== History ==
== Governance ==
== Geography ==
== Demography ==
== Economy ==
== Culture and community ==
=== Culture ===
=== Community facilities ===
== Landmarks ==
== Transport ==
== Education ==
== Religious sites ==
== Sport ==
== Notable people ==
== See also ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
== External links ==
<!-- Optional headings
== Industry and commerce ==
== Politics ==
== Media ==
== Invention and discovery ==
== Future plans ==
== Cultural references ==
== Filmography ==
== Public services == -->
How to write about UK settlements covers a set of project guidelines relating to the structure of Wikipedia articles about UK settlements as developed within WikiProject UK geography and WikiProject Cities. We would welcome suggestions on how to improve these guidelines on the talk page, but please refrain from making substantive changes to this article without first discussing them and reaching consensus.
Articles about UK settlements should normally follow the guidelines outlined below as well as the WP:UKGUIDE and the Manual of Style. However, these are not 'written in stone' and can be adjusted where common sense suggests that an exception is appropriate, with an overall aim of professionalism, simplicity and greater cohesion of Wikipedia articles.
The settlements in the United Kingdom are very diverse and the meaning of "settlement" itself is subject to debate. There are several types of official administrative area that could be described as settlements, but they do not always correspond to what the residents would think of as their own town or city. Similarly, a town or city may spill out of its administrative boundaries; where this has occurred, suburbs and significant places of interest and employment outside the boundary should be mentioned in the article, though it should be noted that they lie within different administrative areas.
Writing about the very smallest settlements in the UK can be difficult due to the lack of source material. If there is no likelihood that an article could ever expand beyond a stub, the place should be dealt with in the article of the smallest notable area in which it lies, such as the council ward, civil parish, community (in Wales), or town, etc. In most cases a redirect should be left to help readers (see Crowden, Devon for an example).
A single name may be in use for a civil parish, an ecclesiastical parish, a council ward and an informal colloquial area, each with slightly different boundaries. On the other hand, one area may have two or three different names – those of a ward, church parish and local names with no official use, for instance. In both these cases, all of the variants should be covered in a single article unless one of the alternatives is sufficiently notable to have an article of its own.
In the United Kingdom, city status can be granted to areas of varying size, from compact urban areas (e.g. Stirling) to large districts which include towns and villages outside their core urban area (e.g. City of Lancaster).
When city status has been granted to an area which includes multiple settlements, we should be guided by reliable sources when deciding whether or not to refer to a particular settlement within that area as a city. For example, although Lancaster, Morecambe, and Carnforth are all in the City of Lancaster district, only the former is referred to as a city in reliable sources. We should therefore refer to Lancaster as a city but Morecambe and Carnforth as towns. Reliable sources should be ignored where they predate the award of city status (see WP:AGEMATTERS). The exact area which was granted city status should always be noted in an appropriate place, such as the article body or a lead footnote.
When a district is awarded city status its local authority often begins to refer to it as 'City of [Settlement]' or similar. This name can, if necessary, act as a WP:NATURAL disambiguation between the articles about the settlement and the local government district.
A deserted town or village that once had its own ecclesiastical parish (or equivalent) can, subject to consensus regarding its status as a standalone old settlement, have its own article if there is sufficient material to make a good article. Examples are Silchester and Gatton, Surrey. However, if a later city, town or village is located close to the centre of the old settlement and absorbs almost all of it, then it is fair to describe it under the new place's history and create a redirect for the old name, if it was different. If the place was not a town or village then it should not have its own article, but should be covered in an archaeology or history section within the appropriate place of today's name, unless it is sufficiently notable for some other reason.
Technically the term "deserted" is disliked because most villages shrank over a period of years and may have had, or continue to have, some sort of vestigial survival – in this case they are correctly termed "depopulated" rather than "former".
In the UK, the uncommonly used term "ghost town" describes somewhere with no more commerce and many vacant homes (Tyneham is an example). The important principles are whether the settlement had its own parish (in northern England, that is extended to cover townships), and that there are substantial remains (standing or archaeological).
Articles should almost always conform to the basic structure of a lead/infobox followed by history, governance, geography, demography and economy, as those sections contain much of the basic information about any settlement. Beyond that, editors are advised to come to a consensus that works best for the settlement in question. Additional or alternative headings are listed under the "Optional headings" section below.
