Get the latest update on our Vizio court case
●News
Press Releases
Press
Blog
Vizio Lawsuit in the News
Our Issues in the News
●About
Sponsors
Sustainers
Board of Directors
Staff
Evaluation Committee
Outside Counsel, et alia
Transparency
Contact
●Our Work
Copyleft Compliance
We defend and uphold the rights of software users and consumers under copyleft licenses.
Impact Litigation
We defend the legal rights of software users. Learn the details, status, and stakes of our court cases.
Give Up GitHub
We urge FOSS Developers to Give Up GitHub! Learn why.
Outreachy
We offer internships for anyone who faces underrepresentation, systemic bias, or discrimination in the tech industry.
FOSSY
Our annual community-oriented conference focused on the creation and impact of free and open source software.
●Tools
Member Projects
We provide non-profit infrastructure and services to our members creating Free/Libre and Open Source Software.
Use The Source
Our tool for evaluating the source code candidates companies must provide for GPLed software.
OpenWrt One
We designed and built the first ever wireless Internet router designed with software freedom and right to repair in mind.
●Learn
The Corresponding Source
A bi-weekly oggcast about legal, policy, and many other issues in the Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS) world.
Glossary of Terms
A list of terms you might be unfamiliar with but occur frequently in our work.
FAQ About the Vizio Lawsuit
Your most frequently asked questions about the Vizio lawsuit, answered in one place.
●
Donate
●News
Press Releases
Press
Blog
Vizio Lawsuit in the News
Our Issues in the News
●About
Sponsors
Sustainers
Board of Directors
Staff
Evaluation Committee
Outside Counsel, et alia
Transparency
Contact
●Our Work
Copyleft Compliance
We defend and uphold the rights of software users and consumers under copyleft licenses.
Impact Litigation
We defend the legal rights of software users. Learn the details, status, and stakes of our court cases.
Give Up GitHub
We urge FOSS Developers to Give Up GitHub! Learn why.
Outreachy
We offer internships for anyone who faces underrepresentation, systemic bias, or discrimination in the tech industry.
FOSSY
Our annual community-oriented conference focused on the creation and impact of free and open source software.
●Tools
Member Projects
We provide non-profit infrastructure and services to our members creating Free/Libre and Open Source Software.
Use The Source
Our tool for evaluating the source code candidates companies must provide for GPLed software.
OpenWrt One
We designed and built the first ever wireless Internet router designed with software freedom and right to repair in mind.
●Learn
The Corresponding Source
A bi-weekly oggcast about legal, policy, and many other issues in the Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS) world.
Glossary of Terms
A list of terms you might be unfamiliar with but occur frequently in our work.
FAQ About the Vizio Lawsuit
Your most frequently asked questions about the Vizio lawsuit, answered in one place.
●Donate
Thanks to so many donors, we met our largest match donation ever of $211,939.
Two generous anonymous donors have provided another $40,012ofadditional matching funds.
Give now to help us reach this stretch goal!
For only 4 more days, the
next $13,079offinancial support we receive will be matched!
$26,933 matched!
$13,079 to go!
$211,927 fully matched!
Home / News / Blog
A Federal Hearing about Rights under GPL
byBradley M. Kühn
on May 11, 2022
Possible Opportunity for the Public To Hear Oral Arguments in Key GPL Enforcement Case
Inour previous update regarding our copyleft
enforcement lawsuit against Vizio, we talked about how Vizio
“removed” the case to USA federal court (namely, the Central
District of California), and how we filed a motion to “remand”
the case back to state court. While this all seems like minor legal
wrangling early in a case, this very first skirmish in our case goes to the
very heart of the right for software repair for consumers. While it won't
be a final decision in the case, this motion will be the first indication
whether the federal courts view the GPL as purely a copyright license, or
as a contract, or as both. That question has been central to legal debate
about the GPL for decades, and, thanks to our case, for the first time, a
federal Court will directly consider this question.
