This page is for tracking anything related with the 2019 GNU Guix/Guile conference and hackathon on Jan. 31st and Feb. 1st—right before FOSDEM2019 and the minimalistic language devroom.
GNU Guix is growing rapidly and has gone from a software packaging system to a full tool stack aimed at reproducible software deployment and development.
GNU Guix is a toolkit that allows developers to integrate reproducible software deployment into their applications—as opposed to leaving it up to the user. GNU Guix is based on the GNU Guile programming language which makes it a very versatile and hackable (in the good sense) environment.
When?
Thursday 31st of January and Friday 1st of February, 2019, the two days before FOSDEM.
We will have some talks in the morning and hacking and discussions the rest of the day. Two days of GNU Guix bliss.
The event targets an audience of Guix developers and users.
In pure “unconference” style, the program will be made by participants as we go, with hands-on sessions organized in sub-groups. Possible session topics that have already been proposed include:
GNU Guix road map
GNU Guix online documentation
Mes and bootstrapping
Reproducibility project
Alternative target architectures (ARM etc.)
Developing workflows (GNU Guix and GNU Workflow Language)
Support for D in GNU Guix
Demonstration and explanation of The Perfect Setup (Emacs, Geiser, Magit)
Demonstration and live-hacking of Next browser + introduction to the code base
Better build systems for JVM languages in GNU Guix (support maven, sbt, gradle, ...)
Add your name here and/or send a message to Manolis <manolis837@gmail.com> or Pjotr <pjotr.public12@thebird.nl>. Please email us if you would need on-site childcare to be able to attend.
Note: there is a maximum of 40 participants.
Participants
Ludovic Courtès
Jonathan Brielmaier
Tobias (nckx) Geerinckx-Rice
Julien Lepiller
Chris Webber
Ricardo Wurmus
Pjotr Prins
Manolis Ragkousis
Alex Sassmannshausen
Andy Wingo
Christopher Baines
Gábor Boskovits
Clément Lassieur (Friday only)
Mathieu Othacehe (Friday only)
Pierre Neidhardt
Björn Höfling
Leo Famulari
Jan (janneke) Nieuwenhuizen
Efraim Flashner
Danny Milosavljevic
Mark Meyer
Tobias "Tomoko" Platen
(Marco van Hulten—arriving afternoon of 2nd day)
Laura Lazzati
Mike Gran
Chris Marusich
Jelle Licht
Andreas Enge
Simon Tournier
Danny Milosavljevic
Andy Patterson
Profpatsch
Christian Jaeger
Matias Jose
Adu O'Hara
(add your name above this line)
Costs
Attendance is free. We will ask a voluntary contribution for consumptions.
Maven uses plugins to implement build phases. We need to build at least a small set of plugins with our ant-build-system.
One problem is that the plugin's jar file not only contains classes but also a meta-file describing the plugins interface.
We can try to build this metafile with the maven-plugins-tools-generators, see [1].
When we actually use the maven-build-system, it needs to generate a ".m2/repository", artificially created from the package inputs.
In order to make life with this step easier, we decided to modify the ant-build-system: It should already create its part of the system:
I.e. when the pachage is called "org.myproject:myartifact:1.0.3", we should generate the path "org/myproject/myartifact/1.0.3/myartifact-1.0.3.jar" and symlink it to the actual jar-file the ant-build-system generated.
We should modify the ant-build-system to copy/generate a pom.xml, either into the jar-file and/or besides it.
Currently it gets patches from the patches-mailinglist and does ... something with it.
Plan: Next step would be to get some metrics out of the patchset: We want to measure if there is any change on linting errors (either new errors or errors fixed). Also it would be nice to measure the impact of the package: Either bei number of dependent packages or even by estimated compile-time of all dependent packages (by getting numbers from previous berlin compilations).
For that, the idea is to apply the patchset on a Guix git checkout and do a full guix lint before and after, save it in a database and compare both states. For the numbers, we can execute a guix refresh -l.
A next step would be to connect patchwork with a new Cuirass instance (independent of berlin server): Create for each patchset a new branch like "PATCH-xxx" where xxx is the debbugs bug number. The branch is given to Cuirass for evaluation.
For that, we need a way to get that into Cuirass: Currently, the configuration is more static. We could either insert directly into the database or write an REST-interface (including authentication?) for Cuirass.
Note: Cuirass can first count the number of rebuilds and we only evaluate the patchset if the number of rebuilds is below a certain threshold (say 1000) of rebuilds.
We have a patchset for patchwork not yet ready for merging (#33185).
Concerning packages not working for non-x86_64 distributions: We should work more on it, test them in the first place. If your package breaks on a system you are unfamiliar with, please ask for help on the mailing list.
We have not discussed what we should do about packages that are long-term broken, but I would suggest to enforce the rules we learned in Frederic Crozat's talk from SuSE:
If a package is broken for more than 6 months, we should just remove it from Guix.
Prior to removing, we should announce on the dev mailing list, maybe someone will care about it then.
Cuirass
We have database issues: Some queries are very slow.
Discussion: Move from SQLite to PostgreSQL?
But is therea Guile-binding?
There is "gule-dbi"?
Or write a new binding?
Or: Connect to PostgresSQL via TCP/Socket, use text-protocol to execute queries?
We have to be careful: The Fibres-framework we use does not permit C-stackframes.
Find some way to "pin" packages: For example, when we have a release, we want to add this build to gc-roots.
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom.
We defend the rights of all software users. (Read more)