 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
|
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
|
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
hd[wvjkd trjasgtwnshydjjh 82.137.14.97 07:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: No valid reason. Orcish is not accepted. RE rillke questions? 08:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Commercial advertisement for a Mexican comms company Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: It a speedy in my book - not appropriate use of a user page - gone Herby talk thyme 09:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Commercial advertisement for a Mexican comms company Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: It a speedy in my book - not appropriate use of a user page - gone Herby talk thyme 09:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
it got flagged and I have uploaded a revised version with my edits and labels Caleb shih (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: ... Polarlys (talk) 13:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As best as I can figure it, file description translated as "This Trichomonas vaginalis", this is an attack image Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: speedy because of attack Romaine (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that the uploader has the rights to release a music album cover under a free art license Whpq (talk) 02:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: This is the crop of a big wallpaper -> http://forum.punjabijunktion.co.in/f9/gippy-grewal-wallpapers-13659/ Neozoon (talk) 23:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: It would seem likely to me that this was also a copyright violation too Herby talk thyme 17:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate of file:meso-Lactide_xtal.png, but with an inferior, less descriptive filename. Whitespace not removed Rifleman 82 (talk) 16:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Redundant. Ed (Edgar181) 21:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 17:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Copyvio ■ MMXX talk 19:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 17:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: copyvio ■ MMXX talk 19:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface from commercial website DS (talk) 17:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Copyvio ■ MMXX talk 19:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 17:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Copyvio ■ MMXX talk 18:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Copyvio ■ MMXX talk 18:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Crop and modification of http://www.sobiratel.net/zasluga/Asia/KoreaN/3Rev/3Rev.jpg User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 21:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Wrong button User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 21:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Surely not the `own work` of Bosshogg6923 (the uploader) 80.187.96.184 20:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Exact duplicate of File:StalinPortrait.jpg. High Contrast (talk) 19:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative of a copyrighted website. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Deleted as a copyvio. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not an own work; copyrighted to the City of West Memphis, AR User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteas{{Copyvio}}, per nom. -Pete F (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: Copyvio User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Purpose for creating this file seems to be soapboxing, which falls outside the scope of Wikimedia's educational mission. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a borderline issue for me. On one hand the image does in a way "symbolise" the movement, but on another it's created by simply juxtaposing the text with the photo of the flag, so it's more of an artwork than a diagram or something educational (a person won't look at the image and say "ahh, now i understand what it means"). However, it can be used for educational purposes, and it is freely licenced. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 05:41, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: We don't keep personal art here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
out of project scope screenshot Funfood ␌ 00:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement, out of project scope Funfood ␌ 00:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of unidentified painting Teofilo (talk) 00:04, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Deleted by Marcus Cyron Captain-tucker (talk) 04:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of contemporary art Teofilo (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Deleted by Marcus Cyron Captain-tucker (talk) 04:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Had been marked for Speedy deletion with the reason: No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina. I think this should be discussed during normal Deletion Discussion. Neozoon (talk) 00:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: We do not speedy FOP cases, but this is certainly a delete. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New Version not seeable, old Version probably copyrighted http://clubeportuguesmaxiscooters.org/forum/index.php and out of scope Funfood ␌ 00:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -Pete F (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The cube to the right of the logo does not make this PD-simple or PD-text anymore. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; original logo surely qualifies for copyright. -Pete F (talk) 23:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a simple logo, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Grooveshark_logo.png User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to clearly meet the threshold of originality. -Pete F (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: Does not meet the threshold of originality, compare COM:TO#United States. Rosenzweig τ 08:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly not just basic shapes, meets threshold of originality Terrillja (talk) 03:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not any more original than the examples at COM:TO#United States (did you even bother to look at that? At least you did not in any way comment on it). --Rosenzweig τ 16:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]Kept as this is clearly below the threshold of originality, see COM:TO#United States as pointed out by Rosenzweig. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a simple logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I would say that it is far more text than non-text. Furthermore, given the following 10 examples (of literally hundreds) found in the category Text Logos, it is far more simple than many others.