Where more than one infobox is used, it is recommended that Template:Infobox UK place is placed in the lead. For example Bath, Somerset has a second infobox in the Architecture section describing its status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Infobox contents:
official name: The official name for the settlement. Do not use additions such as "City of..." unless this is necessary to distinguish the settlement from other similarly named settlements (e.g. City of London)
static_image_name: See Lead image section below
static_image_caption: short caption for the image with suitable wiki-links
population: The population for the settlement
... other details can also be set. See infobox template for a full list of possible entries.
Alead image to represent the settlement should be used within the main article infobox. For a small settlement this should be a picture of a notable local landmark such as a church, high street, marketplace or other streetscape.
For larger settlements such as cities a montage may be used, subject to consensus among the article's editors, however care should be taken to avoid creating montages that create a poor visual impression of the article.
All images used within a montage should be available on a free license and should be credited, with links to the original images.
Captions to montages should identify the subjects of individual images, with wikilinks to related articles
Images within a montage should have an orderly arrangement, using a regular row-based layout and consistent image proportions wherever possible.
Montages within infoboxes will normally appear with a width of 250px and will resize according to display device and user preferences when no size is specified, as is recommended by WP:Imagesize. Avoid creating a montage that will be excessively large when displayed at this width. A maximum aspect ratio of 1:1.5 is recommended.
The first and largest image with the montage should be a representative cityscape such as a skyline, panorama or significant streetscape.
Other images should be selected to be distinctive and broadly representative of the settlement, where possible including the settlement's most widely recognised landmarks, characteristic building-types, a representative spread of architectural styles and periods, and a representation of varied areas within the settlement.
Avoid including too many images. A small number of bold, identifiable, well-chosen images will represent the settlement more effectively than a greater number of less distinct images appearing at lower resolutions. Even the largest settlements should have no more than 6–8 images.
Images within montages appear at low resolution. For these to be intelligible it is recommended to use pictures made up of simple, recognisable shapes, filling the crop and with high levels of colour and tonal contrast.
Avoid duplicating images that appear elsewhere in the article.
The lead (see also WP:LEAD) is the text before the first heading. It should not exceed four paragraphs and should normally cover the following:
Geographic description
Name of settlement: if in doubt follow WP:COMMONNAME; use translated names in national languages where recognised officially or in common use.
Type of settlement: e.g. suburb, town, city, civil parish. A city must have city status by Letters Patent or by convention. An unparished area is neither a type of settlement nor an administrative area and so should not be mentioned in the lead; if necessary to understand the place it may be mentioned in a governance section in the body of the article.
Administrative district: its present council area (lower-tier or unitary authority area in England; principal area in Wales; council area in Scotland; administrative district in Northern Ireland). e.g. Jarrow is in the South Tyneside metropolitan borough of Tyne and Wear, England.
County: use the ceremonial county (England, Wales and Northern Ireland only) where not clear from the administrative district.
Constituent country.
Geographic location: distance from the district's or county's main town or city (unless it is itself the county town or such, in which case it should then be stated)
Physical geography: any rivers which run through or near the town; coastline on which the town or city is located; and any significant nearby or enclosing geographical features.
Total resident population. If the place name has multiple definitions (e.g. built-up area, parish, district) ensure it is clear which definition is being used for the population figure.
Historic county (if in England or Wales and if different from current county), and a brief paragraph about historical roots / founding.
Nicknames, if notable
Primary industries supporting its economy (e.g. service, manufacturing, tourism, etc...)
Notable unique characteristics and characteristics commonly associated with it.
Major churches or major landmarks.
The opening sentence of the lead is particularly important and should be kept as simple as possible in order to be easily understood by readers with no particular knowledge of administrative geography. If a place is part of a settlement which shares the same name as the district, or if the district / unitary authority / non-metropolitan county has the same name as the ceremonial county, there is no need in the opening sentence to repeat those names for every role they play in the hierarchy. For example: "...is a suburb of Colchester..." rather than "...is a suburb of Colchester in the Colchester district...", or "...is a village in County Durham..." rather than "is a village in the County Durham district in the ceremonial county of Durham...".
