The Project Gutenberg EBook of On Books and the Housing of Them, by
William Ewart Gladstone

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org


Title: On Books and the Housing of Them

Author: William Ewart Gladstone

Release Date: February 15, 2009 [EBook #3426]
Last Updated: February 4, 2013

Language: English

Character set encoding: ASCII

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ON BOOKS AND THE HOUSING OF THEM ***




Produced by Charles Hall, and David Widger






 




ON BOOKS AND THE HOUSING OF THEM




By William Ewart Gladstone (1809-1898)  









FOOTNOTES: 








In the old age of his intellect (which at this point seemed to taste a  little of decrepitude), Strauss declared 1that the  doctrine of immortality has recently lost the assistance of a passable  argument, inasmuch as it has been discovered that the stars are inhabited;  for where, he asks, could room now be found for such a multitude of souls?  Again, in view of the current estimates of prospective population for this  earth, some people have begun to entertain alarm for the probable  condition of England (if not Great Britain) when she gets (say) seventy  millions that are allotted to her against six or eight hundred millions  for the United States. We have heard in some systems of the pressure of  population upon food; but the idea of any pressure from any quarter upon  space is hardly yet familiar. Still, I suppose that many a reader must  have been struck with the naive simplicity of the hyperbole of St. John,  2 perhaps a solitary unit of its kind in the New Testament: "the which if  they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself  could not contain the books that should be written."  

A book, even Audubon (I believe the biggest known), is smaller than a man;  but, in relation to space, I entertain more proximate apprehension of  pressure upon available space from the book population than from the  numbers of mankind. We ought to recollect, with more of a realized  conception than we commonly attain to, that a book consists, like a man,  from whom it draws its lineage, of a body and a soul. They are not always  proportionate to each other. Nay, even the different members of the  book-body do not sing, but clash, when bindings of a profuse costliness  are imposed, as too often happens in the case of Bibles and books of  devotion, upon letter-press which is respectable journeyman's work and  nothing more. The men of the Renascence had a truer sense of adaptation;  the age of jewelled bindings was also the age of illumination and of the  beautiful miniatura, which at an earlier stage meant side or margin art,3  and then, on account of the small portraitures included in it, gradually  slid into the modern sense of miniature. There is a caution which we ought  to carry with us more and more as we get in view of the coming period of  open book trade, and of demand practically boundless. Noble works ought  not to be printed in mean and worthless forms, and cheapness ought to be  limited by an instinctive sense and law of fitness. The binding of a book  is the dress with which it walks out into the world. The paper, type and  ink are the body, in which its soul is domiciled. And these three, soul,  body, and habilament, are a triad which ought to be adjusted to one  another by the laws of harmony and good sense.  

Already the increase of books is passing into geometrical progression. And  this is not a little remarkable when we bear in mind that in Great  Britain, of which I speak, while there is a vast supply of cheap works,  what are termed "new publications" issue from the press, for the most  part, at prices fabulously high, so that the class of real purchasers has  been extirpated, leaving behind as buyers only a few individuals who might  almost be counted on the fingers, while the effective circulation depends  upon middle-men through the engine of circulating libraries. These are not  so much owners as distributers of books, and they mitigate the difficulty  of dearness by subdividing the cost, and then selling such copies as are  still in decent condition at a large reduction. It is this state of  things, due, in my opinion, principally to the present form of the law of  copyright, which perhaps may have helped to make way for the satirical  (and sometimes untrue) remark that in times of distress or pressure men  make their first economies on their charities, and their second on their  books.  