Grika Ⓣ 15:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: The fact that other problems may exist is not relevant here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not an own work User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not an own work. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is the logo of the American communist party, the license is incorrect. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a copyright violation. The licensing is indeed incorrect. Having said that, it's rather unlikely that the communists will act to protect their intellectual property...--Claritas (talk) 01:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is a copyrighted logo of a political party. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Also terrible quality Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per [1], we already have an SVG of this. Fry1989 eh? 01:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 05:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Under the Cuban copyright law, works are placed into the public domain after 70 years. The party was formed in 1965, so it has not been 70 years yet. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no free Creative Commons license in Cuba that says that this image is in the public domain. Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence that the underlying copyright holder (Communist Party of Cuba) released it under a free license. It doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria at {{PD-Cuba}}. -M.nelson (talk) 19:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per M.nelson. Mysterymanblue 08:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply] Delete per M.nelson. Even if the SVG file itself was created under cc-zero, the logo itself is still under full copyright by the government of Cuba under their copyright law (Law No. 14 of December 28, 1977 as amended up to 1994). If it is classified as the work of a legal entity such as the party itself (which is likely, as whomever created the logo probably signed those rights over), the copyright is held for an "unlimited duration" (and thus never runs out), unless the entity dissolves, in which case the copyright reverts to the state. Just as an addendum, however, I would recommend that:
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Under Argentine law, works can be in the public domain if they are older than 70 years. The party was founded in 1964 so it has not been 70 years yet. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Under Argentine law, works can be in the public domain if they are older than 70 years. The party was founded in 1964 so it has not been 70 years yet. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Under Argentine law, works can be in the public domain if they are older than 70 years. The party was founded in 1964 so it has not been 70 years yet. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The earliest date for this part is in the 1980's; that is not 70 years. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not an own work] User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Creo que este archivo no se debería de borrar, debido a que es del dominio público. --Zapata (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Personal pic, out of scope and non-educational Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use; original deletion request closed w/ Delete Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It says the logo is for "Copia y Distribucion" but there is nothing about it being modified or being used commercially. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Fair use Amitie 10g (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Captain-tucker (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Logo of an organization; copyrighted. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyrighted logo of the University of Maryland User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyrighted logo User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyrighted logo User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fair use material. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 05:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a work of the author User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a better quality file File:Jack Kemp-Congressional Portrait Collection.jpg – Temporaluser (talk) 02:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no COM:FOP in France for modern sculptures. Joan Miro died in 1983. Leoboudv (talk) 04:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
wrong name code Steven Pavlov (talk) 04:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 10:42, 8 December 2011 by Romaine, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This image has quite a bit of texture to it, including differentiating colors and white spots throughout the lettering. I do not believe this is ineligible for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: PD text logo -- fancy fonts do not make an all text logo copyrightable. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This file was deleted without discussion by User:EugeneZelenko. Since it has been previously kept, it requires a DR.
The logo is simply the single word in an unusual font. Since fonts do not have a copyright in the USA, it cannot have a copyright there. However, the developer of the game is German, so it may have a copyright in Germany. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's not mere font, but with rendered texture. Could be kept if texture will be replaced with something regular. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply] Keep Definitely PD-textlogo ptjackyll (leave a message) 11:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC) P.S. Please read Commons:Threshold of originality#Commons decisions – unusual font or rendered texture cannot be a base to delete. ptjackyll (leave a message) 11:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]Kept: Clearly text logo. --Stifle (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
All rights reserved WhiteWriter speaks 12:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On Panoramio under the license All Rights Reserved WhiteWriter speaks 12:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 04:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
is empty Vammpi (talk) 12:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Please use {{Speedydelete}} for empty category next time. Thanks. – Kwj2772 (msg) 15:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
personal photo, unused since April 2010 Chesdovi (talk) 14:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 04:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oos, unused since April 2010 Chesdovi (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 04:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 04:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 05:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
