●Stories
●Firehose
●All
●Popular
●Polls
●Software
●Thought Leadership
Submit
●
Login
●or
●
Sign up
●Topics:
●Devices
●Build
●Entertainment
●Technology
●Open Source
●Science
●YRO
●Follow us:
●RSS
●Facebook
●LinkedIn
●Twitter
●
Youtube
●
Mastodon
●Bluesky
Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop
Forgot your password?
Close
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Load All Comments
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
/Sea
Score:
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
More
Login
Forgot your password?
Close
Close
Log In/Create an Account
●
All
●
Insightful
●
Informative
●
Interesting
●
Funny
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
bygeekmux ( 1040042 ) writes:
Tattoos have been around for a very long time. A lot longer than clickbait has.
Can we confirm that tattoos have had a measurable negative impact on human immunity that shows itself in longevity statistics, while also proving it was in fact the tattoo that was the cause?
Yes, I’m well aware that lifestyle choices of those sporting ink is a factor here. As well as ink technology. Now let’saccount for those factors and prove the study. On the surface this should be rather easy to validate. Health and safety standards have long been established too. At least in countries that care about it.
As far as trying to drag this argument into the COVID vaccines, that sounds like a horrific weak-ass excuse to dismiss the problems that have risen from those particular emergency-authorized solutions. Don’t try and dismiss all accountability with that weak sauce.
twitter
facebook
bySt.Creed ( 853824 ) writes:
what problems do you experience with the covid vaccine?
bydrinkypoo ( 153816 ) writes:
As far as trying to drag this argument into the COVID vaccines, that sounds like a horrific weak-ass excuse to dismiss the problems that have risen from those particular emergency-authorized solutions.
What problems? You mean the ones that are way less risky than unvaccinated exposure? Whatever, antivaxxer.
bygeekmux ( 1040042 ) writes:
As far as trying to drag this argument into the COVID vaccines, that sounds like a horrific weak-ass excuse to dismiss the problems that have risen from those particular emergency-authorized solutions.
What problems? You mean the ones that are way less risky than unvaccinated exposure? Whatever, antivaxxer.
Risk, is not the topic that will earn you a smile from a grieving mother of a perfectly healthy child who's now dead. Let's stop pretending we can easily explain every completely unexpected death in recent times when almost all of them have one thing in common.
Anyone who understands vaccines and the human body will understand there will be those who suffer from side effects. That's not the problem here, and certainly doesn't make me "anti" vax. I'm more questioning why vaccine companies were not forcedt
bydrinkypoo ( 153816 ) writes:
"Risk, is not the topic that will earn you a smile from a grieving mother of a perfectly healthy child who's now dead."
Coddling idiots only drags the rest of us down to their level.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Slashdot
●
●
Submit Story
It is much harder to find a job than to keep one.
●FAQ
●Story Archive
●Hall of Fame
●Advertising
●Terms
●Privacy Statement
●About
●Feedback
●Mobile View
●Blog
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...
Working...