Project Gutenberg's Christianity Unveiled, by Nicolas-Antoine Boulanger
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: Christianity Unveiled
Being an Examination of the Principles and Effects of the
Christian Religion
Author: Nicolas-Antoine Boulanger
Translator: W. M. Johnson
Release Date: December 30, 2012 [EBook #40770]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CHRISTIANITY UNVEILED ***
Produced by David Widger
CHRISTIANITY UNVEILED
Being An Examination of The Principles And Effects of The Christian
Religion
By Nicolas-Antoine Boulanger
Translated From The French By W. M. Johnson.
"Slave to no Sect, who takes no private read,
But looks through Nature up to Nature's God;
"And knows where faith, law, morals, all began,
All end in love of God, and love of Man."--Pope
London
Printed & Published By R. Carlile, 56, Fleet Street.
1819
Contents
TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.
LETTER FROM THE AUTHOR TO A FRIEND.
CHRISTIANITY UNVEILED
CHAP. I.—INTRODUCTION.
CHAP. II.—SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF THE
JEWS.
CHAP. III.—SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF THE
CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
CHAP. IV.—OF THE CHRISTIAN MYTHOLOGY,
CHAP. V.—OF REVELATION.
CHAP. VI.—OF THE PROOFS OF THE CHRISTIAN
RELIGION.
CHAP. VII.—OF THE MYSTERIES OF THE
CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
CHAP. VIII.—MYSTERIES AND DOGMAS OF
CHRISTIANITY.
CHAP. IX.—OF THE RITES AND MYSTERIOUS
CEREMONIES
CHAP. X.—OF THE INSPIRED WRITINGS OF THE
CHRISTIANS.
CHAP. XI.—OF CHRISTIAN MORALITY.
CHAP. XII.—OF THE CHRISTIAN VIRTUES.
CHAP. XIII.—OF THE PRACTICE AND DUTIES OF
THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
CHAP. XIV.—OF THE POLITICAL EFFECTS OF THE
CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
CHAP. XV.—OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, OR
PRIESTHOOD.
CHAP. XVI.—CONCLUSION.
TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.
In this philosophic age, when nature, reason, and the rights of man have
resumed their empire; when the genius of a great, generous, and brave
people is giving the last blow to superstition and despotism, the
publication of a work which has greatly contributed to these glorious
events, must be highly acceptable, not only to the literary world, but
even to the community at large, who eagerly seek after instruction, the
moment they believe it necessary for their happiness.
This publication bears a conspicuous rank among those works whose free and
independent sentiments have introduced a happy change in the public mind,
and concurred with the writings of Rousseau, Mably, Raynal, and Voltaire,
in bringing forward the French Revolution: a revolution which will
probably prove the harbinger of the complete triumph of reason.
Persecutions and wars will then cease for ever throughout the civilized
world.
In offering this translation to the public, I pay a tribute that every
member of society owes to his fellow-citizens, that of endeavouring to
acquaint them with their true rights and duties, and, consequently, the
means most conducive to their happiness.
New York, 1804.
LETTER FROM THE AUTHOR TO A FRIEND.
I receive, Sir, with gratitude, the remarks which you send me upon my
work. If I am sensible to the praises you condescend to give it, I am too
fond of truth to be displeased with the frankness with which you propose
your objections. I find them sufficiently weighty to merit all my
attention. He but ill deserves the title of philosopher, who has not the
courage to hear his opinions contradicted. We are not divines; our
disputes are of a nature to terminate amicably; they in no way resemble
those of the apostles of superstition, who endeavour to overreach each
other by captious arguments, and who, at the expence of good faith,
contend only to advocate the cause of their vanity and their prejudices.
We both desire the happiness of mankind, we both search after truth; this
being the case, we cannot disagree.
You begin by admitting the necessity of examining religion, and submitting
opinions to the decision of reason. You acknowledge that Christianity
cannot sustain this trial, and that in the eye of good sense it can never
appear to be any thing but a tissue of absurdities, of unconnected fables,
senseless dogmas, puerile ceremonies, and notions borrowed from the
Chaldeans, Egyptians, Phenicians, Grecians, and Romans. In one word, you
confess that this religious system is only, the deformed offspring of
almost all ancient superstitions, begotten by oriental fanaticism, and
diversely modified by the circumstances and prejudices of those who have
since pretended to be the inspired ambassadors of God, and the
interpreters of his will.
You tremble at the horrors which the intolerant spirit of Christians has
caused them to commit, whenever they had power to do it; you feel that a
religion founded on a sanguinary deity must be a religion of blood. You
lament that phrenzy, which in infancy takes possession of princes and
people, and renders them equally the slaves of superstition and her
priests; which prevents their acquaintance with their true interests,
renders them deaf to reason, and turns them aside from the great objects
by which they ought to be occupied. You confess that a religion founded
upon enthusiasm or imposture can have no sure principles; that it must
prove an eternal source of disputes, and always end in causing troubles,
persecutions, and ravages; especially when political power conceives
itself indispensibly obliged to enter into its quarrels. In fine, you go
so far as to agree that a good Christian who follows literally the conduct
prescribed to him as the most perfect by the gospel, knows not in this
world any thing of those duties on which true morality is founded; and
that if he wants energy he must prove an useless misanthrope, or if his
temper be warm a turbulent fanatic.
After acknowledging all this, how could it happen that you should
pronounce my work a dangerous one! You tell me that a-wise man ought to
think only for himself; that to the populace a religion is necessary, be
it good or bad; that it is a restraint necessary to gross and ignorant
minds, which, without it, would have no longer any motive for abstaining
from vice. You look upon a reform of religious prejudices as impossible,
because it is the interest of many of those persons who alone can effect
it, to continue mankind in that ignorance of which themselves reap the
advantage. These, if I mistake not, are the weightiest of your objections.
I will endeavour to remove them.
Books are generally written for that part of a nation whose circumstances,
education, and sentiments, place them above the commission of crimes. This
enlightened portion of society, which governs the other, reads and judges
of writings; if they contain maxims false or injurious, they are soon
either condemned to oblivion, or held up to public execration; if they
contain only truth, they are not in danger. Fanatics and ignorant people
are the disturbers of society. Sensible, enlightened, and disinterested
persons are ever the friends of peace.
You are not, Sir, of the number of pusillanimous thinkers, who believe
that truth is capable of doing harm. It does harm to those only who
deceive mankind, and to the rest of the human species it will always be
useful. You ought long to have been convinced that the evils with which
mankind are afflicted, arise only from our errors, our prejudices, our
interests misunderstood, and the false ideas we attach to objects.
In fine, it is easy to see that the policy and morality of man have been
particularly corrupted by their religious prejudices. Was it not religious
and supernatural ideas which caused sovereigns to be looked upon as gods?
It is then religion which raised up tyrants and despots; tyrants and
despots made wicked laws; their example corrupted the great, the great
corrupted the lower classes of mankind; these vitiated beings became
unhappy slaves, employed either in injuring themselves, flattering the
great, or struggling to get clear of their misery. Kings were styled
images of God: they were absolute like him they created justice and
injustice; their wills often sanctified oppression, violence, and rapine.
The means of obtaining their favours were vice and meanness. Thus nations
became filled with perverted citizens, who, under leaders corrupted by
religious notions, made continually a war, either open or clandestine, and
were left destitute of any motive for practising virtue.
Has this religion influenced the manners of sovereigns, who derive their
divine power from it? Do we not behold princes, overflowing with faith,
continually undertaking the most unjust wars; wasting the blood and
treasure of their subjects; wrenching the bread from the hands of the
poor; permitting and even commanding every species of injustice? Does this
religion, considered by so many sovereigns as the support of their
thrones, render them more humane, temperate, chaste, or faithful to their
oaths? Alas! when we consult history, we there find sovereigns who were
orthodox, zealous, and religious to a scruple, and at the same time guilty
of perjury, usurpation, adultery, robbery, and murder; men who, in fine,
behaved as if they feared not the God whom they honoured with their
mouths. Among the courtiers who surrounded them, we see a continual
alliance of Christianity and vice, devotion and iniquity, religion and
treason. Among the priests of a poor and crucified God, who found their
existence upon religion, and pretend that without it there could be no
morality, do we not see reigning amongst them, pride, avarice, wantonness,
and revenge?
Amongst us, education is very little attended to by the government, which
shews the most profound indifference concerning an object the most
essential to the happiness of states. With most modern nations public
education is confined to teaching of languages, useless to most who learn
them. Christians, instead of morality, inculcate the marvellous fables and
incomprehensible dogmas of a religion extremely repugnant to right reason.
At the first step a young man makes in his studies, he is taught that he
ought to renounce the testimony of his senses, to reject his reason as an
unfaithful guide, and blindly conform himself to the dictates of his
masters? But who are these masters? Priests, whose interest it is to
continue mankind in errors, of which they alone reap the advantage. Can
the abject and isolated mind of these mercenary pedagogues be capable of
instructing their pupils in that of which themselves are ignorant? Will
they teach then to love the public good, to serve their country, to know
the duties of the man and citizen? Certainly not; we can expect nothing
from the hands of such teachers but ignorant and superstitious pupils,
who, if they have profited of the lessons they have received, are
unacquainted with every thing necessary in society, of which they must
consequently become useless members.
On whatever side we cast our eyes, we see the study of the object most
important to man totally neglected. Morality, in which I also comprehend
policy, is considered of very little importance in European education. The
only morality taught by Christians is, the enthusiastic, impracticable,
contradictory, and uncertain morality contained in the gospel. This is
calculated only to degrade the mind, to render virtue odious, to form
abject slaves, and break the spring of the soul; or, if it is sown in warm
and active minds, to produce turbulent fanatics, capable of shaking the
foundations of society.
Notwithstanding the inutility and perversity of the morality which
Christianity teaches mankind, its partisans presume to tell us, that
without this religion we cannot have morals. But what is it to have
morals, in; the language of Christians? It is to pray without ceasing, to
frequent churches, to do penance, and to: abstain from pleasure; it is to
live in selfishness and solitude. What good results to society from these
practices, all of which may be observed by a man who has not the shadow of
virtue? If such morals lead to heaven, they are very useless on earth. But
certain it is, that a man may be a faithful observer of all that
Christianity enjoins, without possessing any of the virtues which reason
shews to be necessary to the support of political society.
It is necessary, then, to carefully distinguish Christian morality from
political morality; the former makes saints, the latter citizens: one
makes men useless, or even hurtful to the world; the other has for its
object the formation of members useful to society; men active and
vigorous, who are capable of serving it, who fulfil the duties of
husbands, fathers, friends, and companions, whatever may be their
metaphysical opinions, which, let theologists say what they will, are much
less sure than the invariable rules of good sense.
In fact, it is certain, that man is a social being, who in all things
seeks his own happiness; that he does good when he finds it his interest;
that he is not commonly bad, because that would be contrary to his
welfare. This being premised, let education teach men to know the
relations which exist among themselves, and the duties arising from those
relations; let governments, calling to their aid laws, rewards, and
punishments, confirm the lessons given by education; let happiness
accompany useful and virtuous actions, let shame, contempt, and
chastisement be the rewards of vice. Then would mankind have a true
morality, founded in their own nature upon their mutual wants, and the
interest of nations at large. This morality, independent of the sublime
notions of Theology, might perhaps have very little in common with
Christian morality; but society has nothing to lose from this
circumstance, as has already been proved.
When the people receive a proper education, which, by inspiring them early
in life with virtuous principles, will habituate them to do homage to
virtue, detest crimes, contemn vice, and shrink from infamy; such an
education cannot be vain, when continual example shall prove to the
citizens that talents and virtue are the only means of arriving at honour,
fortune, distinction, consideration, and favour; and that vice conducts
only to contempt and ignominy.
If the clergy have usurped from the sovereign power the right of
instructing the people, let the latter re-assume its rights, or at least
not suffer the former to enjoy the exclusive liberty of governing the
manners of mankind, and dictating their morality. Let them teach, if they
please, that their God transforms himself into bread, but let them never
teach that we ought to hate or destroy those who refuse to believe this
ineffable mystery. Let no individual in society have the power of exciting
citizens to rebellion, of sowing discord, breaking the bands which unite
the people amongst one another, and disturbing the public tranquillity for
the sake of opinions. If it be said that all governments think it their
interest to support religious prejudices, and manage the clergy through
policy, although they themselves are undeceived; I answer, that it is easy
to convince enlightened government, that it is their true interest to
govern a happy people; that upon the happiness it procures the nation,
depends the stability and safety of the government; in one word, that a
nation composed of wise and virtuous citizens, are much more powerful than
a troop of ignorant and corrupted slaves, whom the government is forced to
deceive in order to satisfy, and to deluge with impositions that it may
succeed in any enterprise.
Thus let us not despair, that truth will one day force its way even to
thrones. If the light of reason and science reaches princes with so much
difficulty, it is because interested priests and starveling courtiers
endeavour, to keep them in a perpetual infancy, point out to them
chimerical prospects of power and grandeur, and thus turn away their
attention from objects necessary to their true happiness.
Every government must feel that their power will always be tottering and
precarious, so long as it depends for support on the phantoms of religion,
the errors of the people, and the caprices of the priesthood. It must feel
the inconveniencies resulting from fanatic administrations, which have
hitherto produced nothing but ignorance and presumption, nothing but
obstinate, weak citizens, incapable of doing service to-the state, and
ready to receive the false impressions of guides who would lead them
astray.. It must perceive what immense resources might be derived from the
wealth, which has been accumulated by a body of useless men, who, under
pretensions of teaching the nation, cheat and devour it.1 Upon this
foundation (which to the shame of mankind be it said, has hitherto served
only to support sacerdotal pride) a wise government might raise
establishments which would become useful to the state in forming the
youth, cherishing talents, rewarding virtuous services, and comforting the
people.
I flatter myself, Sir, that these reflections will exculpate me in your
eyes. I do not hope for the suffrages of those who feel themselves,
interested in the continuance of the evils suffered by their
fellow-citizens; it is not such whom I aim to convince nothing can be made
to appear evident to vicious and unreasonable men. But I presume to hope,
that you will cease to look upon my book as dangerous, and my expectations
as altogether chimerical. Many immoral men have attacked the Christian
religion, because it opposed their propensities; many wise men: have
despised it, because to them it appeared, ridiculous; many persons have
looked upon it with indifference, because they did not feel its real
inconveniencies. I attack it as a citizen, because it appears to me to be
injurious to the welfare of the state, an enemy to the progress, of the
human, mind, and opposed to the principles of true morality, from which
political interests can never be separated. It remains only for me to say,
with a poet, who was, like myself, an enemy, to superstition:
.........Si tibi vera videtur
Dede menus, et si falsa est, accingere contra.
I am, &c.
1 Some have thought that the clergy might one day serve as a
barrier against despotism, but experience sufficiently
proves that this body always stipulates for itself alone.
CHRISTIANITY UNVEILED
CHAP. I.—INTRODUCTION.
OF THE NECESSITY OF AN INQUIRY RESPECTING RELIGION, AND THE OBSTACLES
WHICH ARE MET IN PURSUING THIS INQUIRY.
A reasonable being ought in all his actions to aim at his own happiness
and that of his fellow-creatures. Religion, which is held up as an object
most important to our temporal and eternal felicity, can be advantageous
to us only so far as it renders our existence happy in this world, or as
we are assured that it will fulfil the flattering promises which it makes
us respecting another. Our duty towards God, whom we look upon as the
ruler of our destinies, can be founded, it is said, only on the evils
which we fear on his part. It is then necessary that man should examine
the grounds of his fears. He ought, for this purpose, to consult
experience and reason, which are the only guides to truth. By the benefits
which he derives from religion in the visible world which he inhabits, he
may judge of the reality of those blessings for which it leads him to hope
in that invisible world, to which it commands him to turn his views.
Mankind, for the most part, hold to their religion through habit. They
have never seriously examined the reasons why they are attached to it, the
motives of their conduct, or the foundations of their opinions. Thus, what
has ever been considered as most important to all, has been of all things
least subjected to scrutiny. Men blindly follow on in the paths which
their fathers trod; they believe, because in infancy they were told they
must believe; they hope, because their progenitors hoped; and they
tremble, because they trembled. Scarcely ever have they deigned to render
an account of the motives of their belief. Very few men have leisure to
examine, or fortitude to analyse, the objects of their habitual
veneration, their blind attachment, or their traditional fears. Nations
are carried away in the torrent of habit, example, and prejudice.
Education habituates the mind to opinions the most monstrous, as it
accustoms the body to attitudes the most uneasy. All that has long existed
appears sacred to the eyes of man; they think it sacrilege to examine
things stamped with the seal of antiquity. Prepossessed in favour of the
wisdom of their fathers, they have not the presumption to investigate what
has received their sanction. They see not that man has ever been the dupe
of his prejudices, his hopes, and his fears; and that the same reasons
have almost al ways rendered this enquiry equally impracticable.
The vulgar, busied in the labours necessary to their subsistence, place a
blind confidence in those who pretend to guide them, give up to them the
right of thinking, and submit without murmuring to all they prescribe.
They believe they shall offend God, if they doubt, for a moment, the
veracity of those who speak to them in his name. The great, the rich, the
men of the world, even when they are more enlightened than the vulgar,
have found it their interest to conform to received prejudices, and even
to maintain them; or, swallowed up in dissipation, pleasure, and
effeminacy, they have no time to bestow on a religion, which they easily
accommodate to their passions, propensities, and fondness for amusement.
In childhood, we receive all the impressions others wish to make upon us;
we have neither the capacity, experience, or courage, necessary to examine
what is taught us by those, on whom our weakness renders us dependent. In
youth, the ardour of our passions, and the continual ebriety of our
senses, prevent our thinking seriously of a religion, too austere and
gloomy to please; if by chance a young man examines it, he does it with
partiality, or without perseverance; he is often disgusted with a single
glance of the eye on an object so disgusting. In riper age, new passions
and cares, ideas of ambition, greatness, power, the desire of riches, and
the hurry of business, absorb the whole attention of man, or leave him but
few moments to think of religion, which he never has the leisure to
scrutinize. In old age, the faculties are blunted, habits become
incorporated with the machine, and the senses are debilitated by time and
infirmity; and we are no longer able to penetrate back to the source of
our opinions; besides, the fear of death then renders an examination, over
which terror commonly presides, very liable to suspicion.
Thus, religious opinions, once received, maintain their ground, through a
long succession of ages; thus nations transmit from generation to
generation ideas which they have never examined: they imagine their
welfare to be attached to institutions in which, were the truth known,
they would behold the source of the greater part of their misfortunes.
Civil authority also flies to the support of the prejudices of mankind,
compels them to ignorance by forbidding inquiry, and holds itself in
continual readiness to punish all who attempt to undeceive themselves.
Let us not be surprised, then, if we see error almost inextricably
interwoven with human nature. All things seem to concur to perpetuate our
blindness, and hide the truth from us. Tyrants detest and oppress truth,
because it dares to dispute their unjust and, chimerical titles; it is
opposed by the priesthood because it annihilates their superstitions.
Ignorance, indolence, and passion render the great part of mankind
accomplices of those who strive to deceive them, in order to keep their
necks beneath the yoke, and profit by their miseries. Hence nations groan
under hereditary evils, thoughtless of a remedy; being either ignorant of
the cause, or so long accustomed to disease, that they have lost even the
desire of health.
If religion be the object most important to mankind, if it extends its
influences not only over our conduct in this life, but also over our
eternal happiness, nothing can demand from us a more serious examination.
Yet it is of all things, that, respecting which, mankind exercise the most
implicit credulity. The same man, who examines with scrupulous nicety
things of little moment to his welfare, wholly neglects inquiry concerning
the motives which determine him to believe and perform things, on which,
according to his own confession, depend both his temporal and eternal
felicity. He blindly abandons himself to those whom chance has given him
for guides; he confides to them the care of thinking for him, and even
makes a merit of his own indolence and credulity. In matters of religion,
infancy and barbarity seem to be the boast of the greater part of the
human race.
Nevertheless, men have in all ages appeared, who, shaking off the
prejudices of their fellows, have dared to lift before their eyes the
light of truth. But what could their feeble voice effect against errors
imbibed at the breast, confirmed by habit, authorised by example, and
fortified by a policy, which often became the accomplice of its own ruin?
The stentorian clamours of imposture soon overwhelm the calm exhortations
of the advocates of reason. In vain shall the philosopher endeavour to
inspire mankind with courage, so long as they tremble beneath the rod of
priests and kings.
The surest means of deceiving mankind, and perpetuating their errors, is
to deceive them in infancy. Amongst many nations at the present day,
education seems designed only to form fanatics, devotees, and monks; that
is to say, men either useless or injurious to society. Few are the places
in which it is calculated to form good citizens. Princes, to whom a great
part of the earth is at present unhappily subjected, are commonly the
victims of a superstitious education, and remain all their lives in the
profoundest ignorance of their own duties, and the truest interests of the
states which they govern. Religion seems to have been invented only to
render both kings and people equally the slaves of the priesthood. The
latter is continually busied in raising obstacles to the felicity of
nations. Wherever this reigns, other governments have but a precarious
power; and citizens become indolent, ignorant, destitute of greatness of
soul, and, in short, of every quality necessary to the happiness of
society.
If, in a state where the Christian religion is professed, we find some
activity, some science, and an approach to social manners; it is, because
nature, whenever it is in her power, restores mankind to reason, and
obliges them to labour for their own felicity. Were all Christian nations
exactly conformed to their principles, they must be plunged into the most
profound inactivity. Our countries would be inhabited by a small number of
pious savages, who would meet only to destroy each other. For why should a
man mingle with the affairs of a world, which his religion informs him is
only a place of passage? What can be the industry of that people, who
believe themselves commanded by their God to live in continual fear, to
pray, to groan, and afflict themselves incessantly? How can a society
exist which is composed of men who are convinced that, in their zeal for
religion, they ought to hate and destroy all whose opinions differ from
their own? How can we expect to find humanity, justice, or any virtue,
amongst a horde of fanatics, who copy in their conduct a cruel,
dissembling, and dishonest God? A God who delights in the tears of his
unhappy creatures, who sets for them the ambush, and then punishes them
for having fallen into it? A God who himself ordains robbery, persecution,
and carnage?
Such, however, are the traits with which the Christian religion represents
the God which it has inherited from the Jews. This God was a sultan, a
despot, a tyrant, to whom all things were lawful. Yet he is held up to us
as a model of perfection. Crimes, at which human nature revolts, have been
committed in his name; and the greatest villanies have been justified by
the pretence of their being committed, either by his command, or to merit
his favour. Thus the Christian religion, which boasts of being the only
true support of morality, and of furnishing mankind with the strongest
motives for the practice of virtue, has proved to them a source of
divisions, oppressions, and the blackest crimes. Under the pretext of
bringing peace on earth, it has overwhelmed it with hate, discord, and
war. It furnishes the human race with a thousand ingenious means of
tormenting themselves, and scatters amongst them scourges unknown before.
The Christian, possessed of common sense, must bitterly regret the
tranquil ignorance of his idolatrous ancestors.
If the manners of nations have gained nothing by the Christian religion,
governments, of which it has pretended to be the support, have drawn from
it advantages equally small. It establishes to itself in every state a
separate power, and becomes the tyrant or the enemy of every other power.
Kings were always the slaves of priests; or if they refused to bow the
knee, they were proscribed, stripped of their privileges, and exterminated
either by subjects whom religion had excited to revolt, or assassins whose
hands she had armed with her sacred poignard. Before the introduction of
the Christian religion, those who governed the state, commonly governed
the priesthood; since that period, sovereigns have dwindled into the first
slaves of the priesthood, the mere executors of its vengeance and its
decrees.