adult content 80.187.213.62 15:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: Commons is a host of all content, even if it is explicit. In this case, this image shows a person with a medical condition with his penis and, in our policies, in scope. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
adult content 80.187.218.82 12:25, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy closed, abusive renomination Infrogmation (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
no information about copyright of separate pictures 80.187.213.62 15:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Duplicate of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sabblok.news.jpg User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no information about copyright of separate pictures 80.187.213.62 15:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Derivative work issues. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
according to Exif data it's a courtesy photo (manufacturer image or other external source) thus it's not a US Government image Denniss (talk) 01:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Willy Mullens died in 1952 so this image will only become PD in 2022. SpeakFree (talk) 04:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
James Edwin McConnell (15 July 1903 - 4 May 1995) P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no permission from the party to have this image under this license. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion that the PD license was granted for this image. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derived from a newspaper, claimed as own work. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
City created in 2007, no way it will be public domain in the Philippines (50 years). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
City founded in 2006, no way it will be public domain in the Philippines (50 years). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
City founded in 2007, no way it will be public domain in the Philippines (50 years). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
City founded in 2001, no way it will be public domain in the Philippines (50 years). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seal created in 2005, no way it will be public domain in the Philippines (50 years). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seal created either in 1974 or beyond; no way it could be PD in the Philippines (50 years). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of a poster Sreejith K (talk) 06:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Derivative copyrighted image. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: There are three copyrights here -- the poster, the original larger image and the crop. The second and third are CC-BY-SA, but the first is not licensed. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
NoFreedom of Panorama in US Sreejith K (talk) 06:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: actually this is not really a true sculpture per [2], it is an unrooted tree root that has been treated and placed in the park as an artistic feature, so FoP does not apply. Ww2censor (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: (I'm the uploader) per Ww2censor and also because (I hope this helps) the Flickr contributor explicity released the photo under CC-BY-2.0. Jsayre64 (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Its hard to say if this if an unrooted tree (as it appears) or a tree sculpture. I just confirm that the license is 'cc by generic' at this time. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: Works of art made from "found objects" are perfectly copyrightable. This image infringes on the creator's copyright. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship" - completely untrue Bulwersator (talk) 07:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete copyvio. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio. This image was taken from www.tsk.tr. Takabeg (talk) 07:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The source does not give either the date nor author (lazy sourcing at internet source != anonymous... only anonymous if true diligent search cannot reveal author). The ship wasn't even commissioned until 1940, and it was decommissioned in 1972; no indication this is in the public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Useless personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i think this image is missing evidence of permission. While this account has only 1 upload, the image page states that this image is taken by Dmitry Chistoprudov at http://chistoprudov.livejournal.com/ so we can't make sure that this account is his. Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: THe issue here is not the copyright on the image, but the fact that it infringes on the copyright of the building's architect, Anatoly Polyansky who died in 1993. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio. This image was uploaded here on April 26, 2008. However, we can find easily same image on websites dated before 2007. The uploader claimed that this image wes taken on August 30, 2006 by himself/herself. But according to this imageit was taken on August 30, 2004 by Tolga Yüksel. Takabeg (talk) 08:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is the own work of uploader. First, the misleading name suggests that it was taken from a database (I think this is Tumblr). Moreover, this image don't have META data as well as the low resolution Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal image, out of sope Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of copyrighted poster Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A Joke. Don't see how this is useful for Wikimedia... 194.231.193.224 10:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Silly photoshop of a 19th-century portrait painting (see [3]) with a photographed face pasted in. Was used for an autobiographical hoax article on en-wiki by an impostor/vandal on en-wiki (now indef-blocked there). No conceivable educational use, hence out of project scope. Could conceivably be used as a legit humorous userspace image, assuming that the uploader is in fact the person shown (which is likely), but the uploader is indef-blocked on the only wikmedia project he ever made contributions to. File name is making an unverified and obviously false factual claim about this person (that he is a prince of Prussia); as such it violates Foundation policy on biographies of living persons. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Out of scope. Takabeg (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence to prove that this image is the own work of the uploader. This image was uploaded here on April 19, 2009. However, this forum in July 21, 2007 with the logo of Wow.Turkey.com. I don't think wow.turkey.com is original copyright holder. Because this photograph should be taken from the sky over the building of the Minister of Interior (which is at the opposite side of the building of TBMM). I'm not sure but I think this image is official one. Takabeg (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question: File:TBMM aerial.jpg had been deleted three times. Is this image is same as TBMM aerial.jpg ? Takabeg (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Book cover art, copyright not clear Funfood ␌ 11:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright/Permission of the single photographs not clear. Funfood ␌ 11:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Copyrighted character. IMHO not simple enough, not a regular shape especially at bottom Kungfuman (talk) 11:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