Chew Stoke is a small village and civil parish in the Chew Valley, in Somerset, England, about 8 miles (13 km) south of Bristol. It is at the northern edge of the Mendip Hills, a region designated by the United Kingdom as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and is within the Bristol/BathGreen Belt. The parish includes the hamlet of Breach Hill, which is approximately 2 miles (3.2 km) southwest of Chew Stoke itself.
Chew Stoke has a long history, as shown by the number and range of its heritage-listed buildings. The village is at the northern end of Chew Valley Lake, which was created in the 1950s, close to a dam, pumping station, sailing club, and fishing lodge. A tributary of the River Chew, which rises in Strode, runs through the village.
The population, approximately 900, is served by one shop, two public houses, a primary school and, a bowling club. Together with Chew Magna, it forms the ward of Chew Valley North in the unitary authorityofBath and North East Somerset. Chew Valley School and its associated leisure centre are less than a mile (1.6 km) from Chew Stoke. The village has some areas of light industry but is largely agricultural; many residents commute to nearby cities for employment.
Mentioned in documents as early as the 12th century, Neilston's early history is marked by its status as an important ecclesiastical parish linked with Paisley Abbey to the north. Neilston Parish Church—a Category B listed building—has lain at the centre of the community since 1163. Before industrialisation, Neilston was a farming and weaving community comprised of a series of single-storey houses, many of them thatched.
The urbanisation and development of Neilston largely coincided with the Industrial Revolution. Industrial scale textile processing was introduced to Neilston around the middle of the 18th century with the construction of several cotton mills. Neilston became a centre for cotton and calico bleaching and printing in the 18th century, which developed into a spinning and dying industry and continued into the early 20th century. Although known today as a former milling village, agriculture has, and continues to play an economic role for Neilston. The annual Neilston Agricultural Show is an important trading and cultural event for farmers from southwest Scotland each spring.
Although heavy industry demised during the latter half of the 20th century, the population has continued to grow as a commuting community, supported by its position between Paisley and Glasgow, from roughly 1,000 people in 1800 to 5,168 in 2001. Neilston, part of Scotland's densely populated Central Belt, has continued to expand due to several new housing developments.
A note on the origin of the settlement's name. The Institute of Place-Name Studies at the University of Nottingham now has a helpful online resource.[1] If there is sufficient material to justify a subsection heading, then it may be titled as etymology or toponymy. If a settlement has a name in another recognised regional or national language, this can be presented here.
A note on the earliest known history of the settlement (any Bronze Age or Roman artefacts for example), and the earliest known mentions of the settlement (e.g. in Domesday Book).
Manorial history. Where the village formed part of a former manor, almost always the case with English villages, the subject may be treated summarily as a sub-section within the history section, or where such text has expanded to make the article unbalanced, as a detailed stand-alone article, which should be linked to at the start of the sub-section with a main article tag.
Avoid using headings that arrange the history of a settlement according to century or decade.
Avoid organising prose into timelines. If these exist (or are developed), consider placing them in a [[History of _]] or [[Timeline of _]] article. Where such an article exists, include {{main|History of _}} at the top of the history section linking to this more detailed article.
Unitary Authority or 'County Council and District/Borough Council, plus, if applicable its civil parish(es) / town council(s)? Can you name its wards? Is it a ward? Does it have a mayor or Royal bestowments (charters)? etc.
Representatives – only list the numbers for the parties if a large place.
Changes in governance made throughout the history of the settlement—what was its former status? its former administrative district and/or county? etc.
Parliamentary constituency (both UK and, if other than England (minus London), its devolved/assembly level constituencies). If it is of sufficient importance relative to the constituency then identifying the local MP, MSP, MWA, MLA may be worth including here as well as on the existing page for that constituency.
For whole council districts, or where a place figures in local council heraldry, a note on any grants of arms to the council.
A note on the built environment of the settlement, including how the land is used, if there is any notable infrastructure (a heavy rail line, motorway etc.), and a note on how the urban structure of the settlement is shaped and lies in relation to administrative boundaries and its central business district (if any).
A note on any divisions or suburbs of the settlement.
A note/section on the settlement's climate (where figures are available).