The annual arrivals at the Bodleian Library are, I believe, some twenty  thousand; at the British Museum, forty thousand, sheets of all kinds  included. Supposing three-fourths of these to be volumes, of one size or  another, and to require on the average an inch of shelf space, the result  will be that in every two years nearly a mile of new shelving will be  required to meet the wants of a single library. But, whatever may be the  present rate of growth, it is small in comparison with what it is likely  to become. The key of the question lies in the hands of the United Kingdom  and the United States jointly. In this matter there rests upon these two  Powers no small responsibility. They, with their vast range of inhabited  territory, and their unity of tongue, are masters of the world, which will  have to do as they do. When the Britains and America are fused into one  book market; when it is recognized that letters, which as to their  material and their aim are a high-soaring profession, as to their mere  remuneration are a trade; when artificial fetters are relaxed, and  printers, publishers, and authors obtain the reward which well-regulated  commerce would afford them, then let floors beware lest they crack, and  walls lest they bulge and burst, from the weight of books they will have  to carry and to confine.  

It is plain, for one thing, that under the new state of things specialism,  in the future, must more and more abound. But specialism means subdivision  of labor; and with subdivision labor ought to be more completely, more  exactly, performed. Let us bow our heads to the inevitable; the day of  encyclopaedic learning has gone by. It may perhaps be said that that sun  set with Leibnitz. But as little learning is only dangerous when it  forgets that it is little, so specialism is only dangerous when it forgets  that it is special. When it encroaches on its betters, when it claims  exceptional certainty or honor, it is impertinent, and should be rebuked;  but it has its own honor in its own province, and is, in any case, to be  preferred to pretentious and flaunting sciolism.  

A vast, even a bewildering prospect is before us, for evil or for good;  but for good, unless it be our own fault, far more than for evil. Books  require no eulogy from me; none could be permitted me, when they already  draw their testimonials from Cicero4 and Macaulay.5  But books are the voices of the dead. They are a main instrument of  communion with the vast human procession of the other world. They are the  allies of the thought of man. They are in a certain sense at enmity with  the world. Their work is, at least, in the two higher compartments of our  threefold life. In a room well filled with them, no one has felt or can  feel solitary. Second to none, as friends to the individual, they are  first and foremost among the compages, the bonds and rivets of the race,  onward from that time when they were first written on the tablets of  Babylonia and Assyria, the rocks of Asia minor, and the monuments of  Egypt, down to the diamond editions of Mr. Pickering and Mr. Frowde.6  

It is in truth difficult to assign dimensions for the libraries of the  future. And it is also a little touching to look back upon those of the  past. As the history of bodies cannot, in the long run, be separated from  the history of souls, I make no apology for saying a few words on the  libraries which once were, but which have passed away.  

The time may be approaching when we shall be able to estimate the quantity  of book knowledge stored in the repositories of those empires which we  call prehistoric. For the present, no clear estimate even of the great  Alexandrian Libraries has been brought within the circle of popular  knowledge; but it seems pretty clear that the books they contained were  reckoned, at least in the aggregate, by hundreds of thousands.7  The form of the book, however, has gone through many variations; and we  moderns have a great advantage in the shape which the exterior has now  taken. It speaks to us symbolically by the title on its back, as the roll  of parchment could hardly do. It is established that in Roman times the  bad institution of slavery ministered to a system under which books were  multiplied by simultaneous copying in a room where a single person read  aloud in the hearing of many the volume to be reproduced, and that so  produced they were relatively cheap. Had they not been so, they would  hardly have been, as Horace represents them, among the habitual spoils of  the grocer.8  It is sad, and is suggestive of many inquiries, that this abundance was  followed, at least in the West, by a famine of more than a thousand years.  And it is hard, even after all allowances, to conceive that of all the  many manuscripts of Homer which Italy must have possessed we do not know  that a single parchment or papyrus was ever read by a single individual,  even in a convent, or even by a giant such as Dante, or as Thomas  Acquinas, the first of them unquestionably master of all the knowledge  that was within the compass of his age. There were, however, libraries  even in the West, formed by Charlemagne and by others after him. We are  told that Alcuin, in writing to the great monarch, spoke with longing of  the relative wealth of England in these precious estates. Mr. Edwards,  whom I have already quoted, mentions Charles the Fifth of France, in 1365,  as a collector of manuscripts. But some ten years back the Director of the  Bibliotheque Nationale informed me that the French King John collected  twelve hundred manuscripts, at that time an enormous library, out of which  several scores were among the treasures in his care. Mary of Medicis  appears to have amassed in the sixteenth century, probably with far less  effort, 5,800 volumes.9 Oxford had before that time  received noble gifts for her University Library. And we have to recollect  with shame and indignation that that institution was plundered and  destroyed by the Commissioners of the boy King Edward the Sixth, acting in  the name of the Reformation of Religion. Thus it happened that opportunity  was left to a private individual, the munificent Sir Thomas Bodley, to  attach an individual name to one of the famous libraries of the world. It  is interesting to learn that municipal bodies have a share in the honor  due to monasteries and sovereigns in the collection of books; for the  Common Council of Aix purchased books for a public library in 1419.10  