out of scope, unused AtelierMonpli (talk) 11:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Curious: I did´nt find this image in that horizontal direction. Apparently it was inverted by user before upload as he already did with File:Bragpaulist2.jpg (clearly identified as "inverted" copyvio). What I found is http://namidiacom.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/vamos-para-a-fazenda-serrinha/ (2008) and especially http://www.agitobraganca.com.br/materias/conheca-braganca-paulista/5. Characteristic for both links is the black pixel-dot (better viewed in the 2nd link) over the left sky line, which appears on the upload on the right side. Resuming: Doubtful own work (already circulating in internet) with unknown copyright issues + unrealistic manipulation, confirmed by a (very low res) image of related prefecture site. Gunnex (talk) 12:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Civil Code of Russian Federation, articles 1259 and 1276, states no FOP in Russia. The monument from 1947 by С. Д. Меркуров. PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FOP time is 74 years after the author's death. The author С. Д. Меркуров dead in 1952, we are to wait until 2026.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Civil Code of Russian Federation, articles 1259 and 1276, states no FOP in Russia. The station building appeared in 1954. PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The authors were Б. Мезенцев (+ 1970) and М. Шпотов (+ unknown). Thus 1970+74 = 2044.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Civil Code of Russian Federation, articles 1259 and 1276, states no FOP in Russia. The station building appeared in 1954, the statue created in the same times. PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Civil Code of Russian Federation, articles 1259 and 1276, states no FOP in Russia. The monument created in 1967. PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about the right to shoot. This is about the right to license.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Here is a very crude photo (or maybe hand drawing) of this monument before relocation, from the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (highly reliable source), saying『1967. Скульптор В. Б. Пинчук』(1967 artist V. B. Pinchuk). Here is an article on В. Б. Пинчук in the same encyclopedia mentioning this monument. He died in 1987 + no FOP for Russia = delete. Materialscientist (talk) 09:28, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Civil Code of Russian Federation, articles 1259 and 1276, states no FOP in Russia. The building appeared in 1987. PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
is this image of any use? Chesdovi (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is this file of any use? Chesdovi (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nomination. --Martin H. (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo, OB by File:Babyetchecopar.jpg Chesdovi (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo, was used for self-promotion at wikipedia Chesdovi (talk) 14:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
promotional advert Chesdovi (talk) 15:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 15:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no evidence of permission 80.187.213.62 15:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no evidence uploader is the artist or license-holder for this image (previous year's equivalent is en:File:Amec-2011.png, which is tagged non-free and sourced to parent organization's "all rights reserved" website)--non-free fair-use is not in scope for commons DMacks (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The imaged object may be older than 70 years, but not the photograph. The entire source web site: Copyright (c) 2010 Bugi-myeon, Cheongwon Gun. All Rights Reserved. Ras67 (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
rien Papisn2000 (talk) 15:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no evidence of permission, the permission claim is also too vague 80.187.213.62 15:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no evidence of permission, the permission claim is also too vague 80.187.213.62 15:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio 80.187.213.62 15:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio 80.187.213.62 15:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Composition is public domain as stated, but the 2002 recording by Heeresmusikkorps (German Army Band) 5 is not. —innotata 15:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Composition is out of copyright, but the 1967 recording by Heeresmusikkorps (German Army Band) 6 presumably is copyright in Germany (until 2018 even if the copyright period is 50 years) and in the United States (where copyright in recordings from before 1972 is governed by state common law and essentially perpetual). —innotata 15:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Clearly a screenshoot. mik@ni 16:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sreenshot of not-free software Jacopo Werther (talk) 16:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This image can be found on http://www.bmlv.gv.at/sk/lask/brigaden/jgbrig6/index.shtml
This is the official page of the Austrian Armed Forces but the imprint says "Copyright
Unless stated otherwise, all www.bundesheer.at content is subject to copyright laws, in particular texts, images, graphics, sound, video and animated files. Copying, publishing or other use of such pages or parts of them in electronic or print publications, including the Internet, or for commercial purposes, are subject to prior approval. This applies to all of the content, regardless of file format, and to all forms of use."
I doubt that this user/channel is the official side of the 6 Infantry Brigade. I also don't think that the user has the right to upload this image.