Let us then conclude, that the Christian religion has no right to boast of
procuring advantages either by policy or morality. Let us tear aside the
veil with which it envelopes itself. Let us penetrate back to its source.
Let us pursue it in its course, we shall find that, founded on imposture,
ignorance, and credulity, it can never be useful but to men who wish to
deceive their fellow-creatures. We shall find, that it will never cease to
generate the greatest evils among mankind, and that instead of producing
the felicity it promises, it is formed to cover the earth with outrages,
and deluge it in blood; that it will plunge the human race in delirium and
vice, and blind their eyes to their truest interests and their plainest
duties.
CHAP. II.—SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS.
In a small country, almost unknown to others, lived a nation, the founders
of which having too long been slaves among the Egyptians, were delivered,
from their servitude by a priest of Heliopolis, who, by means of his
superior genius and knowledge, gained the ascendancy over them.1 This man,
known by the name of Diodorus Siculus also relates the history of Moses—Vide
translation of Abbe Terrasson.
1 Maneton and Cheremon, Egyptian historians, respecting
whom testimonies have been transmitted to us by Joseph the
Jew, inform us that a multitude of lepers were drawn out of
Egypt by king Amenophis; and that these exiles elected for
their leader a priest of Heliopolis whose name was Moses,
and who formed for them a religion and a code of laws.
Joseph contre Appion. liv. i. chap. ix. II, 12.
Be this as it may, Moses, by the confession of the Bible itself, began his
career by assassinating an Egyptian, who was quarrelling with an Hebrew;
after which he fled into Arabia, and married the daughter of an idolatrous
priest, by whom he was often reproached for his cruelty. Thence he
returned into Egypt, and placed himself at the head of his nation, which
was dissatisfied with king Pharaoh. Moses reigned very tyrannically; the
examples of Korah, Dathan, and Abirain, prove to what kind of people he
had an aversion. He at last disappeared like Romulus, no one being able to
find his body, or the place of his sepulture.
Moses, being educated in the mysteries of a religion, which was fertile in
prodigies, and the mother of superstitions, placed himself at the head of
a band of fugitives, whom he persuaded that he was an interpreter of the
will of their God, whose immediate commands he pretended to receive. He
proved his mission, it is said, by works which appeared supernatural to
men ignorant of the operations of nature, and the resources of art. The
first command that he gave them on the part of his God was to rob their
masters, whom they were about to desert. When he had thus enriched them
with the spoils of Egypt, being sure of their confidence, he conducted
them into a desert, where, during forty years, he accustomed them to the
blindest obedience, he taught them the will of heaven, the marvellous
fables of their forefathers, and the ridiculous ceremonies to which he
pretended the Most High attached his favours. He was particularly careful
to inspire them with the most envenomed hatred against the gods of other
nations, and the most refined cruelty to those who adored them. By means
of carnage and severity, he rendered them a nation of slaves, obsequious
to his will, ready to second his passions, and sacrifice themselves to
gratify his ambitious views. In one word, he made the Hebrews monsters of
phrenzy and ferocity. After having thus animated them with the spirit of
destruction, he shewed them the lands and possessions of their neighbours,
as an inheritance assigned them by God himself.
Proud of the protection of Jehovah, the Hebrews marched forth to victory.
Heaven authorised in them knavery and cruelty. Religion, united to
avidity, rendered them deaf to the cries of nature; and, under the conduct
of inhuman chiefs, they destroyed the Canaanitish nations with a
barbarity, at which every man must revolt, whose reason is not wholly
annihilated by superstition. Their fury destroyed every thing, even
infants at the breast, in those cities whither these monsters carried
their victorious arms. By the commands of their God, or his prophets, good
faith was violated, justice outraged, and cruelty exercised.
This nation of robbers, usurpers, and murderers, at length established
themselves in a country, not indeed very fertile, but which they found
delicious in comparison with the desert in which they had so long
wandered. Here, under the authority of the visible priests of their hidden
God, they founded a state, detestable to its neighbours, and at all times
the object of their contempt or their hatred. The priesthood, under the
title of a theocracy, for a long time governed this blind and ferocious
people. They were persuaded that in obeying their priests they obeyed God
himself.
Notwithstanding their superstition, the Hebrews at length, forced by
circumstances, or perhaps weary of the yoke of priesthood, determined to
have a king, according to the example of other nations. But in the choice
of their monarch they thought themselves obliged to have recourse to a
prophet. Thus began the monarchy of the Hebrews. Their princes, however,
were always crossed in their enterprises by inspired priests and ambitious
prophets, who continually laid obstacles in the way of every sovereign
whom they did not find sufficiently submissive to their own wills. The
history of the Jews at all times shews us nothing but kings blindly
obedient to the priesthood, or at war with it, and perishing under its
blows.
The ferocious and ridiculous superstitions of the Jews rendered them at
once the natural enemies of mankind, and the object of their contempt.
They were always treated with great severity by those who made inroads
upon their territory. Successively enslaved by the Egyptians, the
Babylonians, and the Grecians, they experienced from their masters the
bitterest treatment, which was indeed but too well deserved. Often
disobedient to their God, whose own cruelty, as well as the tyranny of his
priests frequently disgusted them, they were never faithful to their
princes. In vain were they crushed beneath sceptres of iron; it was
impossible to render them loyal subjects. The Jews were always the dupes
of their prophets, and in their greatest distresses their obstinate
fanaticism, ridiculous hopes, and indefatigable credulity, supported them
against the blows of fortune. At last, conquered with the rest of the
earth, Judah submitted to the Roman yoke.
Despised by their new masters, the Jews were treated hardly, and with
great haughtiness; for their laws, as well as their conduct, had inspired
the hearts of their conquerors with the liveliest detestation. Soured by
misfortune, they became more blind, fanatic, and seditious. Exalted by the
pretended promises of their God; full of confidence in oracles, which have
always announced to them a felicity which they have never tasted;
encouraged by enthusiasts, or by impostors, who successively profit by
their credulity; the Jews have, to this day, expected the coming of a
Messiah, a monarch, a deliverer, who shall free them from the yokes
beneath which they groan, and cause their nation to reign over all other
nations in the universe.
CHAP. III.—SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
In the midst of this nation, thus disposed to feed on hope and chimera, a
new prophet arose, whose sectaries in process of time have changed the
face of the earth. A poor Jew, who pretended to be descended from the
royal house of David,1 after being long unknown in his own country,
emerges from obscurity, and goes forth to make proselytes. He succeeded
amongst some of the most ignorant part of the populace. To them he
preached his doctrines, and taught them that he was the Son of God, the
deliverer of his oppressed nation, and the Messiah announced by the
prophets. His disciples, being either impostors, or themselves deceived,
rendered a clamorous testimony of his power, and declared that his mission
had been proved by miracles without number. The only prodigy which he was
incapable of effecting, was that of convincing the Jews, who, far from
being touched with his beneficent and marvellous works, caused him to
suffer an ignominious death. Thus the Son of God died in the sight of all
Jerusalem; but his followers declare that he was secretly resuscitated
three days after his death. Visible to them alone, and invisible to the
nation which he came to enlighten and convert to his doctrine, Jesus,
after his resurrection, say they, conversed some time with his disciples,
and then ascended into heaven, where, having again become equal to God the
father, he shares with him the adorations and homages of the sectaries of
his law. These sectaries, by accumulating superstitions, inventing
impostures, and fabricating dogmas and mysteries, have, by little and
little, heaped up a distorted and unconnected system of religion which is
called Christianity, after the name of Christ its founder.
1 The Jews say that Jesus was the son of one Pandira, or
Panther, who had seduced his mother Mary, a milliner, the
wife of Jochanan. According to others, Pandira, by some
artifice, enjoyed her several times, while she thought him
her husband; after which, she becoming pregnant, her
husband, suspicious of her fidelity, retired into Babylon.
Some say that Jesus was taught magic in Egypt, from whence
he went and exercised his art in Galilee, where he was put
to death.—Vide Peiffer, Theol. Jud. and Mahom. &c.
Principia. Lypsiae, 1687.
The different nations, to which the Jews were successively subjected, had
infected them with a multitude of Pagan dogmas. Thus the Jewish religion,
Egyptian in its origin, adopted many of the rites and opinions of the
people, with whom the Jews conversed. We need not then be surprised, if we
see the Jews, and the Christians their successors, filled with notions
borrowed of the Phenicians, the Magi or Persians, the Greeks, and the
Romans. The errors of mankind respecting religion have a general
resemblance; they appear to differ only by their combinations. The
commerce of the Jews and Christians with the Grecians made them acquainted
with the philosophy of Plato, so analogous to the romantic spirit of the
orientals, and so conformable to the genius of a religion which boasts in
being inaccessible to reason.1 Paul, the most ambitious and enthusiastic
of the apostles, carried his doctrines, seasoned with the sublime and
marvellous, among the people of Greece and Asia, and even the inhabitants
of Rome. He gained proselytes, as every man who addresses himself to the
imagination of ignorant people may do; and he may be justly styled the
principal founder of a religion, which, without him, could never have
spread far; for the rest of its followers were ignorant men, from whom he
soon separated himself to become the leader of his own sect.2
1 Origen says, that Celsus reproached Christ with having
borrowed many of his maxims from Plato. See Origen contra
Cel. chap. i. 6. Augustin confesses, that he found the
beginning of the Gospel of John, in Plato. See S. Aug. Conf.
I. vii. ch. 9, 10, 11. The notion of the word is evidently
taken from Plato; the church has since found means of
transplanting a great part of Plato, as we shall hereafter
prove.
2 The Ebionites, or first Christians, looked upon St. Paul
as an apostate and an heretic, because he wholly rejected
the law of Moses, which the other apostles wished only to
reform.
The conquests of the Christian religion were, in its infancy, generally
limited to the vulgar and ignorant. It was embraced only by the most
abject amongst the Jews and Pagans. It is over men of this description
that the marvellous has the greatest influence.1 An unfortunate God, the
innocent victim of wickedness and cruelty, and an enemy to riches and the
great, must have been an object of consolation to the wretched. The
austerity, contempt of riches, and apparently disinterested cares of the
first preachers of the gospel, whose ambition was limited to the
government of souls; the equality of rank and property enjoined by their
religion, and the mutual succours interchanged by its followers; these
were objects well calculated to excite the desires of the poor, and
multiply Christians. The union, concord, and reciprocal affection,
recommended to the first Christians, must have been seductive to ingenious
minds: their submissive temper, their patience in indigence, obscurity,
and distress, caused their infant sect to be looked upon as little
dangerous in a government accustomed to tolerate all sects. Thus, the
founders of Christianity had many adherents among the people,2 and their
opposers and enemies consisted chiefly of some idolatrous priests and
Jews, whose interest it was to support the religion previously
established. By little and little, this new system, covered with the
clouds of mystery, took deep root, and became too strong and extensive to
be suppressed. The Roman government saw too late the progress of an
association it had despised. The Christians now become numerous, dared to
brave the Pagan gods, even in their temples. The emperors and magistrates,
disquieted at such proceedings, endeavoured to extinguish the sect which
gave them umbrage. They persecuted such as they could not reclaim by
milder means, and whom their fanaticism had rendered obstinate. The
feelings of mankind are ever interested in favour of distress; and this
persecution only served to increase the number of the friends of the
Christians. The fortitude and constancy with which they suffered torment,
appeared supernatural and divine in the eyes of those who were witnesses
to it; their enthusiasm communicated itself, and produced new advocates
for the sect, whose destruction was attempted.
1 The first Christians were, by way of contempt, called
Ebionites, which signifies beggars or mendicants. See Origen
contra Celsum, lib. ii. et Euseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. iii. c.
37. Ebion, in Hebrew, signifies poor. The word Ebion has
since been personified into the meaning of an heretic, or
the leader of a sect, who were excluded from sacred things,
and scarcely considered as men. It promised them that they
should one day have their turn, and that, in the other life,
they should be happier than their masters.
2 Le peuple.
After this explanation, let Christians no longer boast the marvellous
progress of their religion. It was the religion of poverty; it announced a
God who was poor. It was preached by the poor, to the poor and ignorant.
It gave them consolation in their misery. Even its gloomy ideas were
analogous to the disposition of indigent and unhappy men. The union and
concord so much admired in the earlier Christians, is by no means
surprising. An infant and oppressed sect naturally remain united, and
dread a separation of interests. It is astonishing that, in those early
days, men who were themselves persecuted and treated as malcontents,
should presume to preach intolerance and persecution. The tyranny
exercised against them wrought no change in their sentiments. Tyranny only
irritates the human mind, which is always invincible, when those opinions
are attacked to which it has attached its welfare. Such is the inevitable
effect of persecution. Yet Christians, who ought to be undeceived by the
example of their own sect, have to this day been incapable of divesting
themselves of the fury of persecution.
The Roman emperors, having themselves become Christians, that is to say,
carried away by a general torrent, which obliged them to avail themselves
of the support of a powerful sect, seated religion on the throne. They
protected the church and its ministers, and endeavoured to inspire their
courtiers with their own ideas. They beheld with a jealous eye those who
retained their attachment to the ancient religion. They, at length,
interdicted the exercise of it, and finished by forbidding it under the
pain of death. They persecuted without measure those who held to the
worship of their ancestors. The Christians now repaid the Pagans, with
interest, the evils which they had before suffered from them. The Roman
empire was shaken with convulsions, caused by the unbridled zeal of
sovereigns and those pacific priests, who had just before preached nothing
but mildness and toleration. The emperors, either from policy or
superstition, loaded the priesthood with gifts and benefactions, which
indeed were seldom repaid with gratitude. They established the authority
of the latter; and at length respected as divine what they had themselves
created. Priests were relieved from all civil functions, that nothing
might divert their minds from their sacred ministry.1 Thus the leaders of
a once insignificant and oppressed sect became independent. Being at last
more powerful than kings, they soon arrogated to themselves the right of
commanding them. These priests of a God of peace, almost continually at
variance with each other, communicated the fury of their passions to their
followers; and mankind were astonished to behold quarrels and miseries
engendered, under the law of grace, which they had never experienced under
the peaceful reign of the Divinities, who had formerly shared without
dispute the adoration of mortals.
Such was the progress of a superstition, innocent in its origin, but
which, in its course, far from producing happiness among mankind, became a
bone of contention, and a fruitful source of calamities.
Peace upon earth, and good will towards men.
Thus is the gospel announced, which has cost the human race more blood
than all other religions of the earth taken collectively.
1 See Tillemont's Life of Constantine. Vol. IV. Art. 32.
Love the Lord thy God with all thy strength, and thy neighbour as
thyself.
This, according to the God and Legislator of the Christians, is the sum of
their duties. Yet we see it is impossible for Christians to love that
severe and capricious God whom they worship. On the other hand, we see
them eternally busied in tormenting, persecuting, and destroying their
neighbours and brethren.
To find an explanation of these contradictions, it is sufficient to cast
our eyes upon the God which the Christians inherited from the Jews. Not
contented with the shocking colours in which he was painted, the
Christians have still more disfigured his portrait. The Legislator of the
Hebrews speaks only of the transient punishments of this life; the
Christian represents his God as pouring out unbounded vengeance to all
eternity. In one word, Christian fanaticism feeds itself with the idea of
an hell, where its God, transformed into a ferocious executioner, as
unjust as implacable, shall bathe himself in the tears of his wretched
creatures, and perpetuate their existence, to render them eternally
miserable. There, clothed in vengeance, he shall mock at the torments of
sinners, and listen with rapture to the groans with which they shall make
the brazen roofs of their prisons resound; not the smallest hope of some
distant termination of their pains shall give them an interval of
imaginary relief.
The Christians in adopting the terrible God of the Jews, have sublimed his
cruelty. They represent him as the most capricious, wicked, and cruel
tyrant which the human mind can conceive, and suppose him to treat his
subjects with a barbarity and injustice truly worthy of a demon. In order
to be convinced of this truth, let us contemplate, for a moment, a picture
of the Jewish mythology, adopted and rendered still more extravagant by
the Christians.
CHAP. IV.—OF THE CHRISTIAN MYTHOLOGY,
OR THE IDEAS OF GOD, AND HIS CONDUCT, GIVEN US BY THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
God, by an inconceivable act of his omnipotence, created the universe out
of nothing.1 He made the earth for the residence of man, whom he created
in his own image. Scarcely had this man, the prime object of the labours
of his God, seen the light, when his Creator set a snare for him, into
which he undoubtedly knew that he must fall. A serpent, who speaks,
seduces a woman, who is not at all surprised at the phenomenon. She, being
persuaded by the serpent, solicits her husband to eat of a fruit forbidden
by God himself. Adam, the father of the human race, by this light fault,
draws upon himself and his innocent posterity innumerable evils, which are
followed, but not terminated by death. By the offence of only one man, the
whole human race incurs the wrath of God, and they are at length punished
for involuntary faults with an universal deluge. God repents having
peopled the earth, and he finds it easier to drown and destroy the human
race, than to change their hearts.
A small number of the just, however, escaped this destructive flood; but
the deluged earth, and the destruction of mankind, did not satiate the
implacable vengeance of their Creator. A new generation appeared, These,
although descended from the friends of God, whom he had preserved in the
general shipwreck of the world, incense him by new crimes. The almighty is
represented as having been incapable of rendering his creature such as he
desired him. A new torrent of corruption carries away mankind; and wrath
is again excited in the bosom of Jehovah.
1 Ex nihilo nihil fit, was considered as an axiom by ancient
philosophers. The creation, as admitted by the Christians of
the present day, that is to say, the eduction of all things
from nothing, is a theological invention, not, indeed, of
very remote date. The word Barah, which is used in Genesis,
signifies to compote, arranges to dispose matter already
existing.
Partial in his affections and his preferences, he, at length, casts his
eyes on an idolatrous Assyrian. He enters into an alliance with this man,
and covenants that his posterity shall be multiplied to the number of the
stars of heaven, or the sands of the sea, and that they shall for ever
enjoy the favour of God. To this chosen race he reveals his will; for
them, unmindful of his justice, he destroys whole nations. Nevertheless,
this favoured race is not the more happy or the more attached to their
God. They fly to strange gods, from whom they seek succours, which are
refused to them by their own. They frequently insult the God who is able
to exterminate them. Sometimes he punishes, sometimes consoles them; one
while he hates them without cause, and another caresses them with as
little reason. At last, finding it impossible to reclaim this perverse
people, for whom he continues to feel the warmest tenderness, he sends
amongst them his own son. To this son they will not listen. What do I say?
This beloved son, equal to God his father, is put to an ignominious death
by his favourite nation. His father, at the same time, finds it impossible
to save the human race, without the sacrifice of his own son. Thus an
innocent God becomes the victim of a just God, by whom he is beloved. Both
consent to this strange sacrifice, judged necessary by a God, who knows
that it will be useless to an hardened nation, which nothing can reclaim.
We should expect that the death of this God, being useless to Israel, must
serve, at least, to expiate the sins of the rest of the human race.
Notwithstanding the eternal alliance with the Hebrews, solemnly sworn to
by the Most High, and so many times renewed, that favourite nation find
themselves at last deserted by their God, who could not reduce them to
obedience. The merits of the sufferings and death of his Son, are applied
to the nations before excluded from his bounty. These are reconciled to
heaven, now become more just in regard to them, and return to grace. Yet,
in spite of all the efforts of God, his favours are lavished in vain.
Mankind continued to sin, enkindle the divine wrath, and render themselves
worthy of the eternal punishments, previously prepared and destined for
the greater part of the human race.
Such is the faithful history of the God, on whom the foundation of the
Christian religion is laid. His conduct being so strange, cruel, and
opposite to all reason, is it surprising to see the worshippers of this
God ignorant of their duties, destitute of humanity and justice, and
striving to assimilate themselves to the model of that barbarous divinity
which they adore? What indulgence have mankind a right to expect from a
God, who spared not even his own son? What indulgence can the Christian,
who believes this fable, shew to his fellow-creature? Ought he not to
imagine that the surest means of pleasing his God, is to imitate his
ferocity and cruelty? 1
1 The sacrifice of the Son of God is mentioned as a proof of
his benevolence. Is it not rather a proof of his ferocity,
cruelty, and implacable vengeance? A good Christian, on his
death-bed said, "he had never been able to conceive how a
good God could put an innocent God to death, to appease a
just God."
It is at least evident, that the sectaries of such a God must have a
precarious morality, founded on principles destitute of all firmness. This
God, in fact, is not always unjust and cruel; his conduct varies.
Sometimes he appears to have created all nature for man alone; at others,
he seems to have created man only as an object, whereon to exercise his
arbitrary rage. Sometimes they are cherished by him, notwithstanding all
their faults; at others, the whole species is condemned to eternal misery
for an apple. This unchangeable God is alternately agitated by anger and
love, revenge and pity, benevolence and fury. His conduct is continually
destitute of that uniformity which characterises wisdom. Partial in his
affections, he makes it the duty of his favourite people to commit
deliberately the most atrocious crimes. He commands them to violate good
faith, and contemn the rights of nations. He enjoins upon them the
commission of robbery and murder. On other occasions, we see him
forbidding the same crimes, ordaining justice, and prescribing to mankind
abstinence from whatever disturbs the good order of society. This God, who
is in turn styled the God of Vengeance, the God of Mercies, the God of
Arms, and the God of Peace, is ever at variance with himself. His subjects
are consequently each one at liberty to copy that part of his conduct
which he finds most congenial to his humour. Hence their morality becomes
arbitrary. It is surprising, that Christians have never yet been able to
agree amongst themselves, whether it would be most pleasing to their God
to tolerate the various opinions of mankind, or to exterminate all who
differ from themselves. It is, in fact, a problem with them, whether it be
most expedient to persecute and assassinate those who think not as they
do, or to treat them with humanity, and suffer them to live in peace.
Christians, however, do not fail to justify the strange and often
iniquitous conduct attributed to their God in the Scriptures. This God,
say they, being of right the absolute master of his creatures, can
dispose, of them at his pleasure, and for this no one can accuse him of
injustice, or demand an account of his conduct. His justice is not the
justice of mankind, and they have no right to censure any of his actions.
It is easy to perceive the insufficiency of this answer. Mankind in making
justice an attribute of their God, can have no idea of this virtue, but by
supposing that it resembles the justice of their fellow-creatures. If God
have a justice, which in its essence differs from that of man, we know not
what it is, and we attribute to him a quality of which we have no idea. If
it be said, that God owes nothing to his creatures, he is supposed to be a
tyrant, whose conduct has no rule but his own caprice, and who cannot
continue to be a model for us, having no longer any relation with us,
seeing all relations must be reciprocal. If nothing be due from God to his
creatures, how can any thing be due from them to him? If, as we are
continually told, men are to God, as the clay in the hands of the potter,
no moral relation can exist between them. It is, nevertheless, upon those
relations that all religion is founded. Therefore, to say that God has no
duty towards his creatures, and that his justice is different from that of
mankind, is to sap the foundations of all religion and justice, which
necessarily suppose that punish them for doing evil.
In fine, how can the followers of the Christian system reconcile that
barbarous conduct, and those sanguinary commands, attributed to him in the
Scriptures, with his goodness or his wisdom? And how can goodness be an
attribute of a God, who has created most of the human race only to damn
them eternally? God ought to reward mankind for doing good.
Here we shall be told that the conduct of God is, to us, an impenetrable
mystery, that we have no right to scrutinize it, and that our feeble
reason must be lost whenever it attempts to sound the depth of divine
wisdom. We are informed that we must adore in silence, and tremblingly
submit to the oracles of a God, who has himself sufficiently made known
his will in his holy Scriptures. This is what they call revelation, to
which we proceed in the next chapter.
CHAP. V.—OF REVELATION.