Louis the Fourteenth, of evil memory, has at least this one good deed to  his credit, that he raised the Royal Library at Paris, founded two  centuries before, to 70,000 volumes. In 1791 it had 150,000 volumes. It  profited largely by the Revolution. The British Museum had only reached  115,000 when Panizzi became keeper in 1837. Nineteen years afterward he  left it with 560,000, a number which must now have more than doubled. By  his noble design for occupying the central quadrangle, a desert of gravel  until his time, he provided additional room for 1,200,000 volumes. All  this apparently enormous space for development is being eaten up with  fearful rapidity; and such is the greed of the splendid library that it  opens its jaws like Hades, and threatens shortly to expel the antiquities  from the building, and appropriate the places they adorn.  

But the proper office of hasty retrospect in a paper like this is only to  enlarge by degrees, like the pupil of an eye, the reader's contemplation  and estimate of the coming time, and to prepare him for some practical  suggestions of a very humble kind. So I take up again the thread of my  brief discourse. National libraries draw upon a purse which is bottomless.  But all public libraries are not national. And the case even of private  libraries is becoming, nay, has become, very serious for all who are  possessed by the inexorable spirit of collection, but whose ardor is  perplexed and qualified, or even baffled, by considerations springing from  the balance-sheet.  

The purchase of a book is commonly supposed to end, even for the most  scrupulous customer, with the payment of the bookseller's bill. But this  is a mere popular superstition. Such payment is not the last, but the  first term in a series of goodly length. If we wish to give to the block a  lease of life equal to that of the pages, the first condition is that it  should be bound. So at least one would have said half a century ago. But,  while books are in the most instances cheaper, binding, from causes which  I do not understand, is dearer, at least in England, than it was in my  early years, so that few can afford it.11 We have,  however, the tolerable and very useful expedient of cloth binding (now in  some danger, I fear, of losing its modesty through flaring ornamentation)  to console us. Well, then, bound or not, the book must of necessity be put  into a bookcase. And the bookcase must be housed. And the house must be  kept. And the library must be dusted, must be arranged, should be  catalogued. What a vista of toil, yet not unhappy toil! Unless indeed  things are to be as they now are in at least one princely mansion of this  country, where books, in thousands upon thousands, are jumbled together  with no more arrangement than a sack of coals; where not even the  sisterhood of consecutive volumes has been respected; where undoubtedly an  intending reader may at the mercy of Fortune take something from the  shelves that is a book; but where no particular book can except by the  purest accident, be found.  

Such being the outlook, what are we to do with our books? Shall we be  buried under them like Tarpeia under the Sabine shields? Shall we renounce  them (many will, or will do worse, will keep to the most worthless part of  them) in our resentment against their more and more exacting demands?  Shall we sell and scatter them? as it is painful to see how often the  books of eminent men are ruthlessly, or at least unhappily, dispersed on  their decease. Without answering in detail, I shall assume that the  book-buyer is a book-lover, that his love is a tenacious, not a transitory  love, and that for him the question is how best to keep his books.  