Where there is extensive information, it may be appropriate to create a new more detailed article titled 'Geography of ...' or 'Climate of ...' and move most of the detail to this article. Where this is done include {{main|Geography of _}} ''OR'' {{further|[[Geography of Example-shire]]}} ''AND/OR'' {{seealso|Climate of _}} at the top of the section.
Any airports/ferryports that are associated with the settlement can be mentioned, but a detailed description of any of them should be placed in their own article, or else in the article dealing with the local government article that contains them.
{{seealso|List of schools in Constituent country subdivision}}
If a village, write about the local library and primary school or museums if any exist.
If a town, write about the local secondary school and any grammar, public or specialist schools. A list of primary schools is not usually appropriate (especially if there are more than three); although a total number of how many may be useful.
If a city, write about any universities or further education colleges, museums and any other educational institutions. Notable public schools may also be included. Listing the secondary schools should be discouraged if there are more than about three and primary schools should definitely not be listed. A total of how many primary schools and secondary schools there are can be useful, however.
If there is no notable people section, then list notable people associated with the field of science and engineering or notable people who attended local institutions for their education.
Religious sites (NOTE: May also use the alternative heading of "Religion" should the content extend to material beyond the places of worship themselves): Include the following
Any churches or other such religious sites, and, where applicable, to whom they are dedicated (i.e. which saint).
Sport (NOTE: May also use the alternative heading of "Sport and leisure"; alternatively this may be a sub-section of "Culture" (below)): Include the following
A note on notable sports teams or sports centres.
A note on any proposals involving leisure in the area
The borough has been criticized in the past for not having enough leisure facilities, maintaining the position of Croydon as a three star borough. At the moment only three leisure centres are open for public use and two of these are expected to be closed down in the near future, with plans for only one of them to be re-built. Thornton Heath's ageing sports centre was recently knocked down, and replaced by a newer more modern leisure centre. South Norwood Leisure Centre was closed down in early 2006 so that it could be knocked completely down and re-designed from scratch like Thornton Heath, which would cost around £10 million. In May 2006 the Conservative Party became in charge of Croydon and decided that doing this would cost too much money, so they came up with another idea of just re-furbishing the centre, although this decision did not come without controversy.
Purley Pool is to close soon, but a new "super-pool" is planned in Coulsdon. The ageing New Addington Leisure Centre is also set to close but is to be re-built. A new leisure centre is also going to be built on the A23, southern end of Purley WayinWaddon. Sport Croydon is currently the commercial arm for leisure in the borough and the logo is seen somewhere in each of the centres. Fusion currently provides leisure services for the council which previously used Parkwood Leisure which itself provides services for nearby Lewisham.
Provide information of notable individuals that were born, or lived for a significant amount of time, in the settlement. Prose is preferred, though a bulleted list noting the connection the person has with the settlement as indicated in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#"Children" (i.e., indentation) may be used if appropriate. Simple lists of names add little of value and may be subject to abuse. More developed articles, especially those which have gone through WP:GA and WP:FA, tend to have this section written out as prose. The talkpage may be used in the early stages of an article's development to simply list people who are connected with a settlement.
If the section grows then it may be split out per WP:Summary style into a stand alone article or list which can be linked to via the {{main}} template placed at the top of the section – example: {{main|List of people from Foo}}.
NOTE: Reference sections may follow a number of styles, including separate "Footnote" and "Further reading" sections; please refer to WP:REF for more information.
Every article of Wikipedia must provide reliable citation, and thus this section is mandatory per policy.
Please use {{reflist}} for a standalone "Reference" section.
When providing a reference, please note that the word or punctuation goes before the reference, with no space in between. Full stops should not appear after a reference (e.g., "this is a quote".<ref>Smith J. (1234), Example book</ref>).
External links should be added only rarely, and in accordance with the guidelines found in WP:EL. Consequently, this section should only rarely be found in most articles. In particular, the use of links as described in WP:SPAM should always be avoided.
If any links are deemed appropriate for this section, they should always be accompanied by an appropriate description of (a) what they are, (b) their justification, and (c) the date on which they were added in the form "Accessed: 7 July 2007" (WP:EL#External links section gives some more information about this).