How can we know, without the aid of reason, that God hath spoken? But, on
the other side, is not reason proscribed by the Christian religion? Is not
the use of reason forbidden, in the examination of the marvellous dogmas
with which we are presented by this religion? Does it not continually
exclaim against a profane reason, which it accuses of insufficiency, and
often regards as rebellious to heaven? In order to be capable of judging
of divine revelation, we must have a just idea of the Divinity. But seeing
human reason is too weak and grovelling to exalt itself to an acquaintance
with the Supreme Being, from what source shall we derive that idea, beside
revelation itself? Thus revelation itself is to become the proof of the
authority of revelation.
Let us pass on from this conjuror's circle, and open the sacred books,
destined to enlighten mankind, and before which reason must fall
prostrate. Do they exhibit any precise ideas of the God, whose oracles
they announce? Can we draw from them any just conceptions of its
attributes? Is not this God represented as a mass of extraordinary
qualities, which form an inexplicable enigma? If this revelation be, as is
supposed, an emanation from God himself, who can confide in him? Does he
not paint himself as false, unjust, deceitful, and Cruel; as setting
snares for mankind; seducing, hardening, and leading them astray? 1
1 By the Scriptures and the Fathers of the Church, God is
always represented as a seducer. He permits Eve to be
seduced by a serpent. He hardens the heart of Pharaoh.
Christ himself is a stone of stumbling. Such are the points
of view under which the Divinity is exhibited to us.
Thus the man, desirous of being assured of the truth of Christian
revelation, finds himself, at the first step of enquiry, plunged into
distrust and perplexity, which is increased by the indeterminable disputes
of his sacred guides, who have never been able to agree upon the manner of
understanding the oracles of a Divinity which they say has revealed
itself.
The hesitation and fear of the man who honestly examines the revelation
adopted by Christians, must redouble, when he sees their God represented
as revealing himself only to a few favourites of the human race, while he
carefully conceals himself from the remainder, to whom, notwithstanding
this, revelation is equally necessary. He must be uncertain whether or not
he is of the number, to whom this partial God deigns to make himself
known.
Must not his heart be troubled at the sight of a God, who vouchsafes to
discover himself, and announce his decrees, only to a number of men,
inconsiderable in comparison with the whole human race? Is he not tempted
to accuse this God of a malevolence too dark, when he finds that for want
of revealing himself to so many millions of mankind, he has caused their
inevitable misery through an endless succession of ages? What ideas must
he form to himself of a God who inflicts this punishment upon them for
their ignorance of secret laws, which he has published by stealth in an
obscure and unknown corner of Asia?
Thus Christians, even when they consult the Scriptures, find all things
conspiring to put them on their guard against the God exhibited therein.
Every thing inspires distrust of his moral character. All things float in
an uncertainty. This God, in concert with the pretended interpreters of
his will, seems to have formed the design of redoubling the darkness of
his ignorance. He is, however, told, in order to appease his doubts, that
the revealed will of God consists of mysteries; that is to say, things
inaccessible to human understanding. In this case what need was there of
having spoken? Ought a God to reveal himself to mankind for the sole
purpose of not being comprehended? Is not such conduct as ridiculous as it
is unreasonable? To say that God has revealed himself only to announce
mysteries, is to say that he has revealed himself in order to remain
unknown, to conceal from us his views, embarrass our understandings, and
augment our ignorance and uncertainty.
A true revelation, proceeding from a just and good God, and necessary to
all mankind, ought to be clear enough to be understood by all the human
race. But will the revelation, upon which Judaism and Christianity are
founded, bear the test of this criterion? The Elements of Euclid are
intelligible to all who endeavour to understand them. This work excites no
dispute among geometricians. Is it so with the Bible? and do its revealed
truths occasion no disputes among divines? By what fatality have writings
revealed by God himself still need of commentaries? and why do they demand
additional lights from on high, before they can be believed or understood?
Is it not astonishing, that what was intended as a guide for mankind,
should be wholly above their comprehending? Is it not cruel, that what is
of most importance to them should be least known? All is mystery,
darkness, uncertainty, and matter of dispute, in a religion intended by
the Most High to enlighten the human race.
Far from contenting themselves with the pretended mysteries contained in
the Scriptures, the priests of the Christian religion have, from age to
age, invented new ones, which, though never mentioned by their God, their
disciples are forced to believe. No Christian can entertain a doubt
concerning the mysteries of the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the efficacy
of sacraments; and yet Christ never explained these subjects. Among
Christians every thing seems to be abandoned to the imagination, caprice,
and arbitrary decision of priests, who arrogate to themselves the right of
fabricating mysteries and articles of faith, as their interests
occasionally require. Thus, this revelation perpetuates itself by means of
the Church, which pretends to be inspired by God, and which, far from
enlightening the minds of her children, delights to confound, and plunges
them in a sea of uncertainty!
Such are the effects of this revelation, which forms the basis of the
Christian religion, and of the reality of which we are not permitted to
doubt. God, it is said, has spoken to mankind. But when has he spoken?
Thousands of years ago, by prophets and inspired men, whom he has chosen
as organs of communication with mankind. But how can it be proved to have
been God himself who spoke, except by having recourse to the testimony of
the very persons who pretend to have received his commands? These
interpreters of the divine will were then men; and are not men liable to
be deceived themselves, and prone to deceive others? How then can we
discover what confidence is due to the testimony which these organs of
heaven give in favour of their own mission? How shall we be made sure that
they have not been the dupes of some illusion, or an overheated
imagination?
At this remote period, how can we be certain that Moses conversed with
God, and received from him the law which he communicated to the Hebrews?
What was the temperament of this Moses? Was he phlegmatic or enthusiastic,
honest or knavish, ambitious or disinterested, a practiser of truths or of
falsehood? What confidence can be placed in the testimony of a man, who,
after pretending to have performed so many miracles, could not convert his
people from idolatry; and who, after having caused forty-seven thousand
Israelites to perish by the sword, has the effrontery to assume the title
of the meekest of mankind? Is it certain that the books which are
attributed to Moses, and report so many miraculous circumstances, are
perfectly authentic? In fine, what proof have we of his mission, except
the testimony of a number of superstitious, ignorant, and credulous
Israelites, who were probably the dupes of a ferocious legislator?
What proofs does the Christian religion give us of the mission of Jesus
Christ? Are we acquainted with his character and temperament? What degree
of confidence can we place in the testimony of his disciples, who, by
their own confession, were ignorant and unlearned men, and, consequently,
liable to be imposed upon by the artifices of a dexterous impostor? Ought
not the testimony of the most learned in Jerusalem to have greater weight
with us, than that of the lowest vulgar, whose ignorance always renders
them the dupes of those who endeavour to deceive them? These enquiries
bring us to an examination of the proofs which are adduced in support of
the Christian religion.
CHAP. VI.—OF THE PROOFS OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
MIRACLES, PROPHECIES, AND MARTYRS.
We have seen, in the preceding chapters, what just reasons there are to
doubt the authenticity of the revelation of the Jews and Christians.
And further, relative to this article, Christianity has no advantage over
any other religion.
All the religions on earth, notwithstanding their discordance, declare
that they have emanated from God, and pretend to possess an exclusive
right to his favours.
The Indian asserts, that the Brama himself is the author of his worship.
The Scandinavian derives his from the awful Odin. If the Jew and the
Christian have received theirs from Jehovah by the ministry of Moses and
Jesus, the Mahometan affirms, that he has received his from his prophet,
inspired by the same God. Thus, all religions pretend to a divine origin;
and they all interdict the use of reason in the examination of their
sacred titles. Each pretends to be the only true one, to the exclusion of
all others. All menace with the wrath of heaven those who refuse to submit
to their authority, and all acquire the character of falsehood by the
palpable contradictions with which they are filled; by the mis-shapen,
obscure, and often odious ideas which they give of the Godhead; by the
whimsical laws which they attribute to him, and by the disputes which they
generate among their sectaries. In fine, they all appear to be a mass of
impostures and reveries, equally disgusting to reason. Thus, on the score
of pretensions, the Christian religion has no advantage over the other
superstitions with which the world is infected; and its divine origin is
contested by all others with as much propriety as theirs is denied by it.
How then shall we decide in its favour? How prove the validity of its
pretensions? Has it any superior qualities, by which it merits the
preference? And if so, what are they? Does it, better than any other, make
us acquainted with the nature and essence of God? Alas! it only renders
them more incomprehensible. It represents him as a capricious tyrant,
whose whimsies are sometimes favourable, but more commonly injurious to
mankind. Does it render mankind better? Alas! it arms them against each
other, renders them intolerant, and forces them to butcher their brethren.
Does it render empires flourishing and powerful? Wherever it reigns, do we
not see the people debased, destitute of energy, and ignorant of true
morality? What then are the proofs which are to establish the superiority
of the Christian religion over all others? We are answered,﹃miracles,
prophecies, and martyrs.﹄But these are to be found in all religions of
the earth. There are in all nations men, who, being superior to the vulgar
in science and cunning, deceive them with imposture, and dazzle them with
performances which are judged to be supernatural, by men ignorant of the
secrets of nature and the resources of art.
If the Jew cite the miracles of Moses, I see them performed before a
people most ignorant, abject, and credulous, whose testimony has no weight
with me.
I may, also, suspect that these pretended miracles have been inserted in
the sacred books of the Hebrews long after the death of those who might
have testified the truth concerning them. If the Christians cite
Jerusalem, and the testimony of Gallilee, to prove the miracles of Christ,
I see them attested only by an ignorant populace; or I demand how it could
be possible that an entire people, who had been witnesses to the miracles
of Christ, should consent to his death, and even earnestly demand it?
Would the people of London, or Paris, suffer a man who had raised the
dead, restored the blind to sight, and healed the lame and paralytic, to
be put to death before their eyes? If the Jews demanded the death of
Jesus, all his miracles are at once annihilated in the mind of every
unprejudiced person.
May not we, also, oppose to the miracles of Moses, and Christ, those
performed by Mahomet in presence of all Mecca and Arabia assembled? The
effect of his miracles was, at least, to convince the Arabians that he was
a divine person. The miracles of Jesus convinced nobody of his mission.
Saint Paul himself, who afterwards became the most ardent of his
disciples, was not convinced by the miracles, of which, in his time, there
existed so many witnesses. A new one was necessary for his conviction. And
by what right do they at this day demand belief of miracles; which could
not convince even in the time of the Apostles; that is to say, a short
time after they were wrought?
Let it not be said that the miracles of Christ are as well attested as any
fact in profane history, and that to doubt them is as ridiculous as to
doubt the existence, of Scipio or Cæsar, which we believe only on the
report of the historians by whom they are mentioned. The existence of a
man, of the general of an army, or an hero, is not improbable; neither is
it a miracle.1 We believe the probable facts, whilst we reject, with
contempt, the miracles recounted by Titus Livius. The most stupid
credulity is often joined to the most distinguished talents. Of this, the
Christian religion furnishes us with innumerable examples. In matters of
religion, all testimony is liable to suspicion. The most enlightened men
see but ill, when they are intoxicated with enthusiasm, and dazzled by the
chimeras of a wild imagination. A miracle is a thing impossible in the
order of nature. If this be changed by God, he is not immutable.
It will probably be said, that, without changing, the order of things, God
and his favourites could not find resources in nature unknown to mankind
in general. But then their works would no longer be supernatural, and
would have nothing of the marvellous. A miracle is an effect contrary to
the established laws of nature. God himself, therefore, cannot perform
miracles without counteracting the institutions, of his own wisdom A wise
man, having seen a miracle, might with propriety doubt the evidence of his
own senses. He ought carefully to examine, whether, the extraordinary
effect, which he does not comprehend, proceeds not from some natural
cause, whose manner of acting he does not understand.
1 A supernatural event requires, in order to be believed,
much stronger proofs than a fact in no-wise contradictory to
probability. It is easy to believe, upon the testimony of
Philostrates, that Appollonius existed, because his
existence has nothing in it that shocks reason; but I will
not believe Philostrates, when he tells me, that Appollonius
performed miracles. I believe that Jesus Christ died; but I
do not believe that he arose from the dead.
But let us suppose, for a moment, that miracles may exist, and that those
of Christ were real, or, at least, that they were inserted in the Gospels
by persons who imagined they had seen them. Are the witnesses who
transmitted, or the Apostles who saw them, extremely deserving of credit?
And have we not a right to refuse their testimonies? Were those witnesses
very deserving men? By the confession of the Christians themselves they
were ignorant men, taken from the dregs of the people, and consequently
credulous and incapable of investigation. Were those witnesses
disinterested? No; it was, undoubtedly, their chief interest to support
those miracles, upon which were suspended the divinity of their master,
and the truth of the religion they were endeavouring to establish. Are
those miracles confirmed by the testimony of cotemporary historians? Not
one of them has mentioned those extraordinary facts. We find not a single
Jew or Pagan in the superstitious city of Jerusalem who heard even a word
of the most marvellous facts that ever were recorded, and facts which
happened in the midst of them. The miracles of Christ were ever attested
by Christians only. We are requested to believe that, at the death of the
Son of God, the earth quaked, the sun was darkened, and the dead arose.
How does it happen that such extraordinary events have been noticed only
by a handful of Christians? Were they the only persons who perceived them?
We are told, also, that Christ arose from the dead; to prove which, they
appeal to the testimony of his Apostles and followers. Would not one
solemn apparition, in some public place, have been more decisive than all
those clandestine ones, made to persons interested in the formation of a
new sect? The Christian faith, according to St. Paul, is founded on the
resurrection of Christ. This, then, ought to have been demonstrated to
mankind, in the clearest and most indisputable manner.1
1 The Barilidians and Corinthians, heretics who lived in the
infancy of Christianity, maintained that Jesus was not dead,
and that Simon the Cyrenian was crucified in his place. See
Epiph. Haer. c. 28. Thus, there were men, from the birth of
the church, who doubted the crucifixion, and, consequently,
the resurrection of Christ; and yet we are exhorted to
believe them at the present day.
Have we not room to accuse the Saviour of the world with want of
benevolence, in shewing himself only to his disciples and favourites? It
seems that he did not desire that all the world should believe in him. The
Jews, it is said, deserve to be blinded for putting Christ to death. But,
if this be the case, why did the apostles preach to them the gospel? Could
it be expected that the Jews would believe the report of the apostles,
rather than their own eyes?
Miracles appear to have been invented to supply the want of good reasons.
Truth and evidence have no need of miracles to ensure their reception. Is
it not very astonishing that God Almighty should find it easier to derange
the order of nature, than to convince mankind of truths the most evident,
and calculated to force their assent? Miracles were made to prove things
which it is impossible to believe. There is no need of miracles when we
talk of reason. Things incredible are here adduced in proof of incredible
things. Almost all impostors who have fabricated religions, have announced
incredibilities to mankind. They have afterwards fabricated miracles in
proof of those incredibilities. "You cannot comprehend," said they,﹃what
I tell you; but I will clearly prove to you that I tell the truth, by
doing things that you cannot comprehend.﹄People have in all ages been
overcome by this brilliant reasoning. A passion for the marvellous has
prevented enquiry. Mankind have not perceived that miracles could neither
prove impossibilities, nor change the essence of truth. Whatever wonders a
man, or, if you please, a God may perform, they can never prove that two
and two are not four, or that three are no more than one. They cannot
prove that an immaterial being, destitute of organs, has spoken to man; or
that a good, wise, and just Being has commanded the execution of
injustice, folly, and cruelty. It appears, therefore, that miracles prove
nothing, unless it be the address and impostures of those who are desirous
of profiting by the stupid credulity of mankind, and endeavour to seduce
them into a belief of the most extravagant falsehoods. Such men have
always began by falsely pretending to have an intimate commerce with God,
in order to prove which, they have performed wonders that they attribute
to the Being by whom they say they were commissioned. Every man, who
performs miracles, endeavours to establish, not truth, but falsehood.
Truth is simple and evident; the marvellous is ever to be suspected.
Nature is always true to herself; she acts by unvarying laws. To say that
God performs miracles, is to say that he contradicts himself, and violates
the laws which he has prescribed to nature. It is to say, that he renders
useless human reason, of which he is the author. Impostors alone can
pronounce it necessary to discredit experience and reject reason.
Thus, the pretended miracles of the Christian, as well as all other
religions, have no foundation, but the ignorance, credulity, and
enthusiasm of mankind, and the cunning of impostors. The same may be said
of prophecies. Mankind are ever anxious to pry into futurity; and there
are always some kind individuals disposed to aid them in the gratification
of this desire. There have been enchanters, diviners, and prophets, in all
the nations of the earth. The Jews have not been happier, in this respect,
than others. Tartars, Negroes, and Indians have their share of impostors,
All societies will find deceivers enough, so long as they are willing to
pay for deception.
These inspired men have not been ignorant, that their prophecies ought to
be extremely vague and ambiguous, in order that they might not, in process
of time, appear to have been falsehoods. We need not, therefore, be
surprised, that the Jewish prophecies are very dark, and of such a nature,
that any thing may be found in them which interpreters think proper to
seek. Those which are attributed to Christ, by his followers, are not
considered in the same light by the Jews, who still expect the Messiah,
whom the former believe to have been on earth eighteen centuries ago. The
Jewish prophecies uniformly announce the deliverer of a discontented and
oppressed nation. Such a one was also expected by the Romans, and almost
all the nations of the earth. All mankind have a natural propensity to
hope for a termination of the evils they suffer, and believe that
Providence cannot, in justice, fail to render them, one day, happy. The
Jews, the most superstitious nation on earth, building upon the supposed
promise of their God, have always expected the coming of a monarch or
conqueror, who is to elevate them from disgrace, and crown them with
triumph. It was impossible for them to see this deliverer in the person of
Jesus, who, instead of being the restorer of the Hebrew nation, was its
destroyer; and since whose coming, they seem to have lost all favour with
God.
It is asserted, that the destruction of the Jewish nation, and the
dispersion of the Jews, were themselves foretold, and that they furnish a
convincing proof of the truth of Christian prophecy. To this I answer, it
was easy to foretel the dispersion and destruction of a restless,
turbulent, and rebellious people, continually torn and convulsed by
intestine divisions. Besides, this people was often conquered and
dispersed. The temple destroyed by Titus, had previously suffered the same
fate from Nebuchadnezzar, who carried the captive tribes into Assyria, and
spread them through his territories. The dispersion of the Jews is more
perceptible than that of other conquered nations, because they have
generally, after a certain time, become confounded with their conquerors;
whereas the Jews refuse to intermingle, by domestic connections, with the
nations where they reside, and have religiously maintained this
distinction. It is not the same with the Cuebres or Parsis, of Persia and
Indostan, as well as the Armenians, who dwell in Mahometan countries. The
Jews remain dispersed, because they are unsocial, intolerant, and blindly
attached to their superstitions.1
Thus Christians have no reason to boast of the prophecies contained in the
books of the Jews, nor to make invidious applications of them to that
nation, because they detest its religion.
Judea was always subjected to priests, who had great influence over
affairs of state. They were always meddling with politics, and undertook
to foretel the events, fortunate or unfortunate, which were to befal the
nation. No country was ever more fertile in prophets.
This description of men instituted schools, where they initiated into the
mysteries of their art those who proved themselves worthy of that honour,
by discovering a wish to deceive a credulous people, and by such honest
means acquire riches and respect.2
The art of prophesying was then an actual profession, or an useful and
profitable branch of commerce in that miserable nation, which believed God
to be incessantly busied in their affairs. The great gains resulting from
this traffic of imposture must have caused divisions among the Jewish
prophets. Accordingly, we find them crying down each other. Each one
treated his rivals as false prophets, inspired by evil spirits. There have
always been quarrels among impostors, to decide who should have the
exclusive right of deceiving mankind.
1 The Acts of the Apostles evidently prove, that, even
before the time of Jesus, the Jews began to be dispersed.
Jews came from Greece, Persia, Arabia, &c. to the feast of
Pentecost. Acts, c. ii. 8. So that, after Jesus, the
inhabitants of Judea only were dispersed by the Romans.
2 Saint Jerome says, that the Sadducees did not adopt the
prophets, but contented themselves with believing the five
books of Moses. Dodwell, De Jure Laicorum, asserts, that the
prophets prepared themselves to prophesy by drinking wine.
See page 259. It seems they were jugglers, poets, and
musicians, who had made themselves masters of their trades,
and knew how to exercise them profitably.
If we examine the conduct of the boasted prophets of the Old Testament, we
shall find them far from being virtuous persons. We see arrogant priests
continually meddling with affairs of state, and interweaving them with
religion. We see in them seditious subjects, incessantly caballing against
all sovereigns, who were not sufficiently submissive to them. They cross
their projects, excite their subjects to rebellion, effect their
destruction, and thus accomplish the fatal predictions, which they had
before made against them.1 Such is the character of most of the prophets,
who have played a part in the history of the Jews.
The studied obscurity of the prophecies is such, that those which are
commonly applied to the Messiah, or the deliverer of Israel, are equally
applicable to every enthusiast or prophet that appeared in Jerusalem or
Judea. Christians, heated with the idea of Christ, think they meet him in
all places, and pretend to see him in the darkest passages of the Old
Testament. Deluding themselves by force of allegories, subtilties,
commentaries, and forced interpretations, they have discovered the most
formal predictions in all the vague oracles and nonsensical trash of the
prophets.2
1 The prophet Samuel, displeased with Saul, who refused to
second his cruelty, declared that he had forfeited the
crown, and raised up a rival to him in the person of David.
Elias appears to have been a seditious subject, who, finding
himself unable to succeed in his rebellious designs, thought
proper to escape due punishment by flight. Jeremiah himself
gives us to understand that he conspired with the Assyrians
against his besieged country. He seems to have employed
himself in depriving: his fellow-citizens of both the will
and the courage to defend themselves. He purchased a field
of his relations, at the very time when he informed his
countrymen that they were about to be dispersed, and led
away in captivity. The king of Assyria recommends this
prophet to his general, Nebuzaradan, whom he commands to
take great care of him.—See Jeremiah.
2 Any thing may be found in the Bible, if it be read with
the imagination of Saint Augustine, who pretended to see all
the New Testament in the Old. According to him, the death of
Abel is a type of that of Christ; the two wives of Abraham
are the synagogue and the church; a piece of red cloth held
up by an harlot, who betrayed Jericho, signifies the blood
of Christ; the lamb, goat, and lion, are figures of Jesus
Christ; the brazen serpent represents the sacrifice on the
cross. Even the mysteries of the Christian religion are
announced in the Old Testament. Manna represents the
Eucharist, &c. See S. Aug. Serm. 78. and Ep. 156. How can a
man, in his senses, see, in the Immanuel announced by
Isaiah, the Messiah, whose name is Jesus? Isaiah c. vii. v.
14. How discover, in an obscure and crucified Jew, a leader
who shall govern Israel? How see a royal deliverer and
restorer of the Jews, in one, who, far from delivering his
nation, came only to destroy their laws; and after whose
coming their land was desolated by the Romans? A man must
be sharp-sighted indeed to find the Messiah in their
predictions. Jesus himself does not seem to have been more
clear, or happy, in his prophecies. In the Gospel of Luke,
chap. xxi. he speaks of the last judgment: he mentions
angels, who, at the sound of the trumpet, assemble mankind
together before him. He adds,『Verily I say unto you, this
generation shall not pass away, until these things are
accomplished.』The world, however, still stands, and
Christians have been expecting the last judgment for
eighteen hundred years.
Men are not scrupulous respecting things which accord with their desires.
When we examine, without prejudice, the prophecies of the Hebrews, we find
them to be a mis-shapen mass of rhapsodies, the offspring of fanaticism
and delirium. We find them obscure and enigmatical, like the oracles of
the Pagans. In fine, it is evident that these pretended divine oracles are
the vagaries and impostures of men, who imposed on the credulity of a
superstitious nation which believes in dreams, visions, apparitions, and
sorceries, and received with avidity any deception, provided it were
sufficiently decorated with the marvellous. Wherever mankind are ignorant,
there will be found prophets and workers of miracles, and these two
branches of commerce will always decay in the same proportion as mankind
become enlightened.