I pass over those conditions which are the most obvious, that the building  should be sound and dry, the apartment airy, and with abundant light. And  I dispose with a passing anathema of all such as would endeavour to solve  their problem, or at any rate compromise their difficulties, by setting  one row of books in front of another. I also freely admit that what we  have before us is not a choice between difficulty and no difficulty, but a  choice among difficulties.  

The objects further to be contemplated in the bestowal of our books, so  far as I recollect, are three: economy, good arrangement, and  accessibility with the smallest possible expenditure of time.  

In a private library, where the service of books is commonly to be  performed by the person desiring to use them, they ought to be assorted  and distributed according to subject. The case may be altogether different  where they have to be sent for and brought by an attendant. It is an  immense advantage to bring the eye in aid of the mind; to see within a  limited compass all the works that are accessible, in a given library, on  a given subject; and to have the power of dealing with them collectively  at a given spot, instead of hunting them up through an entire  accumulation. It must be admitted, however, that distribution by subjects  ought in some degree to be controlled by sizes. If everything on a given  subject, from folio down to 32mo, is to be brought locally together, there  will be an immense waste of space in the attempt to lodge objects of such  different sizes in one and the same bookcase. And this waste of space will  cripple us in the most serious manner, as will be seen with regard to the  conditions of economy and of accessibility. The three conditions are in  truth all connected together, but especially the two last named.  

Even in a paper such as this the question of classification cannot  altogether be overlooked; but it is one more easy to open than to closeone  upon which I am not bold enough to hope for uniformity of opinion and of  practice. I set aside on the one hand the case of great public libraries,  which I leave to the experts of those establishments. And, at the other  end of the scale, in small private libraries the matter becomes easy or  even insignificant. In libraries of the medium scale, not too vast for  some amount of personal survey, some would multiply subdivision, and some  restrain it. An acute friend asks me under what and how many general  headings subjects should be classified in a library intended for practical  use and reading, and boldly answers by suggesting five classes only: (1)  science, (2) speculation, (3) art, (4) history, and (5) miscellaneous and  periodical literature. But this seemingly simple division at once raises  questions both of practical and of theoretic difficulty. As to the last,  periodical literature is fast attaining to such magnitude, that it may  require a classification of its own, and that the enumeration which  indexes supply, useful as it is, will not suffice. And I fear it is the  destiny of periodicals as such to carry down with them a large proportion  of what, in the phraseology of railways, would be called dead weight, as  compared with live weight. The limits of speculation would be most  difficult to draw. The diversities included under science would be so vast  as at once to make sub-classification a necessity. The ologies are by no  means well suited to rub shoulders together; and sciences must include  arts, which are but country cousins to them, or a new compartment must be  established for their accommodation. Once more, how to cope with the  everlasting difficulty of 'Works'? In what category to place Dante,  Petrarch, Swedenborg, Burke, Coleridge, Carlyle, or a hundred more? Where,  again, is Poetry to stand? I apprehend that it must take its place, the  first place without doubt, in Art; for while it is separated from Painting  and her other 'sphere-born harmonious sisters' by their greater dependence  on material forms they are all more inwardly and profoundly united in  their first and all-enfolding principle, which is to organize the  beautiful for presentation to the perceptions of man.  

But underneath all particular criticism of this or that method of  classification will be found to lie a subtler questionwhether the  arrangement of a library ought not in some degree to correspond with and  represent the mind of the man who forms it. For my own part, I plead  guilty, within certain limits, of favoritism in classification. I am  sensible that sympathy and its reverse have something to do with  determining in what company a book shall stand. And further, does there  not enter into the matter a principle of humanity to the authors  themselves? Ought we not to place them, so far as may be, in the  neighborhood which they would like? Their living manhoods are printed in  their works. Every reality, every tendency, endures. Eadem sequitur  tellure sepultos.  

