On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 19:08:32 -0000 (UTC), mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst) wrote: > raidframe collects raid components of a set automatically, these get identified > by the serial number in the raid label and you can move the disks (or just the > images) around without problem. Both "raid(4)" and "raidctl(8)" only describe the above in the context of a RAID set that has been marked for autoconfiguration ('raidctl -A on raidN'). My RAID set is currently NOT marked for autoconfiguration so it is configured by '/etc/rc.d/raidframe' running 'raidctl -c /etc/raidN.conf raidN'. Can you confirm that a non-autoconfigured RAID set is not dependent on the order of devices listed in the DISKS section of the "raidN.conf" file? -- John D. Baker