Among the proofs of the authenticity of their religion, Christians
enumerate a multitude of martyrs, who have sealed with their blood their
belief of the opinions they had embraced. There is no religion destitute
of ardent defenders, who would sacrifice their lives for the opinions to
which they believe their eternal happiness attached. Superstitious and
ignorant men are obstinate in their prejudices. Their credulity prevents
them from suspecting any deception in their spiritual guides. Their vanity
persuades them that they are incapable of wavering; and if, in fine, their
imaginations be strong enough to see the heavens open, and a recompense
prepared therein for their courage, there is no torment they will not
brave and endure. In their intoxication they will despise all torments of
short duration; they will smile upon their executioners; and their souls,
alienated from earthly things, will become insensible to pain. In such
scenes, the hearts of spectators are softened; they admire the astonishing
firmness of the martyr; they catch his enthusiasm, and believe his cause
just. His courage appearing to them supernatural and divine, becomes an
indubitable proof of the truth of his opinions.
Thus, by a sort of contagion, enthusiasm communicates itself. Men are
always interested in the fate of those who shew the greatest firmness; and
tyranny always multiplies the friends of those whom it persecutes. The
constancy of the first Christians must, therefore, have produced
proselytes, by a natural effect of their conduct. Martyrs prove nothing,
unless it be the strength of the enthusiasm, error, and obstinacy produced
by superstition, and the barbarous folly of those who persecute their
fellow-creatures for religious opinions.
Every violent passion has its martyrs. Pride, vanity, prejudice, love,
patriotism, and even vice itself, produces martyrs; or, at least, a
contempt of every kind of danger. Is it, then, surprising, that enthusiasm
and fanaticism, the strongest passions of mankind, have so often enabled
men, inspired with the hopes they give, to face and despise death?
Besides, if Christians can boast a catalogue of martyrs, Jews can do the
same. The unfortunate Jews, condemned to the flames by the Inquisition,
were martyrs to their religion; and their fortitude proves as much in its
favour, as that of the Christians can do in favour of Christianity. If
martyrs demonstrate the truth of a religion, there is no religion or sect
which may not be looked upon as true.
In fine, among the perhaps exaggerated number of martyrs, boasted by
Christians, many were rather the victims of an inconsiderate zeal, a
turbulent and seditious spirit, than a real love of religion. The church
itself does not presume to justify some, who, transported by a volcanic
zeal, have troubled the peace of the earth, and poured out flaming
destruction on all who differed in opinion from themselves; until mankind,
consulting their own tranquillity and safety, have destroyed them. If men
of this description were to be considered as martyrs, every disturber of
society, when punished, would acquire a right to this title.
CHAP. VII.—OF THE MYSTERIES OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
To reveal any thing to a man, is to discover to him secrets of which he
was before ignorant. If we ask Christians what the secrets were, the
importance of which rendered it necessary that they should be revealed by
God himself, we shall be told that the greatest of those secrets, and the
one most necessary to mankind, is the Unity of the Godhead; a secret
which, say they, human wisdom could never have discovered, of itself. But
are we not at liberty to doubt the truth of this assertion? Moses,
undoubtedly, declared an only God to the Hebrews, and did all in his power
to render them enemies to the idolatry and polytheism of other surrounding
nations, whose belief and whose modes of worship he represented as
abominable in the eyes of the celestial Monarch, who had brought them out
of the land of Egypt. But have not many wise men among the heathens
discovered, without the assistance of the Jewish revelation, one supreme
God, superior to all others? Moreover, was not Fate, to which all the
other gods of the heathens were subordinate, an only God, to whose
sovereign law all nature was subject? As to the colours in which Moses
paints his Godhead, neither Jews nor Christians have a right to pride
themselves therein. He is represented as a capricious and irascible
despot, full of cruelty, injustice, partiality, and malignity. What kind
of being shall we contemplate, when we add to this the ineffable
attributes ascribed to him in the Christian theology? Is the Godhead
described when it is said that it is a spirit, an immaterial being, which
resembles nothing presented to us by our senses? Is not human
understanding confounded with the negative attributes of infinity,
immensity, eternity, omnipotence, and omniscience, with which he has been
decorated, only to render him still more incomprehensible? How can the
wisdom, the goodness, justice, and other moral qualities of this God, be
reconciled with that strange and often atrocious conduct, which are
attributed to him in almost every page of the Old and New Testament? Would
it not have been better to have left mankind in entire ignorance of the
Godhead, than to reveal to him a God made up of contradictions, which lead
to eternal dispute, and serve only to trouble his repose? To reveal such a
God to mankind, is only to discover to them the means to embarrass and
render themselves wretched, and quarrel with and injure one another.
But, be this as it may, is it true that Christianity admits but one God,
the same which was revealed by Moses? Do we not see Christians adore a
threefold divinity, under the name of the Trinity? The supreme God begat
from all eternity a son equal to himself; from these two proceeds a third
equal to the two first; these three Gods, equal in perfection, divinity,
and power, form, nevertheless, only one God. To overturn this system, it
seems sufficient only to shew its absurdity. Is it but to reveal such
mysteries as these that the Godhead has taken pains to instruct mankind?
Have opinions more absurd and contrary to reason ever existed among the
most ignorant and savage nations?l In the mean time, however, the writings
of Moses contain nothing that could authorise the construction of a system
so wild. It is only by having recourse to the most forced explanations,
that the doctrine of the Trinity is pretended to be found in the Bible. As
to the Jews, contented with the only God which their legislator has
declared to them, they have never attempted to create a threefold one.
1 The dogma of the Trinity is evidently borrowed from the
reveries of Plato, or from the allegories under which that
romantic philosopher chose to conceal his doctrine. It
appears that to him the Christian religion is indebted for
the greater part of its dogmas. Plato admitted three
Hypostases, or modes of being in the Divinity. The first
constituted the supreme God; the second the Logos, Word, or
divine intelligence proceeding from the first; the third is
the Spirit, or Soul of the World. The early teachers of the
Christian religion appear to have been Platonics; their
enthusiasm probably found in Plato a doctrine analogous to
their feelings; had they been grateful, they would have
recorded him as a prophet, or, at least, as one of the
fathers of the church. The Jesuitical missionaries found a
Divinity, nearly similar to that of the Christians, at
Thibet. Among the Tartars, God is called Kon-cio-cik, the
only God, and Kon-cio-sum, the threefold God. They also give
him the titles On, Ha, Hum, intelligence, might, power or
words, heart, love. The number three was always revered
among the ancients; because Salom, which in the Oriental
languages signifies three, signifies also health, safety,
salvation.
The second of these Gods, or, according to the Christians, the second
person of the Trinity, having clad himself with human nature, and become
incarnate in the womb of a virgin, he submitted himself to the infirmities
of our species, and even suffered an ignominious death to expiate the sins
of the earth. This is what Christians call the mystery of Incarnation. He
must be indeed blind, who cannot see these absurd notions are borrowed
from the Egyptians, Indians, and Grecians, whose ridiculous mythologies
describe gods as possessing human forms, and subject to infirmities, like
mankind.1
1 The Egyptians appear to have been the first who pretended
that their gods had assumed material bodies. Foe, the God of
the Chinese, was born of a virgin, who was fecundated by a
ray of the sun. In Indostan nobody doubts the incarnations
of Vistnou. It seems that theologists of all nations,
despairing to exalt themselves to a level with God, have
endeavoured to debase him to a level with themselves.
Thus, we are commanded by Christianity to believe that a God having become
man without doing injury to his divine nature, has suffered, died, and
offered himself a sacrifice to himself; and all this was absolutely and
indispensibly necessary to appease his own wrath. This is what Christians
denominate the mystery of the redemption of the human race.
This dead God, however, was resuscitated. Thus the Adonis of the
Phenicians, the Osiris of the Egyptians, and the Atys of the Phrygians,
are represented as periodically resigning and re-assuming life. The God of
the Christians rises again, re-animated, and bursts the tomb, triumphant.
Such are the wondrous secrets, or sublime mysteries, that the Christian
religion unfolds to its disciples. So great, so abject, and so ever
incomprehensible are the ideas it gives us of the divine Being. Such is
the illumination our minds receive from revelation! A revelation which
only serves to render still more impenetrable the clouds which veil the
divine essence from human eyes. God, we are told, is willing to render
himself inconsistent and ridiculous, to confound the curiosity of those
whom, we are at the same time informed, he desires to enlighten by his
special grace. What must we think of a revelation which, far from teaching
us any thing, is calculated to darken and puzzle the clearest ideas?
Thus, notwithstanding the boasted revelation of the Christians, they know
nothing of that Being whom they make the basis of their religion. On the
contrary, it only serves to obscure all the notions which might otherwise
be formed of him. In Holy Writ he is called an hidden God. David tells us,
that he places his dwelling in darkness, that clouds and troubled waters
form the pavilion with which he is covered. In fine, Christians, although
enlightened, as they say, by God himself, have only ridiculous and
inconsistent ideas of him, which render his existence doubtful, or even
impossible, in the eyes of every man who consults his reason.
What notions, indeed, can we form of a God, who, after having created the
world solely for the happiness of mankind, nevertheless suffers the
greater part of the human race to be miserable both in this world and that
which is to come? How can a God, who enjoys a supreme felicity, be
offended with the actions of his creatures? This God is then susceptible
of grief; his happiness can be disturbed; he is then dependent on man, who
can, at pleasure, delight or afflict him! How can a benevolent God bestow
on his creatures a fatal liberty by the abuse of which they may incur his
anger, and their own destruction? How can that Being, who is himself the
author of life and nature, suffer death? How can an only God become triple
without injuring his unity? We shall be answered, that all these matters
are mysteries; but such mysteries destroy even the existence of God. It
would be more reasonable to admit, with Zoroaster, or Manes, two
principles or opposite powers in nature, than to believe, with Christians,
that there is an omnipotent God, who cannot prevent the existence of evil;
a God who is just, and yet partial; a God all-merciful, and yet so
implacable, that he will punish through an eternity the crimes of a
moment; an only God, who is threefold; a God, the chief of beings, who
consents to die, being unable to satisfy by any other means his divine
justice. If, in the same subject, contraries cannot subsist at the same
time, either the existence of the God of the Jews, or that of the
Christians, must undoubtedly be impossible. Whence we are forced to
conclude, that the teachers of Christianity, by means of the attributes
with which they have decorated, or rather disfigured their Godhead, have,
in fact, annihilated the God of the Jews, or, at least, so transformed
him, that he is no longer the same. Thus, revelation, with all its fables
and mysteries, has only embarrassed the reason of mankind, and rendered
uncertain the simple notions which they might form to themselves of that
necessary Being, who governs the universe with immutable laws. Though the
existence of a God cannot be denied, it is yet certain that reason cannot
admit the existence of the one which the Christians adore, and whose
conduct, commands, and qualities, their religion pretends to reveal. If
they are Atheists, who have no ideas of the Supreme Being, the Christian
theology must be looked upon as a project invented to destroy his
existence.1
1 Divines have always disagreed among themselves respecting
the proofs of the existence of a God. They mutually style
each other Atheists, because their demonstrations have never
been the same. Few Christians have written on the existence
of God, without drawing upon themselves an accusation of
Atheism. Descartes, Clarke, Pascal, Arnauld; and Nicole,
have been considered as Atheists. The reason is plain. It is
impossible to prove the existence of a Being so inconsistent
as the God of the Christians. We shall be told that men have
no means for judging of the Divinity, and that our
understandings are too narrow to form any idea of him. Why
then do they dispute incessantly concerning him? Why assign
to him qualities which destroy each other? Why recount
fables concerning him? Why quarrel and cut each others
throats, because they are differently interpreted by
different persons?
CHAP. VIII.—MYSTERIES AND DOGMAS OF CHRISTIANITY.
Not content with having enveloped their God in mysterious clouds and
Judaic fables, the teachers of Christianity seen to be still busied in the
multiplication of mysteries, and embarrassing more and more the reason of
their disciples. Religion, designed to enlighten mankind, is only a tissue
of enigmas; a labyrinth which sound sense can never explore. That which
ancient superstitions found most incomprehensible, seems not unaptly to be
interwoven with a religious system, which imposes eternal silence on
reason. The fatalism of the Grecians has been transformed, in the hands of
Christian priests, into predestination. According to this tyrannic dogma,
the God of mercies has destined the greatest part of mankind to eternal
torments. He places them in this world that they, by the abuse of their
faculties and liberty, may render themselves worthy of the implacable
wrath of their Creator. A benevolent and prescient God gives to mankind a
free will, of which he knows they will make so perverse an use, as to
merit eternal damnation. Thus, instead of furnishing them with the
propensities necessary to their happiness, he permits them to act, only
that he may have the pleasure of plunging them into hell. Nothing can be
more horrid than the description given us by Christians of this place,
destined to be the future residence of almost all mankind. There a
merciful God will, throughout an eternity, bathe himself in the tears of
wretches, whom he created for misery. Sinners, shut up in this awful
dungeon, will be delivered up for ever to devouring flames. There shall be
heard weeping, and wailing, and gnashing of teeth. The torments of this
place shall, at the end of millions of years, have only begun.
The consoling hope of a distant mitigation of pain shall be unknown. In
one word, God, by an act of his omnipotence, shall render man capable of
miseries uninterrupted, and interminable. His justice will punish finite
crimes, the effects of which are limited by time, by torments infinite in
degree and duration. Such is the idea a Christian forms of the God that
demands his love. This tyrant, creates him only to render him miserable;
he gives him reason to deceive him, and propensities to lead him astray.
He gives him liberty, that he may incur eternal ruin. He gives him
advantages above the beasts, that he may be subjected to torments, which
beasts, like inanimate substances, are incapable of suffering. The dogma
of predestination represents the lot of man as worse than that of brutes
and stones.1
1 The doctrine of predestination was also a tenet of the
Jews. In the writings of Moses, a God is exhibited, who, in
his decrees, is partially fond of a chosen people, and
unjust to all others. The theology and history of the Greeks
represent men as punished for necessary crimes, foretold by
oracles. Of this Orestes, Oedipus, Ajax, &c. are examples.
Mankind have always described God as the most unjust of all
beings. According to the Jansenists, God bestows his grace
on whom he pleases, without any regard to merit. This is
much more conformable to the Christian, Pagan, and Jewish
fatalism, than the doctrine of the Molinists, who say that
God grants his grace to all who ask and deserve it. It is
certain that Christians in general are true fatalists. They
evade this accusation, by declaring that the designs of God
are mysteries. If so, why do they eternally dispute about
them?
It is true, the Christian religion promises a blissful residence to those
whom God shall have chosen to be objects of his love. But this place is
reserved only for a small number of elect, who, without any merit in
themselves, shall, nevertheless, have unbounded claims upon the grace of
God.
Thus, the Tartarus and Elysium of the heathen mythology, invented by
impostors to awe and seduce mankind, have been transplanted into the
system of the Christians, who have given them the new appellation of
Heaven and Hell.
The followers of the Christian religion believe in a race of invisible
beings, different from man and subordinate to God, part of whom is
employed in executing the wrath of God upon offenders; and part in
watching over his works, and particularly the preservation of man. The
former, being malevolent spirits, are called devils, demons, &c. the
latter, being benevolent spirits, are called angels. They are supposed to
have the faculty of rendering themselves sensible, and taking the human
form. Good angels are, in the imagination of Christians, what the Nymphs,
Lares, and Penates, were imagined to be by the heathens, and what the
Fairies were with writers of romances. The sacred books of the Jews and
Christians are replete with these marvellous beings, whom God has sent to
his favourites to be their guides, protectors, and tutelar deities.
Devils are considered as the enemies and seducers of the human race, and
perpetually busied in drawing them into sin. A power is attributed to them
of performing miracles, similar to those wrought by the Most High; and,
above, a power that counteracts his, and renders all his projects
abortive. In fact, the Christian religion does not formally allow the same
power to the devil as to God; nevertheless, it supposes that malevolent
being prevents mankind from entering into the enjoyment of the felicity
destined them by the goodness of God, and leads most of them into eternal
perdition. Christians, however, do virtually attribute to the devil an
empire much more extensive than that of the Supreme Being. The latter,
with difficulty, saves a few elect; while the former carries off, in spite
of him, the greater part of mankind, who listen to his destructive
temptations, rather than the absolute commands of God. This Satan, the
cause of so much terror to Christians, was evidently borrowed from the
doctrine of two principles, formerly admitted in Egypt and all the East.
The Osyris and Typhon of the Egyptians, the Orosmades and Aharimanes of
the Persians and Chaldeans, have undoubtedly given birth to the continual
war between the God of Christians and his formidable adversary. By this
system mankind have endeavoured to account for all the good and evil with
which life is chequered. An Almighty Devil serves to justify the Supreme
Being with respect to all necessary and unremitted evils which afflict the
human race.
Such are the dreadful and mysterious doctrines upon which Christians in
general are agreed. There are many others which are peculiar to different
sects. Thus, a numerous sect of Christians admit an intermediate state
between heaven and hell, where souls, too sinful for the former and too
innocent for the latter, are subjected for a time, in order to expiate by
their sufferings the sin they commit in this life; after undergoing this
punishment, they are received into the abodes of eternal felicity. This
doctrine, which was evidently drawn from the reveries of Plato, has, in
the hands of the Roman priests, been converted into an inexhaustible
source of riches. They have arrogated to themselves the power of opening
the gates of purgatory, and pretend that, by their prayers, they can
mitigate the rigour of the divine decrees, and abridge the torments of the
souls, condemned to this place by a just God.1
1 It is evident that the Roman Catholics are indebted to
Plato for their purgatory. That great philosopher divided
souls into three classes: the pure, the curable, and the
incurable. The first returned, by refusion, to the universal
soul of the world, or the divinity, from which they had
emanated; the second went to hell, where they passed in
review every year before the judges of that dark empire, who
suffered them to return to light when they had sufficiently
expiated their faults; the incurables remained in Tartarus,
where they were to suffer eternal torment. Plato, as well
as, Christian casuists, described the crimes, faults, &c.
which merit those different degrees of punishment.
Protestant divines, jealous probably of the riches of the Catholic clergy,
have imprudently rejected the doctrine of a purgatory, whereby they have
much diminished their own credit. It would, perhaps, have been wiser to
have rejected the doctrine of an hell, whence souls can never be released,
than that of purgatory, which is more reasonable, and from which the
clergy can deliver souls by means of that all-powerful agent, money.
The preceding remarks shew, that the Christian religion has been often
inculcated and spread by dint of terror. By striking mankind with horror
they render them submissive, and remove all his dependence on his reason.1
1 Mahomet perceived, as well as Christian divines, the
necessity of frightening mankind, in order to govern them.
"Those," says the Koran,『who do not believe, shall be
clothed in a garment of fire; boiling water shall be poured
on their heads; their skins and their entrails shall be
smitten with rods of iron. Whenever they shall strive to
escape from hell, and avoid its torments, they shall be
thrust again into it; and the devils say unto them, 'taste
the pain of burning'.』See Alcoran, ch. viii.
CHAP. IX.—OF THE RITES AND MYSTERIOUS CEREMONIES
OR THEURGY OF THE CHRISTIANS.
If the doctrines of the Christian religion be mysteries inaccessible to
reason; if the God it announces be inconceivable, we ought not to be
surprised at seeing the rites and ceremonies of this religion mysterious
and unintelligible. Concerning a God, who hath revealed himself only to
confound human reason, all things must necessarily be incomprehensible and
unreasonable.
The most important ceremony of the Christian religion is called baptism.
Without this, no man, it is held, can be saved. It consists in pouring
water on the infant or adult, with an invocation on the name of the
Trinity. By the mysterious virtue of this water, and the words by which it
is accompanied, the person is spiritually regenerated. He is cleansed from
the stains, transmitted through successive generations, from the father of
the human race. In a word, he becomes a child of God, and is prepared to
enter into his glory at death. Now, it is said, that the death of man is
the effect of the sin of Adam; and if, by baptism, sin be effaced, why is
man still subject to death? But here we are told, it is from the
spiritual, not bodily death, that Christ has delivered mankind. Yet this
spiritual death is only the death of sinfulness. In this case, how does it
happen that Christians continue to sin, as if they had never been redeemed
and delivered from sin? Whence it results, that baptism is a mystery
impenetrable to reason; and its efficacy is disproved by experience.1
In some Christian sects, a bishop or pontiff, by pronouncing a few words,
and applying a few drops of oil to the forehead, causes the spirit to
descend upon whom he pleases. By this ceremony the Christian is confirmed
in the faith, and receives invisibly a profusion of graces from the Most
High. Those who wandering farthest from reason, have entered most deeply
into the spirit of the Christian religion, not contented with the dark
mysteries common to other sects, have invented one still darker and more
astonishing, which they denominate transubstantiation. At the all-powerful
command of a priest, the God of the Universe is forced to descend from the
habitation of his glory, and transform himself into a piece of bread. This
bread is afterwards worshipped by a people, who boast their detestation of
idolatry.2
1 The ceremony of baptism was practised in the mysteries of
Mythias, and those initiated were thereby regenerated. This
Mythias was also a mediator. Although Christian divines
consider baptism necessary to salvation, we find Paul would
not suffer the Corinthians to be baptised. We also learn
that he circumcised Timotheos.
2 The Bramas of Indostan distribute a kind of grain in their
pagodas: this distribution is called Prajadnn, or
Eucharist. The Mexicans believe in a kind of
transubstantiation, which is mentioned by father Acosta. See
his Travels, chap. xxiv. The Protestants have had the
courage to reject transubstantiation, although it is
formally established by Christ, who says,『Take, eat; this
is my body.』Averoes said,『Anima mea fit cum philosophie,
non vero cum Christianis, gente stolidissima, qui Deuni
faciunt et comedunt.』The Peruvians have a religious
ceremony, in which after sacrificing a lamb, they mingle his
blood with flour, and distribute it amongst the people.—
Aluetanae Quest, lib. ii. cap. 20.
In the puerile ceremonies, so highly valued by Christians, we cannot avoid
seeing the plainest traces of the Theurgy practised among the Orientals,
where the Divine Being, compelled by the magic power of certain words and
ceremonies uttered, by priests, or other persons initiated into the
necessary secret, descends to earth and performs miracles. This sort of
magic is also exercised among Christian priests. They persuade their
disciples that, by certain arbitrary actions, and certain movements of the
body, they can oblige the God of Nature to suspend his laws, give himself
up to their desires, and load them with every favour they choose to
demand. Thus, in this religion, the priest assumes the right of commanding
God himself.
On this empire over their God, this real Theurgy, or mysterious commerce
with heaven, are founded those puerile and ridiculous ceremonies which
Christians call sacraments. We have already seen this Theurgy in Baptism,
Confirmation, and the Eucharist. We find it, also, in penitence, or the
power which the priests of some sects arrogate to themselves, of
remitting, in the name of Heaven, all sins confessed to them. It is seen
in orders, that is to say, in the ceremony which impresses on certain men
a sacred character, by which they are ever after distinguished from
profane mortals. It is seen in the rites and functions which torture the
last moments of the dying. It is seen in marriage, which natural union, it
is supposed, cannot meet with the approbation of Heaven, unless the
ceremony of a priest render it valid, and procure it the sanction of the
Most High.1
1 The number of Roman Catholic sacraments, seven; a
cabalistic, magic, and mysterious number.