I fear that arrangement, to be good, must be troublesome. Subjects are  traversed by promiscuous assemblages of 'works;' both by sizes; and all by  languages. On the whole I conclude as follows. The mechanical perfection  of a library requires an alphabetical catalogue of the whole. But under  the shadow of this catalogue let there be as many living integers as  possible, for every well-chosen subdivision is a living integer and makes  the library more and more an organism. Among others I plead for individual  men as centres of subdivision: not only for Homer, Dante, Shakespeare, but  for Johnson, Scott, and Burns, and whatever represents a large and  manifold humanity.  

The question of economy, for those who from necessity or choice consider  it at all, is a very serious one. It has been a fashion to make bookcases  highly ornamental. Now books want for and in themselves no ornament at  all. They are themselves the ornament. Just as shops need no ornament, and  no one will think of or care for any structural ornament, if the goods are  tastefully disposed in the shop-window. The man who looks for society in  his books will readily perceive that, in proportion as the face of his  bookcase is occupied by ornament, he loses that society; and conversely,  the more that face approximates to a sheet of bookbacks, the more of that  society he will enjoy. And so it is that three great advantages come hand  in hand, and, as will be seen, reach their maximum together: the  sociability of books, minimum of cost in providing for them, and ease of  access to them.  

In order to attain these advantages, two conditions are fundamental.  First, the shelves must, as a rule, be fixed; secondly, the cases, or a  large part of them, should have their side against the wall, and thus,  projecting into the room for a convenient distance, they should be of  twice the depth needed for a single line of books, and should hold two  lines, one facing each way. Twelve inches is a fair and liberal depth for  two rows of octavos. The books are thus thrown into stalls, but stalls  after the manner of a stable, or of an old-fashioned coffee-room; not  after the manner of a bookstall, which, as times go, is no stall at all,  but simply a flat space made by putting some scraps of boarding together,  and covering them with books.  

This method of dividing the longitudinal space by projections at right  angles to it, if not very frequently used, has long been known. A great  example of it is to be found in the noble library of Trinity College,  Cambridge, and is the work of Sir Christopher Wren. He has kept these  cases down to very moderate height, for he doubtless took into account  that great heights require long ladders, and that the fetching and use of  these greatly add to the time consumed in getting or in replacing a book.  On the other hand, the upper spaces of the walls are sacrificed, whereas  in Dublin, All Souls, and many other libraries the bookcases ascend very  high, and magnificent apartments walled with books may in this way be  constructed. Access may be had to the upper portions by galleries; but we  cannot have stairs all round the room, and even with one gallery of books  a room should not be more than from sixteen to eighteen feet high if we  are to act on the principle of bringing the largest possible number of  volumes into the smallest possible space. I am afraid it must be admitted  that we cannot have a noble and imposing spectacle, in a vast apartment,  without sacrificing economy and accessibility; and vice versa.  

The projections should each have attached to them what I rudely term an  endpiece (for want of a better name), that is, a shallow and extremely  light adhering bookcase (light by reason of the shortness of the shelves),  which both increases the accommodation, and makes one short side as well  as the two long ones of the parallelopiped to present simply a face of  books with the lines of shelf, like threads, running between the rows.  

The wall-spaces between the projections ought also to be turned to account  for shallow bookcases, so far as they are not occupied by windows. If the  width of the interval be two feet six, about sixteen inches of this may be  given to shallow cases placed against the wall.  

Economy of space is in my view best attained by fixed shelves. This dictum  I will now endeavor to make good. If the shelves are movable, each shelf  imposes a dead weight on the structure of the bookcase, without doing  anything to support it. Hence it must be built with wood of considerable  mass, and the more considerable the mass of wood the greater are both the  space occupied and the ornament needed. When the shelf is fixed, it  contributes as a fastening to hold the parts of the bookcase together; and  a very long experience enables me to say that shelves of from half- to  three-quarters of an inch worked fast into uprights of from three-quarters  to a full inch will amply suffice for all sizes of books except large and  heavy folios, which would probably require a small, and only a small,  addition of thickness.  

