.
Engage in discussion if the reason for the tag is unclear. If you do not get a response, use the "View history" tab to identify who added the tag and notify them of your intention to discuss. Alternatively, you can use the {{Help me}} template for assistance.
If you encounter a statement with an accuracy warning, please:
Refrain from removing the warning simply because the material looks plausible. Instead, verify it properly.
Consult the article's talk page to understand the underlying issues.
If possible, correct the statement right away, ensuring verifiability. Additionally, incorporate any sources utilized for verification into the article, see Wikipedia:Cite your sources.
If you encounter a statement that seems to be or is inaccurate, please:
If feasible, correct the statement right away, ensuring verifiability. Additionally, incorporate any sources utilized for verification into the article, see Wikipedia:Cite your sources.
Should the statement's neutrality be contentious, see Wikipedia:NPOV dispute for more details about addressing the issue.
If you cannot correct it right away:
First, insert a "Dubious" section on the talk page to describe the problem. (Please don't mark up the article text without first describing the problem on the talk page.)
Insert {{Disputed inline}}or{{Dubious}} after the relevant sentence or paragraph. Use {{Disputed inline}} to directly challenge the statement with sources to back up your claim, or {{Dubious}} to point out uncertainty over sources. Add the correct/current month and year to the template.
(Or insert {{Dubious}} replacing 'talkpage section' with the appropriate section on the talk page, if one already exists.)
If there are more than 5 dubious statements, or if a dispute arises:
First, insert a "Disputed" section on the talk page to describe the problem. This will help focus on contributions from others.
Insert {{Disputed}} at the beginning of the article to add a general warning. Check dispute resolution for ways to resolve it.
Once you've found the correct information, edit the page to correct it, remove the warnings, and put something like the following in your edit summary:
Verified article – removed accuracy dispute
When you add an accuracy warning, you are invited to also help resolve other accuracy disputesorfact-check other articles listed in:
Note: This page was previously a noticeboard for accuracy disputes. See the archive for previous disputes, and also the talk page archives for further disputes.
menu at the top of the editing box, or manually insert a citation using ref tags. There are several detailed methods for citing sources available.