External links used as a form of verification for facts found in the text of the article should be treated as references and not be added to this section (see WP:EL#References and citation).
Some settlements' entries may be dominated so much by a specific landmark, person or movement (such as a terrorist attack or natural disaster) that it may require its own section (rather than just a sub-section). Where this is applicable, try to insert it beneath the heading to which it is most related. Similarly some of the smallest settlements may be lacking in extensive notability and source material, and so some of the latter sections may be suitable for amalgamation (such as a "Culture and community" section).
There is broad diversity in the settlements of the UK, and as such, some settlements may require extra or alternative headings. These could include:
(Note: this should be about political figures and political events, not local and national government arrangements)
A note on any notable political figures or events (such as the first successful election of an MP who later became Prime Minister, or a high-profile council strike or political movement which took place in the settlement).
A local election result breakdown table from available data.
(Note: this section may be suitable as a sub-section of "History")
A note on any notable inventions and/or discoveries made within the settlement, whether they be scientific, sporting, engineering or any other field of knowledge.
(Note: this should not be of a speculative nature, but be referenced from published material as to certain development, regeneration or gentrification is set to occur)
A note on any notable energy arrangements in the locality (i.e. wind farm, power station)
A note on any hospitals, surgeries, or other health centres in the settlement (with the possibility of elaborating where the nearest NHS hospital may be).
The Royal Oldham Hospital, at Oldham's northern boundary with Royton, is a large NHS hospital administrated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust. It was opened under its existing name on 1 December 1989. Formerly known as Oldham District and General, and occupying the site of the town's former workhouse (named Oldham Union Workhouse in 1851), the hospital is notable for being the birthplace of Louise Joy Brown – the world's first successful In vitro fertilised "test tube baby", on 25 July 1978. The North West Ambulance Service provides emergency patient transport to and from this facility. Other forms of health care are provided for locally by several small clinics and surgeries.
Per WP:TRIVIA, do not use a "trivia", "miscellaneous" or "other facts" section.
Per MOS:LISTBASICS, avoid using lists wherever possible (particularly for "notable people" or "subdivisions"); consider using tables, diagrams or prose.
Per WP:DATELINK, dates should only be linked if they have an independent significance in the article. The same applies to dates in the footnotes.
Avoid describing named areas that are verifiably part of a wider settlement as "districts" or "suburbs", unless citation supports this. Whilst these two terms have common usages, they also indicate a specific and technical geographic term to which an area may not actually conform.
Per WP:EL and WP:SPAM, be reluctant to add external links unless they are essential, and always restrict them to the External Links section, or to within an appropriately tagged reference.
Avoid weasel words, such as "it is believed that", "is widely regarded as", "some have claimed". (GA criteria)
The words "current", "recent" & "to date" should be avoided because they become outdated. Use "as of <year>" or, if the information should be kept up to date, the {{As of}} template. (GA criteria)
"While" should be used only when emphasising that two events occur at the same time, or when emphasising contrast. It should not be used as an additive link.
Using "with" as an additive link leads to wordy and awkward prose, e.g. "the town has ten councillors, with one being the district mayor" → "the town has ten councillors; one is the district mayor"
Beginning a sentence with "there", when "there" does not stand for anything, leads to wordy prose, e.g. There are ten houses in the village → The village has ten houses. The same applies to sentences beginning with "it".
Avoid peacock terms, such as "beautiful", "famous", "popular", "well-known", "significant", "important" and "obvious". Precise descriptors such as country/county's "Most Beautiful Village", "Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty" and "National Park" is permitted but should be accompanied by sufficient, reliable and notable citations. (GA criteria)
Avoid contentious labels and peacock words, e.g. "Scotland's top-ranked golfer..." especially in a section that is a summary section only, e.g. in Notable People or in describing national/international history or any aspects of politics.
Avoid using "not" unnecessarily, e.g. "previously not developed" → "previously undeveloped"
Avoid contractions (such as "can't", "isn't" or "they're")
Avoid starting a sentence with "Its"; this is a possessive pronoun, its use can be in this way.
Avoid informal words, such as "pub", "carry out", "though", "tremendous" and "bigger".
Avoid vague words, such as "various", "many", "several", "long", "a number of", "just", "very" and "almost".