Images that may would have to be deleted as well:
--D-Kuru (talk) 17:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete www.bmlv.gv.at is an official site. But no free licenses. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted website DS (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted website DS (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted website DS (talk) 17:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC) it came from my microsoft word clip art, sorry i guess i should have cited that, no worries it was just a school project, its okay if the pictures get deleted thanks for your help![reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted website (or possibly of copyrighted educational material, I'm not sure which) DS (talk) 17:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 08:50, 15 December 2011 by Fastily, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of nonfree website DS (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:35, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of nonfree website DS (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:35, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Possible Fair Use. It is a logo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
given that the uploader apparently does not understand "own work", and has labeled this image as a screenshot from a personal page, I conclude that it is not the property of the uploader. DS (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:35, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface for commercial website DS (talk) 17:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:35, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface for commercial webpage DS (talk) 17:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:35, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Poor quality image and useless. There is better alternative: File:Crystal Clear action lock2.png. Angelus (talk) 17:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface from commercial website DS (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Probably PD text, but so small it's useless. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface from commercial website DS (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:18, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface for commercial website DS (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:18, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:18, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:18, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface for commercial website DS (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:18, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of a copyrighted user interface for a commercial website DS (talk) 18:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:18, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on a screenshot of a copyrighted user interface for a commercial website DS (talk) 18:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:19, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Poor quality, out of scope and not vector image! LMFAO - /let's laugh/ 18:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
file not used in any where, and it is a fan made picture of Lucky Star (manga), picture originated in Japan, I saw this picture a few years ago, this user is a very unlikely candidate of the author, at most s/he changed the screen into a wikipedia image. The picture is not educational, and people with minimal knowledge to the series and wikipedia can hardly understand what the picture is showing per the description the author used here. --Mythsearcher (talk) 18:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Copyvio. Original image was available on the web since at least 2009. Rosenzweig τ 16:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of the significance of the logo, which makes it unlikely to be of use in any project. Also, the triangular symbol might just be on the wrong side of {{PD-textlogo}}. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based at least partly on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface for commercial site DS (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial site DS (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 18:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:18, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Artist died in 1945 (less than 70 years ago) 84.81.114.142 19:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This also applies to the other works listed in Category:John Duncan --84.81.114.142 19:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
ESA image. See credits at http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?Category=Planets&IM_ID=9365 84.81.114.142 19:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and out of scope. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a copyrighted logo; claimed as own work. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yet another found-it-on-some-other-site unlicensed upload from editor with a habit of this DMacks (talk) 19:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyvio, has the sulekha watermark, but Sulekha's on the blacklist so I can't tag it as such. —SpacemanSpiff 19:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: 01:48, 12 December 2011 by Polarlys, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused logo, out of scope (promotional use only) User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Not PD. A similar version of this poster seems to have been commissioned in 1961 for an exhibition. The artist, Félix Labisse, died in 1982. See http://www.bridgemanart.com/image/Labisse-Felix-1905-82/The-Moon-Cover-for-the-Melies-Exhibition-Catalogue-celebrating-the-centenary-of-Georges-Melies-1861/13ece2a9732f4db383670e277b7f711d --84.81.114.142 19:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 05:43, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
screenshot of copyrighted user interface for commercial website DS (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 05:43, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that the flicker up loader is the copyright holder of this picture. Mtking (edits) 19:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of a copyrighted user interface to a commercial site DS (talk) 19:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 05:43, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 20:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 05:43, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 05:43, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 20:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 05:43, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
derived work based on screenshot of copyrighted user interface of commercial website DS (talk) 20:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 05:43, 10 December 2011 by J.delanoy, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Commons is no place for lovely private photos. Commons follows encyclopedic goals. This photo isn't used elsewhere in Wikimedia 80.187.96.184 20:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is in use in ru wiki in userpage. Tm (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep First of all commons doesn't follow encyclopedic goals. Secondly an image for a user page was always in scope iirc. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep is in use. @"VolodyA! V Anarhist" alias Beta_M: The educational value is a basic criterion for every file on Commons (per COM:SCOPE). The other thing is flickr where you can upload what you want to. --High Contrast (talk) 08:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: In use Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File from vkontakte.ru. Out of scope - uploaded for "test" article where author declared of his love to her. Dmitry89 (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In this resolution, it is more than doubtful that this map is the own work of the uploader. I suppose he/she took it from the official site of the town 80.187.96.184 20:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what your question is or problem with the map that was uploaded. What are you doubting? I work for City of Gresham and am updating the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamdriscoll (talk • contribs) 22:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: The nominator and I both see a very small map, which means that it is probably taken off the web. The size makes it almost useless. If, in fact, the City of Gresham owns the copyright to this work, then please have an appropriate Municipal Officer (General COunsel, probably), follow the procedure at Commons:OTRS to give us a license. When that is done, this will be restored. Then please upload a much larger version over this one. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Built by Roger-Henri Expert, who died in 1955. Not public domain until 2026. No freedom of panorama in France. Léna (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok from Aih2 original photo : i understand a copyright exists for this monument. Thanks.