We see this Theurgy, or white magic, in the prayers, forms, liturgies,
and, in short, in all the ceremonies of the Christians. We find it in
their opinion, that words disposed in a certain manner can influence the
will of God, and oblige him to change his immutable decrees. Its efficacy
is seen in exorcisms, that is, ceremonies, in which, by means of a magic
water and some mysterious words, it is pretended that evil spirits which
infest mankind can be expelled. Holy water, which has taken the place of
the aqua lustralis of the Romans, is believed by certain Christians
to possess astonishing virtues. It renders sacred, places and things which
were profane. In fine, the Christian Theurgy being employed by a pontiff
in the consecration of a king, renders him more respectable in the eyes of
men, and stamps him with a divine character.
Thus all is magic and mystery, all is incomprehensible, in a religion
revealed by God himself, to enlighten the darkened understanding of
mankind.
CHAP. X.—OF THE INSPIRED WRITINGS OF THE CHRISTIANS.
Christians endeavour to prove the divine origin of their religion by
certain writings, which they believe to be sacred, and to have been
inspired by God himself. Let us then see if these writings do really
exhibit marks of that wisdom, omniscience, and perfection which we
attribute to the Divinity.
The Bible, every word of which Christians believe to have been dictated by
inspiration, is composed of an incongruous collection of the sacred
writings of the Hebrews, called the Old Testament; to which are added, a
number of works, more recent indeed, but of equal inspiration, known by
the name of the New Testament. At the head of this collection are five
books which are attributed to Moses, who was, it is said, in writing them,
the secretary of God. He therein goes back to the origin of things. He
attempts to initiate us into the mystery of the creation of the world, of
which he has only the most vague and confused ideas. He betrays at every
word a profound ignorance of the laws of Nature. God, according to Moses,
created the sun, which, in our planetary system, is the source of light,
several days after he had created the light. God, who can be represented
by no image, created man in his own image. He creates him male and female;
but, soon forgetting what he had done, he creates woman from one of the
ribs of the man. In one word, we see, at the very entrance of the Bible,
nothing but ignorance and contradiction.1 It appears, at once, that the
cosmogony of the Hebrews is only a tissue of fables and allegories,
incapable of giving any true idea of things, and calculated to please only
a savage and ignorant people, destitute of science, and unqualified for
reasoning. In the rest of the writings of Moses, we see little but a
string of marvellous and improbable stories, and a mass of ridiculous and
arbitrary laws. The author concludes with giving an account of his own
death. The books posterior to Moses exhibit equal ignorance. Joshua stops
the sun, which did not move. Sampson, the Jewish Hercules, has strength to
overthrow a temple.—But we should never finish the enumeration of
the fables and falsehoods of these books, which are audaciously attributed
to the Holy Ghost. The story of the Hebrews presents us only with a mass
of tales, unworthy the gravity of history and the majesty of Divinity
ridiculous to reason, it appears to have been invented only to amuse the
credulity of a stupid and infant people.
1 St. Augustin confesses that there is no way of preserving
the true sense of the three first chapters of Genesis
without wronging religion and attributing things to God
which are unworthy of him; and declares, that recourse must
be had to allegory. Aug. de Genesi, contra Machineos.
Origen, also, grants, if we take the history of the Bible
literally, it is absurd and contradictory.—Philos. p. 12.
This strange compilation is intermingled with obscure, and unconnected
oracles, with which different prophets have, from time to time, enriched
Jewish superstition. Every thing in the Old Testament breathes enthusiasm,
fanaticism, and delirium, often decorated with pompous language. There,
every thing is to be found, except good sense, good logic, and reason,
which seems to be absolutely excluded from the books which guide the
conduct of the Hebrews and Christians.
We have already mentioned the abject, and often absurd ideas of God, which
are exhibited in the Bible. In this book, all his conduct appears
ridiculous. He blows hot and cold, and contradicts himself every moment.
He acts imprudently, and then repents of what he had done. He supports
with one hand, and destroys with the other. After having punished all the
human race with death, for the sins of man, he declares, by Ezekiel, that
he is just, and will not render children responsible for the iniquities of
their fathers. He commands the Hebrews, by the mouth of Moses, to rob the
Egyptians. In the decalogue, published by Moses, theft and murder are
forbidden. In short, Jehovah, ever in contradiction with himself, varies
with circumstances, preserves no uniformity of conduct, and is represented
in the books, said to be inspired by his spirit, as a tyrant, which the
most decided villain would blush to be.
When we cast our eyes over the New Testament, there, also, we see nothing
characteristic of that spirit of truth which is said to have dictated this
work. Four historians, or fabulists, have written the marvellous history
of the Messiah. Seldom agreeing with respect to the circumstances of his
life, they sometimes contradict each other in the most palpable manner.
The genealogy of Christ, given us by Matthew, differs widely from that
given us by Luke. One of the Evangelists says, that Christ was carried
into Egypt; whilst, by another, this event is not even hinted at.
One makes the duration of his mission three years, while another
represents it as only as many months. We do not find them at all better
accord respecting the facts in general which they report. Mark says that
Christ died at the third hour, that is to say, nine o'clock in the
morning: John says that he died at the sixth hour, that is, at noon.
According to Matthew and Mark, the women who, after the death of Jesus,
went to his sepulchre, saw only one angel; whereas, according to Luke and
John, they saw two. These angels were, by some, said to be within the
tomb; by others, without. Several of the miracles of Jesus are also
differently reported by the Evangelists. This is likewise the case with
his appearances after his resurrection. Ought not all these things to
excite a doubt of the infallibility of the Evangelists, and the reality of
their divine inspirations? What shall we say of the false and forged
prophecies, applied to Christ in the gospel? Matthew pretends that Jeremy
foretold that Christ should be betrayed for thirty pieces of silver; yet
no such prophecy is to be found in Jeremiah. Nothing is more singular than
the manner in which Christian divines evade these difficulties. Their
solutions are calculated to satisfy only those who conceive it their duty
to remain in blindness.1
1 Jerome himself says, that the quotations of Matthew do not
agree with the Greek version of the Bible. Erasmus is
obliged to confess that the Holy Spirit permitted the
Apostles to go astray.
Every man of sense must feel, that all the industry and sophism on earth
can never reconcile such palpable contradictions; and the efforts of
interpreters serve only to shew the weakness of their cause. Is it, then
by subterfuges, subtilties, and falsehoods, that we are to render service
to God?
We find equal errors and contradictions in the pompous gasconade and
declamatory bombast of St. Paul. The epistles and harangues of this man,
inspired by the Spirit of God, appear to be the enthusiastic ravings of a
madman. The most laboured commentaries have, in vain, endeavoured to
reconcile the contradictions with which his work are filled, and the
inconsistency of his conduct, which sometimes favoured and sometimes
opposed Judaism.1 We do not find ourselves more enlightened by the works
attributed to the other Apostles. It seems as if these persons, inspired
by the Holy Ghost, came on the earth only to prevent their disciples from
comprehending what they had been sent to teach them.
1 St. Paul himself informs us, that he was ravished up to
the third heaven. Why was he transported thither, and what
did he learn by his journey? Things unspeakable, which no
man could, comprehend. What advantage are mankind to derive
from all this? St. Paul, in the Acts of the Apostles, is
guilty of a falsehood, in saying before the high-priest,
that he is persecuted, because he is a Pharisee, and on
account of the resurrection. Here: are two untruths. First,
because Paul was, at that time, the most zealous Apostle of
the Christian religion, and consequently a Christian.
Secondly, because the accusations brought against him did
not refer to his opinion on resurrection. If we know that
the Apostles sometimes wandered from the truth, how shall we
believe them at others? Further, we see this great Apostle
continually changing his counsels and conduct. At Jerusalem,
he point-blank opposes Peter, who favoured Judaism; whereas
he himself afterwards complied with Jewish rites. In fine,
he always accommodates himself to the circumstances of the
time, and becomes all things to all men. He seems to have
set an example to the Jesuits, of their conduct in the
Indies, with which they are reproached, where they unite the
worship of the Pagans to that of Christ.
At the foot of the collection, which forms the New Testament, we find the
mystic work known by the name of the Revelation of St. John. This is an
unintelligible thing, in which the author has endeavoured to collect and
concentrate all the gloomy and dreadful ideas contained in the rest of the
Bible. It exhibits to the wretched race of Man the awful and approaching
end of a perishing world. It is filled with horrid pictures, by gazing on
which, the trembling Christian becomes petrified with fear and wonder,
indifferent to life, and useless, or an incumbrance to society. Thus, in a
manner not unworthy of itself, terminates this compilation, so inestimable
and adorable to Christians, so ridiculous and contemptible to the man of
reason, so unworthy of a good and bounteous God; so detestable to him who
contemplates the unparalleled evils it has occasioned on the earth.
Having taken for the rule of their conduct and opinions a book so full of
blasphemous fables and striking, contradictions concerning God, Christians
have never agreed in the interpretation of his will, or precisely known
what he exacted from them. Thus they have made this obscure work a bone of
contention, an inexhaustible source of quarrels, a common arsenal, where
all contending parties have supplied themselves with arms for mutual
destruction. Geometricians dispute not concerning the fundamental
principles of their science. By what fatality does it happen that
Christian revelation, the foundation of a religion on which depends the
eternal felicity of man, should be unintelligible, subject to disputes,
and often deluge the earth with blood? To judge by effects, such a
revelation ought rather to be thought the work of a malign spirit, a
genius of darkness and falsehood, than of a God desirous to preserve,
enlighten, and beautify mankind.
CHAP. XI.—OF CHRISTIAN MORALITY.
Were we to believe Christians, there could have been no true morality on
earth before the coming of the founder of their sect. They represent the
world is having been plunged in darkness and vice at all times and places
where Christ was unknown. Yet morality was always necessary to mankind;
for, without it, no society can exist. We find, that before the time of
Christ, there were flourishing and virtuous nations, and enlightened
philosophers, who continually reminded mankind of their duties. The
precepts of Socrates, Confucius, and the Gymnosophists of India, are by no
means inferior to those of the Messiah of the Christians. We find, amongst
heathens, innumerable instances of equity, humanity, temperance,
disinterestedness, patience, and meekness, which flatly contradict the
pretensions of the Christians, and prove that, before Christ was known on
earth, virtues flourished, which were for more real than those he came to
teach to men.
Was a supernatural revelation necessary to inform mankind that society
cannot exist without virtue, and that, by the admission of vice, societies
consent to their own destruction? Was it necessary that a God should
speak, to shew that they have need of mutual aid and mutual love? Was
assistance from on High necessary to discover that revenge is an evil, and
an outrage upon the laws, which, when they are just, assume to themselves
the right of retribution? Is not the forgiveness of injuries connected
with this principle? And is not hatred eternalized where implacable
revenge is exercised? Is not the pardoning of our enemies a greatness of
soul, which gives us an advantage over those who offend us? When we do
good to our enemies does it not give us a superiority over them? Is not
such conduct calculated to multiply our friends? Does not every man, who
is desirous to live, perceive that vice, intemperance, and voluptuousness
must shorten the period of life? Has not experience demonstrated to every
thinking being, that vice is injurious and detestable, even to those who
are not free from its empire, and that the practice of virtue is the only
means, of acquiring real esteem and love? However little mankind may
reflect on what they themselves, their true interests, and the end of
society are, they must feel what they ought to be to each other. Good laws
will render them good; and where these exist, there is no need of flying
to heaven for rules for the preservation and happiness of society. Reason
is sufficient to teach us our duties to our fellow-creatures. What
assistance can it receive from a religion by which it is continually
contradicted and degraded?
It is said, that Christianity, far from counteracting morality, is its
chief support, and renders its obligations more sacred, by giving them the
sanction of God. In my opinion, however, the Christian religion, instead
of supporting morality renders it weak and precarious. It cannot possibly
have any solid foundation on the commands of a God, who is changing,
partial, and capricious; and ordains with the same mouth, justice and
injustice, concord and carnage, toleration and persecution. It is
impossible to follow the precepts of a rational morality, under the empire
of a religion, which makes a merit of the most destructive zeal,
enthusiasm, and fanaticism. A religion, which commands us to imitate the
conduct of a despot who delights to ensnare his creatures, who is
implacable in his vengeance, and devotes to flaming destruction all who
have the misfortune to displease him, is incompatible with all morality.
The innumerable crimes with which the Christian, more than any other
religion, has stained itself, have always been committed under the pretext
of pleasing the ferocious God whom the Christians have inherited from the
Jews. The moral character of this God, must, of necessity, govern the
moral conduct of those who adore him.
Hence arises the uncertainty of Christians, whether it be most conformable
to the spirit of their religion to tolerate, or to persecute, those who
differ from them in opinion. The two parties find themselves equally
authorised in modes of conduct which are diametrically opposite. At one
time, Jehovah declares his detestation of idolaters, and makes it a duty
to exterminate them; at another time Moses forbids his people to speak ill
of the God of nations. The Son of God forbids persecution, after having
said that men must be constrained to enter into his kingdom. Yet, as the
idea of a severe and cruel God makes a much deeper impression than that of
a bounteous one, true Christians have generally thought it their duty to
exert their zeal against those whom they have supposed to be enemies to
their God. They have imagined it impossible to offend him by espousing his
cause with too much ardour. Toleration has seldom been practised, except
by indolent and phlegmatic Christians, of a temperament little analogous
to that of the God whom they serve.
Must not a true Christian, to whose imitation the example of the saints
and heroes of the Old Testament are proposed, become ferocious and
sanguinary? Will he not find motives for cruelty in the conduct of Moses,
who twice caused the blood of Israel to stream, and immolated to his God
more than forty thousand victims? To justify his own, will he not appeal
to the perfidious cruelty of Phineas, Jabel, and Judith? Will he not see
David to be a monster of barbarity, adultery, and rebellion, which
nevertheless does not prevent his being a man after God's own heart? In
short, the whole Bible informs the Christian that his God is delighted
with a furious zeal in his service; and this zeal is sufficient to close
his eyes on every species of crime.
Let us not, then, be surprised to see Christians incessantly persecuting
each other. If they are at any time tolerant, it is only when they are
themselves persecuted, or too weak to persecute others. Whenever they have
power they become the terror and destruction of each other. Since
Christianity first appeared on earth, its different sects have incessantly
quarrelled. They have mutually exercised the most refined cruelty.
Sovereigns, in imitation of David, have espoused the quarrels of
discordant priests, and served God by fire and sword. Kings themselves
have often perished the victims of religious fanaticism, which tramples on
every moral duty in obedience to its God.
In a word, the religion, which boasts of having brought peace on earth,
and good will towards men, has for eighteen centuries caused more ravages,
and greater effusions of blood, than all the superstitions of heathenism.
It has raised walls of separation between the citizens of the same state.
It has abandoned concord and affection from families. It has made a duty
of injustice and inhumanity. The followers of a God, who was unjustly
offended at mankind, became as unjust as he. The servants of a jealous and
vindictive God, conceived it their duty to enter into his quarrels and
avenge his injuries. Under a God of cruelty, it was judged meritorious to
cause the earth to echo with groans, and float in blood.
Such are the important services which the Christian religion has rendered
to morality. Let it not be said, that it is through a shameful abuse of
this religion, that these horrors have happened. A spirit of persecution
and intolerance is the spirit of a religion ordained by a God, jealous of
his power, a God who has formally commanded the commission of murder; a
God, who, in the excess of his anger, has not spared even his own Son! The
servant of such a God is much surer to please him by exterminating his
enemies, than by permitting them to offend him in peace. Such a God must
necessarily serve as a pretext to the most destructive excesses. A zeal
for his glory is used as a veil to conceal the passions of all impostors
and fanatics who pretend to be interpreters of the will of heaven; and the
enthusiastic hopes to wash away the greatest crimes by bathing his hands
in the blood of the enemies of his God.
By a natural consequence of the same principles, an intolerant religion
can be only conditionally submissive to the authority of temporal
sovereigns. Jews and Christians cannot be obedient to a temporal
government, unless its laws be conformed to the arbitrary and often
ridiculous commands of their God. But who shall decide whether the laws,
most advantageous to society, are conformed to the will of this God?
Without doubt, his ministers, the confidants of his secrets and
interpreters of his oracles. Thus, in a Christian state, the citizens must
be subject rather to spiritual than temporal government, to the priest
rather than the magistrate. Hence must arise civil war, bloodshed,
proscription, and all that inspires the human breast with horror.
Such is the support afforded to morality by a religion, the first
principle of which is to admit the God of the Jews, that is, a tyrant,
whose fantastic commands annihilate every rule necessary to the tranquil
existence of society. This God creates justice and injustice, his supreme
will changes good into bad, and vice into virtue. His caprice overturns
the laws which he himself had given to nature. He destroys at his pleasure
the moral relations among mankind. In his own conduct he dispenses with
all duties towards his creatures. He seems to authorise them to follow no
certain laws, except those prescribed to them, in different circumstances,
by the voice of his ministers and prophets. These, when in power, preach
nothing but submission. If an attempt be made to abridge that power, they
preach arms and rebellion. Are they weak? They preach toleration,
patience, and meekness. Are they strong? They preach persecution, revenge,
rapine, And cruelty. They always find in Holy Writ arguments to authorise
these different modes of conduct, They find in the oracles of their just
and immutable God, arguments amply sufficient to justify actions
diametrically opposite in their nature and offence. To lay the foundation
of morality on such a God, or open books which contain laws so
contradictory, is to give it an unstable base; it is to found it on the
caprice of those who speak in the name of God; it is to found it on the
temperament of each one of his adorers.
Morality should be founded upon invariable rules. A God who destroys these
rules destroys his own work. If God be the creator of man, if he intends
their happiness and preservation, he would have them to be just, humane,
and benevolent, and averse to injustice, fanaticism, and cruelty.
From what has been said, we may see what we ought to think of those
divines who pretend that, without the Christian religion there could be
neither morality nor virtue among mankind. The converse of this
proposition would much higher approach the truth; and it might be
maintained, that every Christian who imitates his God, and practises all
his commands, must necessarily be an immoral person. If it be said, that
those commands are not always unjust, and that the Scriptures often
breathe benevolence, harmony, and equity, I answer, Christians must have
an inconstant morality, sometimes good and sometimes bad, according to
interest and individuals. It appears that Christians must either be wholly
destitute of true morality, Or vibrate continually from virtue to vice,
and from vice to virtue.
The Christian religion is but a rotten prop to morality. It will not bear
examination, and every man who discovers its defects will be ready to
believe that the morality founded on such a basis can be only a chimera.
Thus we often behold men, who have couched the neck beneath the yoke of
religion, break loose at once and abandon themselves to debauchery,
intemperance, and every kind of vice. Escaping from the slavery of
superstition, they fly to complete anarchy, and disbelieve the existence
of all moral duties, because they have found religion to be but a fable.
Hence, among Christians, the words infidel and libertine have become
synonymous. All these inconveniences would be avoided if mankind, instead
of being taught a theological, were taught a natural morality. Instead of
interdicting intemperance and vice, because they are offensive to God and
religion, they should be prevented, by convincing man that they are
destructive to his existence, and render him contemptible in society: that
they are disapproved and forbidden by reason and nature, who aim at his
preservation, and direct him to take the path that leads to permanent
felicity. Whatever may be the will of God, and independently of the future
rewards and punishments announced by religion, it is easy to prove to
every man that it is, in this world, his interest to preserve his health,
to respect virtue, acquire the esteem of his fellow-creatures, and, in
fine, to be chaste, temperate, and virtuous. Those whose passions will not
suffer them to attend to principles so clear and reasonable, will not be
more docile to the voice of a religion, which they will cease to believe
the moment it opposes their misguiding propensities.
Let, then, the pretended advantages which the Christian religion lends
morality be no longer boasted. The principles drawn from revelation tend
to its destruction. We have frequent examples of Christian nations, whose
morals are far more corrupted than those of people whom they style
infidels and heathens. The former are, at least, most subject to religious
fanaticism, a passion calculated to banish justice and all the social
virtues from society.
Christianity creates intolerants and persecutors, who are much more
injurious to society than the most abandoned debauchees. It is, at least,
certain, that the most Christian nations of Europe, are not those where
true morality is most felt and practised. In Spain, Portugal, and Italy,
where the most superstitious sect of Christians has fixed its residence,
people live in the most shameful ignorance of their duties. Robbery,
assassination, debauchery, and persecution, are there carried to their
worst extreme; and yet all men are full of religion. Few virtuous men
exist in those countries. Religion itself there becomes an accomplice to
vice, furnishes criminals with an asylum, and procures to them easy means
of reconciliation with God. Presents, prayers, and ceremonies, there
furnish mankind with a dispensation from the practice of virtue. Amongst
nations, who boast of possessing Christianity in all its purity, religion
has so entirely absorbed the attention of its sectaries, that morality
enters not into their thought; and they think they fulfil all their duties
by a scrupulous observation of the minutiae of superstitious ceremonies,
whilst they are strangers to all social affections, and labour for the
destruction of human happiness.
CHAP. XII.—OF THE CHRISTIAN VIRTUES.
What has been said is sufficient to shew what we ought to think of
Christian morality. If we examine the virtues recommended in the Christian
religion, we find them but ill calculated for mankind. They lift him above
his sphere, are useless to society, and often of dangerous consequence. In
the boasted precepts, which Jesus Christ came to give mankind, we find
little but extravagant maxims, the practice of which is impossible, and
rules which, literally followed, must prove injurious to society. In those
of his precepts that are practicable, we find nothing which was not as
well or better known to the sages of antiquity, without the aid of
Revelation.
According to the Messiah, the whole duty of man consists in loving God
above all things, and his neighbour as himself. Is it possible to obey
this precept? Can man love a God above all things, who is represented as
wrathful, capricious, unjust, and implacable? who is said to be cruel
enough to damn his creatures eternally? Can man love, above all things, an
object the most dreadful that human imagination could ever conceive? Can
such an object excite in the human heart a sentiment of love? How can we
love that which we dread? How can we delight in the God under whose rod we
tremble? Do we not deceive ourselves, when we think we love a being so
terrible, and so calculated to excite nothing but horror?1
1 Seneca says, with much truth, that a man of sense cannot
fear the Gods, because no man can love what he fears. De
Benef. 4. The Bible says, the fear of the Lord is the
beginning of wisdom. I think it rather the beginning of
folly.
Is it even practicable for mankind to love their neighbours as themselves?
Every man naturally loves himself in preference to all others. He loves
his fellow-creatures only in proportion as they contribute to his
happiness. He exercises virtue in doing good to his neighbour. He acts
generously when he sacrifices his self love to his love for another. Yet
he will never love his fellow creatures but for the useful qualities he
finds in them. He can love them no farther than they are known to him, and
his love for them must ever be governed by the good he receives from them.
To love one's enemies is then impossible. A man may abstain from doing
evil to the person by whom he is injured; but love is an affection which
can be excited in our hearts only by an object which we supposed friendly
to us. Politic nations, who have enacted just and wise laws, have always
forbidden individual to revenge, or do justice to themselves, A sentiment
of generosity, of greatness of soul, or heroism, may induce mankind to do
good to those from whom they suffer injuries. By such means they exalt
themselves above their enemies, and may even change the disposition of
their hearts. Thus, without having recourse to a supernatural morality, we
feel that it is our interest to stifle in our hearts the lust of revenge.
Christians may, therefore, cease to boast the forgiveness of injuries, as
a precept that could be given only by their God, and which proves the
divine origin of their morality. Pythagoras, long before the time of
Christ, had said, let men revenge themselves upon their enemies, only by
labouring to convert them into friends. Socrates taught that it was not
lawful for a man, who had received an injury, to revenge it by doing
another injury.