Our view (and the view of many attorneys whose opinions we trust) and which is supported by substantial case law, is that the
GPL functions as both a copyright license and a contract, and that third
parties who receive distribution of GPL'd (and LGPL'd) software are
third-party beneficiaries. We've done both copyright-based and
contract-based enforcement, and both have their advantages. Contract-based enforcement as a third-party has advantages that are central to the GPL's policy goals. Consumers are the first to discover violations in the first place. Consumers are the most likely to utilize complete, corresponding source code (CCS) to enhance their use of the products they have purchased. Third-party, contractual based enforcement gives consumers legal authority when they ask companies for access to the source code that should be available to them. In other words, this approach gives consumers the
ability to ask the Court directly for the most
important thing that copyleft assures: a right to receive the
CCS and “the scripts used to control
compilation and installation of the executable”. Indeed, in our suit we have asked only for access to the source code, not for any money.
Our case
now is the first of its kind to adjudicate the third-party beneficiary
contractual theory. We are excited that a federal district Court is poised
to give its first answer to the central question to this endeavor, namely:
“Are the GPL and LGPL merely copyright licenses, and thus
preempted and only subject matter for the US federal courts, or can a
third-party bring a contract claim in state court?” If this
question intrigues you, we encourage you to read our motion
for remand, Vizio's reply to that motion
and our rebuttal reply.
Most importantly, clear your calendar for this Friday 13 May 2022 at 10:30
US/Pacific! While Judge Staton may chose to rule on this motion strictly
based on those paper filings, the judge has scheduled a hearing for
that date and time. What's more, anyone in the world can attend this hearing to
listen! Instructions for how to
attend are
found on Judge Staton's
website.
While, as FOSS activists, we're very sad that the Judge has
chosen to use a proprietary videochat platform, we're glad that
PSTN dial-in
is provided, and we'll be dialing in and encourage you to do so as well.
Watch our microblog for live updates!
Please
take careful note of the warning on the Judge's website: Recording,
copying, photograph
ing and rebroadcasting of court
proceedings is prohibited
by fed
eral law.
Remember: you can take as many notes as you like, and
even live blog/microblog what you hear, but take great care to follow the
directives on Judge Staton's website.
[permalink]
Tags:
conservancy,
GPL,
licensing
Please email any comments on this entry to
info@sfconservancy.org.
Other Conservancy Blog entries…
Blog Index by Year
●2026
●2025
●2024
●2023
●2022
●2021
●2020
●2019
●2018
●2017
●2016
●2015
●2014
●2013
●2012
●2011
●2010
Blogs by Tag
●conservancy
●GPL
●supporter
●licensing
●conferences
●law
●events
●software freedom for everyone
●Member Projects
●Outreachy
●FOSS Sustainability
●diversity
●resources
●Copyleft Conf
●ContractPatch
●Filings
●Godot
●Reproducible Builds
●Year In Review 2016
●fundraiser
●CLA
●Wine
●Year In Review 2015
●Kallithea
●QEMU
●Selenium
●Google Summer of Code
●Homebrew
●inkscape
●patent
●security
●Clojars
●Git
●Hackfests
●Racket
●cyborg
●phpMyAdmin
●pypy
●volunteer
●Accounting
●LibreHealth
●Shotwell
●inclusion
●jQuery
●microblocks
●sourceware
Blogs by Author
●Vladimir Bejdo
●Kate Chapman
●Pamela Chestek
●Denver Gingerich
●Bradley M. Kühn and Denver Gingerich
●Will Hawkins
●Fred Jennings
●Deb and Karen
●Jeff King
●Bradley M. Kühn
●Conservancy + Bro LT
●Christine Lemmer-Webber
●Deb Nicholson
●Sourceware PLC
●Rick Sanders
●Bradley M. Kühn and Karen M. Sandler
●Karen Sandler
●Tony Sebro
●Sage A. Sharp
●Brett Smith
●Conservancy's Staff
●Daniel Takamori
●Outreachy Team
●Marina Zhurakhinskaya
●Molly deBlanc
●Main Page
●Contact
●Sponsors
●RSS Feed
●
Software Freedom Conservancy is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity.
Privacy Policy last updated 22 December 2020.
This page and its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