Avoid using overly formal words or wordy phrases, such as "circa", "utilise", "whilst", "upon", "commence", "the majority of", "generate", "due to the fact that" and "prior to".
Avoid redundant words such as "is located in", "the two are both", "they brought along", "they have plans to", "they were all part of", "the last ones to form", "both the towns", "outside of the town", "all of the towns", "received some donations", "still exists today", "it also includes others", "many different towns", "near to the town", "available records show", "to help limit the chance", "Christian church", "in order to", "first began", "joined together", "future plans" and "in the year 2007".
"Last few years" has ambiguous meaning; "past few years" is preferable in some contexts. However: avoid Relative time references
"Within" has a different meaning to "in". "Within" should be used only when emphasising that something is inside something, e.g. "the town is in the county", "the town is within the county boundaries"
Rather than hyphens, en dashes should be used for ranges, e.g. 5–10 years; unspaced em dashes or spaced en dashes should be used for punctuation, e.g. The building—now disused—was built in 1820. importScript("User:GregU/dashes.js"); may be used in your personal JavaScript page to fix dashes with one click.
Page ranges in the footnotes, and sports scores should also use en dashes.
" " (non-breaking space) should be typed between numbers and units, and other numerical/non-numerical components, e.g., "10 miles", which appears on writing 10 miles, similarly for "Boeing 747"
A hyphen should not be placed after an -ly word if it is an adverb, e,g., widely used road; except if the -ly word is or could be mistaken for an adjective, e.g., friendly-looking man.
Periods and spaces are needed after initials in people's names, e.g. P. G. Wodehouse
Compound adjectives need hyphens, for example, the 1000-year-old tree, but, the tree was 1000 years old.
Ampersands should not be used except in company/partnership names, e.g. Marks & Spencer.
Logical quotation (British style) should be used on UK articles. That is, include within quotation marks only those punctuation marks that appeared in the quoted material, but otherwise place punctuation outside the closing quotation marks. For example – "Carefree", in general, means "free from care or anxiety". but "Today", said former Prime Minister Tony Blair, "I feel free from care and anxiety."
Dates should not be linked unless there is "reason to do so" per MOS:UNLINKDATES.
External links that are not references belong only in an External Links section.
Portal links such as to Wikimedia images are usually placed in the "See also" section.
Imperial measurements (eg. miles, feet, acres) should be accompanied by the metric equivalent in brackets, and vice versa. If possible, use a conversion template, e.g. {{convert|5|mi|km|0}}. A further advantage of this is it inputs without having to type it.
Whole numbers under 10 should be spelled out as words, except for distances between settlements and in lists, tables or infoboxes.
Sentences should not start with a numeral. The sentence should be recast or the number should be spelled out.
Statements that are likely to be challenged, quotations and statistics need inline citations. (GA criteria)
Publication references are preferred with author, title, publisher, publishing date and page number.
Book references may also include city of publication and ISBN, but this is not required.
Web references are preferred with the author, publisher, publishing date, website and access date.
Web references preferably should include the language if it is not English, and the format if it is not HTML e.g. |format=PDF
References with consistent formatting, e.g. consistent author format, abbreviations for "page number", etc are often requested for Featured Articles, but are not required for GA or other articles.
Blogs and personal websites are not reliable sources, unless written by the subject of the article or by an expert on the subject. See WP:BLOGS.
Dead web references should not be removed, unless replaced.
Inline citations belong immediately after a relevant punctuation mark.
OpenStreetMap (open licensed!) Community built maps which are incomplete, but good coverage of some areas/cities. See wikiproject
out of copyright ordnance survey scans. Commercial restriction for direct image copying.
Ordnance Survey® Election Maps–boundaries of civil parishes, wards, boroughs etc., up to street map scale. The draconian terms and conditions don't seem to prevent GFDL licensing of research by Wikipedia editors, as long as the editors themselves don't use the information for financial gain, and no-one copies actual extracts, mapping data or layers from the maps (so... can't copy)
Books: There is a list of UK geography books and the Wikipedians who own them at Wikipedia:Library/Places#UK. You can request info from the owners of the relevant books. archive.org texts is a good source for copyright expired material.