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Threshold of originality met (monument historique / historical monument in France). No "freedom of panorama" in France. Le Corbusier is one of the architects, and died in 1965, so not in public domain until at least 2036. Léna (talk) 20:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
because i didnt wanted to post it Doudi83 (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Per uploaders request, looks like a probable copyvio anyway Captain-tucker (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
because i posted it by mistake Doudi83 (talk) 21:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Captain-tucker (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i posted it by mistake Doudi83 (talk) 21:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Captain-tucker (talk) 00:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright status of the portraits not clear. Funfood ␌ 22:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No description, no source, no license, no idea where this location could be. Funfood ␌ 22:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it meets the threshold of originality. Text and circle are fine but this escutcheon is generating a doubt. —Bill william comptonTalk 22:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not for commercial use and it's for an article at the Portuguese Wikipedia about the official Automobile and Karting Portuguese Federation, which is in serious need of expansion. Edu7 (talk) 23:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: That may be, but each representation of a COA has its own copyright. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a screenshot of a copyrighted website (Twitter). The file requires a non-free use rationale, which is not acceptable on Commons, a repository of free files. Logan Talk Contributions 23:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:34, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work (original work (c) Moisés de Huerta y Ayuso (1881 - 1962)) . HombreDHojalata.talk 23:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: As HombreDHojalata has said, it is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo of a man by the seaside Chesdovi (talk) 23:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oos personal photo: unindentified people cooking chicken on the grass Chesdovi (talk) 23:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oos: some really nice country people - doing what exactly? Chesdovi (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Self-promotional image of non-notable performer - out of project scope Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteOnly for self promotion - out of scope. --GeorgHH • talk 15:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
crosswiki-spam (Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q112194819). Already deleted once (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Davonte'.jpg) Estopedist1 (talk) 05:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
oos: unused personal photo of some rabbi posing in a Porsche garage Chesdovi (talk) 23:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oos: not sure if this gorgeous tipycal colombian family passes for scope here Chesdovi (talk) 23:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oos: personal party photo Chesdovi (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm betting that this is a screenshot of copyrighted web software, especially considering the uploader's other contributions Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: 06:19, 9 December 2011 by JeremyA, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oos: what is this guy doing? Chesdovi (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless he has discovered anti-gravity. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And its derivative works.
Copyvio. This image is not the own work of en:User:System Halted. As long as I understand from its landscape, this is considerably old (circa 1990) image. According to comment: source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Atakule.web.jpg Atakule Tower, Ankara, Turkey {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}} Category:Images of Ankara 20 April 2006 . However, the same image was used here (last change: 5.7.2004), and uploaded Wow Turkey on January 3, 2003. According to this website, if we become a member, we can see larger image. Takabeg (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
out of scope, unused AtelierMonpli (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
privacy Dave 06:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep good image in public domain without any privacy issues (unless you tell me that somebody can identify a person by a penis head). VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep 6 billion people in the world and you think they could identify you by a close-up of your bell-end? I think not. Keep, well exposed (no pun intended), well lit and sharp. Works for me. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 21:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Delete uploader's request, not in use. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept. Denniss (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
privacy Dave 06:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Comment - you uploaded this, then six months later decided you find it an invasion of your privacy? -mattbuck (Talk) 17:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep - do not see privacy issues with this image --Neozoon (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep It seems to be a new prank on Commons: "i upload the image and then get it deleted, mwahaha". Most likely has been uploaded by the throw away account by Dave. Useful image. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 05:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nice clear image. As for privacy I rather doubt anyone could be identified by this, or has the missus found out? Just be grateful you didn't have a penis tattoo! --Fred the Oyster (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep - per the rest of the posts -- Gddea - Daniel E. Als-Juliussen (talk) 11:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Delete uploader's request, not in use. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Delete - Per Pieter Kuiper. Tiptoety talk 08:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: I don't see how this could be considered an invasion of the uploader's privacy, given it's non-identifiable and was uploaded by the nominator. I will request this be reuploaded. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