I have recommended that as a rule the shelves be fixed, and have given  reasons for the adoption of such a rule. I do not know whether it will  receive the sanction of authorities. And I make two admissions. First, it  requires that each person owning and arranging a library should have a  pretty accurate general knowledge of the sizes of his books. Secondly, it  may be expedient to introduce here and there, by way of exception, a  single movable shelf; and this, I believe, will be found to afford a  margin sufficient to meet occasional imperfections in the computation of  sizes. Subject to these remarks, I have considerable confidence in the  recommendation I have made.  

I will now exhibit to my reader the practical effect of such arrangement,  in bringing great numbers of books within easy reach. Let each projection  be three feet long, twelve inches deep (ample for two faces of octavos),  and nine feet high, so that the upper shelf can be reached by the aid of a  wooden stool of two steps not more than twenty inches high, and portable  without the least effort in a single hand. I will suppose the wall space  available to be eight feet, and the projections, three in number, with end  pieces need only jut out three feet five, while narrow strips of bookcase  will run up the wall between the projections. Under these conditions, the  bookcases thus described will carry above 2,000 octavo volumes.  

And a library forty feet long and twenty feet broad, amply lighted, having  some portion of the centre fitted with very low bookcases suited to serve  for some of the uses of tables, will receive on the floor from 18,000 to  20,000 volumes of all sizes, without losing the appearance of a room or  assuming that of a warehouse, and while leaving portions of space  available near the windows for purposes of study. If a gallery be added,  there will be accommodation for a further number of five thousand, and the  room need be no more than sixteen feet high. But a gallery is not suitable  for works above the octavo size, on account of inconvenience in carriage  to and fro.  

It has been admitted that in order to secure the vital purpose of  compression with fixed shelving, the rule of arrangement according to  subjects must be traversed partially by division into sizes. This  division, however, need not, as to the bulk of the library, be more than  threefold. The main part would be for octavos. This is becoming more and  more the classical or normal size; so that nowadays the octavo edition is  professionally called the library edition. Then there should be deeper  cases for quarto and folio, and shallower for books below octavo, each  appropriately divided into shelves.  

If the economy of time by compression is great, so is the economy of cost.  I think it reasonable to take the charge of provision for books in a  gentleman's house, and in the ordinary manner, at a shilling a volume.  This may vary either way, but it moderately represents, I think, my own  experience, in London residences, of the charge of fitting up with  bookcases, which, if of any considerable size, are often unsuitable for  removal. The cost of the method which I have adopted later in life, and  have here endeavored to explain, need not exceed one penny per volume.  Each bookcase when filled represents, unless in exceptional cases, nearly  a solid mass. The intervals are so small that, as a rule, they admit a  very small portion of dust. If they are at a tolerable distance from the  fireplace, if carpeting be avoided except as to small movable carpets  easily removed for beating, and if sweeping be discreetly conducted, dust  may, at any rate in the country, be made to approach to a quantite  negligeable.  

It is a great matter, in addition to other advantages, to avoid the  endless trouble and the miscarriages of movable shelves; the looseness,  and the tightness, the weary arms, the aching fingers, and the broken  fingernails. But it will be fairly asked what is to be done, when the  shelves are fixed, with volumes too large to go into them? I admit that  the dilemma, when it occurs, is formidable. I admit also that no book  ought to be squeezed or even coaxed into its place: they should move  easily both in and out. And I repeat here that the plan I have recommended  requires a pretty exact knowledge by measurement of the sizes of books and  the proportions in which the several sizes will demand accommodation. The  shelf-spacing must be reckoned beforehand, with a good deal of care and no  little time. But I can say from experience that by moderate care and use  this knowledge can be attained, and that the resulting difficulties, when  measured against the aggregate of convenience, are really insignificant.  It will be noticed that my remarks are on minute details, and that they  savor more of serious handiwork in the placing of books than of lordly  survey and direction. But what man who really loves his books delegates to  any other human being, as long as there is breath in his body, the office  of inducting them into their homes?  