Christ must have forgotten that he spoke to men, when, in order to conduct
them to perfection, he commanded them to abandon their possessions to the
avidity of the first who should demand them; to turn the other cheek to
receive a new insult; to oppose no resistance to the most outrageous
violence; to renounce the perishable riches of this world; to forsake
houses, possessions, relations, and friends to follow him; and to reject
even the most innocent pleasures. Who does not see, in these sublime
precepts, the language of enthusiasm and hyperbole? Are not they
calculated to discourage man, and throw him into despair? If literally
practised, would they not prove ruinous to society?
What shall we say of the morality, which commands the human heart to
detach itself from objects which reason commands it to love? When we
refuse the blessings offered us by nature, do we not despise the
benefactions of the One Supreme? What real good can result to society from
the melancholy and ferocious virtues which Christians consider
indispensible?
Can a man continue useful to society, when his mind is perpetually
agitated with imaginary terrors, gloomy ideas, and black inquietudes,
which incapacitate him for the performance of his duties to his family,
his country, and mankind? If the Christian adhere strictly to the gloomy
principles of his religion, must he not become equally insupportable to
himself, and those by whom he is surrounded?
It cannot be said, that, in general, fanaticism and enthusiasm are the
bases of the morality of Christ. The virtues which he recommends tend to
render men unsocial, to plunge them into melancholy, and often to render
them injurious to their fellow-creatures. Among human beings, human
virtues are necessary; Christian virtues are not calculated on the scale
of real life. Society has need of real virtues, from which it may derive
energy, activity, and support. Vigilance, labour, and affection, are
necessary to families. A desire of enjoying lawful pleasures, and
augmenting the sum of their happiness, is necessary to all mankind. The
Christian religion is perpetually busied in degrading mankind by
threatening them with dismaying terrors, or diverting them with frivolous
hopes; sentiments equally proper to turn them from their true duties. If
the Christian literally obey the precepts of his legislator, he will ever
be either an useless or injurious member of society.1
1 Notwithstanding the eulogies lavished by Christians on the
precepts of their divine master, some of them are wholly
contrary to equity and right reason. When Jesus says, make
to yourselves friends in heaven with the mammon of
unrighteousness, does he not plainly insinuate, that we may
take from others wherewithal to give alms to the poor?
Divines will say that he spoke in parables; these parables
are, however, easily unfolded. In the mean time, this
precept is but too well followed. Many Christians cheat and
swindle during all their lives, to have the pleasure of
making donations at their death to churches, monasteries,
&c. The Messiah, at another time, treated his mother, who
with parental solicitude was seeking him, extremely ill. He
commands his disciples to steal an ass. He drowns an herd of
swine, &c. It must be confessed, these things do not agree
extremely well with good morality.
What real advantage can mankind derive from those ideal virtues, which
Christians style evangelic, divine, &c. and which they prefer to the
social, humane, and substantial virtues, and without which they pretend no
man can please God, or enter into his glory? Let us examine those boasted
virtues in detail. Let us see of what utility they are to society, and
whether they truly merit the preference which is given them, to those
which are pointed out by reason as necessary to the welfare of mankind.
The first of the Christian virtues is faith, which serves as a foundation
for all the others. It consists in an impossible conviction of the
revealed doctrines and absurd fables which the Christian religion commands
its disciples to believe. Hence it appears that this virtue exacts a total
renunciation of reason, and impracticable assent to improbable facts; and
a blind submission to the authority of priests, who are the only
guarantees of the truth of the doctrines and miracles that every Christian
must believe under penalty of damnation.
This virtue, although necessary to all mankind, is nevertheless, a gift of
Heaven, and the effect of a special grace. It forbids all doubt and
enquiry; and it deprives man of the liberty of exercising his reason and
reflection. It reduces him to the passive acquiescence of beasts in
matters which he is, at the same time, told are of all things the most
important to his happiness. Hence it is plain, that faith is a virtue
invented by men, who, shrinking from the light of reason, deceived their
fellow-creatures, to subject them to their own authority, and degraded
them that they might exercise an empire over them. If faith be a virtue,
it is certainly useful only to the spiritual guides of the Christians, for
they alone gather its fruits. It cannot but be injurious to other men, who
are taught by it to despise that reason, which distinguishes them from
brutes, and is their only faithful guide in this world. Christians,
however, represent this reason as perverted, and as unfaithful guide; by
which they seem to intimate that it was not made for reasonable beings.
May we not, however, ask them how far this renunciation of reason ought to
be carried? Do not they themselves, in certain cases, have recourse to
reason? Do they not appeal to reason, when they endeavour to prove the
existence of their God?
Be this as it may, it is an absurdity to say we believe that of which we
have no conception. What, then, are the motives of the Christian, for
pretending to such a belief? His confidence in his spiritual guides. But
what is the foundation of this confidence? Revelation. On what, then, is
Revelation itself founded? On the authority of spiritual guides. Such is
the manner in which Christians reason. Their arguments in favour of faith
are comprised in the following sentence. To believe our religion it is
necessary to have faith, and to have faith you must believe in our
religion. Or, it is necessary to have faith already, in order to believe
in the necessity of faith.1
1 Many divines have maintained, that faith without works is
sufficient for salvation. This is the virtue which is, in
general, most cried up by them. It is, at least, the one
most necessary to their existence. It is not, therefore,
surprising that they have endeavoured to establish it by
fire and sword, it was for the support of faith that the
Inquisition burned heretics and Jews. Kings and priests
persecute for the establishment of faith. Christians have
destroyed those who were destitute of faith, in order to
demonstrate to them their error. O wondrous virtue, and
worthy of the God of mercies! His ministers punish mankind,
when he refuses them his grace!!!
The phantom Faith vanishes at the approach of the sun of Reason. It can
never sustain a calm examination. Hence it arises, that certain Christian
divines are so much at enmity with science. The founder of their religion
declared, that his law was made for ignorant men and children. Faith is
the effect of a grace which God seldom grants to enlightened persons, who
are accustomed to consult their reason. It is adapted only to the minds of
men who are incapable of reflection, tendered insane by enthusiasm, or
invincibly attached to the prejudices of Childhood. Science must ever be
at enmity with this religion; for in proportion as either of them gains
ground, the other must lose.
Another Christian virtue, proceeding from the former, is Hope. Founded on
the flattering promises given by this religion to those who render
themselves wretched in this life, it feeds their enthusiasm. It induces
them firmly to believe that God will reward, in heaven, their gloominess,
inutility, indolence, prayers, and detestation of pleasures on earth. How
can a man, who, being intoxicated with these pompous hopes, becomes
indifferent to his own happiness, concern himself with that of his
fellow-creatures? The Christian believes that he pleases his God by
rendering himself miserable in this life; and however flattering his hopes
may be for the future, they are here empoisoned by the idea of a jealous
God, who commands him to work out his own salvation with fear and
trembling, and who will plunge him into eternal torture, if he for a
moment has the weakness to be a man. Another of the Christian virtues is
Charity. It consists in loving God and our neighbour. We have always seen
how difficult, not to say impossible, it is to feel sentiments of
tenderness for any being whom we fear. It will, undoubtedly, be said, that
the fear of Christians is a filial fear. But words cannot change the
essence of things. Fear is a passion totally opposite to love. A son, who
fears the anger, and dreads the caprices of a father, can never love him
sincerely. The love, therefore, of a Christian to his God can never be
true. In vain he endeavours to feel sentiments of tenderness for a
rigorous master, at whose idea his heart shrinks back in terror. He can
never love him but as a tyrant, to whom his mouth renders the homage that
his heart refuses. The devotee is not honest to himself, when he pretends
to love his God. His affection is a dissembled homage, like that which men
are forced to render to certain inhuman despots, who, while they tread
their subjects in the dust, demand from them the exterior marks of
attachment.
If some tender minds, by force of illusion, feel sentiments of divine
love, it is then a mystic and romantic passion, produced by a warm
temperament, and an ardent imagination, which present their God to them
dressed in smiles, with all his imputed faults concealed.1 The love of God
is not the least incomprehensible mystery of this religion.
1 It is an ardent and tender temperament that produces
mystic devotion. Hysterical women are those who commonly
love God with most vivacity, they love him to distraction,
as they would love a man. In monasteries, particularly Ste.
Therese, Madeleine de Pazzy, Marie a la Coque, most of the
devotees are of this description. Their imagination grows
wild, and they give to their God, whom they paint in the
most captivating colours, that tenderness which they are not
permitted to bestow on beings of their own species. It
requires a strong imagination to be smitten with an object
unknown.
Charity, considered as the love of mankind, is a virtuous and necessary
disposition. It then becomes no more than that tender humanity which
attaches us to our fellows, and inclines us to love and assist them. But
how shall we reconcile this attachment with the commands of a jealous God,
who would have us to love none but himself, and who came to separate the
friend from the friend, and the son from the father? According to the
precepts of the gospel, it would be criminal to offer God a heart shared
by an earthly object. It would be idolatry thus to confound the creature
with the Creator. And further, how can the Christian love beings who
continually offend his God? Beings who would continually betray himself
into offence? How can he love sinners? Experience, teaches us that the
devout, obliged by principle to hate themselves, have very little more
affection for others. If this be not the case, they have not arrived, at
the perfection of divine love. We do not find that those who are supposed
to love the Creator most ardently, shew much affection for his creatures.
On the contrary, we see them fill with bitterness all who surround them;
they criticise with severity the faults of others, and make it a crime to
speak of human frailty with indulgence.1 A sincere love for God must be
accompanied with zeal. A true Christian must be enraged when he sees his
God offended. He must aim himself with a just and holy severity to repress
the offenders. He must have an ardent desire to extend the empire of his
religion. A zeal, originating in this divine love, has been the source of
the terrible persecutions of which Christians have so often been guilty.
Zeal produces murderers as well as martyrs. It is this zeal that prompts
intolerant man to wrest the thunder from the hand of the Most High to
avenge him of his enemies. It is this zeal that causes members of the same
state, and the same family, to detest and torment each other for opinions,
and puerile ceremonies, which they are led to esteem as of the last
importance. It is this zeal that has a thousand times, kindled those
religious wars so remarkable for their atrocity. Finally, it is this zeal
for religion which justifies calumny, treason, carnage, and, in short, the
disorders most fatal to society. It has always been considered as lawful
to employ artifice, falsehood, and force, in support of the cause of God.
The most choleric and corrupted men are commonly the most zealous. They
hope that, for the sake of their zeal, Heaven will pardon the depravity of
their manners, be it ever so excessive.
1 Devotees are generally considered as scourges of society.
A devout woman has seldom the talent of conciliating the
love of her husband and his domestics. A gloomy and
melancholy religion cannot render its disciples very
amiable. A sad and sullen monarch must have sad and sullen
subjects: Christians have judiciously remarked, that Jesus
Christ wept, but never smiled.
It is from an effect of the same zeal that enthusiastic Christians fly
over every sea, and Continent to extend the empire of their God and make
new proselytes. Stimulated by this zeal, missionaries go to trouble the
repose of what they call heathen nations, whilst they would be astonished
and enraged to find missionaries from those nations endeavouring to
propagate a new religion in their country.1
When these propagators of the faith have had power in their hands, they
have excited the most horrid rebellions; and have, in conquered countries,
exercised cruelties calculated only to render the God detestable whom they
pretended to serve. They have thought that men who have so long been
strangers to their God could be little better than beasts; and, therefore,
judged it lawful to exercise every kind of violence over them. In the eyes
of a Christian, an infidel is seldom worthier than a dog.
It is apparently in imitation of the Jews that Christian nations have
usurped the possessions of the inhabitants of the new world. The
Castilians and Portuguese had the same right to the possession of America
and Africa, that the Hebrews had to make themselves masters of the land of
Canaan, and exterminate its inhabitants, or reduce them to slavery. Have
not Popes arrogated the right of disposing of distant empires to their
favourite Monarchs in Europe? These manifest violations of the law of
nature and of nations appeared just to those Christian Princes, in favour
of whom religion sanctified avarice, cruelty, and usurpation.2
1 Kambi, Emperor of China, asked the Jesuit missionaries at
Pekin, what they would say, if he should send missionaries
to their nation. The revolts excited by the Jesuits in Japan
and Ethiopia are well known. A holy missionary has been
heard to say, that without muskets, missionaries could never
make proselytes.
2 St. Augustin says, that of right divine, all things belong
to the just. A maxim which is founded on a passage in the
Psalms, which says, the just shall eat the fruit of the
labour of the unrighteous. It is known that the Pope, by a
bull given in favour of the kings of Castile, Arragon, and
Portugal, fixed the line of demarcation which was to rule
the conquests which each had gained over the infidels. After
such principles, is not the whole earth to become a prey to
Christian rapacity?
Humility is, also, considered by Christians as a sublime virtue, and of
inestimable value. No super-natural and divine revelations are necessary
to teach us that pride does not become man, and that it renders him
disagreeable to others. All must be convinced, on a moment's reflection,
that arrogance, presumption, and vanity, are disgusting and contemptible
qualities.
But Christian humility is carried to a more refined extreme. The Christian
must renounce his reason, mistrust his virtues, refuse to do justice to
his own good actions, and repress all self-esteem, however well merited.
Whence it appears, that this pretended virtue only degrades and debases
man in his own eyes, deprives him of all energy, and stifles in him every
desire of rendering himself useful to society. To forbid mankind to esteem
themselves and merit the esteem of others, is to break the only powerful
string that inclines them to study, industry, and noble actions. This
Christian virtue is calculated only to render them abject slaves, wholly
useless to the world, and make all virtue give place in them, to a blind
submission to their spiritual guides.
Let us not be surprised, that a religion which boasts of being
supernatural should endeavour to unnaturalize man. This religion, in the
delirium of its enthusiasm, forbids mankind to love themselves. It
commands them to hate pleasures and court grief. It makes a merit of all
voluntary evils they do unto themselves. Hence those austerities and
penances so destructive to health; those extravagant mortifications, cruel
privations, and gradual suicides, by which fanatic Christians think they
merit heaven. It must be confessed, all Christians do not feel themselves
capable of such marvellous perfections, but all believe themselves more or
less obliged to mortify the flesh, and renounce the blessings prepared for
them by a bounteous God, who, they suppose, offers his good things only
that they may be refused, and would be offended should his creatures
presume to touch them.
Reason cannot approve virtues which are destructive to ourselves, nor
admit a God who is delighted when mankind render themselves miserable, and
voluntarily submit to torments. Reason and experience, without the aid of
superstition, are sufficient to prove, that passions and pleasures, pushed
to excess, destroy us; and that the abuse of the best things becomes a
real evil. Nature herself inculcates upon us the privation of things which
prove injurious to us. A being, solicitous for his own preservation, must
restrain irregular propensities, and fly whatever tends to his
destruction. It is plain, that by the Christian religion, suicide is, at
least, indirectly authorised.
It was in consequence of these fanatical ideas that, in the earliest ages
of Christianity, the forests and deserts were peopled with perfect
Christians, who by flying from the world, left their families destitute of
support, and their country of citizens, to abandon themselves to an idle
and contemplative life. Hence those legions of monks and cenobites, who,
under the standards of different enthusiasts, have enrolled themselves
into a militia, burthensome and injurious to society. They thought to
merit heaven, by burying talents, which might be serviceable to their
fellow-citizens, and vowing a life of indolence and celibacy. Thus, in
nations which are the most faithful to Christianity, a multitude of men
render themselves useless and wretched all their lives. What heart is so
hard as to refuse a tear to the lot of the hapless victims taken from that
enchanting sex which was destined to give happiness to our own!
Unfortunate dupes of youthful enthusiasm, or sacrificed to the ambitious
views of imperious families, they are for ever exiled from the world! They
are bound by rash oaths to unending slavery and misery. Engagements,
contradicted by every precept of nature, force them to perpetual
virginity. It is in vain that riper feelings, sooner or later, warm their
breasts, and make them groan under the weight of their imprudent vows.
They regret their voluntary sterility, and find themselves forgotten in
society. Cut off from their families, and subjected to troublesome and
despotic gaolers, they sink into a life of disgust, of bitterness, and
tears. In fine, thus exiled from society, thus unrelated and unbeloved,
there only remains for them the shocking consolation of seducing other
victims to share with them the torments of their solitude and
mortifications.
The Christian religion seems to have undertaken to combat nature and
reason in every thing. If it admits some virtues, approved by reason, it
always carries them to a vicious excess. It never observes that just mean,
which is the point of perfection. All illicit and shameful pleasures will
be avoided by every man, who is desirous of his own preservation, and the
esteem of his fellow-creatures. The heathens knew and taught this truth,
notwithstanding the depravity of morals with which they are reproached by
Christians.1 The church even recommends celibacy as a state of perfection,
and considers the natural tie of marriage as an approach to sin. God,
however, declares in Genesis, that it is not good for man to be alone. He
also formally commanded all creatures to increase and multiply. His Son,
in the gospel, comes to annul those laws. He teaches that, to attain to
perfection, it is necessary to avoid marriage, and resist the strongest
desire with which the breast of man is inspired—that of perpetuating
his existence by a posterity, and providing supports for his old age and
infirmities.
1 Aristotle and Epictetus recommend chastity of speech.
Menander said, that a good man could never consent to
debauch a virgin or commit adultery. Tibullus said, casta
placent superis. Mark Anthony thanks the Gods, that he had
preserved his chastity in his youth. The Romans made laws
against adultery. Father Tachard informs us, that the
Siamans forbid not only dishonest actions, but also impure
thoughts and desires. Whence it appears, that chastity and
purity of manners were esteemed even before the Christian
religion existed.
If we consult reason, we find, that the pleasures of love are always
injurious when taken in excess; and that they are always criminal when
they prove injurious. We shall perceive, that to debauch a woman is to
condemn her to distress and infamy, and annihilate to her all the
advantages of society; that adultery is destructive to the greatest
felicity of human life, conjugal union. Hence we shall be convinced, that
marriage, being the only means of satisfying our desire of increasing the
species and providing filial supports, is a state far more respectable and
sacred, than the destructive celibacy and voluntary castration recommended
as a virtue by the Christian religion.
Nature, or its author, invites man, by the attraction of pleasure, to
multiply himself. He has unequivocally declared, that women are necessary
to men. Experience shews, that they are formed for society, not solely for
the purpose of a transient pleasure, but to give mutual assistance in the
misfortunes of life, to produce and educate children, form them into
citizens, and provide in them support for themselves in old age. In giving
man superior strength, nature has pointed out his duty of labouring for
the support of his family; the weaker organs of his companion are destined
to functions less violent, but not less necessary. In giving her a soul
more soft and sensible, nature has, by a tender sentiment, attached her
more particularly to her children. Such are the sure bands which the
Christian religion would tear asunder. Such the blessings it would wrest
from man, while it substitutes in their place an unnatural celibacy, which
renders man selfish and useless, depopulates society, and which can be
advantageous only to the odious policy of some Christian priests, who,
separating from their fellow-citizens, have formed a destructive body,
which eternalizes itself without posterity. Gens oterna in qua nemo
nascitur.
If this religion has permitted marriage to some sects, who have not the
temerity to soar to the highest pinnacle of perfection, it seems to have
sufficiently punished them for this indulgence, by the unnatural shackles
it has fixed on the connubial state. Thus, among them, we see divorce
forbidden, and the most wretched unions indissoluble. Persons once
married, are forced to groan under the weight of wedlock, even when
affection and esteem are dead, and the place of these essentials to
conjugal happiness is supplied by hatred and contempt. Temporal laws also
conspiring with religion, forbid the wretched prisoners to break their
chains. It seems as if the Christian religion exerted all its powers to
make us view marriage with disgust, and give the preference to a celibacy
which is pregnant with debauchery, adultery, and dissolution. Yet the God
of the Hebrews made divorce lawful, and I know not by what right his Son,
who came to accomplish the law of Moses, revoked an indulgence so
reasonable.
Such are the perfections which Christianity inculcates on her children,
and such the virtues she prefers to those which are contemptuously styled
human virtues. She even rejects these, and calls them false and sinful,
because their possessors are, forsooth, not filled with faith. What! the
virtues of Greece and Rome, so amiable, and so heroic, were they not true
virtues? If justice, humanity, generosity, temperance, and patience be not
virtues, to what can the name be given? And are the virtues less because
professed by heathens? Are not the virtues of Socrates, Cato, Epictetus,
and Antonine, real and preferable to the zeal of the Cyrills, the
obstinacy of Athanasius, the uselessness of Anthony, the rebellion of
Chrysostom, the ferocity of Dominic, and the meanness of Francis?
All the virtues admitted by Christians, are either overstrained and
fanatic, tending to render man useless, abject, and miserable; or
obstinate, haughty, cruel, and destructive to society. Such are the
effects of a religion, which contemning the earth, hesitates not to
overwhelm it with trouble, provided it thereby heightens the triumph of
its God over his enemies. No true morality can ever be compatible with
such a religion.
CHAP. XIII.—OF THE PRACTICE AND DUTIES OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
If the Christian virtues be destitute of solidity, and produce no effect
which reason can approve, we shall find nothing more estimable in a
multitude of incommodious, useless, and often dangerous practices, which
Christians consider as their sacred duties, and by means of which they are
confident of obtaining the pardon and favour of God, and an eternal abode
with him in unspeakable glory and felicity.
The first and most essential duty of Christians is prayer. To continual
prayer their religion attaches its felicity. Their God, whom they suppose
to be overflowing with bounty, refuses to bestow his blessings
unsolicited. He grants them only to importunity. Sensible to flattery,
like the kings of the earth, he exacts an etiquette, and hears no
petitions unless they are presented in a certain form. What should we say
of a father who, knowing the wants of his children, should refuse to give
them necessary food, until wearied out with fervent supplications? But in
another view, does not it imply mistrust of the wisdom of God to prescribe
rules for his conduct? Does it not imply a doubt of his immutability, to
believe he can be prevailed on by his creatures to alter his designs? If
he knows all things, what need is there of continually informing him what
are the dispositions and desires of his subjects? If he is almighty, how
can he be flattered with the submissions, adorations, and formalities with
which Christians prostrate themselves before him?
In one word, prayer supposes a capricious God, deficient in memory,
voracious of praise, fond of seeing his creatures abased in the dust, and
anxious to receive at every instant the most abject marks of their
submission.
Can these ideas, borrowed from earthly princes, be with propriety applied
to an omnipotent Being, who created the universe for man, and desires only
that he should be happy? Can it be supposed that such a Being, without
equal and without rival, should be jealous of his glory? Can the prayers
of man add glory to a Being beyond comparison superior to all others?
Cannot Christians see, that, in endeavouring to honour and exalt their
God, they only degrade and debase him?
It is also the opinion of Christians, that the prayers of one man may be
serviceable to others. Partial to his favourites, God hears petitions only
from their lips. He listens not to his people, unless their prayers be
offered up to him through his ministers. He becomes a sultan, accessible
only to his ministers, vizirs, eunuchs, and the women of his seraglio.
Hence the millions of priests and cenobites, who have no business on earth
but to raise their idle hands to Heaven, and pray night and day for its
blessings on society. Nations pay dearly for these important services, and
these pious impostors live in splendour and ease, while real merit,
labour, and industry languish in misery.
Under the pretence of devoting himself to prayer and other ceremonies of
his worship, the Christian, particularly in some of the more superstitious
sects, is obliged to remain idle, and stand with arms across during a
great part of the year. He is persuaded that he honours God by his
inutility. Feasts and fasts, multiplied by the interests of priests and
the credulity of the people, often suspended for long intervals the
labours necessary to the subsistence of society. Men fly to temples to
pray when they should stay at home and cultivate their fields. There their
eyes are fed with childish ceremonies, and their ears are filled with
fables and doctrines, of which they can comprehend nothing. This
tyrannical religion makes it a crime for the poor labourer to endeavour,
during consecrated days, to procure subsistence for a numerous and
indigent family. And civil authority, in concert with religion, punishes
those who have the audacity to earn bread, instead of praying or being
idle.
