Re: chat/pidgin

●To: Jan Danielsson <jan.m.danielsson%gmail.com@localhost> ●Subject: Re: chat/pidgin ●From: Adam Hamsik <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost> ●Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:31:41 +0200


On May 28, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Adam Hamsik wrote:

Does it make sense to make it which frontend to build configurable

by the options framework?

For me, it would be useful. Though Pidgin and Finch can be considered

separate.

I have looked a FreeBSD ports and they have libpurple, fitch and pidgin packages, because other IM can use libpurple to connect and communicate

over IM networks.


   Yeah, after thinking about it, I realized that:

   1) It really should be split up into three separate packages.

   2) I have no idea how to do that. :-)

I think that this is way to go
cp -R chat/pidgin chat/fitch
add fitch flag to Makefile and try to build change PLIST, change DESCR.

AFAIK pidgin has configure flag to build only libpurple so add also libpurple

package with process mentioned above.

Is anyone else working on this, or should I continue trying to figure

pkgsrc out?

Best option for you and pkgsrc is that you will do it ;D.

- --
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGWykMuPlHKFfKXTYRCoMeAJ9dtdMbo2QKkGhb1WV8ux1krqI31wCePS/n
iOx1zuL4kzRgQyH1fhZG4OU=
=k3Da
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Regards
-----------------------------------------
Adam Hamsik
jabber: haad%jabber.org@localhost
icq: 249727910

Proud NetBSD user.

●References: ●chat/pidgin ●From: Jan Danielsson ●Re: chat/pidgin ●From: Gergo Szakal ●Re: chat/pidgin ●From: Adam Hamsik ●Re: chat/pidgin ●From: Jan Danielsson

●Prev by Date: Re: chat/pidgin ●Next by Date: Re: chat/pidgin ●Previous by Thread: Re: chat/pidgin ●Next by Thread: Re: chat/pidgin ●Indexes: ● reverse Date ● reverse Thread ● Old Index Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index