pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: chat/pidgin




To: Adam Hamsik <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost>

Subject: Re: chat/pidgin

From: Jan Danielsson <jan.m.danielsson%gmail.com@localhost>

Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:10:05 +0200


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Adam Hamsik wrote:
>>>    Does it make sense to make it which frontend to build configurable
>>> by the options framework?
>>
>> For me, it would be useful. Though Pidgin and Finch can be considered
>> separate.
>>
> I have looked a FreeBSD ports and they have libpurple, fitch and pidgin
> packages, because other IM can use libpurple to connect and communicate
> over IM networks.

   Yeah, after thinking about it, I realized that:

   1) It really should be split up into three separate packages.

   2) I have no idea how to do that. :-)


   Is anyone else working on this, or should I continue trying to figure
pkgsrc out?

- --
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGWykMuPlHKFfKXTYRCoMeAJ9dtdMbo2QKkGhb1WV8ux1krqI31wCePS/n
iOx1zuL4kzRgQyH1fhZG4OU=
=k3Da
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Follow-Ups:

Re: chat/pidgin
From: Adam Hamsik


References:

chat/pidgin
From: Jan Danielsson

Re: chat/pidgin
From: Gergo Szakal

Re: chat/pidgin
From: Adam Hamsik




Prev by Date: Re: chat/pidgin

Next by Date: Re: chat/pidgin

Previous by Thread: Re: chat/pidgin

Next by Thread: Re: chat/pidgin

Indexes:

reverse Date

reverse Thread

Old Index



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index