●Stories
●Firehose
●All
●Popular
●Polls
●Software
●Thought Leadership
Submit
●
Login
●or
●
Sign up
●Topics:
●Devices
●Build
●Entertainment
●Technology
●Open Source
●Science
●YRO
●Follow us:
●RSS
●Facebook
●LinkedIn
●Twitter
●
Youtube
●
Mastodon
●Bluesky
Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive
Forgot your password?
Close
Post
Load All Comments
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
/Sea
Score:
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
More
| Reply
Login
Forgot your password?
Close
Close
Log In/Create an Account
●
All
●
Insightful
●
Informative
●
Interesting
●
Funny
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
byCalydor ( 739835 ) writes:
America is hellbent on seeing people die, aren't they?
byXopherMV ( 575514 ) writes:
Don't blame all Americans for the choices of American leadership. Trump is off doing a bunch of stuff no one wanted and which he didn't campaign on. Plenty of Americans didn't want this guy, don't like this guy, didn't vote for him, and have been protesting him since he announced he was running for President. We hated him long before you knew him.
bykarmawarrior ( 311177 ) writes:
Unfortunately we can't get away from the fact that the vast majority of Americans either supported Trump or felt the choice between fascism and more of the same was so trivial that they could sit out the election, not caring who won. 2/3 of Americans were totally OK with Trump winning the 2024 election. And they knew when they voted for him or sat out the election that he was a fraud, he was crazy (the speeches were widely televised), and that he fit the characteristics of a fascist, including an attempt at
bynoshellswill ( 598066 ) writes:
Prefer Trump to Kamala! Who wouldn't have a fascist than a Marxian collectivist leader. Prefer Mussolini to Stalin ... prefer Chang to Mao ... prefer Franco to Ulbricht ... prefer Pinochet to Castro ... prefer Pahlavi to Pol Pot. Who wouldn't, beside Trotsky-slut scum & CMYK-pederasts ?
bydunkelfalke ( 91624 ) writes:
In every sane country Kamala is considered a moderate conservative.
Reply to This Parent
twitter
facebook
Flag as Inappropriate
bydrinkypoo ( 153816 ) writes:
In every sane country Kamala is considered a moderate conservative.
Even that is unwarranted assignation of wokeness. Kamala infamously told asylum seekers "don't come here" despite our being signatory to a treaty which says they can do so. She's just another authoritarian wannabe war criminal. But since Trump is more of all those things, I voted for her anyway. It's truly distressing to see all the idiots that still argue that they were right not to vote for her because she's those things when they enabled the worst president America has ever had, and don't plan to vote in
●ent threshold.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Slashdot
●
●
Submit Story
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
-- Roy Santoro
●FAQ
●Story Archive
●Hall of Fame
●Advertising
●Terms
●Privacy Statement
●About
●Feedback
●Mobile View
●Blog
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...
Working...