 |
This is an essayonWikipedia:Deletion policy.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: AfD discussions are best served by keeping your comments short. The closing admin isn't grading you by volume. |
- Why day is day, night night, and time is time,
- Were nothing but to waste night, day and time.
- Therefore, since brevity is the soul of wit,
- And tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes ...
- Hamlet, Wm. Shakespeare
There are over a hundred entries a day at Articles for Deletion, and similar workloads all over Wikipedia. Beyond a certain length - however much it differs per reader - a long, rambling response on any issue just falls flat. Most discussions here are surprisingly simple: does a certain article subject, or a particular editing action, meet Wikipedia policy and guideline or not? Explaining why (or why not) shouldn't require an essay, let alone multiple essays rebutting every post any editor makes on the subject.
Example:
Assume good faith is a double-edged sword. In the legal field, there is the concept of "equity," part of which boils down to the Golden Rule: in order to receive equity, you must give equity. Swamping a debate with verbiage can be a display of poor faith and incivility, and bogs down far more debates than such rambling essays illuminate. Equity involves keeping one's arguments to a manageable size. This helps to ensure that other editors will read, rather than skim or skip, your comments, and that all editors - not just the ones who feel like writing the most words - have equal time to express their own views.