Can reason subscribe to the ridiculous obligation of abstaining from
certain aliments and meats which is imposed by some sects of Christians?
In consequence of these laws, people, who live by their labour, are forced
to content themselves, during long intervals', with dear and unwholesome
provisions, more proper to generate disease than repair strength.
What abject and ridiculous ideas must they entertain of God, who believe
he can be offended by the quality of the food that enters into the
stomachs of his creatures! Heaven, however, for a certain sum of money
becomes sometimes more accommodating. Priests have been continually busied
in straitening the path of their sectaries, that they might transgress
more frequently; and that the revenue arising from their transgressions
might thus become more ample. All things, even sin itself, among
Christians, contribute to the profit of the priests.
No religion ever placed its sectaries in more complete and continual
dependance on priests, than the Christian. Those harpies never lose sight
of their prey. They take infallible measures for subjecting mankind, and
making all contribute to their power, riches, and dominion. Having assumed
the office of mediator between the heavenly monarch and his subjects,
these priests were looked upon as courtiers in favour, ministers
commissioned to exercise power in his name, and favourites to whom he
could refuse nothing. Thus they became absolute masters of the destiny of
the Christians. They gained establishments and rendered themselves
necessary by the introduction of innumerable practices and duties, which,
though puerile and ridiculous, they had the address to make their flocks
look upon as indispensibly necessary to their salvation. They represented
the omission of these pretended duties as a crime infinitely greater than
an open violation of all the laws of morality and reason.
Let us not then be surprized, that, in the most zealous, that is to say
the most superstitious sects, we see mankind perpetually infested with
priests. Scarcely are they born, when, under the pretext of washing away
original sin, their priests impose on them a mercenary baptism, and
pretend to reconcile them with a God whom they have as yet been unable to
offend. By means of a few words and magical ceremonies they are thus
snatched from the dominion of Satan. From the tenderest infancy their
education is frequently entrusted to priests, whose principal care is to
instil into them early the prejudices as necessary to the views of the
church. Terrors are now introduced into their minds which increase during
their whole lives. They are instructed in the fables, absurd doctrines,
and incomprehensible mysteries of a marvellous religion. In one word, they
are formed into superstitious Christians, and rendered incapable of being
useful citizens or enlightened men. Only one thing is represented to them
as necessary, which is to be in all things devoutly submissive to his
religion. "Be devout," say his teachers, "be blind, despise thy reason,
attend to Heaven, and neglect earth; this is all thy God demands to
conduct thee to eternal felicity."
To maintain the abject and fanatic ideas with which the priest has filled
his pupils in their childhood, he commands them to come frequently, and
deposit in his bosom their hidden faults, their most secret actions and
thoughts. He obliges them to humiliate themselves at his feet, and render
homage to his power. He frightens the criminals, and afterwards, if they
are judged worthy, he reconciles them to God, who on the command of his
ministers remits their sins. The Christian sects that admit this practice,
boast of it as extremely useful in regulating the manners and restraining
the passions of men; but experience proves, that the countries in which
this usage is most faithfully observed, are distinguished rather for the
dissolution than the purity of their manners. By such easy expiations they
are only emboldened in vice. The lives of Christians are circles of
successive offences and concessions. The priesthood reap the profit of
this practice, by means of which they exercise an absolute dominion over
the consciences of mankind. How great must be the power of an order of
men, who possess all the secrets of families, can kindle at pleasure the
destructive flame of fanaticism, and open or shut the gates of heaven!
Without the consent of his priests, the Christian cannot participate in
the knowledge of the mysteries of his religion, from which they have a
right to exclude him entirely. This privation, however, he has no great
reason to lament. But the anathemas or excommunications of the priests
generally do a real mischief to mankind. These spiritual punishments
produce temporal effects, and every citizen who incurs the disgrace of the
church is in danger of that of the government, and becomes odious to his
fellow-citizens.
We have already remarked that priests have taken upon themselves the
management of marriages. Without their consent, a Christian cannot, become
a father. He must first submit to the capricious formalities of his
religion, without which his children must be excluded from the rank of
citizens.
During all his life, the Christian is obliged to assist in the ceremonies
of worship under the direction of his priests. When he has performed this
important duty, he esteems himself the favourite of God, and persuades
himself that he no longer owes any thing to society. Thus frivolous
practices take place of morality, which is always rendered subordinate to
religion.
When death approaches, the Christian, stretched in agony on his bed, is
still assailed in those distressful moments by priests. In some sects
religion seems to have been invented to render the bitter death of man ten
thousand times more bitter. A malicious priest comes to the couch of the
dying man, and holds before him the spectacle of his approaching end,
arrayed in more than all its terrors. Although this custom is destructive
to citizens, it is extremely profitable to the priesthood,1 who owe much
of their riches to legacies procured by it. Morality is not quite so
highly advantaged by it. Experience proves, that most Christians live in
security and postpone till death their reconciliation with God. By means
of a late repentance, and largesses to the priesthood, their faults are
expiated, and they are permitted to hope that Heaven will forget the
accumulated crimes of a long and wicked life.
1 In Catholic countries.
Death itself does not terminate the empire of the priesthood in certain
sects, which finds means to make money even out of the dead bodies of
their followers. These, for a sufficient sum, are permitted to be
deposited in temples, where they have the privilege of spreading infection
and disease. The sacerdotal power extends still further. The prayers of
the church are purchased at a dear rate, to deliver the souls of the dead
from their pretended torments in the other world, inflicted for their
purification. Happy they who are rich in a religion, whose priests being
favourites with God, can be hired to prevail on him to remit the
punishments which his immutable justice had intended to inflict!
Such are the principal duties recommended by the Christians; and upon the
observation of these they believe their salvation to depend. Such are the
arbitrary, ridiculous, and hurtful practices substituted for the real
duties of morality. We shall not combat the different superstitious
practices, admitted by some sects and rejected by others; such as the
honours rendered to the memory of those pious fanatics and obscure
contemplators whom Roman pontiffs have ranked among the saints. We say
nothing of those pilgrimages which superstition has so often produced, nor
those indulgences by means of which sins are remitted. We shall only
observe, that these things are commonly' more respected where they are
admitted, than the duties of morality, which in those places frequently,
are wholly unknown. Mankind find their natural propensities much less
thwarted by such rites, ceremonies, and practices, than by being virtuous.
A good Christian is a man who conforms exactly to all that his priests
exact from him; these substitute blindness and submission in the place of
all virtues.
CHAP. XIV.—OF THE POLITICAL EFFECTS OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
After having seen the inutility and even danger of the perfections,
virtues, and duties proposed by the Christian religion, let us enquire
whether its political influences be more happy, and whether it can in
reality promote the welfare of nations among whom it is established and
faithfully observed. We at once find, that wherever this religion is
admitted, two opposite legislations, ever at variance with each other,
establish themselves. Although this religion preaches love and peace, it
soon annihilates the effects of those precepts by the divisions which it
necessarily sows among its sectaries, who unavoidably interpret diversely
the ambiguous oracles announced in Holy Writ. We find, that from the
infancy of religion the most acrimonious disputes have continually taken
place among divines. The successive ages of Christianity have been stained
with schisms, heresies, persecutions, and contests, widely discordant from
its boasted spirit of peace and concord; which is in fact incompatible
with a religion whose precepts are so dark and equivocal. In all religious
disputes, each party believes that God is on its side, and consequently
they are obstinate. Indeed, how can it be otherwise, when they confound
the cause of God with that of their own vanity? Thus, mutually averse to
concession, they quarrel and fight until force has decided a contest in
which they never appeal to reason, in fact, political authorities have
ever been forced to interfere in all the dissensions which have arisen
among Christians. Governments have always taken in the frivolous disputes
of priests, and foolishly considered them as objects of the last
importance. They have conceived, that in a religion established by God
himself there could be nothing of a trifling nature. Thus, princes have
armed themselves against their own subjects, whose opinions differed from
theirs. The way of thinking at court has decided the creed and the faith
of subjects. Opinions supported by kings and priests have been the only
true ones. Their creatures have been the guardians of orthodoxy, and were
commissioned to exterminate all whom they chose to denominate heretics and
rebels.
The prejudices of princes or their false policy, have caused them to look
upon those of their subjects, who differ from themselves in religious
opinions, as bad citizens, dangerous to the state, and enemies to their
power. If, leaving to priests the business of finishing their own
impertinent disputes, they had not assisted their quarrels and
persecutions, they would have died away of themselves, and never have
disturbed the peace of nations. If those kings had impartially recompensed
the good and punished the bad, without regard to their worship,
ceremonies, and speculative opinions, they would not have made many of
their subjects such enemies to that power, by which they found themselves
oppressed. Christians have always attempted to reclaim heretics by
injustice, violence, and persecution. Ought not they to have perceived,
that this conduct was calculated only to produce hypocrites and hidden
enemies, of open rebellions? But these reflections are not designed for
princes, who from their infancy, have been filled with fanaticism and
prejudices; They, instead of being actuated by virtuous motives, have
formed obstinate attachments to frivolities, and impetuous ardour for
doctrines foreign to the welfare of their states, and a boundless wrath
against all who refuse to bend to their despotic opinions. Such sovereigns
find it a shorter way to destroy mankind than reclaim them by mild means.
Their haughty despotism will not condescend to reason. Religion assures
them that tyranny is lawful, and cruelty meritorious when they are
employed in the cause of heaven.
The Christian religion, in fact, always makes despots and tyrants of all
the sovereigns by whom it is adopted. It represents them as gods upon
earth; it causes their very caprices to be respected as the will of heaven
itself. It delivers mankind into their hands as an herd of slaves, of whom
they may dispose at their pleasure. In return for their zeal for religion,
all the outrages upon justice that they can commit are forgiven, and their
subjects are commanded, under pain of the wrath of the Most High, to
submit without a murmur to the sword that strikes instead of protecting
themselves. It is not, therefore, matter of surprise, that since the
establishment of this religion, we see so many nations groaning under
devout tyrants, who, although obstinately attached to religion, have been
unjust, licentious, and cruel. Whatever were the oppressions and ravages
of these religious or hypocritical princes, the priests have not failed to
preach submission to their subjects: On the other hand, let us not be
surprised to see so many weak and wicked princes, support in their turns
the interest of a religion, which their false policy judged necessary to
the maintenance of their authority. If kings were enlightened, just and
virtuous, and knew and practised their real duties, they would have had no
need of the aid of superstition in governing nations. But as it is more
easy to conform to rites than to acquire talents or practise virtue, this
religion has, in princes, too often found support for itself, and
destruction for its enemies.
The ministers of religion have not had the same complaisance for princes,
who refused to make a common cause with them, espouse their quarrels, and
become subservient to their passions. They have arisen against those who
have thwarted their views, punished their excesses, touched their
immunities, endeavoured to subject them to reason, or repress their
ambitious designs. The priests on such occasions, cry out, Impiety!
Sacrilege! Then they pretend that the sovereign puts his hand to the
censor, and usurps the rights granted them by God himself. Then they
endeavour to excite nations to rebellion. They arm fanatics against
sovereigns, whom they declare tyrants, for having been wanting in
submission to the church. Heaven is always ready to revenge any injustice
done to its ministers. They are themselves submissive, and preach
submission to others, only when they are permitted to share the authority,
or are too feeble to resist it. This is the reason why the apostles, in
the infancy of Christianity, being destitute of power, preached
subordination. No sooner had this religion gained sufficient strength,
than it preached resistance and rebellion; dethroning some kings and
assassinating others.
In every political body, where this religion is established, there are two
rival powers, which, by incessant contention, convulse and wound the
state. The citizens divide into opposite parties, each of which fights, or
thinks it fights, for God. These contests at different times terminate
differently, but the triumphant party is always in the right. By attentive
examination of such events, we shall escape the dominion of fanaticism. It
is by stimulating mankind to enquiry, that they must be freed from the
shackles of superstition. Let mankind think till they have thrown aside
their prejudices, and they will think justly. The reign of the priesthood
will cease when men cease to be ignorant and credulous. Credulity is the
offspring of ignorance, and superstition is the child of credulity.
But most kings dread that mankind should be enlightened. Accomplices with
the priesthood, they have formed a league with them to stifle reason, and
persecute all who confide in its guidance. Blind to their own interests,
and those of their subjects, they wish only to command slaves, forgetting
those slaves are always at the disposal of the priests. Thus we see
science neglected, and ignorance triumphant, in those countries where this
religion holds the most absolute dominion. Arts and sciences are the
children of liberty, and separated from their parent they languish and
die. Among Christian nations, the least superstitious are the most free,
powerful, and happy. In countries where spiritual and temporal despotism
are leagued, the people grovel in the most shameful ignorance and
lethargic inactivity. The European nations, who boast of possessing the
purest faith, are not surely the most flourishing and powerful. Their
kings, enslaved themselves by priests, have not energy and courage enough
to make a single struggle for their own welfare or that of their subjects.
Priests, in such states, are the only order of men who are rich; other
citizens languish in' the deepest indigence. But of what importance are
the power and happiness of nations to the sectaries of a religion who seek
not for happiness in this world, who believe riches injurious, preach a
God of poverty, and recommend abasement to the soul, and mortification of
the flesh? It is without doubt to oblige people to practise these maxims,
that the clergy, in many Christian states, have taken possession of most
of the riches, and live in splendour, while their fellow-citizens are set
forward in the road to heaven, unincumbered with any burthen of earthly
wealth.
Such are the advantages political society derives from the Christian
religion. It forms an independent state within a state. It renders the
people slaves.
When sovereigns are obedient to it, it favours their tyranny. When they
are disobedient, it renders their subjects fanatic and rebellious. When it
accords with political power, it convulses, debases, and impoverishes
nations; when not, it makes citizens unsocial, turbulent, intolerant, and
mutinous.
If we examine in detail the precepts of this religion, and the maxims
which flow from its principles, we shall find it interdicts every thing
that can make a nation flourish. We have already seen the ideas of
imperfection that it attaches to marriage, and its esteem of celibacy.
These notions are highly unfavourable to population, which is,
incontrovertibly, the first source of power in a state.
Commerce is not less contradictory to the spirit of a religion, the
founder of which pronounced an anathema against riches, and excluded them
from his kingdom. All industry is interdicted to perfect Christians; they
live a provisory life on earth, and never concern themselves with the
morrow.
Must it not be a great temerity and sin for a Christian to serve in war?
Is not the man, who has never the right to believe himself absolutely in a
state of grace, extremely rash when he exposes himself to eternal
damnation? Is not the Christian, who ought to have charity for all men,
and love even his enemies, guilty of an enormous crime, when he kills a
man of whose dispositions he is ignorant, and whom he, perhaps,
precipitates at once into hell? A Christian soldier is a monster; unless,
indeed, he fights in the cause of religion. Then, if he dies, "he dies a
blessed martyr."
The Christian religion has always declared war against science and all
human knowledge. These have been looked upon as obstacles to salvation.
Neither reason nor study are necessary to men, who are to submit their
reason to the yoke of faith. From the confession of Christians themselves,
the founders of their religion were simple and ignorant men. Their
disciples must be as little enlightened as they were to admit the fables
and reveries they have received from them. It has always been remarked,
that the most enlightened men seldom make the best Christians. Science is
apt to embarrass faith; and it moreover turns the attention from the great
work of salvation, which is represented as the only necessary one. If
science be serviceable to political society, ignorance is much more so to
religion and its ministers.. Those ages, destitute of science and
industry, were the garden age of the church of Christ. Then were kings
dutifully submissive to priests; then the coffers of priests held all the
riches of society. The priests of a very numerous sect have kept from the
eyes of their followers even the sacred pages which contain the laws of
their religion. This conduct is, undoubtedly, very discreet. Reading the
Bible is the surest of all means to prevent its being respected.
In one word, if the maxims of the Christian religion were rigorously and
universally followed, no political society could subsist. If this
assertion be doubted, listen to what was said by the earliest doctors of
the church, and it will be acknowledged, that their precepts are wholly
incompatible with the power and preservation of states. According to
Lactantius, no Christian can become a soldier. According, to St. Justin,
no Christian can be a magistrate. According to St. Chrysostom, no
Christian can meddle with commerce. And, according to a great number, no
man ought to study. In fine, join these maxims to those of Christ, apply
them in practice, and the result will be a perfect Christian, useless to
his family, his country, and mankind; an idle contemplator, unconcerned in
the interests of this world, and occupied entirely with the other, whither
it is his most important business to go.
Let us look into Eusebius, and see if the Christian be not a real fanatic,
from whom society can derive no advantage. "The manner of life," says he,
﹃in the Christian church, surpasses our present nature, and the ordinary
life of man. There they seek neither marriages, children, nor riches. In
fact, it is wholly foreign to the human manner of living. The church is
given up to an immense love of heavenly things. The members, detached from
earthly existence, and leaving only their bodies below, transfer their
souls to heaven, where they already dwell as pure and celestial
intelligences, and despise the life of other men.﹄A man strongly
persuaded of the truth of Christianity cannot, in fact, attach himself to
any thing below. Every thing here is to him a cause of stumbling, and
calls away his attention from the great work of his salvation. If
Christians were not, fortunately, inconsistent with themselves, and
wandered not incessantly from their fanatical perfections and sublime
speculations, no Christian society could subsist, and the nations
illuminated by the gospel would return to their pristine barbarity. We
should see only wild beings, broken loose from every social tie, and
wandering in solitude through this vale of tears, whose only employment
would be to groan, to weep, and pray, and render themselves and others
wretched, in order to merit heaven.
In fine, a religion whose maxims tend to render mankind in general
intolerant, to make kings persecutors, and their subjects slaves or
rebels; a religion, the obscure doctrines of which give birth to eternal
disputes; a religion which debases mankind, and turns them aside from
their true interests; such a religion, I say, is destructive to every
society.
CHAP. XV.—OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, OR PRIESTHOOD.
There have been, in all ages, men who know how to profit by the errors of
mankind. Priests of all religions, have laid the foundations of their
greatness, power, and riches, on the fears of the vulgar. No religion has,
however, had so many reasons as the Christian, for subjecting people to
the priesthood. The first preachers of the gospel, the Apostles, are
represented as divine men, inspired by God, and sharing his omnipotence.
If each individual among their successors has not enjoyed the same
privileges in the opinion of all Christians, yet the body of priests, or
Church, is never abandoned by the Holy Ghost, but always illuminated
thereby. They collectively, at all times, possess infallibility, and
consequently their decisions become perpetual revelations, equally sacred
with those of God himself.
Such being the attributes of the priesthood, this body must in virtue of
the prerogatives they hold from Christ himself have a right to
unconditional submission from men and nations. The enormous power they
have so long exercised is not, therefore, surprising. It should be
unlimited, since it is founded on the authority of the Almighty. It should
be despotic, because men have no right to resist divine power. It must
degenerate into abuse, for the priesthood is exercised by men whom
impunity always renders licentious and corrupt.
In the infancy of Christianity, the Apostles, commissioned by Jesus
Christ, preached the gospel to Jews and Gentiles. The novelty of their
doctrine, as we have already seen, procured them many proselytes among the
vulgar. The new Christians, inflamed with ardour for their new opinions,
formed in every city particular congregations, under the government of men
appointed by the Apostles. The latter having received the faith at first
hand, retained the inspection and direction of the different Christian
societies they had formed. Such appears to have been the origin of Bishops
or inspectors, which are perpetuated in the Church to this day;1 an origin
in which the princes of modern Christianity sufficiently pride themselves.
It is known that, in this infant sect, the associates held, their goods in
common. This duty appears to have been rigorously exacted; for, by the
command of St. Peter, two new Christians were smitten to death, for having
withheld some part of their own property. The funds resulting from this
practice, were at the disposal of the Apostles; to this, commission the
Bishops, inspectors, or priests succeeded, when they became successors of
the Apostles; and as the priests must live by the altar, we may suppose
that they paid themselves, and not illiberally, for their instructions,
out of the public treasury. Those who attempted new spiritual conquests
were, probably, obliged to content themselves with the voluntary
contributions of their converts. However this may be, the treasures
accumulated, through the credulous piety of the faithful, became an object
of the avarice of priests, and begat discord among them. Each one wished
to govern, and have the disposal of the riches of the community. Hence the
cabals and factions which we find growing up with the church of God. The
priests were always first to wander from the principles of their religion.
Their own ambition and avarice always contradict the disinterested maxims
they teach to others.
1 Saint Jerome highly disapproved the distinction of bishops
and priests or curates. He pretends, that priests and
bishops were according to St. Paul, the same thing, before,
says he, by the instigation of the Devil, there were
destinations in religion. At this day, bishops, who do
nothing, enjoy great revenues; while innumerable curates,
who labour, are dying with hunger.
So long as the Christian: religion was much depressed and persecuted,
discordant Bishops and priests combated in secret, and the noise of their
quarrels did not spread far abroad. But when Constantine wished to secure
to himself a party, the obscurity of which had favoured its increase,
until now become very numerous, the face of every thing in the church was
changed. Christian leaders, transformed to courtiers; and seduced by
authority, fought openly. They engaged sovereigns in their quarrels, and
persecuted their rivals. Laden by degrees with riches and honours; they
would no longer be recognized as the successors of the poor and humble
Apostles, sent by Christ to preach his doctrine.. They became princes,
and, supported, by the strongest arms, opinions, they found themselves
able to give laws to nations, and put the world in confusion.
Under Constantine the Pontificate had been by a shameful imprudence
separated from the empire. The Emperors soon found they had cause to
repent this oversight. The Bishop of Rome, that former mistress of the
world, whose name still sounded awful in the ears of nations, knew how to
make a skilful advantage of the troubles of the empire, invaded by
barbarians, and the weakness of Emperors, too remote to watch over his
conduct. By dint of plots and intrigues, the Roman pontiff at length
seated himself on the throne of the Cæsars. It was for him that Emilius
and Scipio had fought. He was, in fine, looked upon in the west, as the
monarch of the Church, the universal Bishop, the Vicar of Jesus. Christ
upon earth, and the infallible organ of God. Although these haughty titles
were rejected in the East, the Roman, pontiff reigned, without contest, in
the greater part of the Christian world. He was a God upon earth; through
the imbecility of kings, he became arbiter of their destinies, and founded
a theocracy or divine government, of which himself was chief, and they
were his lieutenants. When they had the audacity to become disobedient to
him, he dethroned them, or excited their subjects to rebellion. In a word,
his spiritual arms were, through a long succession of ages, stronger than
the temporal ones of his opponents. Nations had the stupidity to obey him,
and the distribution of crowns was in his power. To secure his dominion
over princes, he sowed divisions among them; and his empire would still
retain its extent and vigour, if a gradual increase of knowledge had not,
in spite of religious opposition, made its way among mankind, and kings,
acting inconsistently with their religion, listened to ambition rather
than duty. If the ministers of the church have received their power from
Christ himself, to resist these his representatives is, in feet, to revolt
against him. Kings, as well as subjects, cannot throw off allegiance to
God without a crime. The spiritual authority proceeding from God, must, of
right, have jurisdiction over temporal authority proceeding from man. A
prince, who is a true Christian, must become a servant of the church, and,
at best, the first slave of the clergy.
Let us not, then, be surprized, that, in the ages of ignorance, priests,
being most readily obeyed by people, more attached to heavenly than
earthly interests, were more powerful than kings. Among superstitious
nations the pretended voice of God and his interests is more listened to
than that of duty, justice, and reason. A good Christian, piously
submissive to the church, must be blind and unreasonable, whenever the
church commands him to be so. The power that has a right to render us
absurd, has the right to render us criminal.