And now as to results. It is something to say that in this way 10,000  volumes can be placed within a room of quite ordinary size, all visible,  all within easy reach, and without destroying the character of the  apartment as a room. But, on the strength of a case with which I am  acquainted, I will even be a little more particular. I take as before a  room of forty feet in length and twenty in breadth, thoroughly lighted by  four windows on each side; as high as you please, but with only about nine  feet of height taken for the bookcases: inasmuch as all heavy ladders, all  adminicula requiring more than one hand to carry with care, are forsworn.  And there is no gallery. In the manner I have described, there may be  placed on the floor of such a room, without converting it from a room into  a warehouse, bookcases capable of receiving, in round numbers, 20,000  volumes.  

The state of the case, however, considered as a whole, and especially with  reference to libraries exceeding say 20,000 or 30,000 volumes, and  gathering rapid accretions, has been found to require in extreme cases,  such as those of the British Museum and the Bodleian (on its limited  site), a change more revolutionary in its departure from, almost reversal  of, the ancient methods, than what has been here described.  

The best description I can give of its essential aim, so far as I have  seen the processes (which were tentative and initial), is this. The masses  represented by filled bookcases are set one in front of another; and, in  order that access may be had as it is required, they are set upon trams  inserted in the floor (which must be a strong one), and wheeled off and on  as occasion requires.  

The idea of the society of books is in a case of this kind abandoned. But  even on this there is something to say. Neither all men nor all books are  equally sociable. For my part I find but little sociabilty in a huge wall  of Hansards, or (though a great improvement) in the Gentleman's Magazine,  in the Annual Registers, in the Edinburgh and Quarterly Reviews, or in the  vast range of volumes which represent pamphlets innumerable. Yet each of  these and other like items variously present to us the admissible, or the  valuable, or the indispensable. Clearly these masses, and such as these,  ought to be selected first for what I will not scruple to call interment.  It is a burial; one, however, to which the process of cremation will never  of set purpose be applied. The word I have used is dreadful, but also  dreadful is the thing. To have our dear old friends stowed away in  catacombs, or like the wine-bottles in bins: the simile is surely lawful  until the use of that commodity shall have been prohibited by the growing  movement of the time. But however we may gild the case by a cheering  illustration, or by the remembrance that the provision is one called for  only by our excess of wealth, it can hardly be contemplated without a  shudder at a process so repulsive applied to the best beloved among  inanimate objects.  

It may be thought that the gloomy perspective I am now opening exists for  great public libraries alone. But public libraries are multiplying fast,  and private libraries are aspiring to the public dimensions. It may be  hoped that for a long time to come no grave difficulties will arise in  regard to private libraries, meant for the ordinary use of that great  majority of readers who read only for recreation or for general  improvement. But when study, research, authorship, come into view, when  the history of thought and of inquiry in each of its branches, or in any  considerable number of them, has to be presented, the necessities of the  case are terribly widened. Chess is a specialty and a narrow one. But I  recollect a statement in the Quarterly Review, years back, that there  might be formed a library of twelve hundred volumes upon chess. I think my  deceased friend, Mr. Alfred Denison, collected between two and three  thousand upon angling. Of living Englishmen perhaps Lord Acton is the most  effective and retentive reader; and for his own purposes he has gathered a  library of not less, I believe, than 100,000 volumes.  

Undoubtedly the idea of book-cemeteries such as I have supposed is very  formidable. It should be kept within the limits of the dire necessity  which has evoked it from the underworld into the haunts of living men. But  it will have to be faced, and faced perhaps oftener than might be  supposed. And the artist needed for the constructions it requires will not  be so much a librarian as a warehouseman.  