180.66.92.28 18:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)몰래 촬영 당한것입니다. 처음 보고 너무 충격이었습니다. 정황을 알고 있고. 어떤 경로로 여기까지 유포되었는지.남자부분은 만들어져 있네요.경찰에문의도해보고 ,원하는 답을 들을 수 없었습니다.몰래 촬영을 한 범인을 잡고 싶지만. 가능성이 없어 보입니다.너무도 괴롭습니다 여자로써죽고싶은 심정 입니다.사진을 삭제해주십시요.사진이 유포 되지않도록 영구삭제해 주세요. 사용하는문서목록에서 사진 파일를 삭제해 주십시요. 절박한 심정으로 글을씁니다.사진 파일: intercourse.jpg -949KB 180.66.92.28 18:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused file, other alternatives exist, uploader requested deletion, which we honor sometimes. No reason not to honor in this case. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 18:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Keep, unique image, clear usage of coloration, contrast, and anatomical structures involved in the process. -- Cirt (talk) 02:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Delete Seems to be honest. Given the circumstances, I think it should be deleted. Although we have no proof, the possibility that it is causing someone this much pain is, in my opinion, a valid reason for deletion. Handcuffed (talk) 01:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]Deleted - I see no need to drag this out, I think I can reverse my decision previously. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
privacy Dave 06:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep No way to identify anybody from this. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept. Denniss (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
privacy Dave 06:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep Good high quality image, with no way to identify a person from it. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep Privacy is a rather lame reason given that this is commons and not a DNA sequencer. This is quite a good shot and definitely useful. Your missus has good steady hands as it's pinpoint sharp and focussed bang on the money. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept. Denniss (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
privacy Dave 06:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep This is a high quality image, but not high enough quality to be able to read DNA from it. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: no valid reason for deletion given Denniss (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
all pictures in flickr channel are all rigths reserved 80.187.213.62 15:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: Per Matt.T, authors uploaded it with the correct licence on wikipedia first PierreSelim (talk) 00:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of photograph Teofilo (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Deleted by Marcus Cyron Captain-tucker (talk) 04:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from speedy: the hammer and sickle symbol can't be copyrighted. The rest is just simple text. Yann (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not only simple text. this one is enclosed in a graphic composition own to this political formation. Oxam Hartog 11:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kept. Jcb (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep derivative of something that would be PD-simple. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 05:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept as per Jcb and Volody. Yann (talk) 11:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently the uploader has a new user account and wants to remove his portrait photo (same with his old account at en:File:DCIFeaturedPhoto.jpg. I suggest to simply remove both his tiny thumbnail uploads: no use, no possible use (seems to be a hobby musician) → out of scope. Well, and uploader request. ;-)
Saibo (Δ) 13:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Orphan userpage images. No alternative usage. MGA73 (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
out of project scope. Portait of non-notable guy. George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
active in German charity projects Kept. Mbdortmund (talk) 22:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
unused personal photo Chesdovi (talk) 14:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted It may be in scope, but it is copyvio as the author is not the uploader. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Images comes from en.spaceengine.org, which is a website with "all rights reserved". Uploader assures at File talk:Space Engine Main 3.jpg that has permission from the site to upload the images. Uploader should follow the COM:OTRS procedure and send to us the signed permission from the website responsible; or the files must be deleted as per Commons:Licensing. Thanks.
--Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 18:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Files are used on en:User:Madeleine Bloom/My sandbox to promote CafeMom, most of them are out of project scope and some might be copyvio. ■ MMXX talk 19:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a "documents of State management such as ordinance, decision or directive, current news and bulletins shall not be the object of copyright." User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward Morning Sunshine (talk) 01:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a "documents of State management such as ordinance, decision or directive, current news and bulletins shall not be the object of copyright." User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a "documents of State management such as ordinance, decision or directive, current news and bulletins shall not be the object of copyright." User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: The PD tag doesn't apply here. PierreSelim (talk) 12:43, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not an own work User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - silly DR; motivated by anticommunism? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: Too simple to be copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is a copyrighted logo of a political party. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep That it is a political party is ok, but it's still PD-simple logo. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 05:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: Too simple to be copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 20:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - just the old hammer & sickle + some geometry and text. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: Too simple to be copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 05:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
in every aspect inferior to File:Simbolo Rifondazione creato con Paint.net.jpg PanchoS (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: Too simple to be copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 05:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned, several better alternatives in Category:Partito della Rifondazione Comunista. Leyo 22:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination; obsoleted by eg. File:Rifondazione Comunista.svg. --Ankry (talk) 13:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - just the old hammer & sickle + some shapes. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: Too simple to be copyrighted. Small flags at the bottom are all De minimis Sreejith K (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a "documents of State management such as ordinance, decision or directive, current news and bulletins." User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A medal is not a document. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a "documents of State management such as ordinance, decision or directive, current news and bulletins." User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Commons:Stamps/Public domain#North Korea suggests that North Korea stamps are in the PD. If it is not the case, it should be corrected. BrightRaven (talk) 13:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just going by the phrase Stefan4 gives above, as given in the Chinese characters (which, by the way, makes sense in Chinese), I think we can say these stamps don't qualify as "documents of state administration". The important part of the phrase in Chinese is "文件", which refers exclusively to textual documents; things like letters, books, official publications, and documents pertaining to matters of official governmental business. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Not eligible for PD according to the local law. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a "documents of State management such as ordinance, decision or directive, current news and bulletins." User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A medal is not a document. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a "documents of State management such as ordinance, decision or directive, current news and bulletins." User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A medal is not a document. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Inappropriate category name. «Партия жуликов и воров» is Russian for «Party of crooks and thieves» and it is just a mocking name of United Russia. No encyclopedic sense, Commons is not a platform for political protests. - A.Savin 13:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We have things like Category:ACAB_(All_Cops_Are_Bastards), it's the same thing. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 06:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Delete No encyclopedic sense. Kobac (talk) 09:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Противоречит следующим правилам ВП: А. Википедия - не политическая трибуна. Б. Нарушение авторских прав художников приводимых изображений. В. Нарушение лицензии Центробанка России на воспроизведение купюр. В. Попытка путём размещения изображений как АИ повлиять на статьи ВП. Это не АИ (любой может написать/нарисовать). Г. Попытка повлиять на результаты выборов в Думу и Президента через Википедию. --188.230.122.134 20:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No encyclopedic sense. Politic street agitation. Marginalism. Glavkom NN (talk) 21:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Delete per A.Savin, Glavkom NN, 188.230.122.134, Kobac. --Michael Romanov (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per A.Savin, Glavkom NN, 188.230.122.134, Kobac. Since this name "Party of crooks and thieves" is now closely associated with United Russia and even recognized as such by the party itself, there is no need for such specific category, so it should be deleted and all files from the category should be moved to Category:Criticism of United Russia Party or smth like this. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 06:11, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep. Appeals to "encyclopedic sense" are irrelevant to this discussion since Commons is not Wikipedia. Organizing media by topic (including political protest slogans) is what categories are for. There are already many such categories, e.g. already mentioned Category:ACAB_(All_Cops_Are_Bastards), Category:Workers of the world, unite! (for media which mention political slogans), Category:Barack Obama "Joker" poster (media on specific protest topic). I actually support Leonid Dzhepko's proposal of creating Category:Criticism of the United Russia Party but the category for the specific slogan will still be useful. --M5 (talk) 06:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Keep Категория допустима на ВикиСкладе, который не является энциклопедией. Категория представляет общепринятое и общепонятное в России название официальной политической партии властей «Единая Россия». Согласен с A.Savin в том, что категория имеет очень большое значение для Россиян. Переименовывать её на английский язык не следует, потому что это не требуется по правилам ВикиСклада. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As per User:Beta_M Laitr Keiows (talk) 01:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Зафорсенная фраза уничтожителя (не просто противника / критикана, а именно человека желающего уничтожения партии) и своего рода пропагандисткая / продвигаемая работа здесь. Не будем же теперь под каждое не зарегистрированное название, словесное очернение отделять категории, тем более так мало картинок. Предлагаю их переместить в категорию: Category:Alexey Navalny Drimidiri (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep). -- TarzanASG +1 22:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per nominator -- ☭Acodered (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: No reason to delete this category as it contains files showing clearly the words « Партия жуликов и воров ». Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
sourced to a random wiki page that does not identify the copyright holder, deleted from en.wiki for this reason Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment En:Wikipedia upload gave no source and was therefore deleted. This upload sources it to Orthodoxwiki. It appears to be a modern amateur depiction of an historic figure; image is currently in use in multiple Wikimedia projects. Infrogmation (talk) 12:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]Kept: Both the source and the creator (Arbible) are identified at orthdodixwiki. Released into the public domain. Skeezix1000 (talk) 10:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I previously nominated this image for deletion, and it was kept. I believe this was the wrong decision. It was originally uploaded to OrthodoxWiki by an uploader who uploads all sorts of copyrighted images from across the web.[4] No reason to think that he is the original creator of this image - so essentially unsourced. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think that there is sufficient reason to believe that it's in public domain. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 05:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Delete Upon review of uploads to the other wiki by the same user, I have concluded that there's insufficient evidence to accept the other wiki's copyright assertions as accurate. Multiple, multiple images are being claimed as generically PD when in fact, there is reason to believe they are not PD. Furthermore, I would argue that the other wiki's copyright assertions are insufficiently specific for Commons' purposes. In asserting a claim of PD, we call for information such as original author and original date of publication. We don't have this, or even an explanation of why the image is in PD. Therefore, COM:PRP demands this image be deleted. Furthermore, I highly recommend that all images sourced from this other wiki be subjected to strict review. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 09:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![13 File:The_information_type_"deals".jpg](http://akarinohon.com/text/taketori.cgi/http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2011/12/08@.gd#File:The_information_type_"deals".jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1_%D0%A0%D0%A1%D0%A4%D0%A1%D0%A0_1925-1954.jpg){kind=link}