Besides, those that derive their power from God can be subject to no other
power. Thus, the independence of the Christian clergy is founded upon the
principles of their religion. Of this circumstance, they have taken care
to profit, and impressed with this idea, they, after being enriched by the
generosity of kings and people, have always proved ungrateful to the true
sources of their own opulence and privileges. What had been given this
body, through surprize or impudence, it was found impossible to recover
from their hands. They foresaw, that future generations, breaking loose
from the fetters of prejudice, might tear from them the donations they had
gained by the extortions of terror, and the evils of imposture. They,
therefore, persuaded mankind that they held from God alone what had been
given them by their fellow-mortals: and by a miracle of credulity, they
were believed on their word.
Thus the interests of the clergy became separated from those of society.
Men devoted to God, and chosen to be his ministers, were no longer
confounded with the profane. Laws and civil tribunals renounced all power
over them. They could be judged only by members of their own body. Hence
the greatest excesses were often committed by them with impunity; and
their persons, at the disposal of God alone, were sacred and inviolable.
Their possessions, although they contributed nothing to public charges,
or, at least, no more than they pleased; were defended and enlarged by
fanatic sovereigns, who hoped thereby to conciliate the favour of Heaven.
In fact, those reverend wolves in shepherds' clothing, under pretence of
feeding with instruction, devoured with avarice, and, secure in their
disguise, fattened on the blood of their flocks, unpunished and
unsuspected. From their instructions for eighteen hundred years past, what
advantages have nations derived? Have these infallible men found it
possible to agree among themselves, on the most essential points of a
religion, revealed by God himself? Strange, indeed, is that revelation,
which needs continual commentaries, and interpretations. What must be
thought of these divine writings, which every sect understands so
differently? Those who are incessantly fed with the gospel, do not
understand these matters better, nor are they more virtuous than others.
They are commanded to obey the Church, and the Church is never at accord
with itself. She is eternally busied in reforming, explaining, pulling
down, and building up her holy doctrines. Her ministers have, at will,
created new doctrines unknown to Christ and the Apostles. Every age has
brought forth new mysteries, new ceremonies, and new articles of faith.
Notwithstanding the inspirations of the Holy Ghost, this religion has
never attained to that clearness, simplicity, and consistency, which are
the only indubitable proofs of a good system. Neither councils, nor
canons, nor the mass of decrees and laws, which form the code of the
Church, have ever yet been able to fix the objects of her belief.
Were a sensible heathen desirous of embracing Christianity, he would be,
at the first step, thrown into perplexity, at the sight of the numerous
variety of sects, each of which pretends to conform precisely to the word
of God, and travel in the only sure road to salvation. When he finds that
these different-sects regard each other with horror that they all deal out
damnation: to all whose opinions differ from their own; that they all
unite their efforts to banish peace-from society; that always, when power
is in their hands, they persecute and inflict the most refined cruelties
on each other, for which shall he determine? For, let us not be deceived—Christians,
not satisfied with enforcing by violence an exterior submission to the
ceremonies of their religion, have invented an art unknown to heathen
superstitions, that of tormenting the conscience, and exercising a tyranny
over the mind itself. The zeal of the ministers of the church is not
limited to exteriors; they steal into the foldings of the heart, and
insolently violate the most secret sanctuaries of thought.1 And-for this
sacrilege, their justification is a pretended interest in the salvation of
souls.
1 Spoken of the Romish clergy.
Such are the effects which necessarily result from the principles of a
religion, which teaches mankind that involuntary error is a crime that
merits the wrath of God. It is in consequence of such ideas, that in
certain countries, priests, with the permission of the civil governments,
pretend to a commission for maintaining the faith in its purity. Judges in
their own cause, they condemn to the flames all whose opinions appear to
them dangerous.1 Served by innumerable spies, they watch the minutest
actions of the people, and inhumanly sacrifice all that have the
misfortune to give them the smallest umbrage. To excite suspicions in
their minds, is to rush upon inevitable destruction. Such are the
blessings which the Holy Inquisition, all mild and gentle, pours upon
mankind.
1 Civil tribunals, when they are just, have a maxim to look
for every thing that can contribute to the defence of the
accused. In the Inquisition a method directly opposite has
been adopted. The accused is neither told the cause of his
detention nor confronted with his accuser. He is ignorant of
his crime, yet he is commanded to confess. Such are the
maxims of Christian priests. The Inquisition, however,
condemns nobody to die. Priests cannot themselves shed
blood. That function is reserved for the secular arm; and
they have even the effrontery to intercede for criminals,
sure, however, of not being heard. Indeed, it is probable,
they would make no small clamour, should the magistrate take
them at their word. This conduct becomes men in whom
Almighty interest stifles humanity, sincerity, and modesty.
Such are the principles of this sanguinary tribunal which perpetuates the
ignorance and infatuation of the people wherever the false policy of
governments permits its horrors to be exercised.
The disputes between Christian priests have been sources of animosity,
hatred, and heresy. We find these to have existed from the infancy of the
church. A religion founded on wonders, fables, and obscure oracles, could
only be a fruitful source of quarrels. Priests attended to ridiculous
doctrines instead of useful knowledge; and when they should have studied
true morality, and taught mankind their real duties, they only strove to
gain adherents. They busied themselves in useless speculations in a
barbarous and enigmatical science, which, under the pompous title of the
science of God, or theology, excited in the vulgar a reverential awe. They
invented a system, bigoted, presumptuous, ridiculous, and as
incomprehensible as the God whom they affected to worship. Hence arose
disputes on disputes concerning puerile subtilties, odious questions, and
arbitrary opinions, which far from being useful, only served to poison the
peace of society. In these bickerings we find profound geniuses busied;
and we are forced to reject the prostitution of talents worthy a better
cause. The vulgar, ever fond of riot, entered into quarrels they could not
understand. Princes undertook the defence of the priests they wished to
favour, and orthodoxy was decided by the longest sword. Their assistance
the church never hesitated to receive in time of danger; for on such
occasions the church relies rather on human assistance than the promise of
God, who declared that the sceptre of the wicked should not rest upon the
lot of the righteous. The heroes, found in the annals of the church, have
been obstinate fanatics, factious rebels, or furious persecutors. They
were monsters of madness, faction, and cruelty.
The world in the days of our ancestors, was depopulated in defence of
extravagancies which excite laughter in a posterity, not indeed much wiser
than they were.
In almost all ages complaints have been made of abuses in the church, and
reformation has been talked of. Notwithstanding this pretended reform, in
the head, and in the members of the church, it has always been corrupted.
Avaricious, turbulent, and seditious priests have made nations to groan
under the weight of their vices, while princes were too weak to reclaim
them to reason. The divisions and quarrels which took place among those
ecclesiastical tyrants did indeed at length diminish the weight of the
yoke they had imposed on kings and nations. The empire of the Roman
pontiff, which endured many ages, was at last shaken by irritated
enthusiasts, and rebellious subjects, who presumed to examine the rights
of this formidable despot. Some princes, weary of their slavery and
poverty, readily embraced opinions which would authorise them to enrich
themselves with the spoils of the clergy. Thus the unity of the church was
destroyed, sects were multiplied, and each fought for the defence of his
own system.
These founders of these new sects were treated by the Roman pontiff as
innovators, heretics, and blasphemers. They, it is true, renounced some of
their old opinions; but content with having made a few steps towards
reason, they dared not to shake off entirely the yoke of superstition.
They continued to respect the sacred writ of the Christian, which they
still looked upon as the only faithful guide. Upon them they pretended to
found all their opinions. In fine, these books, in which every man may
find what he pleases, as they became more common from time to time,
produced new sects. Men were lost in a dark labyrinth, where each one
groped his way in error, and yet judged all but himself to be wrong.
The leaders of these sects, the pretended reformers of the church, gained
but a glimpse at the truth, and attended to nothing but minutiae. They
continued to respect the sacred oracles of the Christians, and believe in
their cruel and capricious God. They admitted their extravagant mythology,
and most of their unreasonable doctrines. In fine, although they rejected
some mysteries that were incomprehensible, they admitted others not less
so. Let us not be surprized, therefore, that, notwithstanding these
reforms, fanaticism, controversy, persecution, and war, continued to rage
throughout Europe. The reveries of innovators only served to plunge
nations into new misfortunes. Blood continued to stream, and people grew
neither more reasonable nor more happy. Priests of all sects have ever
wished to govern mankind and impose on them their decisions as infallible
and sacred. They were always persecutors when in power, involved nations
in their fury, and shook the world by their fatal opinions. The spirit of
intolerance and persecution will ever be the essence of every sect founded
on the Bible. A mild and humane religion can never belong to a partial and
cruel God? whom the opinion of men can fill with wrath. Wherever Christian
sects exist, priests will exercise a power which may prove fatal to the
state, and bodies of fanatical enthusiasts will be formed, always ready to
rush to slaughter, when their spiritual guides cry, the church or the
cause of God is in danger.
Thus, in Christian countries, we see the temporal power servilely
submissive to the clergy, executing their commands, exterminating their
enemies, and supporting their rights, riches, and immunities. In almost
all nations where the church prevails, the most idle, useless, seditious,
and dangerous men are most liberally honoured and rewarded. Superstition
thinks she can never do enough for the ministers of her gods. These
sentiments are the same in all sects.1 Priests every where endeavour to
instil them into kings, and to make policy bend to religion, in doing
which they often oppose the best institutions. They in all places aim at
the superintendance of education, and they fill their adherents with their
fatal prejudices from their infancy.
1 Except the Quaker.
It is, however, in places that remained subject to the Roman pontiff, that
the clergy have wallowed in the greatest profusion of riches and power.
Credulity has even enlisted kings among their subjects, and debased them
into mere executioners of their will. They were in readiness to unsheath
the sword whenever the priest commanded it. The monarchs of the Roman
sect, blinder than all others, had an unbounded confidence in the clergy
of their church that generally rendered them mere tools of that body. This
sect, by means of furious intoleration and atrocious persecutions, became
more numerous than any other one; and their turbulent and cruel temper has
justly rendered them odious to the most reasonable, that is to say, least
Christian nations.
The Romish system was, in fact, invented to throw all the power into the
hands of the clergy. Its priests have had the address to identify
themselves with God. Their cause was always his; their glory became the
glory of God. Their decisions were divine oracles; their possessions
appertained to the kingdom of heaven. Their pride, avarice, and cruelty,
were rendered lawful, because they were never actuated by other motives
than the interest of their heavenly master. In this sect, the priest saw
his king at his feet, humbly confessing his sins, and beseeching the holy
man that he might be reconciled to his God. Seldom was the priest known to
render his sacred ministry subservient to the good of mankind. He thought
not of reproaching monarchs with the abuse of their power, the misery of
their subjects, and the tears of the oppressed. Too timid, or too much of
a courtier to thunder truth in their ears, he mentioned not to them the
insupportable oppressions, the galling tyranny, and useless wars under
which their subjects groaned. But such objects never interest the church,
which might indeed be of some utility, if its influence were exercised in
bridling the excesses of superstitious tyrants. The terrors of the other
world would not be unpardonable falsehoods, could they make the herd of
wicked kings to tremble. This, however, has not been the object of the
ministers of religion. They never stickled for the interest of mankind.
They always burned incense at the altar of tyranny, looked upon its crimes
with indulgence, and devised for them easy means of expiation. Tyrants
were sure of the pardon and favour of heaven, if they entered warmly into
the quarrels of the clergy. Thus, among the Catholics, priests governed
kings, and consequently all their subjects. Superstition and despotism
formed an internal alliance, and united their efforts, to plunge mankind
into slavery and wretchedness. Priests frightened nations with religious
terror, that they might be preyed upon by their sovereigns at leisure;
and, in return, those sovereigns loaded the priests with opulence and
power, and undertook, from time to time, to exterminate their enemies.
What shall we say of those subtle geniuses which Christians call casuists,
those pretended moralists who have computed the number of sins against God
which a man can commit without risking his salvation? These men of
profound wisdom have enriched Christian morality with a ridiculous tarif
of sins; they know precisely the degree of wrath which each excites in the
breast of the Almighty. True morality has but one criterion for judging
the sins of man; the greatest are those that injure society most. The
conduct which injures ourselves is imprudent and unreasonable. That which
injures others is unjust and criminal.
Every thing, even to idleness itself, is rewarded in Christian priests.
Multitudes of these drones are maintained in ease and affluence, while,
instead of serving society, they only prey upon it. They are paid with
profusion for useless prayers which they make with negligence. And while
monks and lazy priests, those blood-suckers of society, wallow in an
abundance shameful to the states by whom they are tolerated, the man of
talents, the man of science, and the brave soldier are suffered to
languish in indigence, and poorly exist on the mere necessaries of life.
In a word, Christianity makes nations accomplices in all the evils which
are heaped upon them by the Clergy. Neither the uselessness of their
prayers demonstrated by the experience of so many ages, the bloody effects
of their fatal controversies, nor even their licentious excesses, have yet
been sufficient to convince mankind how shamefully they are duped by that
infallible Church, to the existence of which, they have had the simplicity
to believe, their salvation.
CHAP. XVI.—CONCLUSION.
All which has hitherto been said, demonstrates, in the clearest manner,
that the Christian religion is contrary to true policy, and the welfare of
mankind. It can be advantageous only to ignorant and vicious princes, who
are desirous to reign over slaves, and who, in order to strip and
tyrannize over them with impunity, form a league with the priesthood,
whose function it has ever been to deceive in the name of heaven. But such
imprudent princes should remember, that, in order to succeed in their
projects, they must themselves become the slaves of the priesthood, who
(should the former fail in due submission, or refuse to be subservient to
their passions) will infallibly turn their sacred arms against their royal
heads.
We have seen, above, that the Christian religion is not, on account of its
fanatic virtues, blind zeal, and pretended perfections, the less injurious
to sound morality, right reason, the happiness of individuals, and
domestic harmony. It is easy to perceive that a Christian, who proposes to
himself as a model, a gloomy and suffering God, must take pains to afflict
and render himself wretched. If this world be only a passage, if this life
be only a pilgrimage, it must be ridiculous for a man to attach himself to
any thing here below. If his God be offended with either the actions or
opinions of his fellow-creatures, he must do every thing in his power to
punish them with severity, or be wanting in zeal and affection to his God.
A good Christian must fly the world, or become a torment to himself and
others.
These reflections are sufficient to answer those who pretend that the
Christian religion is the foundation of true policy and morality, and that
where it is not professed, there can be neither good men nor good
citizens. The converse of this proposition is undoubtedly much truer; for
we may assert, that a perfect Christian, who conforms to all the
principles of his religion, who faithfully imitates the divine men
proposed to him as a model, and practises their austerities in solitude,
or carries their fanatic enthusiasm and bigotry into society, must be
either useless to mankind, or a troublesome and dangerous citizen.1
1 The clergy incessantly cry out against unbelievers and
philosophers, whom they style dangerous subjects. Yet, if we
open history, we do not find that philosophers are those who
have embroiled states and empires; but that such events'
have generally been produced by the religious. The
Dominican, who poisoned the emperor Henry XI. James Clement,
and Ruvaillac, were not unbelievers. They were not
philosophers, but fanatic Christians.
Were we to believe the advocates of the Christian religion, it would
appear, that no morality can exist where this religion is not established.
Yet we may perceive, at a single glance, that there are virtues in every
corner of the earth. No political society could exist without them. Among
the Chinese, the Indians, and the Mahometans, there are, undoubtedly, good
citizens, tender fathers, affectionate husbands, and dutiful children. And
good people there, as well as with us, would be more numerous, if they
were governed by a wise policy, which, instead of causing children to be
taught a senseless religion, should give them equitable laws, teach them a
pure morality uncontaminated with fanaticism, deter them from vice by
suitable punishments, and invite them to the practice of virtue by proper
rewards.
In truth, it seems (I repeat it) that religion has been invented to
relieve governments from the care of being just, and reigning over
equitable laws. Religion is the art of inspiring mankind with an
enthusiasm, which is designed to divert their attention from the evils
with which they are overwhelmed by those who govern them. By means of the
invisible powers with which they are threatened, they are forced to suffer
in silence the miseries with which they are afflicted by visible ones.
They are taught to hope that, if they consent to become miserable in this
world, they will for that reason be happy in the next.
Thus religion has become the most powerful support of a shameful and
iniquitous policy, which holds it necessary to deceive mankind, that they
may the more easily be governed. Far from enlightened and virtuous
governments be resources so base! Let them learn their true interests, and
know that these cannot be separated from that of the people. Let them know
that no state can be truly potent, except the citizens who compose it be
courageous, active, industrious, virtuous, and attached to their
government. Let governments know, that the attachment of their
constituents can have no other foundation than the happiness which the
former procures the latter. If governments were penetrated with these
important truths, they would need the aid of neither religion nor priests.
Let them be just and equitable—-let them be careful to reward
talents and virtue, to discourage inutility and punish vice, and their
states will soon be filled with worthy and sensible citizens, who will
feel it their own interest to serve and defend their country, and support
the government which is the instrument of their felicity. They will do
their duties, without the influence of revelation, or mysteries of
paradise or hell.
Morality will be preached in vain, if it is not supported by the example
of influential characters. It belongs to magistrates to teach morality, by
practising it, by inciting to virtue, and repressing vice in every form.
Their power is weakened the moment they suffer a power to arise, in the
state, whose influence is exerted to render morality subservient to
superstition and fanaticism. In states where education is entrusted to a
fanatic, enthusiastic clergy, we find citizens overwhelmed with
superstition, and destitute of every virtue, except a blind faith, a
ferocious zeal, a ridiculous submission to puerile ceremonies, and, in one
word, fantastic notions, which never render them better men.
Notwithstanding the happy influences attributed to the Christian religion,
do we find more virtues in those who profess it, than in those who are
strangers to it? Are the men, redeemed by the blood of even a Deity, more
honest than others? Among Christians, impressed with their religion, one
would imagine we should search in vain for rapine, fornication, adultery,
and oppression. Among the orthodox courtiers, who surround Christian
thrones, do we see intrigues, calumny, or perfidy? Among the clergy, who
announce to others such redoubtable dogmas, and such terrible
chastisements, do we find crimes that shun the day, and every species of
iniquity? All these men are Christians, who, unbridled by their religion,
continually violate the plainest duties of morality, and knowingly offend
a God, whom they are conscious of having irritated. Yet they flatter
themselves that they shall be able, by a tardy repentance at death, to
appease that divine justice which they have insulted during the whole
course of their lives.
In the mean time, we shall not deny, that the Christian religion sometimes
proves a restraint to timorous minds, which are incapable of that
fanaticism, and destitute of that destructive energy, which lead to the
commission of great crimes. But such minds would have been honest and
harmless without this restraint. The fear of rendering themselves odious
to mankind, of incurring contempt, and losing their reputation, would have
been a chain of equal strength, on the actions of such men. Those who are
so blind as to tread these considerations under foot, would never be
deterred from it by the menaces of religion.
Every man, who has received a proper education, experiences within himself
a painful sentiment of mingled shame and fear, whenever he soils himself
with the guilt of a dishonest action. He even condemns himself frequently,
with greater severity than others do. He dreads, and shuns the eyes of his
fellow-creatures; he even wishes to fly from himself. This is what
constitutes remorse.
In a word, Christianity puts no restraint upon the passions of mankind,
which might not be more efficaciously applied to them by reason,
education, and sound morality. If the wicked were sure of being punished,
as often as they think of committing dishonest actions, they would be
forced to desist. In a society well constituted, contempt will always
follow vice, and crimes will produce punishment. Education, guided only by
the good of society, ought ever to teach mankind to esteem themselves, to
dread the contempt of others, and fear infamy more than death itself. But
this kind of morality can never be consistent with a religion which
commands men to despise themselves, avoid the esteem of others, and
attempt to please only a God, whose conduct is inexplicable.
In fine, if the Christian religion be, as is pretended, a restraint to the
crimes of men, if it produces salutary effects on some individuals; can
these advantages, so rare, so weak and doubtful, be compared with the
evident and immense evils which this religion has produced on the earth?
Can some few trifling crimes prevented, some conversions useless to
society, some sterile and tardy repentances, enter into the balance
against the continual dissensions, bloody wars, horrid massacres,
persecutions, and cruelties, of which the Christian religion has been a
continual cause and pretext? For one secret sinful thought suppressed by
it, there are even whole nations armed for reciprocal destruction; the
hearts of millions of fanatics are inflamed; families and states are
plunged into confusion; and the earth is bedewed with tears and blood.1
After this, let common sense decide the magnitude of the advantages which
mankind derive; from the glad tidings which Christians pretend to have
received from their God.
1 Witness, even in this enlightened age, the Holy Crusade
against France, for the purpose of restoring the Christian
religion.
Many honest people, although not ignorant of the ills produced among
mankind by this religion, nevertheless consider it a necessary evil, and
think it dangerous to attempt to uproot it. Mankind, say they, are
naturally superstitious; they must be amused, with chimeras, and become
outrageous when deprived of them. But, I answer, mankind are superstitious
only because, in infancy, every thing contributes to render them so. He is
led to expect his happiness, from, chimeras, because he is forbidden to
seek for it from realities.
In fine, it is for philosophers and for magistrates to conduct mankind
back, to reason. The former will obtain the confidence and love of the
latter, when they endeavour to promote the public good. Undeceived
themselves, they may undeceive others by degrees. Governments will prevent
superstition from doing harm, when they despise it and stand aloof from
its ridiculous disputes. When they tolerate all sects, and side with none,
those sects, after quarrelling awhile, will drop their masks, and become
contemptible even to themselves. Superstition falls beneath its own weight
when, freedom of conscience being restored to mankind, reason is at
liberty to attack their follies. True toleration and freedom of thought
are the most proper instruments for the destruction of religious
fanaticism. Imposture is in nature timid, and when she finds herself
confronted with truth, her arms fall from her hands.
If a criminal and undiscerning policy has, hitherto, in almost all parts
of the earth, had recourse to the aid of religion, to enslave mankind and
render them miserable, let a virtuous and more enlightened policy
hereafter destroy it by little and little to render them happy. If
education has hitherto formed enthusiasts and fanatics, let it be
hereafter calculated to form good citizens. If a morality founded on
miracles, and looking to futurity, has been unable to restrain the
passions of mankind, let a morality established upon their present and
real wants demonstrate that, in a well constituted society, happiness is
always the reward of virtue: shame, contempt, and punishment the
companions of vice, and the wages of sin.
If error be an evil, to it let truth be opposed. If enthusiasm produce
disorders in society, let it be suppressed.
Let us leave to Asia a religion begotten by the ardent imaginations of the
orientals. Let our milder climates be more reasonable, more free, and more
happy. Let us make them the residence of honesty, activity, industry,
social affections, and exalted minds. May not reason be permitted to hope,
that she shall one day re-assume the power so long usurped from her by
error, illusion, and deceit?
When will nations renounce chimerical hopes, to contemplate their true
interests? Will they never shake off the yokes of those hypocritical
tyrants, who are interested only in the errors of mankind? Let us hope it.
Truth must at last triumph over falsehood.—Mankind, fatigued with
their own credulity, will return to her arms.—Reason will break
their chains—Reason, which was created to reign, with undivided
empire, over all intelligent beings.
AMEN.
End of Project Gutenberg's Christianity Unveiled, by Nicolas-Antoine Boulanger
*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CHRISTIANITY UNVEILED ***
***** This file should be named 40770-h.htm or 40770-h.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
http://www.gutenberg.org/4/0/7/7/40770/
Produced by David Widger
Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
will be renamed.
Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
redistribution.
*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase『Project
Gutenberg』is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
that
- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License. You must require such a user to return or
destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
Project Gutenberg-tm works.
- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
of receipt of the work.
- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the『Right
of Replacement or Refund』described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
For additional contact information:
Dr. Gregory B. Newby
Chief Executive and Director
gbnewby@pglaf.org
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation
Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org
This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.