But if we are to have cemeteries, they ought to receive as many bodies as  possible. The condemned will live ordinarily in pitch darkness, yet so  that when wanted, they may be called into the light. Asking myself how  this can most effectively be done, I have arrived at the conclusion that  nearly two-thirds, or say three-fifths, of the whole cubic contents of a  properly constructed apartment12 may be made a nearly solid mass  of books: a vast economy which, so far as it is applied, would probably  quadruple or quintuple the efficiency of our repositories as to contents,  and prevent the population of Great Britain from being extruded some  centuries hence into the surrounding waters by the exorbitant dimensions  of their own libraries.  



The End 












FOOTNOTES:  



1 (return)
 [ In Der alte und der neue  Glaube]  


2 (return)
 [ xxi, 25.]  


3 (return)
 [ First of all it seems to  have referred to the red capital letters placed at the head of chapters or  other divisions of works.]  


4 (return)
 [ Cic. Pro Archia poeta,  vii.]  


5 (return)
 [ Essays Critical and  Historical, ii. 228.]  


6 (return)
 [ The Prayer Book recently  issued by Mr. Frowde at the Clarendon Press weighs, bound in morocco, less  than an once and a quarter. I see it stated that unbound it weighs  three-quarters of an ounce. Pickering's Cattullus, Tibullus, and  Propertius in leather binding, weighs an ounce and a quarter. His Dante  weighs less than a number of the Times.]  


7 (return)
 [ See Libraries and the  Founders of Libraries, by B. Edwards, 1864, p. 5. Hallam, Lit. Europe.]  


8 (return)
 [ Hor. Ep. II. i. 270;  Persius, i. 48; Martial, iv. lxxxvii. 8.]  


9 (return)
 [ Edwards.]  


10 (return)
 [ Rouard, Notice sur la  Bibliotheque d'Aix, p. 40. Quoted in Edwards, p. 34.]  


11 (return)
 [ The Director of the  Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris, which I suppose still to be the first  library in the world, in doing for me most graciously the honors of that  noble establishment, informed me that they full-bound annually a few  scores of volumes, while they half-bound about twelve hundred. For all the  rest they had to be contented with a lower provision. And France raises  the largest revenue in the world.]  


12 (return)
 [ Note in illustration. Let  us suppose a room 28 feet by 10, and a little over 9 feet high. Divide  this longitudinally for a passage 4 feet wide. Let the passage project 12  to 18 inches at each end beyond the line of the wall. Let the passage ends  be entirely given to either window or glass door. Twenty-four pairs of  trams run across the room. On them are placed 56 bookcases, divided by the  passage, reaching to the ceiling, each 3 feet broad, 12 inches deep, and  separated from its neighbors by an interval of 2 inches, and set on small  wheels, pulleys, or rollers, to work along the trams. Strong handles on  the inner side of each bookcase to draw it out into the passage. Each of  these bookcases would hold 500 octavos; and a room of 28 feet by 10 would  receive 25,000 volumes. A room of 40 feet by 20 (no great size) would  receive 60,000, It would, of course, be not properly a room, but a  warehouse.]  











End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of On Books and the Housing of Them, by
William Ewart Gladstone

*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ON BOOKS AND THE HOUSING OF THEM ***

***** This file should be named 3426-h.htm or 3426-h.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
        http://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/2/3426/

Produced by Charles Hall, and David Widger



Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
will be renamed.

Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
redistribution.



*** START: FULL LICENSE ***

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
http://gutenberg.org/license).


Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works

1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.  See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.

1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase『Project
Gutenberg』is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
1.E.9.

1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
that

- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
     License.  You must require such a user to return or
     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
     Project Gutenberg-tm works.

- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
     of receipt of the work.

- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.

1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the『Right
of Replacement or Refund』described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.


Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.


Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
http://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
page at http://pglaf.org

For additional contact information:
     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
     Chief Executive and Director
     gbnewby@pglaf.org


Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
particular state visit http://pglaf.org

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate


Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.

Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.


Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.


Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:

     http://www.gutenberg.org

This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.